Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
EPIC-ALERT-BASED-ON-SEC-Filings
As outlined in SEC filings:
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf
....inaccurate public disclosure
....unlawful distribution of securities
....falsely recognizing revenue
....overstated BIELs revenue by $366,000, or 47%.
....engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
....unregistered transactions at a discount
....orchestrated the illegal distribution.
....half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities
....offerings were not registered with the Commission.
....constitutes improper professional conduct.
Rationally-investors-can-make-money-that-does-not-correlate-to-well-run-company
Investors having intuitive understanding of the PR Speculation engine and TOXIC Dilution campaign can make a "Profitable" game of it and show an ROI.
Considering-volumes-seems-you-are-rather-astute
Does not take much volume/$$ to move pps.....
IE: 100M in volume is a measly $100k
PR audio generated some uninformed investing.
Not all investors google for "SEC filings BIEL"
Classic-->their-Operating-Loss-lessens-when-they-sell-less-product
Suggest-commenting-to-those-projecting-profitability
This topic emanates from posters speculating on profitability.
These types of questions/answers are dependencies for predicting/speculating on profitability.
If there are unreasonable expectations, then suggest not speculating on profitability.
Suggest-referring-to-original-comment
-->"Ask the company how many units they forecast to sell and at what price per item and most importantly when or over what timeline."
Agreed human nature is to sometimes focus on the negatives as opposed to the positives, this is what kinda drives what is socially termed progress.
Struggle to understand why company is not willing to share details that really should have no harm in disclosing if company is being well run and not influenced by shenanigans.
Wish-company-provided-an-informative-level-of-transparency
The fact all these points are unknowns contributes to the speculation
Per-year-sales-or-per-quarter-sales?
Given what company discloses regarding sales price, unable to determine unit volumes.
http://www.inspired-energy.com/capabilities/Downloads/Smart%20Battery%20Shelf%20Life%2004-04-12.pdf
Suggest-you-ask-for-clarification-from-the-company-if-any-doubts
Will retract/apologize for speculative comments if company is willing to provide more details, also generalized as "Transparency" to investors.
Likely-to-result-in-higher-losses
Older products in inventory with deteriorating battery life needs to be moved, so sell at loss given batter life is likely less than advertised. Similar to try & tell campaign.
Ask the company how many units they forecast to sell and at what price per item and most importantly when or over what timeline.
Agreed-good-example-of-product-market-awareness-and-opportunity
When received original product back in 2009, 1st impressions were reduced as result of not reflecting current fitness wearable approach.
SEC-could-have-put-each-claim-in-seperate-letter/filing
Assume there would be outrage over lack of efficiency at government agency.....
Each item is a separate claim that will need to be refuted and or proven to be accurate.
Each item will need legal fees allocated to refute effectively.
Low confidence in company executing effectively as result of what has been demonstrated with effectively submitting and successfully producing FDA clearance.
Most-importantly-how-many-pinks-fail-to-provide-longs-any-ROI
Investors have to be active traders to have seen any ROI
How-many-pinks-indeed
How many pink company's come under the SEC investigations on multiple occassions
How many pink company's establish single family member funding companies
How many pink company's TOXIC Dilute to the levels experienced, both AS & OS
How many pink company's all but guarantee FDA clearance by target date and fail to deliver
How many pink company's fail to disclose FDA status that with any level of integrity should be disclosed
How many pink company's infer with 510k submission subsequent approval a given
How many pink company's fail to provide any corroborated details that 510k submission being processed by FDA
How many pink company's PR/claim to be adding sales channels yet fail to substantiate with unit volume levels
How many pink company's are per SEC investigated for inaccurate public disclosure
How many pink company's are per SEC investigated for unlawful distribution of securities
How many pink company's are per SEC investigated for falsely recognizing revenue
How many pink company's are per SEC investigated for overstated BIELs revenue by $366,000, or 47%.
How many pink company's are per SEC investigated for engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
How many pink company's are per SEC investigated for unregistered transactions at a discount
How many pink company's are per SEC investigated for orchestrated the illegal distribution.
How many pink company's are per SEC investigated for half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities
How many pink company's are per SEC investigated for offerings were not registered with the Commission.
How many pink company's are per SEC investigated for constitutes improper professional conduct.
Never-a-great-day-waiting-on-biel-to-execute
Obviously-not-enough-for-company-to-be-able-to-project-profitability-"Ever"
Possible-may-not-like-answer-company-would-not-provide
Yes!-Please!-Ask-the-Company-how-many-units-B.Braun-will-sell
Anything that would indicate some resemblance to forecasting capabilities.
Ask-company-to-share-how-many-pet-products-being-sold
Little to no demand for the product
Which-product-is-making-money-for-investors?
Just for clarity: Not Acti-Patch , in fact speculate that 99% of investors loose money on BIEL.
Obviously-the-extrapolation-techniques-are-flawed
Icy-Hot as a whole for the brand generated $110M for US sales.
How much of that $110 is Smart-releif is well below that number.
This is the type of extrapolation that concludes one to have low confidence in projections being set forth for Biel profitability.
The-company-should-have-enough-forecast-visibility-to-minimize-speculation
If not than that infers potential negatives about prospects for company.
