Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
this post has nothing to do with original topic - you claimed Arland sold initially back to Alpha but filings stated otherwise & then you seemed to insinuate dilution had something to do with company failing to provide accounting of his sells when that would have only increased his preferred conversion etc like it did with Sileas shares.
either you are playing some sort of game or you really don't understand that the dilution & preferreds blah-blah have nothing to do with anything here. SEC requires companies to inform their investors of all material events/changes. Arland selling would most certainly qualify as a material event/change. Not to mention, legit companies do not just drop insider with $15+ from filings without any explanation.
Bottom line - "IF" Arland was in fact dumb enough to still be holding (which is not likely given this shyster's background & connection to these other insider shysters) & he sold after 2011 10K report then company was required to provide an accounting of dates that he sold, period.
And hey - already posted the "fully diluted" O/S along with company 2 Bil A/S awhile back & the O/S reported in 2012 filing not anywhere near 700M so.
ah yeah - still looking to see link to filing from you to back up your claim that shows Arland's departure date and or sales that would prove he has less than 11,148,935 (5.69%) company had him down for end of 2011 before they just dropped him and added Alpha so ya got one???
Additionally, you definitely might wanna research Arie Rabinowitz (LH Financial - Arland Holdings - Momona) if you honestly think/believe for one minute he is still holding onto any shares here which is just too funny!!
lol you are STILL not addressing initial post question which was >> gotta link to filing that shows Arland's departure date along with dates of his 15+M sales as most legit companies do provide this information to their investors?
Next - you must have missed several of my posts b/c unlike others that lost their "arse" in this second investor rip-off, i was not one of them & my loss was actually quite small but did take a year to work my way out, which gave me plenty of time to research the shyster insiders running this company that have a very long history of ripping investors off & never making anyone but themselves money so might wanna stop using this one on me!
lol note 4 & 10 have nothing at all to do with my post question concerning Arland,so let's try to stay focused here!! SO AGAIN >>> gotta link to filing that shows Arland's departure date along with date (s) for this insider's $15+M sales that legit companies provide to their investors??
And hey, math is not one of my strengths but i believe that contrary to your claims, 11,148,935 most certainly was more than 5% of the 139+M O/S back in 2011. Which by the way, is the same number of shares listed in his initial 2009 13G filing that company just kept bringing forward before dropping that $15+M & listing Alpha in his place. Imo, Arland is many things but DUMB isn't one of those things & i tend to believe that he sold with the pack back in 2009/10 & has been long gone!!
2011 10K - 4 >> Represents shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of preferred stock held by the stockholder. Sileas Corporation holds 90% or 926 of the preferred shares which are convertible into 37,040,000 common shares. Alpha Capital owns the remaining 10% or 101 preferred shares convertible into 4,040,000 common shares, representing less than 2.13% total beneficially ownership.
10 >> Shows effect if all preferred shares were converted at $.01 if the conversion price is lowered pursuant to the ratchet provision in the Series A preferred stock certificate of designation if the offering covered by this registration statement is commenced. -- pg.67 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1397016/000114420411071709/v243906_10k.htm
5/14/09 Arland 13 G filing
ITEM 4 OWNERSHIP
(a) AMOUNT BENEFICIALLY OWNED: 11,148,935 Shares of Common Stock
(b) PERCENT OF CLASS: 7.88% -- https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1397016/000121390009001143/sc13g0509_arland.htm
gotta link to company filing explaining this insider's departure along with when he sold his $15+ Mil b/c legit companies do not just drop an insider from their filings without providing an accounting lol
Not to mention, if your logic even applied here with Arland then one has to wonder why they even bothered to outline Alpha's buys/sells!!
lol very true >> rip-offs do happen, especially when dealing with a group of insiders that have done nothing but rip their investors off at every company where they have played together.
