Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
not following closely, I do notice that there are those who are selling, longs from the private board? if longs are selling sometime after the move to another exchange, were they expecting something that is not happening now. not that I a buying or selling but curious why expectations, any maybe invesments, are changing.
It sure is, even more so than ever. The only thing that has changed is they are on the OTCBB, why the rush to get here so reporting is required, go figure, lots of discussion there. sure they may sell product and keep going, it is risky. but the risk has already been taken, time is the element now, not risk. who what when where why how, I think we all know this within a year of this new company.
I am not Huff, dont make exuses for him, find something else to attack instead of me. it would be a good guess that everyone here was duped at one point, some when price was several dollars. seems there are 3 types left, those that got over it and left to seek other investments, those that hang in thee with future hope, and those that cant get over what Huff, Joe, and others did to them and need to take it out on someone.
that was a statement about a person before he is at risk of wearing prison stripes. as far as you using that post, you know you were talking about me, getting swindled, like all the others who have been in it before 2006 when it reverse split and everyone jumped me for criticizing this move. your first post was all about me and my investment and you know it. and yes it was directed at Huff, I can like someone and disagree on his opinion and plan. do you know if he really wanted things to turn out this way, did he get pulled into a web of deciept, did his hub dream really have merit. I think if they had a better team things could have turned out better. If he is as guilty he is guilty, no excuse from me.
his actions are overshadowed by those who have been here for years with no vested interest in anything, posting thousands of posts for no good reason other than personal satisfaction.
almost didnt respond, I have no clue what you are talking about " the problem for you is that you did listen and believe Tim" that statement is a lie, or you just plain dont know what you are talking about.
him bringing up names is like a guilty man squealing he did it she did it while getting thrown in jail. of coarse he is going to name everyone in the book, he has nothing to lose by making up stories. he is good at it, even you can see thats how he got where he is in the first place. who will listen to him, let me know, I got some shares to sell for $1 each.
I think its early to say "where we are now" in the context of any accomplishments. his bonus's are what they are, they dont really show a lot of expectation looking at it from the average shareholder. most shareholders are fortunate for any value, but there will be the very few who will have millions to show any significant profit. you have to keep on buying for your shares to maintain total dollar value, again, it is what it is.
I know, its similar to what you get when there are a lot of bears in the wooks, eventual bigtime run.
nothing to do with FRE, should not change a thing. fact is, forcast loss for FRE is huge, if they beat it, it will go up huge. just a few more daze.
this one is from wolly...maybe they are related maybe not. they sure think the same and I like it.
http://watch.bnn.ca/#clip229317
they should not forget that the market down there will become very appealing come 2016 Olympics. time to make phone calls is coming up soon. maybe shoot for London first.
coming this week...
earnings continue, and billions that should help valences stationary initiatives, money gets handed out starting this week.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Vice-President-Biden-Outlines-Funding-for-Smart-Grid-Initiatives/
can they take out 1.9+ resistance, which would lead to stronger resistance around 2.05 and again around 2.25. two or three more areas above, then the real fun would begin. all about market timing for the company at this point.
with funding of at least 25M and the still possible loan, its anyones guess for the next 6 months.
Valence up about 19% today on about 1.4M Shares
I agree, with 9 Trillion sitting on the sidelines, and almost 50% bears out there, its a no brainer. the real question is, where and what sectors will lead the pack.
If anyone out there at Valence is listening, you should bring on the vanadium, there could not be a better time with AONE leading the way.
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/346886/10-Year-Bull-Market-Has-Begun-Dow-Will-%22Double-For-Sure%22-Hennessy-Says?tickers=dia,
price is now 10x VLNC, wont touch it, not to say it will come down, its just too risky right now. I would more like to think VLNC has hope of going up. lots of room from where they are now to where I think they should be, neck and neck with AONE. will Kanode make a guest appearance before CC with news of vanadium or loan or more contracts?
I think he recently mentioned vanadium technology in use and tested.
AONE IPO tomorrow for common folk, well maybe be able to do a trade by friday.
if they turn the lead to gold, using current path and not alchemy, will that be a problem for you?
restricted shares, which is what most likely was given, have a maturity date and cannot be sold until that date expires, that is when you file them.
It does give Jet something to do though
I understand, a loan now would just product toxic financing. Unsecured loans are possible, they would need papers, such as a contract for orders in hand. best option would be a contract that also commits mobilization PO to sanswire.
Nice of you to stop by weeks after a statement, the uptrend did not start until after the 10th.
I guess its easy to wait and respond after the trend changes, as it always does.
I hope the run up because of the A123 IPO lasts.
you swing trade a lot, whats the next trend, for VLNC and the market?
can you tell me before it happens, step up to the plate.
big question, when will vanadium hit the shelves, have any opinion on that as well, I wish I knew, it is the biggest thing they could possibly put out there since its inception,
they should try a loan, it would show commitment to investors not dillution. commit your company and the belief in its products.
right, I think thats why Huff is in hot water again, SEC has the same idea but not the same path your thinking of.
