Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I don't see why he hates on MMMG so much. He still plays their stocks... Either way I believe we will be making some serious money here in the future. TCU has a vast ammount of partners, if they started taking positions we would be in good hands IMO. For all we know the float could already be in the process of being bought up by the partners. If that is the case when we run we will run harder and drop less during accumulation and profit taking.
Pictures from the OTCVERIFY report
There are more pictures in the report, but these are most of them. There are also pictures of different magazine articles, awards, and other proof of TCU's existence.
Looks like we may see a dividend in the future...
I believe this could be a sign of good times ahead....
After that report it will be a lot harder for some to convince others that TCU is a scam...
Does the report have any picture documentation? Tia
Interesting article tweeted by MeshGlobal. Breaks down current network technologies and explains how to build a 4G modem..
http://www.edn.com/article/517825-DSPs_power_the_race_to_4G.php
It appears you are knowledgeable. Can you give me some links where I can read more?
Have you heard of the WSC (white space coalition)?
There aren't any devices that can handle 10-50mbps?
I don't know.. Website launched yesterday with claims the reports are done yet no one has received one yet.
Well, ya...
FINRA just tweeted this
Just here to help.
It's funny how you correct my grammar but you don't know how to use a comma...
I want to see the report first... They have yet to make them available..
You like hanging out on the admin board, huh? You are amongst your people...
So sorry I made a mistake... Between school, work, and trading my head tends to get a little over worked. I am glad THERE are people as nice as you to help us little folk out.
Just like a basher to focus on the irrelevant details.
Have you read what being verified means?
You are missing my point. I do not want admin to moderate based on fact, that is obviously not plausible. What would be nice is the ability to challenge claims without heavy censorship from admin or mod squad. Asking someone to provide facts to support their claim should be allowed. Also when a poster posts the same message day in and day out how does that add to the conversation? If I remember right if a post does not add value to the conversation it can be considered off topic? Per TOS
Allowing someone to visit a board everyday and call the company a scam or the next Microsoft should not be allowed. It is spam and adds no value to a healthy debate.
This site is the breading ground for bashers/shorters. Once a short seller learns that he can come to Ihub and say anything he wants to drive the PPS down, why wouldn't he?
I guess your house your rules... It would be nice to come to a place where people have to support their evidence whether it come from a pumper or a basher. Slippery slope letting anyone post information as fact. Could be libel and slanderous...
well i must be in that 2%
No just curious why their tends to be favoritism towards bashers.. Its not an even playing field here..
You have too much time on your hands
Why does Ihub support bashing?!? How many lawsuits do you need?
I would like to see us break into those .004s today
I suspect once the OTCverify report is released we will learn more.
Either have I. At least we are verified. From the looks of what it takes the report could build some confidence..
Has anyone gotten the actual report?
Jess read post 25778 and really think about it. You used this post to try and prove there are MMs but if MMs can't hold inventory how can their be a Market Maker. It's like a baker with absolutely no tools.. MMs can't hold inventory for MOPN so they don't hence why there are no MMs.
Jess you are confused. What you referenced are screen shots of level 2 which has nothing to do with whether a stock has MMs or not. If you place an order for MOPN it goes straight to the market and does not get processed by a MM. MM's hold inventory to make a market when there isn't one. No MM is holding inventory for MOPN and level 2 just shows retail orders. If I put an order in for instance, the MMID ETMM would be on L2 with my order but it is just a computer matching my price with some other persons price. No middle man. Sorry you wasted your time going through all those posts. L2 still looks similar to what it used to look like..
That warning sign has up when the pps was .32
Has anyone read the report from OTCVerify yet?
Especially if any type of news comes soon forcing shorts to cover even faster.
Pr'd that one will be completed but has not been done yet
So either buy to cover or no more short selling
Nope they didn't. I am not sure what it takes to get MMs
Essentially a short squeeze??
I really don't know..
There are no MMs so whatever MMID you see is representative of individual buyers and sellers
One idea I have... Boost mobile uses Sprints network, that we know. What if Sprint and Clear's vision for the future is one comprised of many smaller mobile companies offering specialized services? One way they could compete against the larger companies is if they continue to ration off their network to these smaller companies and collect licensing fees.
I can see more way than one in how we could fit in.
How can you push back a quarter?