Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"happy happy happy in 60 days." ... these quoted words from your post reveal the exact window that is assigned to Mr. Taeger, ending on Sept. 15, as to Josh earning HERO or goat status. Based on current share price being three full points below Josh's starting point, he is looking good presently. btw, his status is based on pre reverse-split action. If a r/s happens before Sept. 15, (not scheduled, but who really knows?), then neither title will be bestowed on Mr. Taeger. The Sept. 15 price will determine it all! ... Tick tock ..........
p.s. if the price hasn't made a significant move either way during the "Taeger Window", then no lo contendere will of course apply.
this volume spike has zero to do with more people noticing ADMQ. The volume has come from big block purchasing from people with knowledge, re "something"?
ADMQ's problem is, and continues to be, increasing their shareholder base. This company has been successful in the tough printing business. They have survived and shown consistent growth while so many others in and out of the printing industry have failed.
As of now this is a low price penny stock, under a dime, where traders are buying dips and selling quick without keeping a core position. But insiders keep accumulating, and when the marketing problem is solved, and the consistent growth story as you mentioned, is more widely told through a MUCH bigger megaphone, then things will pop.
In the meantime, the youtube niche that ADMQ has opened up, IS! a really great way to garner large and heretofore unknown business opportunities with crazy big followings! (as seen in big spikes after the announcement of youtube contracts!)
News?
never mind the price ... big volume without public news is a sure sign of accumulation by those in the know. Price drops after volume run-ups are simply traders selling and satisfied with their gains from buying in the sevens and eights. I'm sticking with a prediction of substantial news based on recent heavy volume.
Josh ... do you feel Adam Silver has considered the waiting period you speak of? 1/4 inch may not sound like much, but at the elite level, you look for any advantage you can get!
Josh, you are one of the few who will face critical and revealing deadlines, (Sept. 15), head on!
Yes, the coming 60 days will determine your hero or goat status, yet you face it with your terse, but powerful comment ... "I have nothing to fear".
Win lose or draw, right or wrong, you soldier on, undaunted. I admire your courage, aplomb, and consistency.
Fight the good fight ... tick tock!!!
More than "happy" to explain Josh. Go to Steady T's post #96184.
Last line of his post reads ... "Easterling said that in the next 60 days I would be very "happy" with the shares I bought recently."
That is the "window" I am assigning to you until Sept. 15, where you will be proven to be hero or goat.
Granted it is only a short time, but still Easterling's words run contrary to yours, so ........
If your previous posts, (all of them!), have been correct, then you have nothing to fear. I have not tipped my hand either way ... tick-tock!!!
Josh - September 15 will close the Easterling window. You will be proven or disproven at that time. SHMP closed today, (7/12), at .4380 for your point of reference. Tick-tock ..........
Uber and Josh will be proven right or not, (well, sort of), after the 60 day window Easterling was referring to closes. A "happy" shareholder in 60 days? ... We'll see!
Easterling's 60 day window as to making a shareholder "happy" will reveal Josh Taeger as either a Hero or a Goat. (Roy Hobbs faced a similar fate before his last game.)
And this without any news going out to retail investors. The volume has come from inside people knowing "something". Bet we hear news soon, and after the dust settles, probably the traders will be selling again.
Large volume with this recent price rise assures that those with knowledge are accumulating ... even in the face of quick trades. News more important than "providing 700 tee shirts for the Byron Nelson golf tournament" or "helping to sponsor a 24 hour hockey game" must be in the offing!!!
dickie dew ... not much upside to matching wits with an unarmed opponent like logoproducts. Know it all's like him will even see "blue sky" in the very recent hire, (with complements galore!), of the promo company "TEN Associates", LLC ... and then the dismissal of same less than two weeks later. (no criticisms allowed by him!)
No sense getting into the weeds with that! As to ADMQ, hang in as the company finds it's way as to the best way to reach a larger shareholder base. The niche they have uncovered re you tube stars may result in more price spikes, and that can be fun, but the real upside will come when the company finds the right megaphone. Paying outside companies to pump all the goodies is not the way. The CEO buys shares on the open market, and that is always a good sign. His weak suit, at least up till now, is coming to terms with the right marketing plan. Lots of small companies went under due to covid, (certainly some screen printers!), so it is great the company showed it's mettle at such a tough time. You will make money here!!!
... oh well .............
Did you forget the sales increases come directly after the covid downturn? A case could be made that the increases should have been much larger. It's great they weathered the covid storm, but as to touting sales increases the very next year ... duh!
And making ready for the reverse split???
I'm with you Stockcall, except for your usage of the word "soon".
We'll see ... (hope you are right!) ... don't forget, that means sales start before Oct. 1st, right?
uh "marco" ... you meant 4th quarter, not the summer, if accuracy applies.
Let's cut to the chase! ... After the reverse-split, (a shareholder's nightmare!), occurs, there WILL be shrimp for sale, (FIRST TIME EVER), late in the 4th quarter. BUT, BUT, before rejoicing, shareholders would be well advised to think about the myriad of potential pitfalls that await the company ... FAR too many to mention. Even after the company FINALLY! begins it's sales of product, (salmon included for emphasis here!), anyone who believes it will be "all ahead full" is a study in naivete!!!
