Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Unfortunate indeed. I am too timid to buy more shares because Denner could lose the proxy vote judging on this board's support for him.
It's abundantly clear to me that individual country approval news doesn't move the needle in AMRN stock price. Without the Denner news last few weeks, AMRN's stock price would still be stuck in low $1 and going lower.
I am the biggest KM fan. The problem is not him. The problem is JT and his management team which had made so many bad decisions that have brought AMRN to its knees that there is nothing KM could do to turn the situation around. Denner is our only hope.
Unfortunately...
Net positive obviously but you are not responding to my question and your original topic, i.e., partnership agreement.
Ns, please remind me of any previous partnership agreements Amarin has resulted in meaningful revenue, not to mention profits.
zip, you should send your questions to IR who might be responsive to shareholders before the proxy vote.
J, you have an uncanny ability to make simple things complex.
J, because buyers/sellers are unsure about who would win the upcoming votes: A Denner win, the stock price will go up, otherwise stock price will come back down.
liz, I agree with you. Please convince Sleven.
B, thanks for the feedback. If it does not continue, then it sounds like a scam.
Ns, "I doubt my vote will change the outcome", that's a terrible attitude! If you vote your way, you and your money are soon parted.
Ns, if you "vote against 7 new board members", you run the risk of Denner selling his shares and the stock back to $1.15.
Agreed. I think every poster should email IR to show their support for Denner. The best-case scenario is for Denner and Amarin to come to an agreement before the proxy vote.
In my email, I complained about my emails being seldom replied back. She said she had replied to all my previous emails that were received. She was courteous in her response but it was too late for the courtesy.
I emailed Amarin IR yesterday telling her that I will vote my "exact number" of AMRN shares along Denner's slate of directors. She got back to me quickly for the first time instead of mostly ignoring my previous email attempts. I suggest every poster do what I just did to encourage the arrogant management to settle with Denner.
BlinkRx Works!
I was paying $9 for 3-month supply of V for the last 5 years but none of my New York State ObamaCare plans cover V on their formulary starting this year. So I called up the Tele Doc hotline of my health plan ($0 copay) a few days ago to request a 1-month supply of branded V DAW for the purpose of CVD prevention due to my family history. The teledoc PA said she would write DAW but my insurance might not cover it. I told the PA my mail-order pharmacy is BlinkRx and she find it in her system immediately. After I hung up the phone with the PA, I called BlinkRx (844-926-2480) to make sure they got the script. BlinkRx got it and put me on hold to see if they could fill it. After a couple of minutes, they said they have a hard time filling it with Branded V and ask me to provide more detailed insurance info (RxBin, RxPCN, etc.). After another 10-minute wait and the BlinkRx rep told me the good news that my copay is $0 with free shipping. I just received my bottle of V in the mail with Feb 2025 expiration. I repeat the same process for my wife's V script today and also paid $0 copay.
The bottom line, BlinkRx works. Any posters having non-Medicare/Medicaid plans like me should try BlinkRx. Posters who take GV should definitely try BlinkRx instead of betraying their investment.
Does anybody have experience using BlinkRx to get Vascepa? None of my NYS Obamacare plans has Vascepa on its formulary starting 1/1/2023. TIA.
Jefferies analyst Michael Yee upgraded Amarin to Buy from Hold with a price target of $3, up from $1.30. The shares are trading at a $200M enterprise value, or less than one-times peak European sales, and has some "strategic M&A optionality," a large activist investor working to drive change, and the company is not really burning cash anymore after cutting spending in 2022, Yee tells investors in a research note. In addition, Amarin's U.S. erosion has stabilized three quarters in a row, says the analyst. He also believes Amarin has been getting some good European pricing agreements. Yee calls the company "an intriguing small cap value play."
r, "Degrees have never nor will they ever determine intelligence or capability"? Of all people, you are the most qualified to make such a statement
Thanks for the good news, north!
N, where did you hear about "potential settlement with HN"? TIA.
Yeah, right!
Karim Mikhail
Thank you, Lisa. Good morning. And thank you all for joining us today. We began this year embarking on a bold strategy to grow and expand globally. We focused our three dimensional growth strategy, breadth or geographic expansion, heights representing diversification and depth or core operational evolution.
Now, with 2022 nearing a close and despite the significant headwinds and challenges faced early in the year, we are pleased to report that we made significant progress across our key priorities, and we continue to achieve what we committed to.
Most importantly, we have turned around our cash burn levels as we strengthened our foundation through operational excellence, strengthened our leadership team and laid the groundwork for a true transformation of Amarin in 2023.
I'm going to begin today by discussing the results of our cash preservation initiatives because I believe this progress is significant and critical to support our future growth and expansion plans.
There are two key initiatives that were central to our effort and the progress delivered. First in June, we took swift action announcing an extensive cost savings plan to reduce our operating expenses by $100 million over 12 months. This initiative was comprehensive and involved cost reductions across the entire organization. And we are beginning to realize the savings this quarter exactly as planned.
Second, beginning last quarter, and as part of our companywide focus on operational excellence, we took steps to evolve our supply chain strategy and amend our supplier agreements to align supply arrangements with current and future demand within our US business.
These initiatives, which Tom will discuss in more detail shortly, have resulted in significantly lower cash burn quarter-over-quarter. In fact, this quarter we are cash positive, excluding restructuring charges.
Also contributing to the improvement of our cash runway is the consistent stabilization of the US revenue over the last three quarters, despite continued pressure from additional generic competition. We achieved this by refocusing our core US team efforts to sustain and support the VASCEPA brand.
Additionally, and as a result of the difficult decisions made at the right time to reduce commercial footprint in the US, we remain highly profitable, supporting future international growth. As I look at our third quarter results, and in the US business, I'm pleased to say our strategy is working.
In the third quarter of 2022, we recorded $89.9 million in total net revenue, including $87.9 million in US product sales, largely unchanged from last quarter despite the continued pressure from generic competition and the restructuring effort we announced in June, which reduced our sales and marketing efforts and commercial footprint in the US significantly. This is now the third consecutive quarter with relatively consistent revenue performance, despite continued generic competition, which is unprecedented in the industry. And the third quarter performance was achieved with a more efficient footprint and resources which speaks to the strength and efforts of the core US team.
Our steps to focus on promoting our brand are working. Based on the latest prescription trends, we are maintaining current share at roughly 60% of the total IPE market on a quarterly basis. We will continue to closely monitor the market dynamics in the US and remain ready to adjust as necessary wherever possible.
