Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
My pleasure trade2much and thanks.
Sorry for not doing such a thorough job lately of 'keeping up'.
I was updating current PPS's in Table A more often but I slacked off, kinda pointless, generally down anyway, but I will update soon.
Also haven't been as timely updating Table C with some possible 'new' or 'paid' clients. These were interesting to monitor and even to trade a couple such as IDGG and COPI when they were 'new' and 'paid'.
I've been busy on some other projects and moving a family member, hopefully the basic info provided here in the iBox gives the intended overview of the perils of 'playing with the fire' of Toxic/Death Spiral financings and the companies who partake of them.
Still adding to that 'Featured Cozy Network' involving Yorkville/O'Leary and added Tobin to the mix. I wish I knew what it all meant lol. Probably just illustrates what a good command of writing SEC filings can allow a 'network' to accomplish relative to siphoning monies from otcbb 'investors' and transferring those monies into deeper pockets lol.
regards,
jonesie
Are these sell signals?
Or penny-flipping day-trading signals? I'm trying to get a handle on what's being predicted here because appearances on this board over the last few years have coincided perfectly with tops (almost always AFTER a 2 or 3 or 4 day runup) and the stock has almost always gone down immediately after these appearances.
Was I just reading them wrong? These have all been SELL signals? These have all been 'calling the top' AFTER a couple of days of runup? Have these been signals to those who can short sub-penny otcbb stocks to short NEOM again?
1/19/06: "Confirmed". NEOM had just hit .425 high and never printed a higher price
2/17/06: "Another move"? NEOM had hit .40 , long ride down ever since
3/20/06: "Ready". Hit .38 that day , down ever since.
5/19/06: "Perfect." .215. 2 weeks later .25 then down ever since
7/25/06: "Confirmed" .185 that day , down ever since
9/24/06: "Nice chart" .129 , down ever since
10/20/06: "Looks good" .10 , down ever since
4/6/07: "So close" That was at the near-high of .068 after a 5-day runup , made it to .0685 the next day , down ever since
4/13/07: "Could make a monster move" , down ever since
8/14/07: "Love to see you going" , .027 , .032 the next day, down ever since
10/22/07: "Looking up" .022 after a runup from .014 , hit .03 one day later, down ever since
11/5/07: "Looking better" .0195 , down ever since
3/15/08: "News expected?" .009 after a runup from .0069 , made it to .011 , down ever since.
Is this weekend visit the final death knell? Is NEOM going to have 3 zeroes after the decimal point now?
Just curious.
jonesie
Good description of toxic PIPEs.
(Note the Cornell Reference at the end.)
From quarterbuck:
http://quarterbuck.com/?q=node/61
Excerpted:
"A death spiral PIPE (Private Investment in Public Equities) investment is one where an investment firm lends money to an ailing firm. These debts are usually debentures, ie notes backed by nothing but the credit of the company. These notes also have provisions where the debenture is convertible into stock at a later point of time. So far, there is nothing that is illegal or unethical - convertible debentures are a common investment vehicle for private equity players. It allows them to get senior, fixed returns from ailing stage companies (debentures are debt) but can also provide high upside (convertible to stock). Death spiral PIPE's differ in one significant aspect - the debentures are not converted to stock at a fixed, pre-determined price, but at a price that depends on market price. It might say something like "Investor can convert the debenture into stocks worth $10,000" rather than "Investor can convert the debenture into 10,000 stocks at $1 each stock".
This crucial difference provides a huge incentive for the investor to push the prices lower -- The lower the price, more stock the investor can buy for the fixed sum agreed in the debenture. So sometimes the investor shorts the stocks, pushing the prices of the company lower and then exercises a part of the debenture. The stocks from the proceeds are used to cover the short , netting the investor a profit. The investor can continue to do this till the company dies or the market refuses to buy any more of the stocks. SEC has investigated such transactions, but many have been settled rather than taken to court. A pump and dump scheme on the other hand is clearly illegal.
I am not saying that Infinium got into a death-spiral PIPE, nor is this stock advise. You should make decisions for yourselves, but here is the filing that Infinium made with the SEC. You can see the filings and judge the motivations for each of the parties for yourselves.
http://www.secinfo.com/d12TC3.v3br.htm
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1145019/000114420406003444/v034105.htm
"Talking about death spirals , what the heck is Lehman Brothers doing a PIPE deal with Cornell Capital Partners ?"
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1157762/000114420408011102/v104590_8k.htm
Interesting chart ...
... mostly because it's 'mixed signals' lol
We've got an uptrend going since sometime in December.
CMF with two settings doesn't actually give me the warm/fuzzies , showing money flowing OUT of the stock.
Acc/Dis , the same thing , clearly in a decline until if/when a positive divergence shows up.
