Fed's in the tank for Harris and the Dems!

Sheesh, this is the statement with which I do not agree, that's all folks...don't know why you keep up the charade that I am disagreeing with how the rate cut will be received by Rs...I'm not as clearly stated several times. Buy your own champagne...

I suspect that you misread my reply as I agree #1, they will lose their mind, but #2, Fed action will be only as conditions warrant and I do not agree the Fed is in the tank for Democrats. I must have more confidence in their integrity than you do; that's all I was saying...

Yes on #1, but #2 will be done only as economic conditions, statistical data and events warrant, IMO.

Do us all a favor and go have a BM, because you are FOS and prone to hyperbole, aka, BS, as usual...start with the gas. The other crap is just that. Fits.

https://gasprices.aaa.com/

Today’s AAA
National Average
$3.478
Price as of
8/3/24

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
bell·weth·er
/'bel?weT?H?r/
noun
plural noun: bellwethers

the leading sheep of a flock, with a bell on its neck.
an indicator or predictor of something.
"college campuses are often the bellwether of change"

Now for a break from our regularly scheduled programming...just for fun!

The Brooke Hargis-Every woman needa think of herself as a house!

Ancient history, like 6 months ago? WTF, hope you both have been taking your meds...I'm sure you're both much better now!

Trump: “Which is incapable of solvin’ even the sollest problem. We are an institit in a powerful death penalty. We will put this on.”

WTF does that even mean, but, yes, he has the best words!

"Looking good, Kamala!" Methinks she's looking mighty fine, but as you wish...we'll see how the upcoming debates in fact do well confirm her standing vs. the quite selective editing and rebuttal cutoffs achieved on the video by the esteemed "journalist", Megyn Kelly...and where is Tulsi now? Oh, yes...Fox news...the old standby gig for bullshitters and falsifiers.

"Sounds like your gripe is, in fact, with him. Not with me."

No...my gripe is with your lack of investigative thought and being willing to expand your mental horizon beyond what is nominally evident in front of your nose. His comment did not eliminate other considerations also being necessarily evaluated as a precursor to said subsequent requirement stated in the open. He also prefaced the nomination of a black woman to SCOTUS...have you a problem with KBJ as well? Get over it!

Well, rant, vent, whatever one calls it, there's no harm in getting it out rather than stewing internally. I'm sure you'll listen to his address tonight and go from there, hopefully with a less concerned mindset and be able to go forward with a measure of positivity. It's certainly difficult to absorb everything that's happening...everywhere it seems, so we each have to find our own path guided by our own best angels and informed by the facts as best we can discern. Regards...

Yes, sir I did, thus my reference to the entire set. Please note the jobs/population ratio is at its highest level ever, .64. The population increase from 1970 to 2020 is not 40% as you stated, but 63%. From 1969 through 2022, jobs increased from 91,053,200 to 212,442,000, an increase of 133%. You are mixing up and misusing FRED and BLS in your misstatements that there has been no job creation and no job growth, which is the premise of your entire thread and our futile attempts to apply reality to your comments. As you wish on your commentary, poetic license, I suppose, I took some shots, too, lol!

"And ignorant..to think one party performs economically better than the other. Maybe the word "ignorant" is being too polite. Again..you are being played by both parties..." Well, we agree to disagree...again!

Finally...and I think we've about exhausted the subject for now. EOD for me with you. At least we agreed on my point that you now say you are making, lol! Toodles...

Yes, but, but, but Conix said she is just a token, so there's that box being checked. While I'm at it and just for OMOLIVES, lol...forgive my off topic!

OMO, quit with the freaking bullshit and misinterpreting stats that are incomplete when reviewed in a vacuum without context and concurrent analysis with other economic factors and events. Though you've already been presented with sufficient information for you to review and yield to the facts you deny, you simply can't or won't! Let me boil it down to something very simple...look up total US employment for the last however many years of interest to you. Voila, do you see the job creation/growth over time? Methinks you should, and for example the following...and enjoy! Don't forget to scroll to the bottom of the page for a nice chart from 1969 to current. No job growth??? WTF are you sucking on or smoking? Hopefully, this will allow you to slow your roll just a little bit or at least pick something else to fuck up!

https://united-states.reaproject.org/analysis/comparative-trends-analysis/total_employment/tools/0/0/

OMG too funny!

Nice find/post of the Trump donation to Kamala in 2011...was news to me for sure!

Haha, even though Trump had already agreed to debate Biden on ABC on September 10, now, of course he needs for a Harris debate to be on Fixed News, aka Fox non news...scrambling hard, isn't he?

Agree, and here's another to cement that great UnHerd of thinking...
Why the Right loves a Great Man The new political divide is over accountable power by Mary Harrington
https://unherd.com/2024/07/why-trump-needs-the-swarm/
Thank goodness it's behind their paywall so we don't have to experience it...except that Conix will probably pollute us with it now, lol...

lol, that wasn't his quote; it was from the article of Lionel Shriver/UnHerd that you posted, ma'am...you shouldn't be surprised, but are confused in that regard...

