Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Where's my $13M??!! Promised an update on all business past and present. So?
These are regs for INTRA state transport within Washington state. Has nothing to do with interstate transport.
And what is your source for that information?
No, just smart enough to pick up the phone and make a couple of calls, or do a little Google work and find out that such a permit does not exist.
It's called Due Diligence. You ought to try it some time.
You never did any research on "Chief" Bills, did you?
No, because no company can do that. Including IBRC.
Then you end up in New Hampshire instead of Maine. Either way, does that really sound plausible?
You can go from Maine to California without having to cross 13 state lines. What a crock.
What kind of volume did it trade that day?
Seriously? Up .0002 on about 8.5 million shares traded? This won't even hit it's 90 day avg. volume, 52 week high is just delusional.
I have never heard of that. Not saying you're wrong, just that I never heard of that happening.
I'm curious. What's this payout you speak of?
There are no institutions trying to get into this. Institutional holdings are zero.
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/ibrc/institutional-holdings
Obviously, "final update" doesn't apply to the future, does it?
In the quote he posted, I noticed the phrase "final update" with regard to past business and contracts. I don't know that I like the sound of that.
What if the fact presented are "alternative facts?"
"In the end, it's not what you don't know that gets ya. It's what you're absolutely sure of that just ain't so." Mark Twain
Good advice.
Best post I've seen.
I understand that they have a tractor beam that can lift money right out of your pockets, and it's almost undetectable.
Again. Please identify those assets.
Look at the dollar amount of the activity: 1.48 million dollars. Obviously insider shares are valued differently than our peon shares. At pps of .0013, that's the equivalent 1.14 billion shares.
Obviously the insiders no longer have any interest in seeing that this doesn't go to hell in a handbasket.
76. That's about what I had left in my account when I learned about reverse mergers the first time.
Hard Knocks U. Very tough school.
Let's just say that I have paid for the education I have on this subject.
A merger has absolutely nothing to do with selling a business. What makes a company a shell in a merger transaction is that the two parties have agreed that it is not worth anything but it's listing on the exchange. Hence the market cap that LIKEGOLD pointed out.
I can confirm that this is a provisional patent number for an old application.
You can't buy into AHIT, it's too closely held. 10 day average volume is 331 shares.
You can't buy into AHIT, it's too closely held. 10 day average volume is 331 shares.
Let's be clear here, I have not said this company will not succeed. I'm just pointing out that there are a lot of claims/promises being made with very little concrete to back it up.
Hmmm, why does that sound familiar?
Their patented technology relates to holographic advertising/PR systems. My projected income, according to my math, Is 10 Billion over the next 2 months.
This is a sell, re-buy after the merger, and then hold for 5 years stock.
That math is not quite realistic, because they wont be adding shares. Our shares in IBRC will be wiped out. Cease to exist. New management will then issue new shares in the merged entity, as many as they choose to do. Then, as is typical of reverse mergers, management will pay us a certain percentage of those shares in exchange for our shell company. That is most typically in the 25% range (look it up people). New management retains the remaining 75% as their share. Why? 'Cause they can. How? 'Cause they can.
Bottom line: IBRC shareholders owned 100% of IBRC, they now own 25% of the new company.
Thanks.
That's a very good question. People should be a little more pissed off about that.
They were probably embarrased to let anyone see the response from the WH. Any memory of what they were tweeting about?
How do you explain the tweet from dreamlife confirming reverse merger with IBRC? You did come across that in the midst of your dd, right?
I don't think that's a fair assessment. Several of us have been screaming for couple of weeks about that. LIKEGOLD is talking about getting lawyers involved.
Unfortunately, still many here that believe the $13M is going to miraculously reappear when the merger closes.
Nice to hear from someone who actually sees the real situation.
You are at least looking at the real issue. The share distribution is where the major screwing takes place.
Very impressive gains! For example, I followed up on a couple of those mergers to see where they are today. The first one on the list, that ran 420,000%. Not hard to understand, since they were addressing what would be a 9 to 12 billion dollar instantly with their technology. And of course, these guys never lie. That was 2006.
Flash forward to 2008:
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2008/lr20648.htm