With the stabilization of the US business and the bold cash preservation actions we have taken, we have successfully extended our cash runway to ensure we can fund our expansion plan.
While I began today's discussion with the recent actions dedicated to strengthening our financial foundation and preserving our US revenues, we remained laser focused on our core future objective, which is global growth and expansion for VASCEPA, VAZKEPA in Europe and internationally as this is the key to shareholder value creation.
2022 has been about laying the foundation for our future across Europe, and we are now beginning to see the stage shape before our eyes. We are now officially on the market and in commercial launch stage in the UK and Sweden.
We recently received final positive national reimbursement in Finland and Northern Ireland at a price in line with our recent UK pricing. We also received individual reimbursement in Austria, with the process underway for national reimbursement.
Although there are no set timelines in any of the remaining major markets, we are now negotiating reimbursement and are now in the advanced stages in all markets. In particular, price negotiations are nearing conclusion with Spain's Ministry of Health, which could allow for a possible pricing and reimbursement decision shortly before the end of 2022.
In the Netherlands, we received a positive scientific assessment by the National Healthcare Institute, ZIN, for reimbursement and are beginning pricing negotiation with the Dutch Ministry of Health.
In Italy, we achieved the key milestone of a positive scientific assessment, allowing for our dossier to advance from the scientific assessment phase into the pricing and reimbursement negotiation phase with the Italian authorities.
Our strategy has always been around building a strong, diverse and sustainable revenue stream in Europe. This is why we have filed in 13 markets simultaneously since 2021, and are now in the mid to late stage reimbursement negotiations in France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and Norway.
This progress thus far, and specifically, the level of reimburse net price we have received, acknowledges the value of VAZKEPA and our ability to demonstrate this value to payers across Europe.
Turning to commercialization efforts in Europe. In the UK, our launch is underway since mid-October and it's progressing well and in line with our expectation based on our deep understanding of the market.
To provide some context on the UK market and how it operates, there are three distinct tiers of health care administration in England – NHS England, or the National Health Services, which provides guidance on usage. Next, the integrated care systems are consolidations of organizations that plan for service delivery and funding. The final tier are local accounts with formularies, which lists the reimbursed product.
As you recall, since receiving our final approval in July, we have been following the typical process while we await approval for public funding. We spent the first 90 days post approval focused on gaining formulary access through education, medical and scientific engagement, implementing formulary guidelines and building awareness and adoption through multiple educational and commercial channels.
And we are simultaneously building a strong team in the UK. As I mentioned earlier this month, public funding is now becoming available, and we are transitioning to the commercial focus.
The number of formulary inclusion of VAZKEPA continues to track ahead of analogs and is improving weekly, thanks to the clear stepwise approach to achieve both formulary listing and medicines pathway inclusion. We are proud that VAZKEPA is making its way as a new standard of care to reduce the risk of CV events beyond LDL-C management in England. We will be updating investors with our UK performance to ensure everyone can keep track of our progress versus benchmarks over the next quarters.
Turning to the rest of Europe, we're also progressing in other major markets as well as continuing to advance our reimbursement discussions with national health authorities in Norway, Italy, France, the Netherlands, Portugal and Switzerland, where we have recently submitted and are now on file for reimbursement discussions.
We remain on track to receive reimbursement decisions in up to eight countries and to launch VAZKEPA in up to six European countries this year. And we remain confident that 2023 will be the beginning of strong, sustainable revenue generation to over $1 billion plus peak opportunity in Europe.
Our progress continues beyond Europe, where we continue our plan to file in up to 20 countries through 2024. I'm pleased to say thus far we have filed in 10 markets with the potential for a number of others before year-end and into early 2023.
Specifically, Amarin's marketing authorization submissions for VASCEPA/VAZKEPA have been achieved in Hong Kong, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain, and applications remain pending in a number of other markets, including Australia and New Zealand, which are continuing to advance their local procedures. We've also confirmed that our regulatory filings are now actively under review in South Africa and other markets. This is critical as we continue our search for the right partner in all those international territories where we do not plan to build our own infrastructure.
Our current partners continue to make progress as well, including Eddingpharm, our partner in China, recently stated that they have received confirmation that the Chinese government has completed the product testing and has initiated the final review period prior to approval. This final review began earlier this month and has a clock of up to 67 business days. Our partner has communicated to us that they anticipate an approval could still be achieved before year-end.
In Canada, HLS Therapeutics Inc. has obtained reimbursement from all major public payers, gaining access to the vast majority of eligible patients in Canada. They continue to be in the launch phase in the public sector.
We remain confident in the multibillion dollar global market opportunity for VASCEPA/VAZKEPA in Europe and internationally. And we continue to invest in our data and evidence building of IPE, now with a global focus.
Following a leading presence at the European Society of Cardiology Congress over the summer, we remain committed to maintaining a strong presence at important medical meetings, including the upcoming Canadian Cardiovascular Congress, American Heart Association, and the International Society for Pharmaceutical Outcome Research in Europe, which is a premier congress to discuss healthcare outcomes research. Our data was selected for presentation demonstrating the cost effectiveness of VASCEPA in treating cardiovascular outcomes in the Netherlands.
Lastly, we continue to develop our fixed dose combination, which ensures our ongoing progress with this important program that combines placebo with a statin.
To summarize our progress year-to-date, we are experiencing stable business trends in the US, taking important steps to preserve our cash, our global expansion plans remain on track and we are continuing to focus on building data evidence and furthering our pipeline for the future.
With that, I'll turn it over to Tom to talk more about our progress and strong results this quarter. Tom?
Tom Reilly
Thank you, Karim. Good morning, everyone. I am pleased to report our financial performance for the third quarter of 2022.
I'm glad to note when excluding the $25 million Q2 restructuring payments made in Q3, we were cash positive in the third quarter of 2022.
Let me begin with our revenue performance. For the third quarter of 2022, we reported total net revenue of $89.9 million, including net product revenue of $89.2 million, a decrease of 37% compared to the third quarter of 2021. US product revenue was $87.9 million, a decline of only $2.8 million versus the second quarter of 2022, reflecting relatively stable trends in both volume and price.
Beginning last quarter, we are not investing to grow the IPE molecule in the US market, but are investing in sustaining and supporting with a separate brand and prescriber base we have today in the US.
