Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
”arbitrary deadlines”
So Ken Griffin believes he is Loki as the “god” is depicted at the end of the last episode of the second season.
Interesting.
On the other hand:
I will choose a path that's clear, I will choose Freewill — Rush
Geddie Lee / Alex Lifeson / Neil Peart
It sounds like you want to enter the bet? Put your money where your mouth is as they say, although that doesn’t sound too sanitary.
Do you want to bet if the maa will be submitted or not before January first? Loser has to stop posting here, excepting one farewell post.
You’re right. I just checked it. (Monthly) Submission deadline December 25, 2023.
Still, how do you submit an maa on Christmas Day?
C’mon, nobody drinks tea from a pale anymore.🥸
Newman is obviously playing the part of the overzealous long. He makes a great straw-man for you. He seems to revel in his over the top opinions.
Where’d you pull that date out of? NWBO tends to not be so kind around Christmas. Ahem….dropped a refinance on everyone in past year(s).
And how does someone submit an MAA on Christmas???
Your 25th/26th scenario sounds a little….
You just ignored your own error, and started your false argument all over again.
Instead, the publisher had the majority of all material for the last section on November 22, but today is December 8, so they may have all the material by now. It would make sense, because they defined “several” weeks by October 13 standards, which is “Two to Three weeks.” Aka: December 13, or thereabouts.
You have reading comprehension problems. Neither I nor NWBO (in their public communications) claimed the publisher had everything on November 22.
Today is December 8, 2023.
Pumpernickel is not a source.🥸
You don’t know they haven't received “everything.” They had the ”majority” of the remainder on November 22 when the publisher began reviewing the last section for the last time/step.
The Company previously reported that one key section of the MAA package remained to be completed and to then be delivered to an independent publisher for quality control checking of citations, numbers, cross-references, formatting and the like, in preparation for the submission.
The Company provided (aka Nov 22) an update that most of the work has been completed on the key section of the MAA that remained to be done at the time of the prior update (aka Oct 13), as well as on required supporting documents, the majority of which have been delivered to the publisher/QC team (as of Nov 22). That team is now under way on this final stage of their work.
As described in the Company’s prior update (Oct 13 PR said two to three weeks) it is anticipated that the publisher/QC team will need several weeks to complete their work on both the last portion of the MAA package and the integrated whole. Their work is independent of the Company.
DD thinks they might be covering on the dark exchange.
Hoffman never stated this:
So you're all betting on submission before the publisher even gets all the material? — Learnincurve
Di is the “SMA,” sexiest man alive?
Again?
Something is definitely rigged. You know those aren’t his real nose hairs…. am I right?🥸
Ex’s source revealed.
“Sorry, I will call BS” — Exwannabe
Ok, you are in on Maverick0408’s side of the bet. MAA submitted before January 1, you stop posting for good here, with the exception of one goodbye post. MAA not submitted to MHRA until after December 31, I stop posting, with the exception of one goodbye post. (No new profiles)
Any other bears want to take the same bet?
So join the bet anyway. No time or risk involved. Right?
You must have meant to respond to another post.
BP do not have any current CIs to “milk”in GBM.
Maybe everything is as it should be today.
NWBO/consultants/publisher took some extra time (two weeks) to get MAA correct.
Shorts were publicly noticed that they might be stuck if they don’t remove their positions.
Looks potentially like shorts are clearing out for now. (Although the way they might be going about it is questionable)
I hope.
Much Bravado. Want to join the bet?
False. Instead, the 2023 PRs clearly demonstrate there was no prior maa submission.
I don’t think we’ll be able to better confirm ‘covering’ until Monday’s short coverage data comes out.
Want to join the bet?
Yes, I’ve also noticed DD includes you in some of his postings.
Because it’s recounting past events, which don’t fall within future predictions exemption.
So we need to add kidnapping/enslaving aliens to your list of nefarious behavior. SMH.
That’s speculation, but logically, one might wonder why the publisher, and not NWBO gets the last independent edits followed by submission? Why would NWBO feel the need to emphasize this?
More like background. The reason it’s relevant to me is that a larger publisher is likely capable of better timeline assessments and meeting them — hopefully. Also, a more experienced publisher is likely to submit a more bullet proof submission.
sentiment_stocks
Member Level
Re: exwannabe post# 654093
Friday, 12/08/2023 12:17:36 AM
My goodness… how deep does this posting go? Lol… I just stumbled onto this tortuous thread.
I’m confident that it’s a fact that the initial publisher was recently purchased by the bigger publisher.
I’m confident that what flipper has linked that I wrote is as close as the company’s take as it can be, give or take some sort very minor misinterpretation. And so hopefully this post can put an end to this thread.
There is treatment for amnesia, but you must remember to seek it.🥸
My thinking was NWBO probably couldn’t previously afford the most seasoned publisher, but as ‘luck’ would have it, their publisher was, reportedly, acquired by a larger and more seasoned publisher a few months back.
(Note: See Senti’s prior posts regarding publisher change)
Very informative link, and great question.
Thank you.
Back again for more Ex (12 hours later)?Here is Senti’s take on our debate.
sentiment_stocks
Member Level
Re: exwannabe post# 654093
Friday, 12/08/2023 12:17:36 AM
My goodness… how deep does this posting go? Lol… I just stumbled onto this tortuous thread.
I’m confident that it’s a fact that the initial publisher was recently purchased by the bigger publisher.
I’m confident that what flipper has linked that I wrote is as close as the company’s take as it can be, give or take some sort very minor misinterpretation. And so hopefully this post can put an end to this thread.
If you recall Bozo, I no longer felt the need to contact the ombudsman years ago, because the data release timeline was announced. You’re welcome.
Thanks. I have enjoyed your humor immensely. Hey, it ain’t over until midnight of January 5, 2024.
Senti is still hopeful for 2023, Hoffman is as well. I believe Doc is too. So are a few others.
I made the bet before I heard about the apparent new publisher, which now makes me think there is still a chance the Company’s/publisher’s time estimate is sound. (I was dubious first read of the last PR)
Hope so. If not, chalk my time here up to a decade of ‘monastic’ prayer**.
The power of attention.
**(And I’m not all that spiritual)
No it doesn’t. He walked away again (two days in a row) when I posted the three messages. Predictably, you stepped in and are trying to deflect.
Knock knock
Who’s there?
Interrupting thread.
Inter…..
Spam spam spam..
Exactly, almost a decade ago, I was referencing (on this message board) a Royal Academy White Paper on similar points, but back then, it was probably just a glint in regulators’ eyes.
That’s twice now on different days he’s done that (disappeared) after I copy and paste these posts to him.