And hey, my opinion is no more wrong than yours have been & just might be why this OTC company dropped Arland & His 15+M from filings without any explanation.
lol Again, you are missing the point so knock yourself out with your opinions that will probably end in the same way as those opinions before you b/c everyone knows >> this is a scam company that has ripped their investors off twice now. And since you like opinions, here is mine >> Arland probably sold his 15+ Mil with everyone else soon after company went public but company continued to list him on paper until Alpha was ready to step back in.
Good that you finally see this BUT once again, you are making yet another claim without any filing to back it up. Unlike you, i do not trust OPXS filings and for good reasons - like this current situation that has investors filling in the blanks with their opinions. However, "IF" i did trust the filings then clearly, the company would take precedence over someone posting on a message board and contrary to your newest claim, company listed Arland Holding's @ 5.69% for the 10/11 period that they signed and filed with SEC on 12/27/11.
Bottom line, still does not negate the fact that this OTC company just dropped this insider from their filings without any explanation about him or his 15+ Mil, which clearly indicates selective SEC reporting that is quite common down here in the wild west, period.
Nice try but we started this little dance back in 12/17 & Arland's ownership just being dropped from filings without any explainable was the topic & the following reflects what you were claiming just a few months ago which concerned the commons NOT the preferred shares & is a claim that you have yet to produce a filing to back up. However, i opted to produced filings that support my claim so...
here is a repeat of ownership post with note 4 listed in both 10K's along with Arland's 13 G/A SEC filing that contrary to your claims, he obviously was required to file as an owner.
As note 4 under Alrland's ownership in 12/11 10K reflects, Alpha's 10% (101 preferred shares) was listed & that # was decreased to 97 after his conversion of 3.64 shares along with conversion amounts for both Alpha & Sileas increasing in 12/12 10K.
Bottom line and contrary to intial claims, there is no reference to Alpha repurchasing the shares he allegedly sold to Arland in 2008 so i think you may want to stop making these claims UNLESS you can present a filing to prove your claim as a fact, period
12/11 10K - 5% holder Arland Holdings
# of shares = 11,148,935
preferred conversion = 4619,296
combined ownership = 15,768, 231
% of O/S = 5.69% --
4 Represents shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of preferred stock held by the stockholder. Sileas Corporation holds 90% or 926 of the preferred shares which are convertible into 37,040,000 common shares. Alpha Capital owns the remaining 10% or 101 preferred shares convertible into 4,040,000 common shares, representing less than 2.13% total beneficially ownership -- pg 67 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1397016/000114420411071709/v243906_10k.htm
Arland holdings 13 G/A Filing - https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1397016/000121390009001377/sc13ga1_arland.htm
12/12 10K - " On February 22, 2012, Alpha Capital Anstalt purchased 5,000,000 restricted shares of Common Stock of Registrant at a purchase price of $0.01 per share, for a total purchase price of $50,000.The purchase price for the Common Stock was negotiated on February 2, 2012 when the stock price was $0.01. The $50,000 has been utilized by Optex Systems Holdings for operating expenses. On August 22, 2012, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted 3.64 preferred shares at a stated value of $6,860.34 into 2,500,000 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.01 per share for a total converted value of $25,000. The Common Stock was purchased or converted by Alpha in private transactions exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1934 and is restricted from resale and the stock certificate issued bears the appropriate restrictive legend.
