Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No, read my lips! Biocurex is currently in negotiations with other Pharmas and has garnered the interest of many in the industry. It is just a matter of time before they have other licensing deals in place.
My statements will completely nullify your contention because Biocurex will have at least one other licensee before Abbott has any recaf product on the market. My guess is within the next 6 months.
It's not about what I can afford. It's about sharing the responsibility. Why should I incur all of the cost and effort for the entire board. Am I the only one with a job?
You don't have to pass the hat, "jerk off", just dig into your own dust filled pockets and make the call yourself, free-loader!
Believe me, that doesn't even count as a possibility!
"They effectively have an exclusive anyway because Moro has been unable to get any additional agreements. All that is important to Abbott is that the test has value."
They have had offers and Abbott knows it, that's why they expressed a desire to have an exclusive. Abbott has realized the potential the technology holds and wants to have control. Biocurex is negotiating at present with a number of other pharmas. Others have made offers, but Biocurex did not accept the terms because they are looking for a deal at least as good as the one they got from Abbott. They (Biocurex) are fully aware of the goldmine they are sitting on and won't sell out or settle for a sub par licensing deal.
This is becoming a full time job, Gold seeker, exposing your ignorance, and your false statements!
Abbot Labs (NYSE: ABT) has been begging BOCX to get exclusive rights to their technology but BOCX only gave them semi-exclusive rights.
"I don't know about the first statement. Wittenberg should be smart enough to not say that since if true, it would be definite inside information."
That would not qualify as definite inside information because it is not anything concrete! It is merely a statement that is expressing Abbott's desired outcome.
You are sounding more and more ridiculous!
Honestly, I called and spoke to Dr. Moro one time, and any rapport that was established, happened in that one conversation. You could conceivably call, ask questions and get the same kind of straight forward answers. Some here tried to make me a spokesperson cause I made that 1 phone call and got results, but calling Canada from Calif is not cheap. Why can't others here share the burden of making the call?
"If BOCX doesn't give Abbot an exclusive, could they (Abbot) just say "screw it, we're going to bury you" and then return the license."
"Thoughts?"
Here's a thought, please explain how that makes any sense at all?
Abbott has an opportunity to market a revolutionary cancer marker that would reap untold billions, and you think they would shoot themselves in the foot, invite competitors to license the technology after they already have a licensing deal in place?
What kind of logic are you following?
"That is why management made the current maneuver right now. They just could not wait any longer."
You don't know who did the selling or why!!! You are merely assuming and making speculations, but do not qualify your statements as such. Therefore you are misleading in most of what you say. You have been doing this consistently. My question is why? You never offer a factual foundation for your statements. As long as you continue this pattern of posting, I will expose you as the uniformed, "wanna be, know it all" that you are, so that you don't continue to mislead weak minded investors.
Most of what this poster says is not based on any facts. He merely spouts what he believes to be true. Measure every thing he says and challenge him to back it up!
"The other thing that is very clear now is that Management has a very significant element of doubt that Abbott will continue the deal or they would never have done this maneuver."
What manuever? You are speculating, like an idiot and leading people to believe you know what you are talking about! You don't know who is behind this so called "manuveur"! And you say you are not a basher?
"Something I noticed yesterday that was interesting was the number of "odd lots" being sold. This is two of those still showing on the last trades chart.
0.96 1231 OBB 15:44:36
0.98 330 OBB 15:54:27
It is interesting because this is not just trading shares, this is a total position closeout or retail coming in with the shares figured to the last penny. I would guess this is more likely retail coming in which is where most of this buying is coming from. Cancer stocks are attractive because of public awareness and the potential large profit."
Not true! I had an order to buy 45K and it executed in odd # lots until it was filled. The market maker breaks up orders all the time including sells. There is nothing specific about the amounts of the lots on either side.
You are an example of a person who thinks they know more than they do. Your uninformed speculations erodes any sense of credibility. You speak out of both sides of your mouth. One day you sense something good coming, and the next you sense Abbott is going to return the license, based on what? A feeling you have? I can't imagine anyone on this board taking anything you have to say with more than a grain of salt. You demonstrate "zero" credibility and definitely have some agenda. Call it bashing if you like, but you are trying to influence the minds of potential investors, under the guise of trying to be perceived as a poster who contributes to the flow of information on this board.
After my experience over at Raging bull, I can't imagine DC Steve not making his presence felt here too. My guess is that his new alias here is either Reverse or Goldseeker. The only two here that fit his profile. He obviously wants to be incognito, so his posting approach would need to be deceptive.
