Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I am still hoping that the rest of the World will see and learn the value of this and the demand will grow. We seem to be concentrating on the approval of the US authorities, but they are not the be all end all.
When there grows a demand for something, demand feeds more demand. Hopefully it can save lives all over and that will prove more powerful than any approving agency.
GLTA...
Thank you for posting that article! Question... We seem to be waiting for emergency usage approval from the US authorities... but.. it is a huge World out there. What authorities have to approve RLF-100 for European countries and the rest of the infected World? That article originated in Europe... Just seems to me that if the rest of the World starts using it and the results are excellent.. word will spread.
Rise on speculation fall on the news.. so I have heard. Hard for the little guy to compete against institutional computer driven trades... you end up trying to catch a falling knife. For me I just bought a lot more at the bottom and it is already bouncing back as typically happens. I am thinking (and that is usually a dangerous thing...) that once the news gets out to people who are seriously in danger of passing on, the demand will grow.. That may take a bit to happen. But... just speculating.. GLTA!
All good points... Thanks to all who have posted here and GLTA!
It would stand to reason that this is about the merger which I would think that they would want to complete prior to any clinical trial results being announced. If trial results are announced prior to a merger, imagine what that would do the complicate the terms of a merger once and if the SP starts to spike.
To me.. and I may be wrong... the statement in the massage saying: "Please do not ask about future clinical trial results or anticipated regulatory action because we cannot predict the future in this regard." is a disclaimer and indicates that they will not be talking about clinical trial results.
Sorry if this was already posted. A real life usage event...
https://patientdaily.com/stories/573477964-promising-drug-helps-florida-man-with-covid-19
Sorry if this has already been posted. I have been trying to keep up, but you people post a lot! LOL I like that it is available under the Right to Try Program.
NeuroRx and Relief Conclude Enrollment in their Phase 2b/3 Trial of RLF-100â„¢ for Critical COVID-19 with Respiratory Failure:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/neurorx-and-relief-conclude-enrollment-in-their-phase-2b3-trial-of-rlf-100-for-critical-covid-19-with-respiratory-failure-301199129.html
When RLF-100 becomes as common a name as is "WD-40"... all will be well... LOL
But if it proves to the World that is saves the lives of people with little else hope, that will be a Godsend...
True that. Just wondering why the company is so quiet after all the months of meetings and actual commercials.
Fastmetals... It is true as you project, but we are hearing crickets from those at the top... Why? No projections, no plans no nuting...
macd... They may be no longer in effect, but the concept and technology is still available to be used and or improved.
I have been unable to find anything regarding ABWN doing any RnD or improvements for the past state of the art of this concept.
I do remember reading something about research at a college of engineering but can not verify any of that. Still looking, but sadly, ABWN is not talking to anybody.
My one concern is that ABWN was the assignee to a couple of patents.
This one was adandoned:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20190036603A1/en?assignee=Airborne+Wireless+Network
And this one has expired since it has been around longer than the 18 year limit.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6285878B1/en?assignee=Airborne+Wireless+Network
Not sure where that leaves ABWN...
Just thoughts.. So Google is utilizing high altitude balloons to try and provide internet connection to remote areas around the globe. Very expensive and probably technically difficult. So... The question remains.. Will the ABWN technology do the same? Are there enough flights in remote areas to service such an option?
I am not saying that ABWN is involved or even interested in this.. Just throwing it out there...
Invest at your own risk..
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/world/africa/google-loon-balloon-kenya.html
Thanks macd for checking into all that!
Good questions. I would presume that if anything is happening in the background with even a patent of ABWN then silent insiders will know and a PPS change would indicate that... regardless of the rules of insider trading. Or perhaps some large new positions have already indicated a hint.. I don't follow this deeply enough to know.
Interesting article mentions ABWN
Not sure how pertinent this mention of ABWN is...
Aerospace Avionics - Market Research Report | Growth Forecast 2025
https://www.cuereport.com/aerospace-avionics-market-24634/
New research report on Aerospace Avionics market, which is a detailed analysis of this business space inclusive of the trends, competitive landscape, and the market size. Encompassing one or more parameters among product analysis, application potential, and the regional growth landscape, Aerospace Avionics market also includes an in-depth study of the industry's competitive scenario.