5% Holders Alpha Capital (1)
# of shares = 7,500,000
preferred conversion = 66,789,526
combined ownership = 74,289,526
% of O/S = 8.56% --
4 Represents shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of preferred stock held by the stockholder. Sileas Corporation holds 90% or 926 of the preferred shares which are convertible into 635,267,484 common shares. Alpha Capital Anstalt owns the remaining 10% or 97 preferred shares convertible into 66,789,526 common shares -- pgs 56 & 68 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1397016/000114420412068723/v330201_10k.htm
Will help you out here b/c know there is nothing indicating that Alpha repurchased shares from Arland. Not to mention, Arland had 11,148,935 shares & Alpha clearly did not purchase this amount plus makes absolutely no sense for Arland (a business man) to purchase shares from Alpha in 2008 & then sell them back to Alpha in 2012 without making some sort of profit lol
" On February 22, 2012, Alpha Capital Anstalt purchased 5,000,000 restricted shares of Common Stock of Registrant at a purchase price of $0.01 per share, for a total purchase price of $50,000.The purchase price for the Common Stock was negotiated on February 2, 2012 when the stock price was $0.01. The $50,000 has been utilized by Optex Systems Holdings for operating expenses. On August 22, 2012, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted 3.64 preferred shares at a stated value of $6,860.34 into 2,500,000 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.01 per share for a total converted value of $25,000. The Common Stock was purchased or converted by Alpha in private transactions exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1934 and is restricted from resale and the stock certificate issued bears the appropriate restrictive legend.
12/12 10K - 5% Holders Alpha Capital (1)
# of shares = 7,500,000
preferred conversion = 66,789,526
combined ownership = 74,289,526
% of O/S = 8.56% -- pgs 56 & 68 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1397016/000114420412068723/v330201_10k.htm
12/11 10K - 5% holder Arland Holdings
# of shares = 11,148,935
preferred conversion = 4619,296
combined ownership = 15,768, 231
% of O/S = 5.69% -- pg 67 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1397016/000114420411071709/v243906_10k.htm
Not interested in opinions SO ONCE AGAIN >> got a link to filing with page number to back up your claim that Arland in fact sold the shares he allegedly purchased from Alpha in 2008 back to Alpha 4 years later which i believe is when Arland's ownership was dropped from filings.
lol like i said in post, other smaller companies have been moving up & if what you are saying now is true then not sure why you even posted about the possibility of world conflict having any bearing on this small micro cap company!! Additionally, you wouldn't see insiders/hedge funds etc selling unless they filed 13F or form 4's which is not common for OPXS. Looks like there is only one here now that uses form 4 and he has already sold some if not all of his OPXS ownership.
PS - if you check Arland filings, you will see that he has filed nothing in relation to his $15+M ownership that company just dropped from their OTC filings lol
ah hello, insider's selling etc has nothing at all to do with the lack of buying/volume that has increased for other defense companies since threats of war. Additionally, last div payment has already occurred so insider's selling today had nothing to do with it and if you read my post then you saw that i said those 30 100 share sells within 2 minutes was the first time i had seen that happen here.
Not sure how your post relates to my post because even "IF" what you say is true in relation to Alpha selling which we will not know until next filing then still does not have anything to do with the fact that other defense stocks are up significantly with orange man's war treat tweets while the "new & improved" OPXS is still hanging out right where it always hangs out >> the gutter. Not to mention & don't feel like digging back but believe you did post some things about conflict in the world helping OPXS that i let you know has not changed anything here so now you know it doesn't lol
once again, the "new & improved" OPXS not doing much while other defense stocks (inc/smaller companies) are moving up nice since orange man's twitter alerts!
selling continues BUT real strange today & don't remember seeing a day like this one in the past. 32 sells between 12:32/35 & with the exception of 2 1500K sells the other 30 sells were 100 shares each so what's up with that??
think they might have meant "sell recommendation" b/c as usual, their recommendations don't do much for this scam which the $35+k sell vol today clearly reflects! Although - 100 share vol yesterday was all buying vol lol
let's see what you are saying another year from now b/c this isn't the first company these shysters have "cleaned up" in order to give themselves more play time lol
lol you keep posting >> "I never would have touched this with potential share issuance toxicity" so you wait to touch it when most are not touching it due to company past & 2 investor rip offs etc b/c most recognize the likelihood of it happening a THIRD time is a given, especially when you consider the shady insiders running this company that have never made their investors any money at any company where they have all played together. So like i said, to each his/her own.
