Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
RE:
If they are not accurate then they need to come down.
RE:
Feel free to demonstrate how the photos are in error and I will gladly remove them.
RE:
I go by satellite pictures
The pictures showing Laman Milner personally delivering the vials of gold to Paul Edward Norat were removed from their site and press release. Maybe Milner was camera shy.
RE:
They're still testing samples from it. No production yet
Also let's forget about this mining thing.
Doc Watson Mine records prove NO MINING.
Mine ID# 0203281
http://www.msha.gov/drs/drshome.htm
According to the official records, nothing is happening at this mine:
Not even a compliance inspection since 2012.
Nothing is moving forward at the Doc Watson Mine.
Investing based on the latest CFGX report?
If you found this forum through a search engine, you probably saw one of the latest CFGX press releases claiming they've found gold on their Doc Watson Mine property. You are probably now researching whether or not you want to invest some of your hard earned money in CFGX.
This post won't tell you one way or the other about the validity of their claims. Instead, completely discount and disregard anything anyone has ever said about CFGX and the Doc Watson Mine and read their own technical report about the Doc Watson Mine property. Then, decide for yourself whether or not the claims do or do not make sense. Come to your own conclusions about what is happening.
Here is the link to their own technical report:
http://www.capfiglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Tech-Doc-06-15-2014.pdf
The next phase of the pump...
Paul Edward Norat has been called out for not having a mining permit, so if he wants this pump to continue he'll need to apply for one which he has not. I was unable to even locate an exploration permit. If he has one, I'm sure his team will present it.
Other filings he'll need before mining can begin:
http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/az/pdfs/3809.Par.10193.File.dat/az-mine-permit-guide.pdf
It's a long list. He better get started.
Bragging about "sufficient anomalous gold".
That quote is being repeated over and over as if the author is saying great things and validating the mine estimates:
It is however, too early in the exploration phase to determine whether or not the property will develop into an economically viable placer deposit. The author’s verification samples indicated sufficient anomalous gold over a broad enough area to warrant additional exploration work.
The author concludes that neither mineral reserves nor mineral resources currently exist at the Doc Watson Project as of the effective date of this report.
The author concludes that neither mineral reserves nor mineral resources currently exist at the Doc Watson Project as of the effective date of this report.
The author concludes that neither mineral reserves nor mineral resources currently exist at the Doc Watson Project as of the effective date of this report.
The author concludes that neither mineral reserves nor mineral resources currently exist at the Doc Watson Project as of the effective date of this report.
What is the value of a NO BID stock?
Market closed. Still NO BID.
Everyone knows what this company is.
Before you invest in this company.
If you are buying stock based on the results they released of their Doc Watson Mine property, demand to see a verified drill report first. A drill report is the only real way to verify and estimate gold on site. Their own technical report of the property bases their estimate on drill reports nobody has seen. Not even the guy who wrote the report.
RE:
How do you know that gold came from Doc Watson?
Gold and silver assay report for 14 samples of placer gravels with ID numbers A through J and L through O (Appendix II), average of all samples is 3.64 grams per ton (gpt) gold (minimum 0.34 gpt gold; maximum 21.46 gpt gold; median 1.90 gpt gold).
Questions about the vials of gold.
Paul Edward Norat is reporting that over 4 ounces of gold was recovered from the Doc Watson Mine.
There are 28.34 grams per ounce. 4 ounces comes to 113.36 grams.
The report, in which their expert states there is no gold on site, includes an assay report from samples given to the independant lab which states:
Gold and silver assay report for 14 samples of placer gravels with ID numbers A through J and L through O (Appendix II), average of all samples is 3.64 grams per ton (gpt) gold (minimum 0.34 gpt gold; maximum 21.46 gpt gold; median 1.90 gpt gold).
Therefore, I can’t speak to: (1) the arrangement that exists between Noble Metal Kings and underlying land owner;(2) whether or not either one of them has a permit, or has made the proper arrangements with regulatory bodies;
"Huge news!". Still no bid. Nobody cares.
Everyone knows what this company is.
RE:
CFGX = No RS commitment!! This is a good thing only way to go is UP!!
Is this the "News next week" you've been waiting for, but stringing investors along for months? You waited all that time for that news. An honest person would feel ripped off.
The news that is supposed to make this stock "blow up", "skyrocket", "shoot to the moon", will have "everyone chasing"?
Still no bid. Good job.
RE:
The hard stuff is done. Once they get set up and organized the mining side of things should go farely smooth.
The breakdown.
That said, I want to set the record straight on a few things. The Off-Take Agreement between Noble Metal Kings and CFGX is arms-length, which means CFGX has nothing to do with Noble Metal Kings or the underlying land owner. Therefore, I can’t speak to: (1) the arrangement that exists between Noble Metal Kings and underlying land owner;
(2) whether or not either one of them has a permit, or has made the proper arrangements with regulatory bodies;
(3) whether either one of them has sufficient funding;
(4) whether or not the property contains massive amounts of gold, or none at all; and
(5) whether or not I’ll see another spec of gold from them, ever.
All of these things are out of my control and I have no influence upon them.
Therefore, I can’t make any representations regarding them; all I can do is make available to the public any and all information that becomes available to me.
His expert didn't find gold, but Laman Milner did? It was probably bought on Ebay just for the pictures.
