Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
cribot whitney hasn't filed audited reports since 2008. he did raise money in mid 2012. agree with ya that whitney is probably pocketing cash. did ya see the big decline in silver revenues in the latest earnings reported? couple hundred grand missin in silver?
don't know why ya post was bounced. no offense taken here. did get the card wink
Ya wrong dude. BC has no "jurisdiction or authority" over the othm stock. Cant happen wont happen. BC only has authority over the CEO dude. The only thing they can do is fine him. Go ahead. Thats what happens in civil cases. It over mo ey. Nobody cares about that. Nothin can happen to the stock like ya want. Can't happen. Pointin out the facts.
Wrong again dude. This is a US company with its stick traded in the US. They can fine the CEO but not the stock. They can't cease the stock like ya say. Can't happen cause they don't have the "jurisdiction and authority" to. They only have jurisdiction an authority over the CEO. So what. Has no effect on the stock cause BC has no authority over the stock. US regulators do. Sorry
This case can only make findings. There is no guilty or not guilty. Can't happen cause its not a criminal case. Gotta get facts straight. Ya gotta think of it like an arbitration. That's civil dude.
OTHM doesn't have it's stock traded in BC. There is no cease trade order that can be issued. An arbitration from another country cannot have stock ceased in th US. Can't happen cause they don't have the authority to. What a hoot
Ya wrong. It's a civil case. a case that is over a private placement from a few years ago.
Not criminal like ya believe. There is no guilty or not guilty. An there no jurisdiction for BC on securities traded here in the United States. It just can't happen
Yes true but it's a friggin registered agent dude. They are a glorified post man.
Malc please show where the old man runs anything other than a registered agent business. Show how much stick he owns. Does he sit on the board or hold office? Answers are obvious. He doesn't
who the registered agent employs is no concern. coleman is not an associate of othm. the registered agent is ONLY the "registered agent." its not an employee of the othm. othm is not dependant on the registered agent. ya keep forgetting the registered agents function which is to accept service of process. the registered agent PLAYS NO ROLE IN THE COMPANYS OPERATIONS. this is nuts. think of it more like your central bank account. you can change it any time. you pay the registered agent $100 bucks a year. its so silly. dudes who say otherwise never owned their own company. if ya speak to the registered agent more than once a year would be a surprise. show me where old man coleman is a criminal of anything. he is not.
gotta disagree with ya. there is no association to coleman. its to the registered agent. coleman is th e signer for the registered agent and an employee of the registered agent. who the registered agent employs is no regard to OTHM or to this board. dudes are sayin that coleman runs the public company or is the ceo. that's nuts. just not true
registered agents don't own the stock. they are not officers. they are not directors. they are not employed by the company other than to be the registered agent in Nevada to accept service of process. that's it dudes. the fact that this dude runs his registered agent company from his house. who cares. be an agent for 1000 companies. god bless. and which coleman are ya talkin about? senior or junior? senior is the dude that owns the registered agent company. I know two other dudes that do the same thing and run a registered agent business in Nevada. it means nothing to the public company. what a hoot
this coleman dude is the registered agent for the co. that is his association. registered agents are not an officer. dude is runnin a business from the home. its very common in Nevada.
really 222 companies are public? negative
everything points to a registered agent business on otter creek. so what. dude handles 222 companies. so what. my DD shows there is a roger coleman "SR" that runs the registered agent. dudes keep focusing on someone else like its important. its a registered agent. come on dudes
newp take a look. this dude is the registered agent for 222 companies.
http://nvsos.gov/SOSEntitySearch/RACorps.aspx?fsnain=HYyAjJ2kD3b7HTPe1N3GNw%253d%253d&RAName=CORPORATE+CAPITAL+FORMATION%2c+INC
officers list the registered agent as the company's address all the time. its perfectly NORMAL
look at this one: inko trading
http://nvsos.gov/SOSEntitySearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=ZmjFUqXE0xs%252fhJdYEXyPlQ%253d%253d&nt7=0
mgk logistics
http://nvsos.gov/SOSEntitySearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=4ghC0a5iG3CjgHmjbE1KKg%253d%253d&nt7=0
euro-American
http://nvsos.gov/SOSEntitySearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=svZ4fLE1LzHfzd6fkYJKfA%253d%253d&nt7=0
all American
http://nvsos.gov/SOSEntitySearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=Ff25WXrxGr08srGbN%252fHxsA%253d%253d&nt7=0
Who cares about this dude. Seen no info that this dude is an officer director or shareholder of this public company. His company is the registered agent. He runs that co and is the registered agent for a bunch of companies. Almost all are private cos. so what
Registered agent accepts service. Collects the mail. That's it. Surprised dudes never heard of this. Company doesn't need to reply to the agent. If ya set up a business then ya know these things
Ya haven't read it then. There nothin like that there
The registered agent collects the mail. They don't run the company
Runnin a business from the home is common. What a hoot
Ya know that's a civil dispute
Not strange dude. It's called a "registered agent"
That company is the registered agent in Nevada. Nevada requires a business to be listed as an agent and this dude listed is the owner of that registered agent company. surprised that ya cant see that with the link ya provided
here is the rule
NRS 78.090 Registered agent required; address of registered office; powers of bank or corporation who is registered agent; penalty for noncompliance; service upon and delivery to registered agent in lieu of corporation.