lol "cleaned up" via another round of toxic financing along with r/s & SECOND investor rip off which are not good signs for the majorities of smart money investors. Plus cannot trust OTC filings that just drop insider & his $15+M without any explanation BUT to each his/her own.
posts concerning news/contracts relating to OPXS customer base, along with the conflicts in various parts of the world etc, etc has clearly not benefited OPXS throughout the years & still not seeing much of a change in this respect - same old OPXS lol
Havta ask b/c never quite got why others in the past posted old news so maybe you can explain what bearing this almost 1 year old news has or has had on OPXS?
my turn >> no worries, you didn't cause any confusion & i saw that <SMH> today & thanks to dloggold i knew what it meant :)
3/13 Tues - 42+% (25,361) short vol from 59,518 total vol (16,500 buy vol --- 43,018 sell vol --- range $1.00/05
20180313|OPXS|25361|0|59518|O http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20180313.txt
3/12 Mon - 48+% (6,500) short vol from 13,362 total vol
20180312|OPXS|6500|0|13362|O http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20180312.txt
3/9 Fri - 15+% (1,955) short vol from 12,573 total vol (2,055 buy vol --- 10,518 sell vol --- range $1.02/03)
20180309|OPXS|1955|0|12573|O http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20180309.txt
lol if you have whole lot of time and want to understand clearly what's going on, this thread from beginning to end is quite detailed, informative and long and you will learn much about shorting as it relates to this trash.
lol well at least i got 2 of the 3 words right!!
rotfl - woulda never figured that one so thanks for breaking it down for me! learn something new every day.
lol translation needed >> <SMH> ?? eom = end of month?
not seeing that kind of vol yet to indicate insiders selling @ these levels & believe this will probably be heading higher.
lol my opinion has not changed over the years & MS was/is a poster boy & was much easier to spank than the bigger WS fraudsters & know i wasn't the only one making $ when he was running this show!!
ut-oh - you are sounding a bit like someone else living over there on that dark side lol. Seriously though, they are still pulling rabbits out of their hats & contrary to an opinion/prediction, this is still not in subber land & seems to be holding up pretty well, especially given all company has been through so far. Came close to breaking my rule awhile back but decided to wait until it breaks $1 to pick up some :)
thurs 3/8 - 8,000 shares short vol from 8,543 total vol (7,100 buy vol --- 1,443 sell vol -- range $1.01/05
20180308|OPXS|8000|0|8543|O http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20180308.txt
Wed 3/7 - 100 shares short vol from 100 total vol (100 sell vol @ $1.01)
20180307|OPXS|100|0|100|O http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20180307.txt
lol "Fire fish i think you would be better on a hot grill!" -- is looking like some OPXS investors are already on that hot grill & getting ready to be fried with a THIRD investor rip off. "They" (whoever they are) say >> you can't teach stupid...
sheesh - not the point so i suggest that you read what was initially stated & stop clogging the board with "incorrect interpretations".
get real - anyone with eyes can see there were filings as the first excerpt along with SEC link posted for you 12/17 clearly reflects. Additionally & since you clearly do not wanna take the time to educate yourself via reading this entire thread, went back to pull another post showing an additional filing that has also been removed by these shysters in their "clean-up" work & they misspelled Arland's name in that filing lol
lol if you had bothered to follow my suggestion & read the entire thread then you would see that OPXS most certainly did have a filing that stated Optex DE issued shares to Arland that has since been removed in their recent "clean-up" work. Not to mention, you did did not dispute the SEC linked filing i posted as per your request in Dec but did get into debating when those shares were issued to Arland b/c filing had stated "As of December 28, 2008, shares were issued to Longview/Arland & this was your reasoning for that one >>
lol already covered this one around the end of Dec after you asked for link to filings due to links in my Dirt post being changed, remember? Can see where i discovered OPXS had been removing & adding new filings here https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=137235441 which had me looking for original link to SEC filing that i posted here for you that clearly showed that Optex DE had issued shares to Arland & has been posted/disputed over & over since then too https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=137259986