The point is the posters projecting profitability by Q# is whats at question. Let the company PR when they expect to be profitable.
Speculative-promises-of-Q1-now-Q2...sounding-like-FDA-Clearance-by-end-of-2015
IE: Factual history has proven these as false promises
Until the company states we will be profitable at revenue targets X, then uninformed speculation at best.
Icy-Hot-$110M-in-2014-How-many-BIEL-units-think-can-be-sold-US
http://www.statista.com/statistics/322991/sales-of-otc-pain-relief-products-in-the-us/
Assuming Smart Relief is included in this $110M US Sales.....
The potential US OTC sales volumes are likely well below any extrapolations being speculated on in this forum.
No-information-from-company-that-states-sell-more-implies-profit
Until company provides a level of transparency that clearly, not by speculation, states that at X sales volume we are profitable, then this type of conjecture is non-deterministic.
If the company had a profit projection it would be PR'd
The fact there is no profit projections of any kind from the company suggests there is not any foreseeable profitable scenario at any volume of sales.
Shield-unsuspecting-uninformed-investors-from-losses
There is no ill-will or anger involved, only good-will to inform unsuspecting & uninformed investors from speculative driven losses
Facts are TOXIC Dilution has highest probability to produce losses for well informed investors
Unless well verse trader that knows how to profit from PR speculation bounces
Fact:Company-has-not-released-any-communication-that-shows-profitability
There is no company released information that projects profitability "Near or Long term"
Facts are the company has not released any information that suggest profitability
Gross-numbers-irrelevent-Net-numbers-shows-loosing
Does not matter what the costs are, the facts from company released information is that losses grow proportionally to sales, that infers as more items sold then more losses accumulate.
Alternative-possibility-per-eventual-SEC-actions-bankruptcy-0.00001-PPS
Per-company-released-financials-more-stores-infers-larger-losses
Bottom line, losses are funded by TOXIC Dilution stock selling campaign, every share sold is ~50% pocketed by entities noted in Per SEC filings:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf
....sold purportedly unrestricted shares in unregistered
transactions at a discount to then-current market prices........
orchestrated the illegal distribution. Approximately half of
the proceeds of these sales were then “loaned” to BIEL and the
other half was retained by the entities.
acknowledging-based-on-facts-is-a-start
Desperate-times-indeed
o Mounting legal fees
o FDA Clearance no where in site
o Every item sold results in additional losses
o SEC facilitating an end to the family loans
o AS likely above 20B
o OS growing, Toxic dilution continues at accelerated pace
Read-company-released-financial-loose-money-on-every-item-sold
Does not matter how many stores or countries are selling product, if every item sold results in losses.
False-SEC-did-not-oppose-defendants-request-for-6-months
Defendants could have requested "speedy" trial, they requested the opposite to delay.
Which for investors just means additional legal fees diverted from alternative product and profitability related objectives.
In the end investors loose.
ROFLMAO-old-news-per-CEO-"FDA-no-reason-not-cleared-by-end-of-year-2015"
Now that's some old news.
Great-news-forthcoming-from-SEC-Proceedings
When unsuspecting/uninformed investors no longer exposed to the speculative PR's that facilitate TOXIC dilution campaign executed by those referenced in SEC filings.
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf
....inaccurate public disclosure
....unlawful distribution of securities
....falsely recognizing revenue
....overstated BIELs revenue by $366,000, or 47%.
....engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
....unregistered transactions at a discount
....orchestrated the illegal distribution.
....half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities
....offerings were not registered with the Commission.
....constitutes improper professional conduct.
ROFLMAO-FACTS-as-filed-by-the-SEC http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf
Pertinent keywords/statements as stipulated by the SEC
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf
....inaccurate public disclosure
....unlawful distribution of securities
....falsely recognizing revenue
....overstated BIELs revenue by $366,000, or 47%.
....engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
....unregistered transactions at a discount
....orchestrated the illegal distribution.
....half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities
....offerings were not registered with the Commission.
....constitutes improper professional conduct.
remedial action is appropriate in the public interest ......
including, but not limited to, a censure, disgorgement, a civil penalty and a penny stock suspension or bar....
should be ordered to pay disgorgement pursuant....
Emphasize --> "but not limited to"
TOXIC-Stock-dilution-facilitated-by-paid-for-advertizing
As outlined in SEC filings:
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf
....inaccurate public disclosure
....unlawful distribution of securities
....falsely recognizing revenue
....overstated BIELs revenue by $366,000, or 47%.
....engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
....unregistered transactions at a discount
....orchestrated the illegal distribution.
....half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities
....offerings were not registered with the Commission.
....constitutes improper professional conduct.
Paid-for-advertising-funded-by-unsuspecting-uninformed-investors
Informed investors acknowledge what SEC has publicized:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf
....unlawful distribution of securities
....engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
....unregistered transactions at a discount
....orchestrated the illegal distribution.
....half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities
Per-SEC-loans-on-BIEL-balance-sheet-50%-retained-by-the-entities
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf
....sold purportedly unrestricted shares in unregistered
transactions at a discount to then-current market prices........
orchestrated the illegal distribution. Approximately half of
the proceeds of these sales were then “loaned” to BIEL and the
other half was retained by the entities.