1. Every corporation must have a registered agent who resides or is located in this State. Notwithstanding the provisions of NRS 77.300, each registered agent must have a street address for receiving service of process, which is the registered office of the corporation in this State. If the registered agent is in the business of acting as a registered agent for more than one business entity, the physical street address of the registered office must be in a location for which such use is not prohibited by any local ordinance. The registered agent may have a separate mailing address such as a post office box, which may be different from the street address.
Ya wrong there. Most public companies are set up in Delaware or Nevada. That doesn't mean they work outta there. They pay an agent to collect the mail.
snizzle. this has toxic funder written all over it
Crobot where is nitwhit hidin the assets that ya talking about? Didn't look to much into the itro business just followed the case
That's a nice web weaved
Yes pd but fact is most of the hedge funds providing funding to pinks and bullys are out of business. NIR Cornell and the dirtbags near me la Jolla cove. They all needed complicit CEOs to make their money and screws the stockholders of the public company
your comments are dumb when ya keep talkin about the notes. ya need to read the notes like we have. ya talked to a "person" that gave ya wrong info. sorry ya feel little but ya comments about certain things were uninformed. like contempt. like conversions. like deliverin over 400,000 bars of silver as a side payment to ribotsky so nobody knows. what a hoot. just the image of ribotsky drivin around long island with a trailer to his Ferrari carryin 400,000 bars of silver. its priceless dude. need to get a dude to do a caricature of this!
go after nitwit. spill tha beans on that corrupt ceo. ya the expert there. we just tried to correct ya on a few thing ya were sayin over here. we can explain them in detail. ya the one getting upset cause ya don't like that your arguments to certain facts never stood up. just like dr. evil said "the little one, he just doesn't get it!"
sorry ya feel small.
if ya read carefully, goin by the evidence presented by itro, nir did nothing illegal. read the documents. nevermind. ya will listen to some person who helped whitney make the wrong allegations. always said that nir probably had help if they did short. from the evidence provided the short sellin claim was rejected. don't think nir destroyed the company, thinkin nir destroyed the stock with the ceos help. itro is still in business
don't really care if ya take my word or not, the dude ya listening to is wrong. then ya come to this rag like ya know whats in the financing contract? every dude posting a lot on this board has read the financing agreements. why cant ya read them. its free to see. we all have.
I said
ya havent been correctly informed from this "person" as to what nir is all about and what they are allowed to do. nitwit tried every argument in court that ya are putting up here and the judge said itro was wrong. I will take the judges opinion over someone who "saw the contract." anyone who looks for the contract has seen the contract
meaning your "person" is wrong about his assumptions of what nir can and cant do. what nir did was ruled legal by the judge. itro along with your "person" who thinks they know what they are talkin about regarding the contracts is wrong. the judge for the case thinks so too. so the comment is dumb.
thinkin timing was lucky rather than planned. like itro fought nir for 2 years then nir blew up. lady luck wa rolling on their side. agree the complicit ceos take the cash spend it all then hand over the keys. what a hoot
snizzy. are ya sayin this ceo of othm is a registered agent in Nevada for 100 other companies? actin under the alias of roger coleman? runs a company as corporate capital formation?
reading ya posts on other boards and this is dumb.
did ya know that in Nevada private individuals act as registered agents for other companies. its a big business in Nevada. this coleman dude is either an employee or the owner of corporate capital formation. do they do that in florida too?
agree with ya pd that there were many ceos that gamed nir and got money
tks JJ. itro case was the gran daddy of em all. if nir lost that one. pwc has some meat to go after.
good background jurisper. it will take another two years
get your facts straight first dude. it is very obvious ya have done very little DD on the ajw v itronics case.
the judge rejected the short selling claim because there was no legal basis for it. do some background on the facts of the case, read the affidavits by itro, then we could have an intelligent convo about why.
ya havent been correctly informed from this "person" as to what nir is all about and what they are allowed to do. nitwit tried every argument in court that ya are putting up here and the judge said itro was wrong. don't shoot the messenger here dude because ya don't like what ya hear. I will take the judges opinion over someone who "saw the contract." anyone who looks for the contract has seen the contract.
will have to break it to ya but itro definitely spent more on the lcase than nir. probably to the tune of $500,000. that's a lot of silver bars.
so ya asked an attorney who was probably not from new york a hypothetical question then ya get a hypothetical answer. ya didn't do your homework so let me give ya facts to ask the question. nir and itro entered into a settlement agreement on march 31, 2011. then they entered into a stipulation of discontinuance discontinuing all claims with prejudice. if itro doesn't pay then nir is entitled to enter a judgment against itro. nirs claim is a civil case for breach of contract. it is not contempt.