Ok, OMO, read all about it...
Not a home run, but covers enough of your job creation and other economic indicator misreadings...
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/mar/21/simon-rosenberg/have-96-of-jobs-created-over-35-years-emerged-unde/

and

about that pesky labor force participation rate..."Our analysis suggests that over two-thirds of the 1 percentage point drop in overall LFP from 2019 to 2022 can be attributed to a decline in trend LFP, with cyclical factors explaining the rest. Most of the drop in trend LFP is due to changes in the composition of the population, especially aging of the population. Looking ahead, we estimate that aggregate trend LFP will decline approximately 1 additional percentage point over the next decade, driven primarily by population aging."
https://www.frbsf.org/research-and-insights/publications/economic-letter/2023/08/how-far-is-labor-force-participation-from-its-trend/

that's all you're getting for free tonight...not gonna spoon feed you, do the work...fuagf would extract all the info and bold it to make his point clear for you...not me, dig for it...lazy boy...ok, I did one for you.

Nice, sir...shows even hopefully well intentioned and generally very reliable sources can fall into the trap of not paying enough attention to what they push through the too quick news grinder. Sometimes stuff slips through that infers malice or at least careless indifference to a more complete representation.

My bad, too...those were the words of Janice Shell, not I; I bolded to accentuate her words then responded to them, and have nothing further to add on the teleprompter shatter thing (I posted vid link twice) other that I find it highly unlikely, personally, but to each their own.

Ok, as you wish, and I did not link a bandage vid, I said "he is still wearing a bandage, small though it may be, it was said via unlinked hearsay."

I can accept that it might not...IF it were shattered, which it appears not to be in the video...show your proof that is was during the strike, then we can discuss. Glad for it to be proven wrong, but until done, best evidence I've seen so far, which is all I'm saying. And, Scripps is legit center, as far as I can tell, and generally interested in straight shooting, not conspiracies or alternative unproven theories. Regardless, are you saying you prefer the exploding ricocheting glass for whatever reason that is more plausible, likely, or just to prove there were no bullets flying from shots taken? Good with that, but it simply should not have happened at all and maybe we can agree that perhaps the SS has some explaining to do vs giving credence to some ketchup packet or other nonsense being given air. Finally, you're not saying his ear wasn't hit by something caused by the/a shooter, are you?

corrected link...center bias for Scripps...

That is a great one and I hope that is widely circulated with some specific bullet points identified in the text of P2025, which can be done!

Yes, you've made that abundantly clear.

Which is exactly what I inferred.

Yes, I'm fine without good visuals. Infections aren't my specialty.

BUT Trumpty was very definitely not wearing a bandage at the rally he did a few hours ago.

Fine for you, but not supportable, and as you said, not your specialty.

Definitely, I think not!

and...there's this...

Nope, teleprompters are located in front of Trump, not even close to being possible to have impacted the right side of his head on his ear!

Always a suspect narrator, for sure, but wow, you seem to have worked up a nice harsh on this with your definitive pronouncements, and what "breakthrough" that was not part of the write up? And the bandage is off and the ear seems to you to be ok without good visuals? I wouldn't want this to have happened to me, or you, or anyone for that matter, and yes, he is still wearing a bandage, small though it may be, it was said via unlinked hearsay.

Forgive the messenger, but...
https://www.aol.com/news/trumps-former-physician-gives-details-204731156.html

Trae can rip a quick and hot run down, no teleprompter needed...

Cannon dismisses entire classified documents case!

Yeah, but look at all the crap sold there

https://www.merrickmint.com/catalogsearch/result/index/?limit=64&p=1&q=donald+trump

Agree per norm, but allowing for the distinct possibility and capability to adjust to and for a range of imitations, inflections, other impersonations and traits wouldn't be out of the question?

See below and I don't know what you're waiting for as I responded to your query which wasn't worth responding to, but I did, and here's the recap for you. Pay closer attention.

rooster
Re: longrider51 post# 483936
Thursday, July 11, 2024 5:06:17 PM
Post# of 483939
Well? I’m waiting
*****
longrider51
Re: rooster post# 483932
Thursday, July 11, 2024 5:03:56 PM
Post# of 483939
The last time I checked Joe Biden is still our President. Dig it?
*****
rooster
Re: longrider51 post# 483929
Thursday, July 11, 2024 4:53:14 PM
Post# of 483939
And is Joe able to continue being the president?

The last time I checked Joe Biden is still our President. Dig it?

What a weak effort of just more deflection and wanna be projection vs. lack of substantive rebuttal. Nice of you to show that none exists. Your Teflon is wearing thin.

So, you, sir chickenshit, are obediently complicit in another of his universal lies...check! Facts and evidence be damned! Just mouth off another deflection and non-denial. Suck up, syncophant!

Hellooooooooooo...wake up yardbird! It was recorded at a Heritage Foundation dinner in April '22 where he was the keynote speaker. Refute that!

By the way, here's the transcript of the evening's remarks including Trampy's remarks. Funny how he says Herigage (sic), then goes back and gives it another try and does a little better...what a comedian!

https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-delivers-keynote-speech-in-florida-4-21-22-transcript

Excerpt 46:24..."Because our country is going to hell. The critical job of institutions, such as Heritage to lay the groundwork. And Heritage does such an incredible job at that. And I’m telling you, with Kevin and the staff, and I met so many of them now, I took pictures with among the most handsome, beautiful people I’ve ever seen. I didn’t like that picture. If you could lose that picture, please would you Kevin? But this is a great… No, he says I won’t do that. But this is a great group. And they’re going to lay the groundwork and detail plans for exactly what our movement will do and what your movement will do when the American people give us a colossal mandate to save America and that’s coming. That’s coming. Because nobody can stand what’s happening right now. Only a fool, only a fool or somebody that hates our country could like what’s happening right now."