"Just remember Nerd....back when I said Monterrosso couldn't have done what he did without help from other officiers?"
dont really matter, the filing should have been out by now, cant see any reason why its not. tell me they have huge revenue to sort through and I would then say they have a reason to be late. It is the first time I have any doubts about what is going on, not that it changes my mind, but it is an indication on how the new management operates outside of what they have promised.
shorts heads will spin in the coming weeks and months, yours sources are far from the truth on many things including stocks.
it would be nice for them to get compliant with filings, it would make it easier for this stock to go up while we wait for contracts.
If this market climbs, as many indicators are showing, we can advance to another base level while we wait.
SEC must have been busy roughing up the little guys like globetel and sanswire. Then need to let it go here, and move on to places that affect the economy and other big violators not hurt small share holders like us.
http://www.reuters.com/article/reutersEdge/idUSTRE58249420090903
I guess lower lows are not only possible, but happening. maybe it is time Kanode was replaced. looks like he went in a dark corner and has not come out since no grant money. I wonder what he is doing? these are the days battery companies make it big, but they have to make deals. why have they not gone after loan money more aggresive than grant money is beyond me.
I guess innocent until proven guilty does not apply with some on this board?
when you are dealing with the likes of Joe M. and Huff, they will say anything to deflect on someone else maybe? they are already guilty, why would anyone not suspect they are fabricating more stories to send the SEC after JL.
I did not know the CEO was accused of doing this by any official capacity
" To cooperate with the SEC. Not destroy evidence so a SEC settlement can be made to let the company grow"
I dont spend much time on this board,so can you, as many like to say, show me a link to this accusation.
The big deal of the day is still up to date filing, its what is expected of a CEO or CFO by any standard.
not much going on, my guess, the lows are in. Maybe a surprise coming soon for the better!
still waiting on news of loan, which would get things rolling for 2010 in the US
nice of you to insult ell the investors and the company in one post, but as all the longs keeps telling the ones like you, the past is gone and its time you see it for what it is. the past and its violators has nothing to do with the future of those who have not violated anything, and should even be considered innocent until proven guilty. you guys should be following Huff and Joe around instead.
They got the goods, and the upswing in the economy should unvail this.
http://www.customclassictrucks.com/hotnews/0909cct_smith_newtons_worlds_largest_electric_truck/index.html
it does defy logic, if they were traders, they would do it on other boards also. I understand that trading is legal, longs are torn between the commitment to the company and stock trades. But constantly repeating past events seems useless and you tend to ignore it and its messenger.
I can say only that the recent delay in filing in confusing me, move to a new exchange and not be ready, kind of selfish of whoever had the most to gain and was the one who pushed the most for it to happen this soon. if not selfish, It makes me wonder if they have announcements coming soon and need to be better positioned for it. Or they just messed up because they are very busy.
Dont need to watch it close, this stock has a mind of its own and can go straight up at any moment or not. you wont see 50 again or anything like the old days. I think it will reach 15 or somewhere near BAC within months.
I agree, I like domino's pizza with neat and orderly toppings also.
As for Sanswire, you do your DD while they prepare for contracts.
Since they did file today, my guess is its a moot point of what ifs if they did not.
FRE up 1.5% in Europe, futures up huge.
overview from when he was on the Daily show, Stewart exposed him for what he really was and him and his buddies always will be. there was no need for them to post or say anything about FRE.
[edit] Jon Stewart
Main article: Jon Stewart's 2009 controversy with CNBC
On March 12, 2009, Jim Cramer appeared on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.[56] Stewart reiterated earlier claims regarding the CNBC host's "silly and/or embarrassing and/or stupid financial observations."[57] Moreover, he claimed CNBC shirked its journalistic duty by believing corporate lies, rather than being an investigative "powerful tool of illumination."[58] For his part, Cramer disagreed with Stewart on a few points, but acknowledged that he could have done a better job foreseeing the economic collapse: "We all should have seen it more." [59]
Stewart also discussed how short-selling was detrimental to the markets and investors. Cramer admitted to Stewart that short-selling was detrimental, stated his opposition to it, and claimed that he had never engaged in it. He said, "I will say this: I am trying to expose this stuff, exactly what you guys do, and I've been trying to get the regulators to look at it."[60] However, Stewart played several video clips from 2006 where Cramer discussed the spreading of false rumors to drive down stock prices and encouraged short-selling by hedge funds as a means to generate returns.[61] At one point in a clip from December 22, 2006 he said, "I would encourage anyone in a hedge fund to do it." He called it a very quick way to make money and very satisfying. He continued, "By the way, no one else in the world would ever admit that, but I don't care, and again, I'm not gonna say it on tv." [59] Stewart responded, "I want the Jim Cramer on CNBC to protect me from that Jim Cramer." [59] Cramer again admitted that he can do better, and that he should try to change. The interview ended when Stewart pointedly suggested: “Maybe we can remove the ‘financial expert’ and the ‘In Cramer We Trust’ and start getting back to fundamentals on the reporting, as well, and I can go back to making fart noises and funny faces.” Cramer responded: “I think we make that deal right here.” [62]
Didn't go so well. Politics may cause this company to grow slow, but sure.