While we are pleased with a relatively stable trend, we expect volumes and price will continue to experience some pressure throughout this year and into next year. The results included international product revenue of $1.3 million, which includes European product revenue of $0.7 million.
Cost of goods sold for the three months ended September 30, 2022 was $27 million compared to $30.2 million in the corresponding period of 2021. During the three months ended September 30, 2022, Amarin continued the initiative which began last quarter to take steps to amend supplier agreement, to align supply arrangements with current and future market demand, resulting in a charge of $3.1 million this quarter. The renegotiation of these agreements is a very important step in our cash preservation strategy and lowering our future inventory purchases.
Excluding the impact of this item, gross margin was 73% for the three months ended September 30, 2022 compared to 79% in Q3 2021.
Moving to operating expenses. During the third quarter of 2022, we reported expenses of $68 million compared to $124.9 million in the third quarter of 2021, a decrease of $56.9 million or 46%. The results this quarter include a $4.4 million restructuring expense related to the discontinuation of operations in Germany, and the third quarter of 2021 included a $14.1 million restructuring charge related to the US. The decrease compared to last year is related to the cost saving initiatives that were announced in September of 2021 and in June of 2022. These savings were partially offset by our investments in growth and expansion in Europe.
Operating expenses decreased $38.5 million or 36% versus the second quarter of 2022. This is a $28 million decrease versus Q2 2022, excluding net restructuring charges and stock compensation expense.
We began to realize the benefits of the June cost reduction this quarter, and we expect to continue to realize the benefit through mid-2023, totaling $100 million in savings. The US business continues to be profitable from a contribution margin perspective, and provides all the necessary financial support for the expansion into Europe and other geographies around the world.
Under US GAAP, Amarin reported net loss of $5.1 million for the third quarter 2022 or basic and diluted loss per share of $0.01.
As of September 30, 2022, Amarin reported aggregate cash and investments of $306 million, demonstrating a significantly lower cash burn relative to earlier quarters in 2022. We have taken significant steps to strengthen the company operationally. We plan to continue to manage our cash prudently relative to business performance. With the recent operational initiatives and the stabilized revenue trends in the US, we have significantly lowered our cash burn and believe our current available cash and resources, including US profitability, are adequate to support continued operations, including European launch activities.
Now I will turn the call back to Karim for closing remarks. Karim?
Karim Mikhail
Thank you, Tom, for that financial overview and our results during the third quarter. I'm pleased with the results this quarter and thus far this year. We have made a great deal of progress despite the many challenges.
As we look to the remainder of 2022 and into the early part of 2023, we will continue to ensure we remain operationally strong from a cash perspective, dedicated to driving our global expansion plans, with the launch materializing in Europe and continuing to build evidence globally to support diversity VASCEPA/VAZKEPA. And we remain focused on our bold vision to stop cardiovascular disease from being a leading cause of death worldwide.
And with that, operator, we are ready to take questions.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
[Operator Instructions]. Your first question for today is coming from Michael Yee.
Michael Yee
It's Mike Yee from Jefferies. We had two questions. First, congrats on the US. It looks to be quite stable, which is great. Do you guys expect continued generics to come in at some point as supply opens up or do you also have exclusive contracts and preferred contracts, which is also helping. Can you remind me how that dynamic works in the US? That was give us some visibility there.
And then secondly is on Europe. I know that you're working on some regions and they're coming on. Can you just describe how you expect the cadence and, importantly, the investment for the spend to grow there as you get through 2023?
Karim Mikhail
We'll start with the first question with regards to generic. Just to remind, this was a very unusual generic launch sequence. We've had one in October of 2021, then we've had one six months later, then the third one came in Q1 2022. Apotex launched in February, and we have also seen Teva launch the 500 milligram just two weeks of this last quarter. So we still see new generic entrants.
Now, so far, Teva only came with a 500 milligram, which is really 2% of the market. We'll have to wait and see when they come, if they come, with the 1 gram. I think what we can share is that even with three on the market, we've seen a stabilization of our prescription and our revenue in the first, second and third quarter of this year. So, we keep tracking this. The situation is dynamic. But having said that, we feel confident that where we stand today, we did stabilize the revenue. We are losing in low-single digit in prescription and things are progressing as we plan them.
Now, of course, we have to be ready for any possible scenario, right? We could have different events coming up. And for that, we have multiple sorts of scenarios ready. We are ready to go for an authorized generic and press on the button, and immediately switch if we need be, and even other plans that that we could implement in that case. But that's for the US. We feel confident the situation is so far stable, and we continue our efforts with our core efficient team in the US.
Moving on to Europe, as you've seen, we have had consistent pricing reimbursement, positive decisions in Europe, right? We started with Sweden at the price of $180 per month, almost $2,000 annually. Then we've had the UK, which is far more sophisticated, more complex system, that also agreed to the same price. This quarter, we announced a third country, which is Finland announcing also approval for this price. And just to give even more color and detail, Finland initially rejected the file completely, and we had to resubmit from scratch, and we still got the price we asked for from Finland aligned with the other markets. So things are progressing well.
You've just heard also that we received a positive scientific assessment from the Netherlands, we received the positive assessment from Italy, and we are in final price negotiation in Spain. So, I don't want to say we're accelerating, but things are progressing in the right direction with regards to pricing reimbursement.
At the same time, we are starting now commercial launches, right? We're starting commercial launches in the UK and in Sweden and things are progressing as planned and we believe we will be able to share some UK metrics in the next quarters to ensure that all investors and shareholders are updated with our performance in Europe.
Operator
Your next question is coming from Georgi Yordanov.
Georgi Yordanov
This is Georgi Yordanov from Cowen and Company. Maybe just to follow up on the previous question. Just on the generics, do you have any idea or thoughts around like why their share has plateaued around that 10% to 15%? And your renegotiated supply agreement that you mentioned, does that kind of maybe provide additional capacity for those generics? And then I just have one follow-up.
Karim Mikhail
I don't know which company you really quoted as to flat in terms of generic share. Some of them are at 15%, some are at less. The reality is this is now an open market. And every generic is going after its business. So, we do not know why their share is where it is. We know what we are doing, right? What we are doing is we're fully focused on brand promotion. We're not investing a dollar to grow the molecule, which ends up going to generic business, right? So, that's what we're focusing on. We're making sure we have an appealing offer to our plans, so that they continue to work with us because we have a sustained supply with efficient cost of goods. So that's what we are doing. And so far, as you can see, it is working, right? We are stabilizing the erosion from a share perspective. On quarterly basis, we are at 60%, which is great.