Some major findings of the aerospace avionics market report include:
-> The demand for new aircraft is increasing across the globe due to increasing passenger traffic and cargo movements
Aerospace Avionics market is projected to exceed USD 94 billion by 2025. The growth of this market can be attributed to the increasing passenger traffic, new aircraft deliveries and increasing per capita income in Asia Pacific and the Middle East & Africa. The increasing technological advancements in open architecture, neural sensing and motion planning act as drivers for the market.
Aerospace Avionics - Market Research Report | Growth Forecast 2025Aerospace Avionics - Market Research Report | Growth Forecast 2025
Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.cuereport.com/request-sample/24634
-> Increasing demand for lightweight and integrated avionics systems is contributing to the growth
-> Some of the major players operating in the aerospace avionics market are Safran, Harris Corporation, Saab AB, Thales Group, and BAE Systems
-> Increasing defense spending from countries such as India & China is driving the demand for military aviation, supporting avionics market growth
-> Companies are focusing on a new technology with robot co-pilot, airborne wireless network, and neural sensing to gain a competitive edge over the rivals.
(More to the article at source)
https://www.cuereport.com/aerospace-avionics-market-24634/
Silence is not very golden...
Just pointing out what other news there is out there on this topic. Too bad ABWN can't merge.. but I am sure they will not. They have ruined their credibility by keeping everyone in the dark...
There is demand... Too bad ABWN can't merge technology. Or can they? https://www.technologyreview.com/the-download/613272/now-amazon-plans-to-launch-a-massive-constellation-of-more-than-3000-internet/?utm_medium=tr_social&utm_campaign=site_visitor.unpaid.engagement&utm_source=twitter
ABWN... Highly speculative and a real dice roll at this point. I purchase a hundred bucks worth after each RS and that gets me one million shares. Even if it eventually gets to 1 cent, that is a 10 grand gain. And 10 cents would be even better. If another RS hits, I will buy another 100 bucks. But to be sure this should not be anyone's main bet! Diversity in one's portfolio is the safest bet over time.
Well.. of course if they are anywhere near the shock and blast zone.. nothing will help! I would think that at least the military network could be so dense and redundant that it would be fail-safe. The military relies on redundancy.
Perhaps... depending on if the systems were EMP hardened. Most of the military aircraft that I worked on were. It is about shielding etc. Most military electronic systems when designed consider these options.
And.... EMP energy (electro magnet pulse from a nuclear burst) can knock out regular communications, but will not affect lasers.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-EMP-effect-on-laser-beam
So an aircraft flying at an altitude of about 32,000ft, the line of sight would be about 200 miles in any direction and that is a diameter of 400 miles. It doesn't take many aircraft to cover huge areas even if the transmission diameter 300 miles. There is enough air traffic for a huge overlap overkill.
You stated: "If one one satalite goes out, that’s a fraction of our military. The only stable solution would be the ABWN model."
And ABWN would be a backup and less vulnerable because of the cross area coverage though a bit subject to weather and traffic schedules and patterns. It could be a mix of sat, aircraft and transmission towers.
Please post evidence, otherwise your statement has no validity.
It was just my opinion on the probability of the success of the patent being granted by the PTO. What interests me more is the in-flight testing schedule. I am sure they are keeping that schedule under wraps. The outcome can spike the SP and will certainly give credence to their objective. Many eyes in the industry will be watching.
I feel that this is more than a lotto ticket. It just seems like the next logical step in reducing the cost of an ever increasing demand.
I don't believe that it is a matter of "if" the patent will be granted, but rather when it will be granted. I processed my own patent application for an earthquake detector. (I am not a patent attorney.) It included drawings, schematics, technical claims and all that is required to apply and submit. It took a bit over 18 months for it to get approved. The assigned inspector had just a couple small issues with it which had to do with some technical wording. He sent a notice to me and I made the corrections. It was approved. I fabricated several hundred units for test marketing and got them into elementary schools and it actually got coverage on So CAL ABC News after an earthquake. That helped verify its functionality and I was able to finally licensed the patent.
My point is that with the ABWN patent, these are professional patent attorneys and they would not apply for an extremely expensive patent if they were not sure that it would ultimately be approved. There is always a required prior art search that has to be accomplished and so we know that the ABWN patent will not infringe on prior art.
