Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Level 2 is looking EXCELLENT!!!!!! Hardly any resistance up to a dollar.
In at .07, holding every share still at .78 -- weeeeeee.
I made no indication of anything except for wanting to speak to investor relations. The way my call was handled was very shady, in my opinion.
Thanks Steven, I've always valued your opinion.
Gomez was also my number one reason for putting skin in here. I know with him, failure is not an option. But as you stated, it's iequity that worries me here. I just really hope they aren't botching things here.
That would be excellent. Let me know if they blow you off, like they did me via the phone.
You are correct, I don't know for certain. But as I stated earlier, there is very little for the ASC to gain from telling people that they've not received contact from AEGY and that they have an undeliverable address, but much to gain the other way around.
People investing money should care. The point isn't whether it's an SEC matter or not, the point is that if a company is lying about contacting the ASC, then what else are they lying to shareholders about? Are you so blind to see that there is significant risk here?
I never claimed that the "SEC is in cahoots."
I do however, know that the SEC moves a big slower than a snails pace. It's *possible* that the SEC is looking into this matter. I'm sure there will be some sort investigation into the matter considering the discrepancies between AEGY saying they contacted the ASC, and the ASC saying this wasn't true, while AEGY has an undeliverable mailing address.
Also, I contacted the number listed on AEGY's business listing, and I've still not received the call back after the operator "took my number" - HAHA. Right...
Because the company still hasn't cleared it up.
Any company that claims to have contacted someone, and the other party denies it, and can't deliver mail to the address on their filing is a HUGE red flag, any way you look at it.
There is reason to believe there is a problem here, as one of the two sides are lying, and I highly doubt it's the ASC.
In any event, the lack of updates to shareholders within two weeks of the ASC releasing that PR shows a lot about this company. If they cared about the people holding shares of their company, they would have updated us on the status of this. Instead, the last word came from the ASC, and I'm doubting they are the ones lying about not receiving any sort of contact from AEGY. There's nothing for the ASC to gain by lying. There is a ton of gain for AEGY though.
SSC
Most of which are from Turkey. Lots of odd, fake profiles.
I may be wrong about this, but i believe this is saying that people that naked shorted this stock are forced to buy back in if they have not covered their position. To me it sounds like he is explaining the increase in volume starting today, and probably continuing through next week. This is great for short term, but if the people forced to buy back in end up selling, it could force the pps up temporarily, followed by a correction, unless of course the shorts realize they have a winner and hold on to their shares.
Again, I've not dealt with this before, so I'm not positive on this. Also, I believe a lot of this will be ended by March 14th when the new shorting rules go into effect.
Thank you for the link! Derek had some pretty tough questions there, but answered all of them with ease. I'm happy with his responses and even more happy that he is our CEO.
SSC
Glad to see you back here and happy. Longs win here :)
Found my own answer. FY ended 12/31. Fins have to be posted by March 31 in that case.
Does someone here have the fiscal year periods that TRTC runs on? What date did the last quarter end? I'm trying to find the last date that fins can be released to remain SEC compliant.
Thanks,
SSC
Just for everyone's information, I never received that call back from iequjty. As I assumed, they took my number to get me off the phone as quickly as possible.
They own a 5 acre greenhouse in NJ that was completed and turned online last month. Cost was over 4.5 million - already paid for.
I definitely agree, especially after witnessing that 4000 share trade at .0001 yesterday. So odd!
After .68, level 2 is clear until $1.00
This is a combination of things. Derek posted a comment on 420 investor (lots saying they'll be doubling down today), the two upcoming tv interviews, Gupta's show, and earnings report any day.
As I said, the run up til earnings will happen soon. And here we are. :)
BMAK is still on the ask, you better believe the dumping will continue if this hits .0004
I didn't think that you could set stop losses on OTC stocks? Which brokerage allows you to do this? Scottrade won't.
Slapped the ask for 5,000 more at .604
Man, I woke up late.
That's test text. Loremipsum.net
Good point, thanks for the clarification!
I must have missed this. What's the difference?
This is exactly what I called iequity to ask about. No call back still. Not really expecting one though..
Let us hope. I'd like to see a PR soon stating that all deficiencies have been resolved.
Couldn't sell this even if I wanted to. Bought my shares with unsettled funds, so I'd get a reg-T Restriction.
That's okay, it just reminds me not to sell and keep my eye on the prize. Licenses usually given out on Fridays so far.
SSC
More reason to buy. They usually close about 5c apart, so that puts this at .88 :)
Except, you're buying with money that you'll later be taxed on.
L2 shows this closing over .90
Pretty clear til .95, which has been sitting the same for DAYS. 12,000 shares there will be taken out and then we have the sky as the limit.
There are SO few sells here. There is no doubt about the fact that almost everyone buying this stock is holding out for the license.
Let's hope Friday bears some fruit!
I understand that, but even attempting to reach iequity's investor relations proved to be difficult, and shady.
Asking me what it's regarding, and then INSTANTLY coming back from hold with a blowoff, seemed very sketchy to me.
Seems very misleading. Why would iequuty own one, then attempt to acquire the other? So misleading on their part.
Then why is AVNE registered to the same address as Farmer Janes Collective - which is iequity? This was my main question and reason for calling investor relations, which I can only assume will never call me back.
Entity Name: AVENTURA LABORATORIES, INC
Entity Number: C3622401
Date Filed: 12/02/2013
Status: ACTIVE
Jurisdiction: CALIFORNIA
Entity Address: 3579 E FOOTHILL BLVD #228
Entity City, State, Zip: PASADENA CA 91107
Agent for Service of Process: JOSHUA SAYRE
Agent Address: 3579 E FOOTHILL BLVD #228
Agent City, State, Zip: PASADENA CA 91107
What's with the .0001 sell today then? To make the intraday chart look less vertical?
I just called I-equity. I got an operator that asked me who I'd like to speak to. I asked for investor relations. She then asked what I would like to speak to them about, in response I told them "The recent SEC suspension of AVNE." She then asked to put me on hold, which I politely agreed to. About 5 seconds later, she came back saying "they" are not available right now, and asked if I could leave my phone number for a return call. I highly doubt I'll receive the return call. I only wanted to ask them about the suspension, and why AVNE's address is registered under the same as AEGY, as this definitely makes me think AEGY is the next to be suspended. I'm trying to pull my money out here and break even, but it seems like we won't be hitting .007 again...
Very odd. I suggest others call as well. The number listed on OTC is:
(561) 244-2532
FL, USA
I just don't understand how this is the only stock that this happens to. Crazy!
It is great, but DC already had medical MJ. It is nice to see, though.