Just chillin with a workload

and a jittery economic climate. But the golds
are cool especially my Timmins. Got involved with
it at 56c now breaking out above $3.30

OOps , tho I have just

got to say I like the sound of that. Tell you one thing
Tex, you go where no other man goes. Guess I'll call you
Spock from now on in.
B.

Hey SJO, you look like

you have come to grips with the dog box. LOL.
I wouldn't worry much over the "North kid".
They have plenty of their own troubles, problem is
some of them are so busy looking at others, they
just don't see what's coming up behind.
When you hear the yell for help, give a condescending
smile and say, " Sure thing if you do good by me".
Peace Amigo.
B.

Yep and me too. I see

only one person who can get ol QASP back together again
and that is JC. He has a definite vested interested and
quite honestly the only one with the know how.
B.

Well there you go the

progress everyone was wondering about and
I mentioned in a previous post. So far, so
good. 8K filed and now working on completing
the merger. Looks like Mike Kendricks has been
busy getting things together.
Now to see how the ship is set on a even keel
and what the destination is.
B.

Yes everybody has their story

but it's the real one that matters in the end
and I think the last couple of days are showing
a direction, wouldn't you say?
As for where Joseph Canouse get's the money?
Well I am sure he has given that considerable thought
before embarking on what he is doing. I too, am pretty
sure he knows what he is doing.
Was a time when I followed the crowd. NO LONGER. I look
at this from a business point of view and I am beginning
to see what direction Joseph is going. A difficult task
considering the opposition and spoilers and know it all's,
but I think he may get us all some value. Himself too,
of course. That's what it is all about.
B.

Mineseeker never was in the broadband

game. THEY WERE IN THE LEARNING GAME. Like teaching
the people of Mozambique how to do things. Broadband
does no good in Mozambique, Kosovo or anywhere else
there are mines. WHY don't people get that!!!

NO MERGER DOCUMENTS were ever filed. The intent was
there but it was never done. Mike Kendricks first
priority now, I imagine, is to file an 8K and have
the "Stop" sign removed to a "YIELD" and then go
ahead with the merger in the right way. Officers and
who will be what are sure to follow.
This is all just plain business strategy and quite
probably what is going on behind the scenes.
The only ones to know are the ones involved, and
they sure ain't on this or any other board.
B.

That is hilarious. I am sure

your name was removed, fact is you must be mighty old if it
ever was on that list. That list was referred to in a Gilbert
and Sullivan operetta, Oh somewhere at the turn of the century.
Early 1900s. Something about as useful as the list I'm not
supposed to be on. That is really funny and certainly
lightens up the heavy drama on this board.
B.

Good morning, I suppose it is incriminating in the
eyes of some to communicate, but that remains my prerogative.
I would like to say I hope you are making progress in getting
QASP out of the quagmire and look forward to events of that progress.
I find it fascinating how supposed shareholders continually
go to extremes to bring down the very company they would
like to recover their lost investment from.
B.

Thank you Joseph for the

heads up, but frankly is of no consequence. Actually the
whole thing reminds me of a G.& S. operetta, I gotta little
list, I gotta little list. Much the sort of activity of
grade school. I am however, interested in the progress
of MS and hope things work out well. I think it time the
name NHSH is forgotten for good.
B.

Tell you one thing for sure,

I sure as heck won't want to be here where
those elves come from, come winter.
If at all possible I just might be able to
swing a day or two to visit orange land
myself and make a get together possible.
Anyways enjoy the weekend and leave the
boards to the needy.
B.

Yes tex that is the goal

and honestly, I see some of it happening.
Don't think too hard on shells beach can
sometimes produce nicer fish than just
the wormy type. Yes Mike is more on the
reality prospect I wouldn't be surprised
on him taking the right door. QASP shareholders
slamdunk court would set the dogs running.
Could be an interesting next couple of weeks.
Enjoy the weekend I'll ask chief to lend me
his peace pipe and then, getting back to
reality, for sure, pray for rain down South.
Cat can't fish without water.
B.

Good luck on that round trip

QASP will be very interesting, need that price up a mite.
Those TMM, hold with both hands tight. Up around $3 now
and my head on a block ol Brucy will get it to $10
for Santa.
Geesh cross my heart an hope to LIVE>
B.

Oh yeah tex cooler than

you guys in TX, Time for a weather break
around you nek o woods.
B.