People like them are selfish ground dwelling leeches! Hopefully their efforts are in vain.
Amen!!!
Your whole premise is based on speculation and it appears that most here do not agree with your logic. No matter how many times you repeat your message, that will not change!
Bull Sh_t-Your logic is flawed, for reasons already stated
"Moro doesn't want the stock price skyrocketing right now due to more possible repercussions from the SEC as before. Hyping emails making possible false statements is what got us on the pinks. Moro doesn't want retail investors thinking they got badly burned in these transactions and complaining so he is containing the rise and selling the most stock they can at reasonable prices."
There you go again, speaking for others, stating your opinions as fact. Listening to you, one would think Dr. Moro told you these things personally. After speaking to Dr. Moro myself, I can say, once again, that you don't know what you are talking about. Dr. Moro wants to see much higher prices for the stock, as he repeatedly says it's undervalued and doesn't understand why the stock is selling at such low levels. He even filed to have a placement at $2.50 after the Abbott deal, while we were still trading on the pinks, that he withdrew by the way. He is doing what he can to increase the share price. Your reasoning doesn't even add up. The SEC is watching regardless of stock price. If there is a danger of getting delisted again, it is not necessarily tied to what price the stock is selling at. Dr. Moro understands that any info released to the public must be accurate, or else. That's it, period. What CEO wants to see the stock price depressed on news? Ridiculous!!!
You know, there is an acronym that is used for opinions so that it is not confused with fact. It's (IMO), meaning In My Opinion!
If someone made a reference about someone on this board not being too bright, the first alias to pop up in my head would be Goldseeker. Not to say that I don't think that you are intelligent, I'd say dense is closer to the truth.
However, it is not uncommon for a person who is intellectually exposed, in this case through inference, attacks the one who is responsible for the revelation. I never plainly made a statement about your intelligence, but I suppose I have revealed enough to warrant an attack. I welcome you to provide the board with any facts to support your argument that brings my intelligence into question. I'm sure you have none, just your insecurities coming out, resulting from exposure!
Well it is regretable that you feel I've step on your toes, but I'm positive I'm not the first. Wear shoes next time.
It could be, maybe, or what if ... ! I wonder, do you talk in your sleep? Do you talk to yourself? Do you think aloud? There is no doubt in my mind that you do all of the above!
This board has already expressed to you, in various posts that it could care less about your speculations!
Who asked you? So then, why do you insist on sharing your hypothosises? Most here would be much more interested in facts. I believe someone on this board once referred to your MANY speculations as dribble! I must concur.
I hope you know that no one visits this board to attain Goldseeker's speculative wisdom. Will you please, in the future, just keep your theories, speculation and projections to yourself!
I'm not saying I want to be a millionaire, but going to be, but thanks for the advice!
I am I the only person finding you irritating?
I am thinking that people with cancer would definitely know about and watch Cancer Today, because it is a program that focuses on a disease that they have and breakthroughs in its treatment and diagnosis. Given that so many people have this awful disease, you may be dramatically underestimating the number of viewers that will be exposed to the Recaf technology resulting from the broadcast. Adelphia and Time Warner carry the program, along with other cable companies; and their website gives access to all of the programing that is aired.
Therefore, I don't see how you can put this media exposure in the same category as Lebed. You seem to be lumping the bad pr decisions in with all of Biocurex's investment decisions, even the potentially good ones. I think that this exposure could possibly lead to more exposure in the field, more investment interest and more media coverage in the future by big T.V. networks. We'll see.
There was some conjecture that this media coverage might also be paid for by Biocurex. Is there anyone that can offer any evidence of this, or is it just postulation?
In any case, who can argue that things within the company aren't turning for the positive, with more great news ahead?
Investors who have little patience, typically, after a time, begin to question their investment, 1st to themselves, then to the public, via message boards, playing devil's advocate looking to find posters who will help reaffirm their investment. These skeptical, faint of heart investors don't deserve the affirmation that they seek. Let their own due dilligence persuade them, or not. I think that some of the tactics used to achieve their goal of affirmation are cowardice and cynical in nature. They do not deserve to reap the same benefit of the faithful. I say leave them to fester in their doubt and double-mindedness!
What is your definition of an interview vs a fake interview?
If lebed is being compensated for his so called "picks", is it really a pick after all, or just a play on words?
Well, I stand corrected! Very surprising and disturbing that Biocurex would use sleazy outfit like lebed!
mysscat, it was very obvious that the poster who made that comment was not serious, just a jerk with a very bad sense of humor. All you had to do was to do a google search on Lebed and you would have known that Biocurex would have nothing to do with that guy! Stop being so gulible, or at least look in to things for yourself! Please don't encourage him to post here anymore, with your ridiculous questions. Thank you!