This paragraph is the best part:
That said, I want to set the record straight on a few things. The Off-Take Agreement between Noble Metal Kings and CFGX is arms-length, which means CFGX has nothing to do with Noble Metal Kings or the underlying land owner. Therefore, I can’t speak to: (1) the arrangement that exists between Noble Metal Kings and underlying land owner; (2) whether or not either one of them has a permit, or has made the proper arrangements with regulatory bodies; (3) whether either one of them has sufficient funding; (4) whether or not the property contains massive amounts of gold, or none at all; and (5) whether or not I’ll see another spec of gold from them, ever. All of these things are out of my control and I have no influence upon them. Therefore, I can’t make any representations regarding them; all I can do is make available to the public any and all information that becomes available to me.
RE:
we bout to turn this ship around. Big revenue on it's way.
RE:
Who knows but at least he included this within his report:
RE:
If I had a nickle for every project that got a late start, than I'd have a lot of gumballs in my pocket.
The author concludes that neither mineral reserves nor mineral resources currently exist at the Doc Watson Project as of the effective date of this report.
RE:
Their lawyer says word it this way so in a court of law there's no loophole they can sue us on. All documents sound like that.
The author concludes that neither mineral reserves nor mineral resources currently exist at the Doc Watson Project as of the effective date of this report.
RE:
Im still waiting for your fraud cries on the "OFFICIAL" lab reports. Is the lab a make believe tool shed in a fraudulent forest. That got a make believe load of dirt with thousands and thousands of dollars of fools gold in it. lets hear it. This should be good.
Assay certificates made available to the author, Copper States Analytical, are only indirectly tied to a documented sampling program and it cannot be determined what original volume of material the assays represent.
RE:
How would he know anything without the lab reports?
This technical report is based on the following sources of information:
• Discussions with Dwayne Watson;
• Private documents provided by Dwayne Watson that were generated by prior explorers in the area and by recent placer sample testing completed by Mr. Watson;
• Inspection and verification sampling of the Doc Watson property; and
• Additional information acquired in the public domain.
RE:
Maybe they ought to file for permits...
It's funny that's how you interpret that one cherry picked statement because the author is very clear that the site needs further review because the reported estimates lack credibility.
You either think he's reliable or you don't. Can't have it both ways.
The author concludes that neither mineral reserves nor mineral resources currently exist at the Doc Watson Project as of the effective date of this report.
When your expert tells you outright that there is NO GOLD and you misrepresent that there is a 10 year stream of gold concentrates that is 100% fraud.
Also, just two paragraphs above the piece you quoted is this:
Cautionary statement: Investors are cautioned that the potential grades obtained by the author are select "grab" samples and are not necessarily representative of the grades that would be determined in a detailed and methodical evaluation of the Project.
More proof of the Doc Watson Mine scam.
In case you think I'm cherry picking again, this was just above the quote you provided.
Here again are the words of Doc Watson Tech report author.
These interpreted estimates and grades are not considered by the author to be reliable, but are presented here because they were considered reliable at the time.
Investors are cautioned that grades reported above were not verified with detailed sampling and systematic evaluation by the author. These historical estimates were based on poorly defined sampling and concentrating methods.
Sampling appeared to be erratically spaced in the placer mineralization, typically an unreliable practice. The classification and volume of mineralization also do not appear to have been based on metallurgical studies.
The assay certificates and other supporting information from the C Rose evaluation and Jacobs drilling programs were not available for the author's inspection. Assay certificates made available to the author, Copper States Analytical, are only indirectly tied to a documented sampling program and it cannot be determined what original volume of material the assays represent.
The author therefore does not regard these historical estimates as resources as that term is defined in CIM Definitions Standards, nor does he regard the reported gold and silver values as representative of the property
It's not cherry picking when you do it I guess. This is just two paragraphs above the quote you cherry picked. Maybe you missed it.
Cautionary statement: Investors are cautioned that the potential grades obtained by the author are select "grab" samples and are not necessarily representative of the grades that would be determined in a detailed and methodical evaluation of the Project.
RE:
Again, the linked mine being abandoned does not in and of itself constitute fraud.
RE:
Thank you for the compilation of cherry picked quotes.
The author concludes that neither mineral reserves nor mineral resources currently exist at the Doc Watson Project as of the effective date of this report.
RE:
Thank you for the compilation of cherry picked quotes.
RE:
That is proof enough for me.
RE:
I am not here to mislead anyone and I most certainly would not be here if I knew it was a scam,
I was prepared to move on but the constant pestering for proof as if it somehow validated CFGX as a company made me want to look again. The proof was there the whole time in their own technical report.
Thanks to 4On4Off for inspiring me to have another look. Much appreciated.
Proof of Doc Watson Mine scam.
As far as I've been able to research, I can't find anything to support that the Doc Watson/Gold Remedy Mine is anything other than abandoned.
I haven't even been able to find a submitted application that covers the dates since the initial announcement on the CFGX website. In fact, there hasn't been a submitted application the year previous to announcement. I'm sure if such evidence exists, your team will provide it, but if you can't prove it, it must be true, right?
The Doc Watson Technical Report:
http://www.capfiglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Tech-Doc-06-15-2014.pdf
Here is a quote from their own Doc Watson technical report. (I've retained a copy of the original release in the event they choose to alter it. I suggest everyone keep a copy for their own records.):
Note that none of the historical classifications have been verified, and therefore do not meet NI43101 standards for verified historically estimated mineral reserves or mineral resources for use in current estimates released to the public.
No coordinates for the drill hole collars were provided and the holes were not located in the field by the author. No core or drill hole cuttings were available for inspection by the author.
Most geologic data for the property come from reports where historic placering operations occurred on the east side of the Lost River Range, such as at the King Tut placers.
This site 80 acres has never been mined,
The author concludes that neither mineral reserves nor mineral resources currently exist at the Doc Watson Project as of the effective date of this report.