SJO did you notice the drama

with GLD/ Going up slowly last couple of days,
the semi hostile grab expires Monday, I think, then
there should be another offer on the table.
That little fellow NCM is right in the middle of the TRR
and GLD claims. I am sure there will be a bomb dropped on
that bunch. Gld biggest claim area at 42c, Trr $4,40 semi hostile
take out surrounded by GLD and NCM 6c totally surrounded by both
of them. I'm on watch for GLD. interest, but have had stock in
all three for a year.
Once the dust settles, guess what, all will be taken over by a
much bigger player.
Figure gold at 2k by end of next month or sooner.
B.

Now that is the smartest post

I have seen for a long time. correction tho,
see I always correct.
Don't leave out silver, just tack it on at the end
and go with the 3G'S.
Lol, Peace SJ
B.

I haven't posted on this board

lately, for the simple reason that I have a certain respect
and am not in the least bit interesting in engaging in futility.
Something I notice is so quickly resorted to when loyalties
get involved.
The statement "share offer officially dead -no shares no offer"
is rash and ill thought out, obviously motivated by loyalty,
however misguided. Any offer, whatever is referred to, is
far from dead. I for one know of no dead offers. But then that
is just me and what do I know.
B.

Sorry to contradict cat, but that

signature was required for continuity in a legal sense.
It does not reflect any position of persuasion nor anything
else for that matter.
I expect a normal process will now follow and further clarity
of officers, structure and so on.
B.

Very nice! Now isn't that an

excellent way to bring back stability to
NHSH. For the record all the cudoes go to Mike Kendricks
and James, so don't get too carried away congratulating
too many. The rest had no option, which should be quite
obvious.
As for James needing funding, Hmmm, you ain't seen nothin
yet. Both the above gentlemen are now very well aware of
their respective directions and I wish them success.
B.

No he didn't, that is very

astute of you. Then again he never does, does he?
He gets someone else to do it for him.
B.

I think you should leave out

the "they" in that pump story. The one, and I know it is
an excuse but true, was inexperienced and easily led around.
Hell I was, so were you. One thing for sure James knows better, a
lot better now. as well remember too 92A and $350, that's all
it would have taken.
But this may still have a life, we will just have to find out
what kind of life that is.
B.

I do believe on good authority

he is a master at skyping. I have very good reason
to believe the more one thinks and associates patterns
the more convoluted things become. I have nothing against
social get together s, but when they undermine a distinct
benefit in the offing, I get kinda flat.
B.

No, No not to common shareholders

US less privelaged, and that means me too, you know
the guy trying to help us with - ER - Jeff's an groups? help.
When I finally dug, I damn near gagged on the smell.
Have to say, I shared some facts with a few less
privileged, which were then very quickly twisted into a knot.
So now I very carefully restrict my share instinct,
B.

Morning iwond sure is like

a soap opera, isn't it. I doubt ol Jeffy will be back in the
Q. Heck I hope not! Any more shareholders groups and I will
run screaming to the hills looking for Braveheart. Maybe
someone from the Senate or something can step in.
Joe is on nobody's side and I don't blame him for that. he
has his own scene, and I don't blame him for that either.
As for the others, now there's a thing of ugly.
B.

I have heard of this sort

of manipulation. Actually seen it first hand, so have you
right here, in my opinion. The PRs are in some cases very convoluted.
As for getting the band back together, I think that would
be difficult, all the instruments are kinda out of key at
the moment, some even run over by the band truck.
Hang in there tho, cause analyzing carefully and not necessarily
reading behind the lines, I recon a couple of days and some sort
of info (possibly PR) and things should become clearer as to
direction. I'm hoping by the week end.
B.

OOH you betcha is is

But they're not really insiders, they just think
they are. Just amigo's with privileges when the
chiefies feel so disposed.
B.

Modified 2nd try: Deano, this is hilarious and

if you had followed my posts you would not
be surprised.
You know you were all barking up the wrong tree. Mind you, so,
was I, blindly following posts. But recently I have approached
things from a business perspective.
Joseph is not the bad guy you all think. Sure his actions seem
self serving and only interested in dilution and so on.As for
the offshore accounts and shorting, you are looking in the
wrong place. Just evidence the "N" debacle. There's enough
Gibraltar et al to get a man seasick. No Canouse is out to
make money, then aren't you all? But to make money you need
a LEGAL vehicle, and to get that vehicle some things need to be done that on the surface look suspect to those on a direct line to suspicion.
Now we have the infamous Dean, that everyone loves to hate.
None of those who hate him know him. All they know is the
"Daddy" part and then the infamous mirror debacle.
How many people in a business office don't joke and make fun
about shareholders and clients and so on? Can you imagine
if those clients, shareholders etc. found out about that "FUN"
what kind of stink it would make?
Now, make no mistake I am not defending Dean, I don't know him.
Don't want to, He is bad meds. But how well did we know the recently ousted CEO> AND so far I see no evidence of any criminal
activity conducted by Dean. Isn't 11 months kinda a long time
for the FBI etc. to get real?

