Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thank you , happy holidays!!!! Be Safe
Have a great holiday!!!
Thank you, I wish all a very happy and safe holiday.
Obviously, the 092 was supposed to be 002 if you read the context of my post. I wholeheartedly apologize for my fat finger mistake causing you so much stress and despair.
Sorry, I meant to print .92, you can find it in the charts. Thank you for your astute observations and PVSP DD. Have a great day!!!!
Great planning, you "thought" you got rid of certain shares. Surely a sign of a pointed and precise strategy. I would have been a lil embarrassed to post that bit of financial/trading acumen. Also, averaging down is a great strategy, avg down too soon on an apparent downtrend supported by the charts is certainly what the shorts and MMs count on. It seems you apparently were unable or incapable of understanding even the basics of selling specific PVSP shares in your account(s). Your broker can advise you of the basics next time. GLTY.
I just can't believe you haven't taken the write off and repurchased much lower. I believe that you have believed that if you did the stock would make an unbelievable run during the 30 plus day buyback period. Unfortunately, I don't believe that you believe in financial advisors or have much experience in same. I believe you would be sitting in an unbelievable position with the write off and new purchase at 002 or less.
And it is obvious that you prefer to disbelieve what management believes. What exactly are you trying to say, that you disbelieve what someone else believes that the management believes or disbelieves in order to make others believe or disbelieve as the truth??? Great point!!
Great post
"I hope Paul can slap Arty with a big"
Show us a link where the CEE of a public Co sold stock or CDs without the proper filings. That is what you claimed. SHOW IT or stop with incessant ramblings of deception.
Please provide a link wherein the CEO sold stock or CDs. You too funny. Still have not used a calculator mr apples/oranges/deception. You are too funny.
Also, assuming the Riss info is correct, he has contributed $151k including taxes towards cash flow for the year which is significant. Additionally, I think there were other salary deferrals as well as expense cuts.
I certainly would have taken the write off a long time ago and repurchased 30+ days later. You are also assuming no growth or contracts.
Actually, the FF conversions have been right at market and I don't look at them as I would an Asher et al. This could certainly signal an end to the short term CD loans. Also, if the Riss info was correct in response to Baz's email, it appears as if Riss is contributing by deferral his salary to help the cash flow as well as his 5m share purchase last week. I doubt he would be doing this if he did not see an end in sight to the cash flow problems. Also, it would be prudent for Riss to validate the Panomark re transparency for shareholders as well as assuring investors that there will not be a split.
It seems apparent that this type has been planted on most penny boards in the last few years. The offshore and Canadian chop shops are pretty obvious.
Yes, they are certainly real and 100x worse in the pennies. Thank you.
Good post and I agree. You were correct re my other post as I have had no contact. iPhone and fat fingers. My earlier post that Green commented on re name change is quite simple if Finra agrees to the reasoning. During the name change process, once Finra initiates the name change the stock is still trading, however, the share certificates must still be exchanged share for share. IMO, the primary issue is to have the product synonymous with the trading name.
Thank you, IMO, emails should be published as written from the source( with personal info deleted)as it Just adds credibility. That said, I am not doubting you or the contents of your post. Thank you again.
Same to all, Riss may have thrown a monkey wrench at some brokers here. Have a good weekend all.
The info is in Reg D Sec 506 for unaccredited investors, which can total 35 per year. The restriction period is one year for unregistered and less if it is registered as 144 stock.
Can't say since it may be a subscription agreement,private placement, registered or exempt. Many variables here and there are many variables now with restriction periods.
Wow, very nice. I will talk to some peeps about the subscription agreement this weekend. I also, once again say that my broker friend was right on about parties buying at 092. My advice is do not hit the ask at this time when you can buy at 002. Good move on the part of Riss being a lil creative re the subscription.
Very funny Mr Apples, you know everything about all the CD financiers but you don't know about the one in your own backyard.
Thank you, I just know that there are issues that an officer can sidestep with ifs, ands and buts. Lying about a financial transaction is suicide. There is one thing that bothers me, the disconnect between the names of our product Vox and the public co, PVSP. Would like to see the public entity become Vox Mobile Communications. This would also kill naked shorts as the certificates would need to be converted. I just think that there are thousands of users that have no idea that Vox is public.
Agreed, however, I don't think there are many "clear" SEC rules. I also think that a CEO would be putting his neck in a noose if he lied about a financial transaction to a shareholder. The key here,IMO, is the non derivative firm vs derivative. I will give Riss the credit here.
The P would signal an open market purchase, which it was clearly not as it is 2x the volume that day. It certainly could be a direct purchase from the Co as it is listed as a non derivative and most likely restricted. Please note in the definition " or other acquisition". If it was an option or warrant it would state same as being exercised including the exercise price. There are no incentives as a straight stock bonus that I can find in the 10k so I believe it was a direct purchase from the Co at market.
Thank you, I stand corrected. It was an award, expect to see a bonus award for Richards also.
No, A is purchase and D is sell. Also, the non derivative form was filed so it is not a warrant. I think my broker friend was correct and Riss also bought shares from the CD seller at 092. The transaction date is the 19th and there were only a couple of million traded thus it was not open market. Nonetheless, it is a positive sign when a CEO spends cash for stock.
A friend of mine believes that this block of sellers are brokers that have already purchased stock from the CD holders at around 002/share; which in effect masks the normal VNDM/VFIN scenario.
Yes, the future certainly holds free wifi in its grasp. As such, VoIP will become very strong as the driver for all aspects of data/voice/gaming.
I guess we see things differently, all I saw was clients and numbers but no dollar signs. No one should demean shareholders who are down and who wholeheartedly believed a deceitful CEO and CIO via PRs and personal contact.
That is the most ridiculous statement that I have ever heard relative to a stock or the stock market in general. I also think you misinterpreted Daub's post, I took it to mean there are 10-20k potential clients that could be obtained at a minimum rate 100 new clients per month.
I just read your post from last night, good luck on your idea. Just seems impractical that PVSP would pass on it resulting in your going to a competitor. I hope their reasoning was of sound mine and not ego.
So, you do think he is technically capable and is a part of developing the tech or did he hire all of tech.
I have first hand dealings with him or Riss. Does he just not like shareholders or just in a defensive mode due to circumstances.
I believe that probably happen in 95% of all stocks today.
Agreed, the past is the past. Hopefully, Riss has enough foresight to bring in someone; although I thought I read that he turned down an investor that wanted to take the reins.
Actually, it is probably the right time for PVSP to try and bring in others as distributors/mergers. The problem is Riss does not have the capacity to accomplish such things.
Yes, the consolidation of any industry/ sector is usually a result of increased competition and lower pricing strategies wherein the big boys find it more expedient to buy technology and/or customers and get the cheap providers out of the game. . The earlier posted article stated the very low average spend of $7.13/customer in 2012 which means very few are doing well at this time. IMO, had PVSP had the right Mgt. in place the would have been far ahead of 8x8 and a major player. Riss did not know how to implement and did have the wisdom to bring in the right guy that could.
CDEL owns a good stake in etrade
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-08-08/whats-e-trade-doing-with-its-customers-orders-anyway