Now what can happen tomorrow, look, for the moment, our strategy is working. We continue to monitor. Is there enough supply for the generics? You bet, there is enough supply? Right? So, if there is an estimate or an assumption that generics are not selling because they don't have enough supply, I can tell you it takes 18 months to have enough supply. So we've been beyond the 18 months. With generics on the market, there is enough supply beyond what anybody probably needs. So it's not a question of supply.
Now, with our renegotiated arrangements, this was necessary from a cash burn perspective, right? And we you see the result and the very positive impact on our cash burn because that's an initiative that's here to stay. So, this is not something that you do that, in a way, you eliminate cash burn for a quarter and then it's going to come back. In reality, this is going to be a stable situation. We have enough inventory for the US. And we don't believe that the extra supply that's going to anybody else can really change the story because there was already enough supply on the market even before that. So that's not changing really the situation.
Georgi Yordanov
My follow-up was, just as we think about the positive decision and the upcoming launch in the UK, do you – kind of like as we try to understand the size of that specific market, in particular, do you have any kind of like data on usually what percentage of pharmaceutical sales in Europe come from the UK? And how should we be thinking about the ramp up there in terms of the launch?
Karim Mikhail
The UK is definitely one of the top five, right? You're talking about a population of close to 70 million. It's a big market. In general, it will usually be number three, number four, depending on the uptake because it's a highly scientific market, by the way. Prescribers tend to be skeptical. And that's an advantage for us because we have evidence. So we believe it's a market that we can do well early on. So far, we can see that we are tracking better than analogs in terms of formulary inclusion. That's the most important proxy that tells you how much uptake you're going to get because your product has to be listed and has to be funded on the local formulary. So far, we're ahead of analogs. So, it is a significant market. We are confident that this is going to be an important launch. And again, we continue to prepare and we will update over the next quarter with the results.
Georgi Yordanov
Congrats on the progress.
Operator
Your next question for today is coming from Roanna Ruiz.
Roanna Ruiz
Roanna Ruiz from SVB Securities. I wanted to check in a little bit about Germany and arbitration decision. [indiscernible] if you still expect to be on track for a mid-November update there?
Karim Mikhail
On Germany, the timing of the arbitration is mid to end November. As you've seen from prior disclosures, we already took all the actions needed basically to eliminate cash burn in Germany waiting for a decision. In general, arbitrations usually do not lead to a positive decision. Let's be very real. That's usually a low probability of success. And if you succeed, usually there is risk in lowering the price, which will have impact on other markets.
The decision we took, which is to say, look, we're going to suspend operations in Germany, was to protect the price in the UK and Sweden and Finland, the price we're negotiating in Spain, as you can imagine, and other prices because the value of Germany as a country – let's assume that a large market is 15% of total Europe, right? So, if that country is going to give you a price 15% less than your average European, you are at a loss, right? So, we are not going to accept a price less than 15% because so far we have a very consistent approval pricing level at the European level, right? If you look at our Finland price, it looks today maybe just like lower than the UK. In fact, it's only because of exchange. In reality, it's higher based on earlier calculations. So that's really for Germany and arbitration.
Roanna Ruiz
That makes sense. I also want to check in on your fixed dose combination work for VASCEPA with a statin. Any updates on how that's progressing? And could we expect any data or program updates later this year or into 2023?
Karim Mikhail
We're working very hard on this initiative. And you've seen that we're making a lot of effort to keep our disclosures to a minimum because there is a lot going on that we need to keep sort of confidential until the right moment. Once we will be ready to communicate, we will and it is over the next quarter or two that we are going to come out with an update. So there's a lot going on. It's just that it's not the right time to disclose it at this stage, but the program continues and progresses successfully.
Operator
Your next question for today is coming from Louise Chen.
Carvey Leung
This is Carvey on for Louise from Cantor. First question is, what do you expect to be the biggest catalyst in the next 12 to 18 months?
Second question is on the $100 million cost savings through mid-2023, can you speak more about the pace of saving realization? Should we expect more savings to be realized early on, say, later of this year or more so the beginning of next year?
And our last question is, you just guided the commercial launch in Hong Kong for some time this year, which is a separate track from China? Is there any updates here?
Karim Mikhail
I'll take the first question about the most important catalyst. I believe the most critical one is for us to achieve pricing reimbursement in another large market. This is really what's going to drive shareholder value. The price that we have in the UK is very positive. But I think the key question is, with the situation in Germany and the challenges we face, can we actually achieve the same pricing and reimbursement level in other larger markets. And that's a very critical one. And we are working to deliver on this over the next few months, in the very near term, because we are in very active pricing negotiation with the Spanish government. So to me, that's one of the most critical key milestones.
Another one would be that we come out with an update on our fixed dose combination. I think there's very little known about this at this stage. And when we will go public with this, many of the shareholders will understand the value that this fixed dose combination really brings short and long term for the business. So, that's really at a high level.
Now for the question on cost savings and sequence, I'll leave Tom sort of give more detail on that.
Tom Reilly
We committed to $100 million of cost savings through mid of 2023. And you'll see, for this quarter, we realized just about approximately $25 million. So the way to think about this on a moving forward basis over the next three quarters is within that range on quarterly basis. So, we'll deliver the $100 million.
I think the other thing just to keep in mind, related to how we stabilize our cash burn and our operating expenses, we've been really timely with our investments in Europe as we're getting reimbursement. So as reimbursement comes in, obviously, the spend will adjust. And if it doesn't come in on the time we're expecting then, we'll adjust accordingly as well. So we're being very prudent on that, as we continue with our cash preservation.
Karim Mikhail
And finally, on Hong Kong and China, as you know, Asia is still by the way severely impacted by COVID. And things sort of start, restart in multiple – and we are in discussions to see what is the best sort of moment to go ahead with a launch. Hong Kong is a small market. Honestly, we're focusing more on the larger ones that will make a big difference in creating shareholder value. And as you've seen from our disclosures, we put in a lot of information about updates on filing in other Asian markets because we believe it's so critical when we are active in Asia that we're active in multiple territories because they do synergize our effort at the end of the day.
Operator
Your next question for today is coming from Daniel Wolle.
