iclight. Uclight in the tunnel, but it is not the light of a trainwreck in flames that you think (and gleefully hope) urcing but its the NWBO locomotive ponderously approaching u as it nears the end of its long and successful journey to the MHRA and LICENCING.

Interestingly the commentary is voiced by a Brit even though the video is produced in the USA ("tumor" not "tumour"). Can it be that just as Brits make the best villains in films (eg Alan Rickman as Hans Gruber in "Diehard"), they are perceived as more trustworthy when promoting something?

This is why he and his company must be taken to court, either by NWBO or the Fiduciary Authorities, to show to his Floridian neighbours and the world at large just what a dishonest and venal individual he is. His reputation must be trashed.

Wannabe - you ask "How hard is it to import frozen material?". The answer is clearly "Harder than you think".

So, Maverick, if your confident statement of future fact isn't precognition, its the second - "... your willfully biased assessment to bolster your own personal beliefs and/or investment strategy?"

Am I right or am I right?

Thanks, Hoff; I was thinking of opening a book on whether Mavericks statement was precognition or self-serving FUD but quickly realised that the odds of it being the first were longer than the possibility of the tinfoil helmet curing GBM.

Maverick, "Nothing will happen in November and more excuses will be delivered in December again. Another lost year with false promises by management."

Is this precognition or just your wilfully biased assessment to bolster your own personal beliefs and/or investment strategy?

I think that we should be told!

Don't be childish and ridiculous!

A very supportive commentary on the delay of the submission to the MHRA in today's Seeking Alpha by Avisol Capital Partners.

Of course, I don't have a grasp of what this stuff really means. That's why I asked.

Now, from what you are saying, I can presume that the FDA made a preliminary assessment on the results so far and judges that the therapeutic appears not only to be a significant advance in its field but also is more likely to succeed. It will, therefore, pull out all the stops to get it through the rest of the regulatory process without undue delay.

If that is correct, I thank you.

It sounds very impressive:

With Robert Prins as the lead investigator and with Timothy Cloughsey and Prof Linda Liau in support, it looks like it is one of the DCVax family.

Gary, I agree.

Gary, I hope that you are wrong with your suggestion of a possible "small confirmational trial" which would delay the institution of what is fast becoming recognised as a far more effective combination therapy. This would leave patients solely with unassisted DCVax-L treatment which at best has modest (but highly significant) benefits as compared with the current S.O.C.

I suspect that denying those with GBM from receiving the much more effective combination treatment (until all the small trial's "i"s had been dotted and all the "t"s had been crossed) would cause something of an uproar from patients and their families directed at the Regulatory Authorities. They would find it difficult to provide an adequately persuasive reason for denying patients a very effective treatment when all those patients could instead be receiving that combination treatment thereby providing the data which could inform whether or not to licence the combination therapy.

Gary, I agree that the regulators are sensible and honest enough not to exclude poly-ICLC and/or pembrolizumab from licences involving DCVax-L. I believe that at worst they would give a provisional licence for the inclusion of both drugs with DCVax-L in the treatment of GBM with the proviso that the combinations would be reviewed in several years time. By then it should be clear whether the combinations work better than DCVax-L alone or not.

I am also blocked (by Cloudflare) when I use the > or links.

Too true, TC.

thanks Aß,
My problem was how to add such things as accents (eg, acute, grave and circumflex - as in née, élèvé,and fenêtre ) to letters on this board, so that instead of ending up with "touche" I would have the "touché" that I was seeking instead. As you may surmise, I now have more than one relatively easy ways of being able to do this thanks to the help of quite a number of helpful participants on this board.
Notwithstanding that, many thanks for your interest.
Best wishes, and à la perchoine! (as the locals in my part of the world are wont to say.

Hi, Hb. Thanks for your suggestion but regrettably I'm somewhat of a dinosaur when it comes to electronic messaging devices and have only a desktop PC running on Windows 9 and the level of sophistication needed for an easy workaround for my problem does not exist. I have found (since I put out my cry for help) that the only way I could get where I want to be using the bits and bobs on my system is to open up the symbols page in MSWord and put the symbol I need into a document, then copy and paste it into the message on this site - but there are only so many hours in the day!
Anyway, thanks for your interest in my problem.
Best wishes.

Thanks, Swordsman, for your suggestion. Although I use keystrokes (eg ctrl plus ^ for a circumflex accent, etc) to put accents etc. into Word documents, unfortunately they do not work for me on this site using a PC running on Windows. However, many thanks for your help.
Best wishes.