Am I the only one that has reverse on IGNORE?
Nice morning volume, 12 minutes into the day, 34K, bid .81, ask .82.
I agree. Dr. Moro did imply that with more research and "tinkering" they could possibly improve the results on this new platform. I predict that the feasibility milestone payment will be paid in 07' negating the minimum royalty payment. Soon after, we should see a pr re: FDA submission, then listing on AMEX. That being said, in 08' the baseline pps, instead of being .70, should be about $4 with a high of about $8 that year. Higher, if begin to see royalty payments coming in, let's say the last quarter(s) in 08'
Good point!
OT: Mysscat, you are correct! Gaboy has been here a whole 6 days longer than me!!! And you called me childish??? Next time you want to make a point, I hope it's much more profound than this. Funny stuff!!!
OT: Well mysscat, I am a gentleman and I can see that your feathers are all ruffled. My parents taught me to respect my elders, so I apologize for my rudeness and will turn the other cheek the next time that you launch an attack on me. Have a nice day!!!
OT: Well "mysscat"
OT: Sorry, I forgot the (OT) label on my last post!
Your conjectures about me, as insulting as you "try" to be, are comical in nature, because I am what I am. What you imagine about me is perfectly fine. Fact is there is one thing that you could take to the bank, that is when this investment hits $6.00 per share, I will be a millionaire after taxes. We'll see what you imagine about me then. Too bad you have no information about me to support your theories. Haaaa, ha, ha!
OT: Since when do you know how I feel and what I think? You don't know me lady! I never implied I wanted to be any kind of enforcer. When I need or want you speak for me, I'll be the first to let you know.
Could it be that you feel a bit insecure because I expressed my opinion and it makes a whole lot of sense, and perhaps you don't like to be corrected? You and Gayboy sound like a couple of adolescents, telling me how I feel priviledged because I made a positive contribution to the board. I have never sought any special acknowledgement for that interview, or brought it up, other than to cite quotes from the good Dr. Moro to shed some light on some investor's speculation. I conducted that interview because I wanted to be clear about my investment and I'm not a selfish kind of person. I want to share the knowledge and information that I learn with my fellow investors. Why should you be envious of that? Envy is the only reason I could think of to make you and Gayboy draw that conclusion. Surely I have never boasted of my contributions to the board. It is very ignorant and immature of you both, to draw that kind of baseless conclusion.
Talk about rude, you are the one that asked me to shut up! I think this is a good time for you to follow your own advice! Obviously, you don't think I have anything positive to contribute to this board, therefore I welcome you to put me on ignore, you won't miss much!
The topic,Gayboy, is "staying on topic"! Your "cute" comment is far from witty and closer to retarded!
Thank you!
I suppose you are correct! Darn!!!
Ameritrade needs to get their act together!
I do have hip-hop buddies, but fortunately my friend base is not limited to this message board, unlike some!!!. And contrary to your belief, there are plenty of people who read this board that agree with me. If you notice, on other message boards, when posters are "off topic" they label their post as such. (OT)
I don't think I was out of line. I wasn't disrespectful or rude. I stated my opinion, which was very reasonable. You probably don't appreciate it when people point out when you are not following the status quo, therefore, mistakenly viewed it as chastisment. I was just pointing out the fact that ideally discussions here should focus on Biocurex, for the most part. I noticed that the conversation was increasingly focusing on the war and mid-east conflict. People come to this board to discuss Biocurex. Some of us don't want to sift through posts to get what they came for. If you were polite and respectful of your fellow posters, we wouldn't be having this convo, use the (OT) label for personal convo.
It's called correction, so consider yourself corrected!!!
There is still buying interest. It is 6:57 pacific time, the market has been open for 27 minutes and already there has been 47,645 shares traded with a high of .85 that I'm showing on my level II quote.
I am chilled, laid back and focused on my investment. I'm not trippin' or telling anybody what to do. I am simply introducing you to the reality that people don't visit the "BIOCUREX" engage in idle chit chat! That's cool once and a while, and I do understand that posters form a bond over time. I have no problem with that. I just stated my opinion. Like I stated in my last post, if you want to post "off topic", why not label your post as such, or send private messages?
What does my interview with Dr. Moro have to do with anything? Since when does 2 + 2 = 5. I have been here since as long or longer than you, so what's your point?
Label your sh^t off topic, if you want me to shut up!!!