facts are that itro defaulted by june 2011. ribotsky was out around the end of 2011. nir ran out of time to act against itro. agree with ya that PWC should go after itro. feel for the bagholders. agree they should pressure PWC to go after itro. couldn't tell ya whats goin on at PWC. ya should contact PWC and spill the beans on nitwit. help them out cause they need it. so ya correct there, this dude is only explaining fact the he knows so don't take it personal. you seem to be the expert on nitwits fraud.
ever think that what ya were told was wrong? no slam dunk. itro had no control over what nir did with their shares. nir sold immediately and probably had help. so you were told about nir naked shorting. this is where the itro case interested this dude. those claims were tried and rejected by the judge. try to put those issues to rest.
did read the financing agreements and the settlement agreement. itro was to start delivering shares beginning in may 2011. there are no details beyond that. my dd suggests that itro and whitney never paid a penny to nir (or ribotsky) after the settlement agreement in 2011. I am convinced itro and nitwit did not make any payments. nir was slow to goto court. if payments were made then there would have to be a record of them. it is unlikely that nitwit was paying ribotsky on the side and not getting credit for payin down the debt. it doesn't make sense.
the settlement agreement said that itro was to deliver shares (or cash if itro wanted) but lets agree they did neither. that is not criminal. it is not contempt. peeps make agreements they don't keep all the time. it is now nirs (actually now PWCs) duty to take itro back to court to enforce the settlement. these are "civil" issues not criminal issues. if PWC does nothing then that is their choice.
ya claim there is fraud in the operation of itro. you are probably right. nitwit has not reported audited reports in a long time. that allows nitwit to pad his pocket with the companys money. the dudes controlling that board we deleting my posts cause they didn't like what they were hearing. typical. do think there is more there than what itro is reportin. thinkin nir was on to nitwit then nir blew up before they could do anything more. whitney had lady luck on his side.
I do know what I know through DD. not what peeps told me. did DD about the facts of this case if ya want to continue. but don't know about nitwit specific dealings with him hiding assets (just helpin correct ya on a few minor issues). it wouldn't surprise anyone on this board that whitney was doin just that.
let me bring up to speed. first ya should read my posts on the itro board. then ya should read the court filings. your understanding is partly wrong. nir sued and itro countersued. every defense and claim itro had was rejected by the judge. no slam dunk for itro. nir won everything in court as dumping their shares is what itro agreed to. itro settled for over $8M as was to start delivering shares in may 2011. read it. never did see itro deliver any shares. seriously doubt that any shares or any money or any silver was ever transferred from itro to nir.
itro not payin nir is not a criminal issue. nir sued and won. its now in PWCs hands to do whatever they wish with the debt owed.
PWC could go after itro for default on the notes. It is unlikely. Itro is definitely in default. Itro also guaranteed the repayment of the notes with the assets of itro. Thinkin you should call up PWC and offer to buy the itro notes. Take the company from nitwit
the question posed here is just dumb
ribotsky doesn't want the 10,000 TONS of silver to transport from Nevada to long island that you suggest. its just dumb to even think it. side pocketing cash is criminal. thinkin fbi, sec and divorce would have found it. although that would be great its not likely because nir wants to sell shares. that's where they make their money. been watching the lawsuit between nir and itro for a long time. itro was losin every battle in court and settled. once itro settled the never made a payment to nir. its possible they paid in cash or shares. didn't see the shares dumped on the market. didn't see cash payments to nir on their financials. so the conclusion is that itro paid zilch to nir. how is that allowed you ask? they didn't pay. that's it. happens all the time. nir now has to go back to court again. nir now no longer exists. one of my last posts on that itro board was that hopefully nir goes out before itro has to pay up. otherwise the stock would be in the gutter. thinkin itro had lady luck on its side at the casino.
normally your attacks should be deleted but this dude does not care. your dumb remarks are what they are. it shows stupidity and lack of knowledge
just don't get it do you
did you read the settlement? there was no spike in volume because it is likely that itro didn't send nir any shares. was lookin to see it and didnt. nir didn't care if there were any buyers they sold the shares and probably had help doin the job.
So lets spell this out for ya. $8M is $12M worth of itro settlement shares. $8M of silver is 400,000 bars of silver which is over 10,000 TONS of silver. news flash just saw ribotsky pulling a trailer full of silver bars with his Ferrari.
thank you for signing up to tell this ihub rag that itro somehow produced 400,000 bars of silver to secretly cut a deal with ribotsky so the itro shareholders would never find out. ok dude I will stick with my medical grade
1 penny traded today
nirs game was to sell deeply discounted shares on the unsuspecting public. usually the ceos of those companies helped nir. to think ribotsky wanted itro 20 dollar bars of silver instead? dude I want what you are smokin. don't think itro paid nir anything after the settlement. was lookin for that big drop in the pps. didn't see it.