Thanks, Vector, my misunderstanding of your previous message and now, Hey Presto ° é ! Á É Í etc.
Now all I have to do is either learn them all or coy them down on a piece of paper (probably the latter as my memory cannot be trusted!
Many thanks

Thanks Doc,

I've copied the é from VectorWaveRider's message and, lo and behold, it works - Touché

Thanks for the suggestion, and thanks to all those others who've passed on hints for taking the trouble to address my problem.

Best wishes to all.

Floreat NWBO and all its true investors

Hi Vector, Thanks for the suggestion but unfortunately Alt 0233 stays as Alt 0233. However, the é in your message copies and pastes as é (sic) and so I'll have to build up a store of such accents etc that I cannot produce with the system that I have in my PC. Thanks for your interest.

Thanks, Biosect, but I only have a desktop PC running Windows on which, as you point out, Microsoft wasn't all that bothered with such things as accents, diaeresis et al. However, many thanks for your help.

Thanks, Dude. Unfortunately I do not have an i-phone or any Apple products, only a desktop PC running Windows. However, thanks for the advice.

Thanks, Swordman. Unfortunately, although that method works for MS Word, it doesn't for messages on this board.

Hey Dude, How did you get this site to accept an acute accent over the "e" (aka "e-acute accent") of

Shows the evidence on which you base this claim:

Visceration: "Removal of the bowels and other organs from the abdominal cavity, usually from a living animal".
Citadel does so amazingly well with its investments and its share-trading that its leader, Ken Griffin, must have some way of foretelling the future. I suspect he is a Haruspex (a practitioner of haruspicy - the ancient Roman art of foretelling the future by the inspection of the entrails of a viscerated animal) and so now he will know where his own future lies having been able to inspect his own befouled entrails following their visceration by the law.

Er, Um - how embarrassing!!
Sorry, Dude. I went all over their site looking for any reference to or appertaining to DCVax - including the photo on your page - and failed to see (despite all my looking) that the main picture on the opening page was what I was looking for. I can't even blame my eyesight 'cos I was wearing my reading glasses so I reckon that I must be suffering from incipient terminal stupidity.
Better sign off now before I forget what I'm doing.

I would have been much happier to read in the description of immunotherapy something that actually went some way to describing NWBO's proven methodology for DCVax's production rather than:

Pompous prig.

"ExWannabe & LC", The Comedy Duo you all love .... to hate!
EW: "I say, I say, I say, Old Chap; Have you heard the one about the investors pre-selling shares?"
LC: "No, Old Fellow, I haven't heard the one about investors pre-selling shares."
EW: "Well, they will only be short for a few days so the interest hardly matters!"
LC: "Good Heavens!! We'll see if Thermo takes a board seat this time around"! [Eye rolls and all the FUDSTERS fall about hysterically laughing as they frantically search for shares to cover their incipient ruination.]

hi ex, this is nothing to do with NWBO but is a bit of ephemera relating to Jaguar.
Jaguar Motors was originally called the "Swallow Sidecar Co." initially based in Blackpool, a seaside resort in the northwest of England, and was so named because it made side-cars for motor bike combinations. In 1928 it moved to the industrial city of Coventry and started making high-powered cars adopting the name Jaguar for their models.
Its first sports car was the "SS Jaguar 100" produced from 1935 to 1940 when production ceased and the company turned to war-work producing parts for the Spitfire, the Lancaster and the Mosquito. After the war it restarted producing cars (the XK120 was the first) in 1948, changing the firm's name from "Swallow Sidecars" to "Jaguar" because of the connotations that "SS" (its brand name) raised - it did not think that being linked to the German Schutzstaffel would be good for business.

So, LC, claiming a lie is just a different opinion despite overwhelming proof that the lie is a lie is a lie thereby providing you with a Get-Out-Of-Gaol-Free-Card shows just how corrupted your morals (or, more charitably, your thought processes) are. I doubt that you in all honesty (hand-on-your-heart, cross-your-heart-and-hope-to-die) could accept this as moral justification for the misleading claims which you continue to churn out ad nauseam.

That's as nebulous a claim as one could expect to read on this forum in the course of a lifetime!

"Mockery" that's all that you have left by way of an answer! You're blown.

Ho!, Ho!, Ho!, Ho! - "Pot calling the kettle black", if ever there was one!