Just some thoughts.
B.

Chief, I fail to see what you

agree with.
Sour grapes? c'on over what? Not being invited by the
group? Even my posts reflect that I wanted clarity when
I started the pledge thing. Sour grapes, that's childish.
I called them very early on, that is why I went
another way to help shareholders. Whether they took advantage
of that or not was their call.
The details are well known by those that did. I will not go
into details, I'm a professional and I know what I am doing
and have patience.

I too have heard a smattering of an attempt, to the effect that
I benefited and am benefiting. NOT true. I did and do what I
do to help. I don't need to benefit. I do it for real friends.
Heck I can earn more in a week, if I set my mind to it, than
the whole lot of this put together.
Disgruntled? You becha!! I persuaded many to help with legal
costs and it was claimed the "Group" was unknown, when there
was an association and CC meetings on Skype all the time.
And these had the interests of the shareholders in mind?
I THINK NOT.
The legal actions were pathetic, as it turns out, to boot.
Am I stopping? I have never started, believe me. Quite honestly
I no longer care, I helped the way I said I would, some know
and some decided I was the bad guy. Bad move because chances
lost and the real bad guys were doing their thing under everyone's noses.
It's deep alright, or should I say was, because there will be
a period of tranquility and face saving stability. There are
some pretty smart people an the move.

And Porgies dumb question why Skype and not Centacom CC?
I would think that would be blatantly obvious. Centacom
peeps didn't know.
B.

Yes you are absolutely right

but nobody will accept it, defeats me and you, I notice,
the frustration.
I think it is less of "who dictates what other than James"
rather it is who was smart enough to recognize an amicable
resolution to put a stop to something very unsavory and save
the face of what there is here.
I am sure the air will clear pretty soon. Sure hope so.
B.

Put this on the "Q" board, but it fits here too.

What happened to shareholders group?

With the top dog EX CEO, Preoccupied with another company, perhaps? Now that's not fair for the poor QASP shareholders they were so concerned about. Even convinced us all with red herrings like cut off dates and all that exciting stuff.

Just makes me think, in my opinion of course, wouldn't that be an ideal avenue to pursue for a real smart piece of legal action.
Consider this; All these suing process against individuals, which I knowfrom experience, can be so time consuming and expensive going on forever, that they can often be considered unproductive and a waste of good time and money. When there could be a potential gift presenting itself.

Go for a group for tortious interference, and, possible the big "C" involvement in the name of the big "F", and that could be something even the old jaded judge would jerk his head up for. Then using a bit of imagination, one could include such heinous possibilities like, insider information, stock manipulation and Gee shucks, dare I mention character assignation, defamation, extortion intent and, Oh well that's enough, but the possibilities are endless.

A lot could be involved: Group of? + Skype conferers and wow, thats a tortsycrowd, if ever I heard of one. And the documentation and evidence is all over the place. All in my humble opinion of course.
Actually, I was invited to join that skype CC stuff when I started to canvas contributions for the head honcho. But I declined. See I wanted transparency and Skype wasn't it.
Course that was when I was popular, wouldn't be invited now.
My, MY, that was fun and just shows what a vivid imagination I have. Good fodder for a movie script tho, in my opinion.
B.

What happened to shareholders group?

With the top dog EX CEO, Preoccupied with another company, perhaps? Now that's not fair for the poor QASP shareholders they were so concerned about. Even convinced us all with red herrings like cut off dates and all that exciting stuff.

Just makes me think, in my opinion of course, wouldn't that be an ideal avenue to pursue for a real smart piece of legal action.
Consider this; All these suing process against individuals, which I knowfrom experience, can be so time consuming and expensive going on forever, that they can often be considered unproductive and a waste of good time and money. When there could be a potential gift presenting itself.

Go for a group for tortious interference, and, possible the big "C" involvement in the name of the big "F", and that could be something even the old jaded judge would jerk his head up for. Then using a bit of imagination, one could include such heinous possibilities like, insider information, stock manipulation and Gee shucks, dare I mention character assignation, defamation, extortion intent and, Oh well that's enough, but the possibilities are endless.