Daniel Wolle
This Daniel from J.P. Morgan. Karim, you highlighted a potential peak opportunity of $1 billion for Europe. Does that assume launch in Germany as well? And within Germany, you sort of mentioned that Finland, you got rejected, but then you still managed to get an approval. You have outlined a process by which you're trying to submit a dossier [indiscernible] restart again. So maybe can you give us a little bit detail on what the process is involved? And what type of new clinical evidence can you provide to support the therapeutic benefit of VAZKEPA. And I have one follow-up question.
Karim Mikhail
With regards to Germany, yes, we confirm based on the pricing and reimbursement levels that we are getting in Europe today that we believe that the peak is upwards of $1 billion, right, even without Germany, right?
Now, the way it's going to work is the following. We currently today in an arbitration. We'll have to wait to see how the arbitration decision goes. There has been one precedent on the German market where a product that received a negative decision that went back and applied. In that case, they actually used real world evidence, data to support the clinical benefit. I'm not saying this is exactly what we're going to do. But I'm just mentioning that there is a path. There is a very specific path to resubmitting a file in Germany.
Having said that, the most important part today is to focus on the other larger markets, making sure that we get pricing reimbursement in Spain, making sure we get pricing reimbursement in Italy and France because that's really what's going to drive the value overall.
Daniel Wolle
In terms of generics in the US, beyond supply issues, we've heard that pricing of APIs have become more competitive for the generic manufacturers. Do you believe there's any impact from that on the stability of VASCEPA?
Karim Mikhail
There was a period where pricing was stable. Then there was a period that pricing was unstable beginning of this year. So it's difficult to predict at what price and whether there will be. But, look, it would be unreasonable not to think that there will be future price competition. If you have more generics, theoretically, you're going to have more price competition. And we have taken that into account in the way we look at the business and the way we sized our footprint.
I remind people that, a year ago, our footprint was 780 people. Today, our footprint is 75. So we are at a 10% footprint. So that's why we believe we are still driving significant contribution margin from the US no matter what the price impacts are or volume impacts are. And if we need to, we have an authorized generic plan ready with a lot of supply that's just ready to go to the market. And that's why you've seen us confident in coming out and saying we're extending our cash runway because we believe in whatever scenario we're going to be. We will be able to get to revenue from Europe with our investments and with the contribution margin we're getting from the US.
Daniel Wolle
And last question from me. Understanding that you haven't disclosed much about the fixed dose combo, do you believe it can provide any new patent profile to VASCEPA by any chance in the US?
Karim Mikhail
There is a question of patents. But there is also a question of other protection. And today, let's face it, this opportunity is going to be very, very critical for Europe, right? Because this is where we're talking about the $1 billion opportunity. This is where we're creating shareholder value. So most of our efforts are really making sure that that's going to add additional opportunity to Europe, which I believe everybody's seeing moving in the right direction.
What will it provide to the US will depend very much on where the generic market is going to be when we come out with a fixed dose combination, which is going to be a couple of years or more from now. So this is really going to be focused mainly on Europe and international markets. And we're going to talk more about it when we are ready to disclose more details.
Operator
[Operator Instructions]. Your next question for today is coming from Paul Choi.
Paul Choi
Paul Choi with Goldman Sachs. A quick financial question for Tom, just one point of clarification with regard to the $100 million in savings that you're targeting through mid-23. How much of that is incremental savings from the current run rate versus the discontinuation of operations from Germany? Can you quantify that for us?
Tom Reilly
The way we've previously disclosed and we're committed to – the way we look at this is we looked at the full year of 2021 as our base, which was approximately $450 million of operating expenses. So we've committed the $100 million of savings that we anticipate through mid of 2023 will be based off that $450 million benchmark.
Paul Choi
I'm just trying to understand how much is like from just your discontinuation of operations in Germany versus your 2021 base of that $100 million target?
Tom Reilly
It's baked in. It's baked in. It's part of the overall net investments related to Europe.
Paul Choi
A follow up for Karim. You talked about some additional partners for geographies where you're not going to necessarily be directly commercializing yourself in ex-US markets. Can you maybe just give us a sense as to when those partnerships or agreements might potentially be finalized? And then how you're thinking about the incremental launch timing in those external markets relative to the US?
Karim Mikhail
We are trying to align the dates of these partnerships with the dates of regulatory approvals because that's really when it becomes critical. And for the moment, we did discuss and engage with local partner in some of the larger markets internationally. We did engage with regional partners in other regions, like Asia or Latin America, but we're also engaging with global partners that can take multiple territories at an international level and we're working very hard to align those approvals. We're going to have some approvals by end of this year, some next year and some 2024. So that continues to be a top priority because we believe that that's just going to open another revenue stream with no basically cost – no burden on our side. So, it's definitely a priority. And hopefully, we will be announcing something by early 2023.
Operator
That is all the time we have for questions today. I would like to turn the floor back over to the Amarin management team for closing remarks.
Karim Mikhail
I just want to thank everyone. This has been a very solid quarter coming up from Q1 and Q2, with US revenue stabilization, the fact that we are cash positive excluding restructuring charges and we continue to make strides in pricing reimbursement in Europe and now launching effectively in one of the largest countries. So, we thank you. And we look forward to speak in the next quarter and to update you on our results. Thank you all.
zip, based on this week's script data from raf:
Vascepa
TRx 64,464; +4.8% (+2,948) w/w; -21.5% y/y
NRx 29,796; +10.2% (+2,752) w/w; -19.7% y/y
Ref 34,668; +0.6% (+196) w/w; -22.9% y/y
Lovaza (Fake & Brand)
TRx 65,492; +9.1% (+5,450) w/w; +1.9% y/y
NRx 32,289; +14.3% (+4,046) w/w; +2.8% y/y
Ref 33,203; +4.4% (+1,404) w/w; +1.0% y/y
Fake Vascepa
TRx 40,043;
L+gV=105535 Vs V=64464
Pdude, "45% of insurance contracts"? Where did you get the number?
Full-time poster, unemployed doctor?
raf, if you look at the STRENGTH data, the Asian population was statistically significant in MACE reduction as well. That means EPA would only show its cardiovascular benefit after crossing a certain EPA threshold.
" We are not hiring a primary care field force in the U.K. because that would be a lot of money wasted." Is that the Canadian model that KM plans to adopt down the road with the help of PFE?
Andrew Fein
Hello, everyone. I'm Andrew Fein, one of the biotechnology analysts at H.C. Wainwright. Thank you for coming. Glad to be back in person.
