Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Last post was from Cicso appeal case
Court of Appeals Docket #: 18-1886 Docketed: 04/26/2018
ChanBond, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Appeal From: United States Patent and Trademark Office
I found something for the date of 10/4 entered on pacer 9/13 (link below and text copied below)
Anybody think this is of any significant value? Maybe?
https://ecf.cafc.uscourts.gov/n/beam/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=CaseSummary.jsp?caseNum=18-1886&dktType=dktPublic&incOrigDkt=Y&incDktEntries=Y
09/13/2018 17 MOTION of Appellant ChanBond, LLC to extend the time to 10/04/2018 to file the Opening Brief. [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 09/13/2018 by email. [549574] [18-1886] [Robert Whitman] [Entered: 09/13/2018 03:14 PM]
09/13/2018 18 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file appellant's opening brief [17] filed by Appellant ChanBond, LLC. The brief is due 10/04/2018. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [549576] [MJL] [Entered: 09/13/2018 03:21 PM]
I think Evilbean is referring to the next message he sent that day about UOIP and Carter did this right by going dark and not giving the 13 any info. And he then mentions a settlement might be right around the corner. Maybe that is the 10/4 date. We are near a settlement. I am getting as excited as jbbb.
Yes as Evilbean mention....Thank You. I think I might believe you.
It would be nice if you could post a screenshot or picture of the email (blacking out any personal info) so we can see this email too. I understand if you don't want to but it sure would help the believability of such an email. You'd want proof just the same, wouldn't you?
Yes, that is true. Trading on greys starting 10/3. I actually meant off the greys but that seems not likely to happen.
Maybe he has all the paperwork in order or in some other way convinced the SEC to let us trade again.
One question to you though. How did he know Rob's hang in there to you? Did you mention it to William. That seems odd unless you put it in your email to him.
001's hitting. Nice L2. Go BLDV!
How about if it is written into UOIP's last 10Q!
Please see last paragraph in these filings in Note 1 as pasted below with link to filings. At least this is UOIP's filings acknowledging ownership and the patents and lawsuit. Is that enough proof?
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=11200129&guid=yEJZU6F-Mg-8xth
On October 27, 2015, the Company acquired 100% of the membership interest ChanBond, LLC (ChanBond) (see Note 18), a portfolio of patents that disclose a technology that allows cable companies to provide high-speed data transmission over their existing hybrid-fiber coaxial networks. ChanBond contends that virtually every cable multi-system operator (MSO) in the U.S. utilizing DOCSIS 3.0+ is infringing upon its patents, accordingly on September 21, 2015 ChanBond filed lawsuits in U.S. District Court in Delaware against the 13 largest cable MSOs in the country (See Note 18).
To confirm the state, I wonder if it is worth it to call the transfer agent listed with OTC to see if they have any info?
Olde Monmouth Stock Transfer Co., Inc.
Transfer Agent
200 Memorial Pkwy
Atlantic Heights, NJ 07716
(732) 872-2727
www.oldemonmouth.com
If you go to this contract
http://www.getfilings.com/sec-filings/151124/UnifiedOnline-Inc_10-Q/uoip_ex102.htm
and see schedule 2.2.7
look at section 5.1 and it states Delaware
Also a page before that 2.2.3 Unified Online BOD resolutions it states Delaware also with bylaws of the corp and General Corporate Law in the State of Delaware.
This contract is a lot to read and I stared with the schedules at the back. Not sure if this is all we need for the actual shareholders, but I'll post if I see anything else.
Sorry I can't cut and paste any of this.
I think this is the link referred to. The date of event at top of form is for 10/26/2014.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=11010807&guid=RxgZUn_Awxmovth
Agreed! Long UOIP!
I too worry about retaining a lawyer. What is the first thing you do if someone starts taking action against you? You scramble to start defending yourself. I am worried that the defense for them would be we knew what we bought both good and bad. We (most of us) intentionally bought a buyer beware company that was not being promoted in any way. That's the bad. The good is the huge money we stand to gain here. I am very long knowing the risk of losing my investment is greatly offset by this huge opportunity of a once and a lifetime case.
Once legal action is taken or even the appearance of legal action by shareholders, I am worried this could start a self defense legal action on the other side, and we will really get lowballed - current share price at time of halt.
For the longs that are here for the big payoff, that will hurt.
Hopefully any action by us, the shareholders is done non threatening, until it needs to be threatening and right now it doesn't. This is what we bought. I don't really even see legal action for anyone to bought the skull and crossbones stock.
Most wouldn't buy a stock in this status, but we have more going for us than most stocks and we were not tricked into buying this so I'd say there is no legal action here.
I get we have rights but how far do rights go with a non reporting CE stock and I am worried this will trigger an action by Chanbond/Carter to get rid of the shareholders; and if we get current price as of now, it seems legal to me but we miss out in the long run.
Also I don't think this is like some halted CE stocks that have actual criminal CEO's and fake promotions that mislead stockholders so I am wondering if the SEC may be more lenient on us as in not halting the stock altogether. I am really hopeful on this. We will at worst end up on the grey market and still trade.