A lot could be involved: Group of? + Skype conferers and wow, thats a tortsycrowd, if ever I heard of one. And the documentation and evidence is all over the place. All in my humble opinion of course.
Actually, I was invited to join that skype CC stuff when I started to canvas contributions for the head honcho. But I declined. See I wanted transparency and Skype wasn't it.
Course that was when I was popular, wouldn't be invited now.
My, MY, that was fun and just shows what a vivid imagination I have. Good fodder for a movie script tho, in my opinion.
B.

Very few posts here and

very little information or interest.
I am surprised, because I feel someone should
get this even slightly back on track.
I still have all my stock, have never sold a single one
since way, way back.
I think you are all so preoccupied with dilution and going
after the wrong people that here is blindness fatigue.
B.

Chief I doubt very much

that MS will walk anywhere. In my opinion, why
leave the golden mine buried, when there are ways
of seeking and finding it. I have learned in this type
of entanglement, it is smarter to carefully disentangle
and deal with the known, than walk the minefield of treading
on uncharted fields. the technology needs refining
before that is explored.
B.

An absolutely excellent summary

of your findings. That type of research and post is an
object lesson to many and very much worth reading.

There are many aspects of what you have researched that
will be revealed and others that will have been effectively
dealt with soon, in my opinion. Consequently I will not comment on them.
I would, however like to single out one particular referenced statement and show how things can so easily be twisted:

"Jeff declares in his resolution that NHSH did not receive the requested shares of Centacom stock needed to close the merger and that Centacom failed to disclose $31,000 due to attorney, Mohammad Bataineh, for legal services he previously performed for Centacom Corp. The resolution further states that Mohammad Bataineh is threatening legal action to collect the money owed to him."

"the requested shares of Centacom" not specified and not detailed.
The lawyers fees,
These were a bill (account)given to James of a personal nature.
Mohamad was never engaged to work for Centacom and has no proof of that happening.
James was over charged, so placed 15K in trust pending receipt
a complete accounting of all charges, which he did not receive.
On my suggestion, because going for a lawyer is a never ending thing, should he not receive full accounting, there will be a
letter sent to the Florida Bar association reporting the conduct.

You be the judge.
B.

If you keep your Emails

Have a look way back at the first Emails you got
from the group when they were using a yahoo mail
account. that first one was sent by someone and
they forgot to remove their name from the mailing.

Can't make it easy now, can I?
B.

Here is a question and a rebuttal

Where did you get the information on James a week before,
and then the direction to the mugshots?

Your knowledge of criminal law is sadly lacking and very
typical of the uninformed using leverage which could be
very dangerous, if taken exception to. I would suggest that
you concentrate on the investment side and back off on the
expert analysis.
That type of record and it's true outcome, is quite definitely
not to be played in the court of public opinion. Perhaps it
would be in your own best interests that you read the history
and make a note to yourself the conditions involved.
As for the stand up guy, the evidence is something quite
different.
B.

Yes we have and you refuse to

lay the blame on the submitted articles of mergers etc.
NRS 92A.200 on the one who had the responsibility and
did not do it. The argument of "there was no money"
does not wash : Fees $350. sounds like the other one
of my favorite phrases "the poor QASP shareholders".
Seems that one wasn't attended to either, in spite of
the "Shareholders group".
Mind you, I could kick myself for not going into that
thoroughly, then again, who would of thunk.
In what I do I should have known better.
B.

Actually you should qualify

that, from bleeding to have been bled previously.
you will not bleed now and will heal fast.
B.

He was/ is one of the

shareholders group and one of the skype team.
These are the ones who did nothing and obviously
knew much. I tolerate many things, BUT do not like
being made a fool of. Especially when it involves
me soliciting others to help in a wild goose chase.
B.

Hi Chief, bit tired but

back on this side of the big sea shining water LOL
To answer your questions from my perspective:
I guess I was mislead by the promise of NHSH, same
as James was. So yes, for sure.
Note holders FOR sure and perhaps not all the board
members.
OK it is a work in progress, I think the whole picture
will change, and I think all players will do the musical
chairs bit and the chairs removed, possibly with new others.
I think there is the possibility, no make that probability,
that it will stabilize. Future, we will see.
Last question, ABSOLUTELY NOT. I could easily filter out
some, others not so easily because of their attitude change
pattern, if you get what I mean. A few who have never been trusted and don't have to be here, are squarely here to help
All what I think. Hope that answers you.
B.