So the next company presenting will be Amarin, and presenting for the company will be its President and CEO, Karim Mikhail. Thank you.
Karim Mikhail
Thank you, Andrew. This is Karim Mikhail, President and CEO of Amarin. Today, my presentation may make some forward-looking statements. And of course, for all the list of risk factors, please do consult our SEC filing.
So at Amarin, we have a very focused growth strategy. Really, priority number one is growing the VASCEPA business by stabilizing the U.S., launching successfully in Europe and expanding to international. And -- but also, we're also focusing, obviously, on managing the life cycle of VASCEPA. We have an incredible asset that we want to extend its life cycle and diversifying with BD development, but also working obviously on evolving our operational model. So these are our 3 key priorities in terms of growth strategy.
Just to give you an update on where we are at the second quarter of 2022. Beginning of the year was a very challenging because we've had a third generic entrant to the market. So you've seen the U.S. business getting a hit despite the fact that we kept the business stable with 2 generics for a number of quarters.
Having said that, second quarter of 2022 was a stable quarter, where we've had 78% prescription drop, but at the same time, we benefited from some of the destocking that we've had in the first quarter. So we kept the revenue at $90 million in the U.S., which I believe was a significant step forward, considering the fact that we had a full quarter of the third generic on the market with Apotex being there.
During that quarter, we took some very important decision in terms of capital structure. We've had a very significant restructuring decision to basically save $100 million in our operational expenses over 12 months between third quarter of 2022 to the second quarter of 2023. So a very, very significant action there. And of course, we made progress on many other elements.
But to give you a bit of flavor on where we are on the third quarter, the most important element we want to highlight that for the last 10 to 12 weeks, we've actually seen very encouraging signs and trends in terms of the stabilization of the erosion in the U.S. market. So this is data that is -- so far, we have not seen this trend in the last 2 years since the launch of generics. So definitely, it is encouraging now. Obviously, we have to continue to be vigilant over the next few quarters in case we have a new entrant, in case we have other events that will impact the market. But from a U.S. business stabilization, we've seen encouraging trends.
We have made progress with our cash preservation initiatives. You've heard me talking about the cost savings of the $100 million, but we also have had a number of renegotiations of our supply agreements, which, if all goes well towards year-end, that's going to significantly reduce our inventory purchases, which is going to impact our cash positively. Of course, we stay committed to be very vigilant on the timing of investment in Europe.
So now that you've seen we have pricing reimbursement in the U.K., We are investing fully in the U.K. because we have a very positive price. However, in other countries, because we have not had a signature yet, we are still operating with a small core of people and not to invest ahead of time.
European reimbursement negotiations are progressing pretty well in general. In the last few weeks, we've had a country like The Netherlands issue a positive assessment with very clear guidance on what they expect in terms of price. It's in line with the U.K. and with other prices. So that's also very encouraging. I remind people The Netherlands is the sixth largest European country after the big 5. So it's a significant player, it's not a small market.
But also, we have progress in Spain, we have progress in France, and we have progress in the other markets, including, by the way, submitting some new files.
International expansion plans are on track in terms of regulatory approvals for the remaining of the year. We'll talk about that a little bit more in detail.
And finally, we are still working pretty hard on the scientific evidence supporting our products. So at , we presented new data, and we will be obviously present also at AHA.
So just to remind you on where we are at the European level, we have 3 countries where we have pricing reimbursement. We have the U.K., we have Sweden and we have individual reimbursement in Denmark, at the price of close to $2,000 annually which, for an oral lipid-lowering drug, if you compare that to any benchmark, it's a very positive pricing.
So far, as we said, negotiations are progressing in France, Spain, Netherlands and Austria. We have submitted new dossiers in Portugal, Switzerland. And we will be submitting very soon in Belgium.
As you may have seen also from our disclosures, we basically did not get to an agreement with in Germany, and we decided that we did not want to stay in Germany and basically risk the price in other European countries. So we decided to pull out of Germany for a period of time until we come back with a different submission that will get us the right price in Germany.
Overall, just a visual to see how far we're progressing. You can already tell from this -- from this slide that we have a number of countries where we are already in pricing and reimbursement negotiations. The most important ones, let's face it, are France where they have given us a positive assessment and we are in price negotiation. We are also in price negotiation formally now in Spain, but also The Netherlands and a few other countries. So overall, very good progress, and we see all the negotiations converging closer to the U.K. price which, for everybody, is actually a net price visible to every other country. So the nice part of the negotiation is that a France or a Spain knows exactly what the U.K. government is paying and there is no guessing around that.
In terms of international expansion, as you remember, we've had a plan to go to 20 additional countries so that we are present in the 50 largest markets in the world. And for those submissions, we have 6 that we are getting this year, and we can confirm that things are -- the regulatory approvals are progressing appropriately to receive approval for those 6 countries before end of the year. Then we have the second wave of 9 countries in 2023 and we finish with 5 countries in 2024. So by end 2024, we would be registered in the 50 largest cardiometabolic markets.
Although the REDUCE-IT study was published 3, 4 years ago, we continue to focus very much on generating new scientific evidence. We just came back from European Society of Cardiology in Barcelona, where Dr. Deepak Bhatt presented the new data on and the prevention with some very unique data where you reduce myocardial infarction by 40%. For clinicians that's very, very significant data. And I can tell you for pricing and negotiation discussion, that's also very valuable because you are able to demonstrate that you reduce the burden, the economic burden of such treatments on the European governments.
We also presented the data on the benefit for the smoker patient population, both of them are positive. So we continue to drive the scientific evidence, making sure we stand very strongly behind VASCEPA and VAZKEPA in Europe.
Just on my last slide, just a list of drivers for success for the second half of 2022 and beginning of 2023. The first one is really maintaining the stabilization of the U.S. business. And as you've heard in the last 10 weeks, we have had very limited erosion, if any. So that's pretty significant. We hope we can keep it this way, if there are no new entrant, no additional challenges. We'll see how that evolves over the remaining part of the year.
We're making very good progress with reducing our operational spending, as outlined in the savings plan. You remember, cash burn first quarter was above $90 million. The second quarter was $65 million. So we're very, very actively managing it. And we will definitely see the progress in the third quarter.
We are in the face of getting ready for commercialization in the U.K. We've hired all our specialty field force. We are not hiring a primary care field force in the U.K. because that would be a lot of money wasted. It takes 2 years to get primary care to prescribe in the U.K. But we have a full key account management team and very, very solid medical team.