Right, Carter and the inventors are in same situation as us. If they get paid, should we also get paid?
Does anyone see a way Carter and other large shareholders would get paid and leave us with nothing?
Even if we are revoked, but I think we will trade on grey market until this settles or 2020, another poster mention we could get paid in a dividend if the stock is actually halted. Remember Carter needs his money too, or am I missing another way he could get paid.
I am surprised we haven't heard anything from Carter even if it isn't his place. He is the guy that could make it happen.
This adds hope. Obviously they had plans for this and who would have done that? Carter? Any hope in if you raise the AS, you have some kind of interest in the company and that should be the motivation to get this taken care of.
It also could have been the catalyst for the sec to take action, maybe? Either way I think this is good news there are plans for UOIP.
Not sure if the will would have anything but your mention of lawyer got me thinking. Not Rob's lawyer for his will but UOIP's lawyer. We need to find out who that was - if they had one, and if they have any info that could help us. Of course the lawyer would be under no obligation to help us but any info would help.
Also the poster that mentioned contacting the former CFO might be the best bet if we can't contact Carter.
Us shareholders need to act in our best interest and stay on top of this. 10 days can go by really fast for a busy executive not involved in day to day dealings and before you know it time's up and there are years of financials not produced yet. If they are going to get current, they need to start this asap if not. (my feeling is not)
I really do feel this wasn't Carter's area of interest in day to day dealings with UOIP and getting current. But under the new circumstances, it would be in his interest to get these shares current again. And it is in our best interest to be proactive in making sure we have tried everything we can.
2 officers listed per OTC Markets site are:
Robert M. Howe, III
CEO
Ellen Sondee
CFO
Per this 8K Sondee resigned and was not replaced 4/2016
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=11335321&guid=OIAZUHypngRIvth
Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
On April 26, 2016, Ellen Sondee, working through Scale Finance, tendered her resignation as Chief Financial Officer of UnifiedOnline, Inc. (the “Corporation”).
The Corporation has not yet replaced Ms. Sondee so I would say there are no remaining officers in UOIP to take care of things. Hopefully Carter has an outside acctg firm or lawyers to handle this. But I am sure we are headed to grey market since it has been neglected up to date. see no other filings or news on any replacements.
I am still long on UOIP and am hopeful this won't effect end outcome and Carter/Chanbond are not crooks and will do the right thing. Still depressing though.
I remember it being said on here about not going dark but it was also said it could go dark. This was still a risk.
The CE status was a risk of halt or suspension and I think we all knew that, plus don't invest more than you can afford to lose, plus they could lose the case. This was a gamble play and still is if you believe in Chanbond and the lawsuit.
The poster saying this isn't a company is wrong.
I do get this halt is not a good thing but there is nothing you can do about it for 10 days and after that you are limited.
I am riding this out to see how it plays out (unless something changes with the case). Everyone has to do what is good for them.
I have analyzed your post and it should be corrected as follows
We are legal shareholders that purchased shares in the open market from a company that does exist. The company currently is in illegal status since they have not submitted financials and taxes, and therefore was placed on a 10 day halt. Depending on how this is handled will determine how the shares will trade in the future. Either way this is handled, we should still benefit if the lawsuit ends up in a win, however the payout may be different. Stay positive at least for the 10 days.
Your original post:
We are not legal shareholders. We were sold shares in a company that legally did not exist after they lost their Corporate status for failure to submit yearly reports and pay taxes to the State of Delaware. I am sorry for all of us. You don’t buy stock in a company that does not exist legally as a Corporation.
Your assumption is that the shareholders of uoip won't get any part of the settlement so if that is true (and I don't think it is), why would Rob need to keep us happy? In that statement alone, you're saying they are connected.
Yes, maybe a shareholder with accounting background could be taken in to bring them current.
LOL that thought has crossed my mind too but didn't want to say.
Maybe one of the defendants in the case. Be tough to have to lose to a non compliant company. Also could be another tactic of defendants to disprove or delay things.
This should force UOIP's hand to get current.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1097718/000135448815004760/uoip_8k.htm
On the Closing Date, pursuant to the Agreement, the Seller executed an interest assignment deed which assigned, transferred and conveyed all of its membership interests in ChanBond to the Company and ChanBond appointed William R. Carter, Jr. (a related party to the Company) as sole manager (“Manager”) who shall have sole and exclusive authority over the business of ChanBond, in exchange for a cash payment of five million U.S. Dollars ($5,000,000) payable on or before October 27, 2020 (the “Cash Payment”) and a shares payment of forty-four million, seven hundred thousand (44,700,000) shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) par value of $0.001. The obligation to make the Cash Payment shall be evidenced by a promissory note (the “Promissory Note”).
See halt code column - 4th in from rt.
http://otce.finra.org/TradeHaltsCurrent
Is there a chance Carter is too busy to even know this is halted? Also too busy to take care of it. I wish we had a contact for him.
OK thanks. It looks to have to do with the 15c2 that Zombywolf just mentioned.
Have you ever heard of the piggyback exemption rule? Does that apply here?
