get your facts straight first dude. it is very obvious ya have done very little DD on the ajw v itronics case.
the judge rejected the short selling claim because there was no legal basis for it. do some background on the facts of the case, read the affidavits by itro, then we could have an intelligent convo about why.
ya havent been correctly informed from this "person" as to what nir is all about and what they are allowed to do. nitwit tried every argument in court that ya are putting up here and the judge said itro was wrong. don't shoot the messenger here dude because ya don't like what ya hear. I will take the judges opinion over someone who "saw the contract." anyone who looks for the contract has seen the contract.
will have to break it to ya but itro definitely spent more on the lcase than nir. probably to the tune of $500,000. that's a lot of silver bars.
so ya asked an attorney who was probably not from new york a hypothetical question then ya get a hypothetical answer. ya didn't do your homework so let me give ya facts to ask the question. nir and itro entered into a settlement agreement on march 31, 2011. then they entered into a stipulation of discontinuance discontinuing all claims with prejudice. if itro doesn't pay then nir is entitled to enter a judgment against itro. nirs claim is a civil case for breach of contract. it is not contempt.
facts are that itro defaulted by june 2011. ribotsky was out around the end of 2011. nir ran out of time to act against itro. agree with ya that PWC should go after itro. feel for the bagholders. agree they should pressure PWC to go after itro. couldn't tell ya whats goin on at PWC. ya should contact PWC and spill the beans on nitwit. help them out cause they need it. so ya correct there, this dude is only explaining fact the he knows so don't take it personal. you seem to be the expert on nitwits fraud.