Negotiations are progressing for pricing reimbursement in Spain, France, Italy, Netherlands, and we have new submissions. Achieving international regulatory approval in up to 6 countries before year-end is also progressing. We continue to generate data. We are going to have new data submitted at AHA to ensure that we keep supporting the evidence behind VASCEPA.
So with that, thank you all, to questions.
Question-and-Answer Session
Q - Andrew Fein
Feel free to jump in. But I guess a couple of questions. Yes, starting obviously with stabilization that you've seen to date in the third quarter. Do you attribute it simply to the lack of another generic entrant coming on board? Or are there active efforts on the part of the company that you think is leading to the stabilization?
Karim Mikhail
So clearly, we've had 1, 2, 3 generics, and let's face it, we've never seen a slowing down of the erosion. I think we communicated publicly before that we've seen a steady trend of generic erosion from day 1 when Hikma came to the market until basically 10 to 12 weeks ago. And that erosion did not change whether they were 1, 2 or even 3 products. I'm talking prescription, of course, not talking value because there are price impacts. But in terms of prescription, we have seen a steady gradual erosion from month 1 until 2 months ago. But for the last 2 months, we've seen basically a slowing down and almost a stabilization of the erosion. So I don't want to say it's only attributed to us and our effort, but we're very, very focused, obviously, today on fighting for the brand.
You remember when we took the decision to reduce our commercial infrastructure in U.S. significantly, we took also a decision at that point in time to say, okay, from now on, 0 investment on growing the molecule, we're focusing only on the brand and on stabilizing the brand and making sure that we're going to get the scripts. And we've seen encouraging times.
Andrew Fein
I guess turning to Europe for a second then. What's Germany's problem? I mean, given the totality of data that you've generated, given the seemingly attractive price point that you went through quite clearly, what's the roadblock there? And I guess, are there lessons to be learned in terms of how you present things, how you pitch the totality of the evidence as you continue your conversations with other European countries there?
Karim Mikhail
Yes. So first of all, I want to start by saying what we've seen in Germany and what we faced in Germany has 0 impact on any other countries because the negotiation in Germany is very German, right? If you're asking what is the problem with Germany, it's really the way the negotiation is structured, the way prices are referenced.
And let's face it, this is not an Amarin-only challenge. I'm sure people follow the news in the last 2, 3 weeks that were very large pharmaceutical companies facing the same outcome. But by the way, that's not new for Germany. People will remember that there was a time where Lipitor has to withdraw out of Germany, where CRESTOR never actually entered Germany. So it's not like this is a discovery.
Now we went in very focused on our value-based pricing strategy. And we said, look, here's why you need to reimburse this product. The way they reference prices just gets to numbers that I don't think any pharmaceutical company will accept for the sake of every shareholder. And that's why when you look at what Germany size could contribute to the overall European, every other company and Amarin says, "Well, I'm willing to sacrifice Germany if I know I'm going to make it in every other market with a superior price."
So this is where we are. It doesn't mean we're giving up on Germany. We could just turn the page and say, forget it, we actually have a plan to come back. It's going to take a bit more time. But for the moment, we are delivering very positive prices in other European countries, and we will continue to do so over the next few months.
Andrew Fein
I guess in the context of the cost savings initiatives that you've highlighted, how should we think about those driving with the presumed ongoing efforts to find additional -- potentially find additional assets. Does cost savings then give you more flexibility from an asset allocation perspective, if you will, externally? Or should we think about perhaps you stepping back at the moment from an external seeking path and focusing more on the various efforts that you've highlighted?
Karim Mikhail
Look, I mean, this is a moment for companies in the market today to think very creatively, let's face it. If this was all about to the 1 plus 1 equals 2, then you end up with very limited options. In reality, we're saving costs because we want to be profitable ASAP, and we have a plan to do so, and Tom can go through the details of how we plan to do this and save cash in different parts. That, in any way, does not stop us from creatively thinking on how we bring in another asset commercially, because the U.S. market today has 75 very solid reps who really know the space very well. They are supporting a product against 3 generics over the last years and keeping 60% of the business. So we believe there is definitely room to do so.
Now what opportunity is out there? How are we going to go about them is a different story, but this could be definitely creating shareholder value if that opportunity [indiscernible]. But for the moment, we're also focusing very much on contribution margin in the U.S., delivering all on our commitments because we're using that money to invest in Europe to start with, right? That's our priority before thinking that, that money is going to be used as well, obviously.
Andrew Fein
And Tom can address this, too. But I guess as you speak with your investor -- your current investor base, how does it kind of divvy up in terms of those folks that would like to see you become profitable versus those that perhaps care a little bit less about that and would rather see you invest for additional top line growth?
Thomas Reilly
Want me to answer?
Karim Mikhail
Go ahead. I can also add. Okay.
Thomas Reilly
Yes, I think it's a balance between both, right? So what Karim mentioned before, the cost initiatives is really for our operational investment to Europe. So from an investor perspective, to see the top line growth in Europe, we hear a lot of. And then we also hear from other companies or other investors about profitability. So it's a combination of both.
Karim Mikhail
And again, at the end of the day, we went out and we disclosed that. I believe our investors who are staying with us believe that the opportunity in Europe is above 1 billion, right?
Now to get to that, you need to manage your short term. This is where the whole cash preservation cost structure effort become very, very important, right? And that's why the 2 have to work together.
Andrew Fein
I guess in terms of business development, obviously, it's something that you guys have been speaking publicly about for quite some time now. Nothing's transpired yet. How should we think about that? Is it simply a matter of you not getting comfortable from a valuation perspective with assets that you've encountered? Have you been outbid in some previous efforts? I guess, how -- what's the right way to think about that?
Karim Mikhail
Well, the right way to think about it is that we set a definition that is very clear and focused. If we were out just to get anything, I think by now we would have landed somewhere. We are really targeting significant synergies from such a transaction. It's not just about bringing an asset.
So we said we want to be in cardiovascular. We want to be in specialty rare cardiovascular or cardiometabolic. And there aren't too many assets that are out there with that definition that will deliver business in the short term, right? Because it's one of our criteria.
So once you put a list of requests, the number of products that are out there that can fulfill this is not a huge list. So that's why we've been vigilant. We're not trying to do anything. And again, this is about creating shareholder value. This is not about ticking a box to say, let's do this or let's do that. So if it takes time because we didn't find the right opportunity, it takes time and we didn't find the right opportunity.