The suspension mentions it is suspended until 10/2 and it also mentions it is eligible for piggyback exception rule. I am trying to research what this means. But expert opinions on this board is welcome for a faster answer.
Green again! I hope everyone held their shares. Maybe something good is coming after that shakedown.
Thanks for the clarification!
That was my thought when I saw 30 disputed documents. Must be a big dispute and they must not have been able to settle the dispute on their own - out of court.
If you look at Aug 9, that was about a discovery dispute. I can copy what I can but I don't have access to the report.
This is from Aug 9 and is referred to in today's pacer filing:
08/11/2018 295 Official Transcript of Discovery Dispute held on 08-09-18 before Judge Richard G. Andrews. Court Reporter/Transcriber Leonard A. Dibbs. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 9/4/2018. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/11/2018. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/9/2018. (lad) (Entered: 08/11/2018)
My take on this was the court will solve the dispute that came up a couple weeks ago and not regarding the entire lawsuit (just the dispute)
New info on Pacer tonight. I used cut and paste feature to copy it below:
08/30/2018 303 ORAL ORDER: Notwithstanding what the Court said on August 9, 2018, it now thinks the better course here would be for Plaintiff to promptly produce the 30 disputed documents "In Camera" and the Court will resolve the dispute. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/30/2018. (nms) (Entered: 08/30/2018)
Yes, good things coming. Should just be a matter of time now before more eyes on this and price follows.
FYI
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/DPWW/news/Diego-Pellicer-Worldwide-Inc-Announces-Fiscal-2018-Second-Quarter-Financial-Results?id=201852
Diego Pellicer Worldwide, Inc. Announces Fiscal 2018 Second Quarter Financial ResultsPress Release | 08/23/2018
SEATTLE, Aug. 23, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Diego Pellicer Worldwide, Inc. (OTCQB: DPWW), the premium marijuana brand and retail development company, today announced its financial results for the fiscal 2018 second quarter ended June 30, 2018. The company reported a net income of $1,010,752 for the six months ended June 30, 2018, and a net loss of $849,894 for the quarter ended June 30, 2018.
“It’s been a year of expansion – both in Colorado where we currently do business, and now we’re conducting due diligence and actively exploring real estate and upscale branding opportunities in California, the largest cannabis markets in the United States,” said Ron Throgmartin, chief executive officer of Diego Pellicer Worldwide, Inc. “To accelerate this development, we formed a new management company to set carefully selected operators up for success, while providing a continuous revenue stream for Diego Pellicer Worldwide, Inc.”
In July, Diego Pellicer Worldwide, Inc. announced a second store location in Denver and is currently working on the design and build-out with world-renowned architect Michael Rotondi, FAIA and original Apple store creative team member Jill Savini. Earlier this month, Diego Pellicer Worldwide, Inc. formed Diego Pellicer Management Company to license the upscale Diego Pellicer brand to qualified operators while providing expertise in retail, product and manufacturing from its accomplished executive team with extensive industry experience. As part of its management and premium branding program, Diego Pellicer Worldwide, Inc. receives royalty payments from all operators under the Diego umbrella.
Diego Pellicer Worldwide, Inc.’s full second quarter 2018 10-Q filing is available on the company’s investor site at Diego-Pellicer.com,
http://compliance-sec.com/secfilings/company/DPWW/filings.html.
About Diego Pellicer Worldwide, Inc. (OTCQB: DPWW)
Diego Pellicer Worldwide, Inc. is the premium marijuana brand and retail development company. The company actively seeks, develops and leases legally compliant real estate, including turnkey cultivation and processing facilities as well as high-end, branded retail stores to licensed marijuana operators. When federally legal, DPWW is positioned to become a national, vertically integrated marijuana company. To learn more about how to become a branded Diego Pellicer retailer, cultivator or investor visit www.Diego-Pellicer.com.
Safe Harbor Statement
Certain statements contained in this press release may be construed as "forward-looking statements" as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act"). The words "estimate," "project," "intends," "expects," "anticipates," "believes" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are made based on management's beliefs, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management pursuant to the "safe-harbor" provisions of the Act. These statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected on the basis of these statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company also undertakes no obligation to disclose any revision to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
CONTACTS:
Suzanne Herrick,
Fedoruk & Associates, Inc.,
612-247-3079,
suzanne@fedorukinc.com
Nello Gonfiantini,
Diego Pellicer Worldwide, Inc.,
775-690-2188,
nello@diego-pellicer.com
WEBSITE: www.diego-pellicer.com
Is this what they mean by working hard?
$HEMP starting to move?
I think areas of interest in latest 2 releases today and pay extra attention to are:
- The Revenue Recognition and Business Venture sections in the 6/30 Q
-The last 3 or so paragraphs in the latest news release (8/13).
If you can read between the lines, I think there is a reason to hold and see how this plays out.
I wonder if they will do a promotion on this with the release of the new shares to raise funds? Not that I want a pump and dump here but just more attention.
Info on Deal Capital Partners, LLC
https://investmentbank.com/
and
https://www.prweb.com/releases/equity-crowdfunding/investment-banking/prweb13965982.htm