4th quarter ... 2021
this price ... that price ... this bottom ... that bottom ... have posters dropped "bankruptcy" from the discussion?
LionCub ... have you looked up the "MedSpa"? ... (It's basically a house with a few bedrooms!)
The first of your "several" will be a reverse split!!!
m polo ... what's the difference? ... (won't much matter to those holding prior to the sure to come filthy reverse split!!!)
More like SHMP ... (ticker symbol for a stock nearing R/S time!)
those events have passed ... production is in sight ... seems like the market should be reacting ... no?
Wow ... getting in at .04 we are ALL making big money! (better clean your glasses!) ... btw, seems like 1 year to me that the price tipped .84, but was closer to six months ago. Hard to keep up with a falling share price.
Ok, my revised question to you ... with the share price cut in half from 6 months ago, (a year ago it was about where it is now!!!), AND, with actual production now in sight for the first time, an "explanation please" on why this is so.
Finance 101 teaches the market anticipates the future, so why is the market not reacting positively to the coming months of production?
"momo" is 1/2 the share value of a year ago, even with production finally dead ahead! explanation please?
Maybe, but do you think that Ceo Grist's background of once getting a hockey scholarship, and later as a ketchup salesman for Heinz, will be enough to push this company forward?
SeaBlue,
I couldn't make the webcast today. The reason I asked about the R/S, was because I had emailed Nic Cacos some many months back, and then Dan a few days later, wanting their feelings about rolling back the stock. Dan said he and Keith were not high on the idea, (good!), but that there were factions within the company, (about 50/50), who were proponents as to a reverse split. (bad!) I expressed my opinion to the negative, but as I say, that was a while ago, which was why I raised the issue.
So he answered with a "no"? ... That is great news, at least to me, as a R/S is a huge no-no in my book!
Couldn't make the webinar ... and was late as to R/S question. I posed same to Nicolas Cacos, via email, many months ago, and then to Dan a few days later. Dan was more upfront and said he and Keith were not high on R/S prospects, (good!), but that factions connected to the company were 50/50 as to a R/S, (bad!). Did not go further, other than express my opinion to both of them, how opposed to a R/S I am at any time and any price.
supposedly split, (no pun intended!), about 50/50 as to a R/S. This is not coming as an opinion, and it is not b.s.
I hope you add the R/S query to your question list.
Does the company have any plans or discussions re reverse-split possibilities going forward? I feel that is a critical question, and for the record, I feel that rolling back the stock in a R/S would be disastrous to current shareholders!!!
Certainly strong news ... now what does it take to get the investing public to take notice of a low price bargain like this?
WHAT??? ... Institutional investors???
to quote McEnroe - "YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS!!!"
Amazing ... you refuse to discuss First Mining going forward when share price is taken out of the discussion, (I just wanted to see if you could do it), and equally amazing you assume share price doesn't matter to me. Of course it does! The company question to you that started all this was a reasonable one ... grad finance professors use this "trick" all the time in evaluating companies going forward, and for whatever reason, you choose not to participate in a discussion when price is removed. "That's your choice"!
Implanting ... Since share price is your primary criteria, and, as you say, you have been holding for so long with virtually zero results, why in the world would you continue to hold? Especially if you are not expecting a different outcome???
I asked a simple question ... if the share price issue was removed, how do you think the company is doing? ... and you could not answer without doubling back to the share price. If I did not feel a company had not done anything to make me a dime in five years, AND! I did not expect a different result going forward unless changes were made ... well, it's hard to see why you are staying in the game. Based on your post, why hold???
With all due respect ... because the only focus here seems to be only on the share price. Finance 101 teaches that the market anticipates, so obviously the market has not yet anticipated the "end game", (especially Springpole), as of yet.
My question is a simple one. How do you feel the company is doing, taking the share price out of the equation? (would like the answer to not double back to the share price issue.)
I believe 100% in the well thought out words coming from "Dan's basement". Yes, I have seen similar words from him re First Mining in the past, and yes, the share price is stagnant since then, but I doubt there are many posters, (if any!), who do not believe good things, (seriously good things!), are in store for the company's future. (actually I like that his message over time has not changed.) Since the market anticipates, ergo the frustration of us shareholders re the unresponsive share price. I think we will see the roots of the positive moves that the company has been making the last many months taking hold, and with the passage of hopefully not so many more days, the flat-lined share price can begin a northward journey. Isn't this a "when" and not "if" situation???
Of course there are always questions and discussions. And there should be! The assets in First Mining are strong and I guess my optimism re the future caused my reaction to use the term "moaning". "Frustration" would have been a better word as frustration can still connote great things ahead. If the stock price had been hidden from sight the last 8 to 10 months, I feel most of the board would have expected a much stronger price if the curtain was lifted today. A step back from share price and a focus on the steps FF is taking to ready Springpole, permitting and recent purchase of adjacent land for starters, plus impressive proven and probable reserves, with many, many, more positives, I believe the frustrations of a too low share price will give way to positive market momentum whenever the market "decides" to seriously determine the value of Springpole, (and the rest of the assets too ... especially when assigning value going forward.)