At the moment, we are very focused on launching in Europe. We are very focused on getting the 20 additional countries. We're very focused on stabilizing in the U.S. And when that opportunity will come up, we will address it, but we also cannot invent it, it has to be out there for us to brand at the right time.
Andrew Fein
One last question for me and then I'll pass it over to my colleague, Matt Coffield. And that's -- I think the past year, maybe 18 months has certainly seen a burdening of the obesity space as an area of specialty. Now physicians and training can do fellowships. They can become obesity specialists, which is something that hadn't existed before. And it seems like a core group of endocrinologists have redefined themselves, if you will, partly driven by the success of the and Eli Lilly drugs.
I guess where do you fit into that? As you look at the data in terms of who's prescribing VASCEPA in the U.S., are you seeing increased proportionality of folks who define themselves as obesity specialists? Is that something you can survey from the data? And how does that kind of play into your thinking in terms of positioning the drug going forward?
Karim Mikhail
Sure. So this is a very attractive space. Let's be very -- whether it's reimbursed or out of pocket, people pay a lot of money to ensure that they get their weight to be the way they're looking for. So it's a very attractive space, right? And it's a space that we've been looking at. But again, with the very same criteria, right? The criteria is it's something that needs to be very close to our footprint. We are not intending to add resources to address this. This needs to drive synergies, right?
Number two, is it going to deliver income very quickly? Is it within -- so overall, I believe this market is attractive. It's going to become even more attractive. It is a specialty play at this point in time. in the future, this space may move from a specialty play to primary care. We don't believe that that's going to happen in the next 2 to 3 years. This is going to happen from the next 5 to 7 years.
So we continue to follow all the different players in that space, but in other areas, too, where we believe we can even have a stronger "step forward." So thank you.
Andrew Fein
Great. So maybe slightly changing gears. When can we anticipate to see progress on the fixed-dose combination program? And is that something you continue to be encouraged about and looking towards the future?
Karim Mikhail
So fixed dose combination is a very significant initiative. It is supporting the diversification element on our side. When you get a product like VASCEPA with 25% or 30% outcome benefit, it would be a shame not to imagine a full portfolio of products around it.
If you took a product like ezetimibe, which was launched 20 years ago, that had 3 statin combinations. Until today, by the way, very, very highly used everywhere. So for us, this is a model to follow, right? We are going to build a portfolio.
Now because of the cost reduction, and we are very, very cash prudent today, we decided to focus on 1 statin in terms of development and really go sequential in terms of planning, meaning not take risks to run different phases in parallel because you can do that and save time.
But we are encouraged by the progress we're making. So far, we have made very, very little -- very few public statements because we believe the minute we talk about this, there is competitive risk. But some time in 2023, we will talk not only about the product, what it will bring and the value, but what sort of protection can come with it and so on.
So we are very encouraged with the fixed-dose combination, and it's a significant part of our future fixed-dose combinations in general.
Unidentified Analyst
That's very helpful. And then you've mentioned that you're taking steps to renegotiate various agreements to reduce your purchase obligations for inventory, which would reduce or help reduce cash burn. Can you update us on this progress with any further specifics or perspective?
Karim Mikhail
Tom, do you want to go ahead?
Thomas Reilly
Yes, sure. So the product had a very long lead time. When the third generic came in, we had purchased commitments that we had to renegotiate on. So during our Q2 earnings call, we gave an update on some progress we've made. We had a restructuring charge of $15 million related to the negotiations. We're continuing to make progress in Q3, and we'll see the benefits or yield the benefits in the future related to that.
Unidentified Analyst
Okay. And then maybe just in our remaining minute or 2 here, there are some interesting recent data at ESC. What kind of data can we expect for AHA?
Karim Mikhail
I mean there are submissions that are made at AHA, there are no decisions yet. They are all late-breakers. So up to now, we cannot really communicate. But what I can say is we are very committed to stand behind VASCEPA in every way. Today, this product has probably the most significant type of outcome benefit that you have on the market, including 20% cardiovascular mortality benefit, right?
I mean 2 or 3 weeks ago, there was a lot of noise about the that delivers 33 or something like that. This is a one product that by itself does 20%. So we will continue to focus on that space. We stand very much behind the science.
And let me tell you, it's actually very challenging that your study ended literally 4 or 5 years ago and you're still generating science. We have a slide that has how many subgroups were studied after REDUCE-IT. It's maybe 15 subgroups, all of them coming very positive and very significant. So let's see what we're going to have at AHA. We'll see.
Unidentified Analyst
We look forward to it. Thank you. Well, in the interest of time, I think we'll part ways there. But thank you very much to Amarin. This has been very informative. Really appreciate it.
Karim Mikhail
Thank you very much.
Thomas Reilly
Thank you.
GSK to SCOTUS: Don't take up 'skinny' generic drug label case:
https://endpts.com/gsk-to-scotus-dont-take-up-skinny-generic-drug-label-case/
J, you are right, much better than throwing it away.
I would give the 425,000 UK patients within the R-I label free 6 months (or 3 months or whatever numbers that make sense) Vazkepa supply, which would work down $100 million of inventory (a sunk cost), hoping to retain those patients afterward to generate $765M in annual revenues from UK alone for the next 10 years. It's a more proactive action than just writing off the inventory.
r, why a patient seeing doctors has so much free time to post? Did you post in between seeing patients? Lastly, can you show one of your posts this week that's informative and helpful to this message board regarding Amarin?
north, hard to imagine Auvelity, which is an FDC of two generic drugs (dextromethorphan and bupropion), would commend a BO premium.
$100M College Whiz Who Scored As Bed Bath And Beyond Squeezed Says He 'Wasn't That Aware It Was A Meme'
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-100m-college-whiz-scored-192823638.html
Pfizer (PFE) is in advanced talks to buy Global Blood Therapeutics (GBT) - WSJ
https://www.streetinsider.com/Hot+M+and+A/Pfizer+%28PFE%29+is+in+advanced+talks+to+buy+Global+Blood+Therapeutics+%28GBT%29+-+WSJ/20424108.html
liz, I think what the "creep" meant is shorting without any hedging, not truly naked short AMRN.
Substantial Impact of Eicosapentaenoic Acid on Cardiovascular Outcomes in the REDUCE-IT Trial
Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, MPH
https://e-cmsj.org/DOIx.php?id=10.51789/cmsj.2022.2.e3