So in my mind, it is just a matter of time before approval. I would think it could take up to 18 to 24 months, but that does not inhibit ABWN from continuing testing for proof of concept and design.
It is all old technology... but what ABWN has though is a patent with an actual proof of concept that may be worth a buyout from a huge player. Not an uncommon scenario.
Though some of your logic may indeed be correct, I look at it a bit differently. I believe that what will bring in the Airlines and cargo carriers will be the opportunity for profit. Providing internet access is a huge profitable business and any system that will offer it for perhaps half the monthly fee will bring customers in huge numbers. Capitalism at its best.
You stated that the equipment will be too heavy. I worked for Boeing with the C-17 flight test bed simulator and avionics labs and we developed the Formation Flight System (among other things) for the C-17 cargo aircraft. It was pretty much built utilizing "off the shelf" equipment and pretty light weight. The software was the critical component. A small black box in the end.
And... Not for one second do I believe that retail or other shareholder investors buying stock will bring in the funds required to support the massive infrastructure needed for this venture. I believe what we are seeing is proof of concept, marketing charts and targeting for real investors who will or may see this as a viable future profit making option.
For the cheap price for millions of shares, to me it is worth the wait... even if I lose a few bucks. Life is a gamble anyway.
I am a new shareholder here. I have been keeping up with ABWN for some time and the concept is intriguing in that the cost to operate and maintain such a network appears to be much less expensive than maintaining a huge matrix of expensive satellites. It offers a potential profit to commercial air carriers. Internet availability is too expensive as it is available now and the problem is that it is not available in all areas. The more technology becomes dependent upon being connected, the more important that alternative connection options will become. It is just a natural progression of technology. It is most difficult if not impossible and cost prohibitive to upgrade a satellite when it is in orbit.
Below is form Global.com
THE COST OF BUILDING AND LAUNCHING A SATELLITE
Satellites are not cheap business. They cost a lot of money to design, construct, launch and monitor. Just how much money? If you have at least $290 million in your bank account, that money can go into making a satellite that can track and monitor hurricanes. Add about $100 million dollars more if you want a satellite that carries a missile-warning device.
What makes satellites so expensive?
Some of the factors that drive the cost of satellites are the equipment and materials used to build them. Transponders alone hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to maintain, while bandwidth cost per MHz is priced at a minimum of about $3,500 a month. Running a satellite at a 36MHz bandwidth will cost over $1.5 million a year. There are also the other gadgets and equipment that have to be built into the satellite in order for it to perform its intended function. These can include computers, computer software and cameras.
What's in a name anyway? The problem with using WMIH may be that it is tainted with the sour remembrance of the bankruptcy and guilt by association with WAMU. We may not see it that way at all, but others may especially with the old world investment giants. New potential shareholders may balk when a broker answers their question about the history of WMIH when they are told it shares DNA with WAMU!
Besides, WMIH doesn't sound like a word if you try and pronounce it. I believe that they are just trying to make the "Mr Cooper" name more relatable and friendlier sounding to new home loan purchasers. Getting a loan and buying a home can be a scary thing for young people to commit to. The Mr Cooper approach is an attempt to soften the fear and build confidence and trust and it is much more memorable than WMIH.
Well that was my point. I am thinking that for those who already got wet with ABWN through Wells Trade will be able to do business with that position. But no new buyers allowed. Like I said.. Strange.. to me anyway.
I actually spoke to the Wells broker and was told that Wells Trade can't trade ABWN because it is not on the authorization list. There was no other option with them on this position. I am wondering how they are dealing with those who bought ABWN for more than a buck...are they now not allowed to add or sell? Strange...
As far as Wells Trade and the pinks go, I have traded pinks over the years with Wells. I am going to open another account with another brokerage firm. Thanks!
Thanks!
I tried to purchase some ABWN through Wells Trade and I was told it wasn't allowed. The broker stated that it is listed as a cautionary stock because of its low price and it has had some possible scam action and manipulations etc. I don't know what they are basing that info on, but their refusal to trade this stock is a form of manipulation. I agree that it is highly speculative, but it would't be my first lotto ticket buy.
Any suggestions on how to purchase? Thanks in advance...
Good question...