Lastly , the 'resistance' around $1.85-$2.00 puts us in an ascending triangle , and a breakout above that on volume would perhaps presage a 'next leg up'.
But until that happens it appears sellers still control the action and there aren't any really motivated buyers out there at the moment.
JMHO -jonesie
.<font color=#006400> SYMBOL CHANGES
UCPI.OB changed to SOIS.OB
UCPI.OB changed to SOIS.OB
How would he know?
Here is what was actually said if you're interested in "facts".
At least in the facts regarding a rumor :)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=28740427
Absolutely, there hasn't been any such correlation.
No matter where NEOM has been in the buzz cloud, the PPS continues to go down. I'm thinking most of the clicking on NEOM is akin to watching a train wreck.
Anyway, The Buzz Cloud is what it is.
While there are a few stocks 'most clicked on at iHub' which are over a buck, most are under a dime, the majority of those are under a nickel, with a lot of those under a penny, and it's probably a toss up as to whether they have two or three zeroes after the decimal point.
I think it should be renamed 'Cloud of Shame' or 'Buy One Of These And Get A Free Buzz Cut For Your Portfolio Value'
LOL
jonesie
NOTICES TO DRILL, RE-WORK, ABANDON
No notices for Tri-Valley for week ending 4/19/08
ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/oil/weekly_summary/2008/04-19-2008.pdf
Thanks for posting that.
NEOM has been in and out of the bottom of the Buzz Cloud for quite a while now.
But what you failed to notice or if noticed, to mention, is that the typeface for NEOM right at this moment is larger than the smallest typeface in that array, meaning that NEOM picked up a few more clicks here late today:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/quotes.asp?ticker=NEOM
Now, NEOM isn't in 'bold' yet, so it's not quite as popular as these:
VDTI: .525
GLCC: .15
SRSR: .0275
UHCR: .078
WNBD: .021
IMEN: .0029
nor even as popular at the moment as these gems:
PYCT: .0002
HCPC: .0002
NUBV: .0001
RGVD: .0015
But NEOM did move up a bit today as far as the Buzz Cloud goes.
:)
Hey, more iHubbers clicked on NEOM very recently than they clicked on AAPL.
I guess we're buying AAPL and putting ourselves on all the iPhones.
;)
jonesie
All someone has to do ...
... is look at the quantity of shares on those trades to know that nothing important is happening.
That's why they call it 'painting the tape', paint covers a multitude of 'sins'.
jonesie
Yep , I saw that.
Very few dollars caused a green close.
Called painting the tape.
We'll see what happens next.
jonesie
It's an interesting concept, being 'rewarded'.
Those who sold in .60's and .70's were rewarded. Those who got out by .42 were rewarded, if they bought earlier. Anyone who bought on TS's first pumps around .06 had ample opportunity to be rewarded for the luck/astuteness of their timing (if it was on the buy AND sell side) and taking that action .... even if they didn't sell until Tobin said to sell. Those who bought on the last pumps didn't fare so well, but such is what happens when listening to touts.
At every step on the way down various touts have touted various things as being important and beneficial. NeoReader has been tested 'behind closed doors' at Google. NewsCorp is inches away from doing the deal. Equity stake partners are right around the corner. Fortune 100 and 500 companies are queuing up to join in.
Do we get 'rewarded' for holding onto our shares because of what these touts say is about to happen? Even if it appears these touted events have some validity because of the patina of company-derived info brushed over them? It doesn't appear so. SHOULD we be rewarded for doing so? Probably not.
In penny/otcbb stocks we don't actually 'invest in a company', the company generally doesn't get our 'investment monies' and then use them to build the company. NeoMedia never sold treasury stock on the open market in the last few years , if they had then perhaps we could be said to have invested in the company if we bought some of those shares.
No, mostly what happens is other 'traders' (long, short, midterm, whatever, you don't make money 'til you close 'the trade' so we're all 'traders') get our money when we buy shares from them ... and if we sell those shares at a higher price , we take some money from whoever bought our shares , and they hope to be able to sell those shares at higher prices still.
That's just the 'greater fool theory' in otcbb-land when it's dealing with a company with no revenues or revenue growth, just promises of such.
Now in NeoMedia's case they did get money without actually producing anything , they got it from YA , because YA knew WE would buy THEIR shares for a while , so indirectly we could be said to have 'invested' in the company , but for every dollar we put in .... the company only got a percentage after YA's largish cut , and then of course we helped to dilute ourselves at the same time by supporting this system of .... as was so astutely pointed out again here today by someone .... Death Spiral Financing.
So YA got rewarded .... for getting shares at low prices , and then selling them higher. Pretty quickly too , it seems.
And of course ex-NEOM management/directors got some money from us because we bought back the cheap (free?) shares they gave themselves when they decided to sell them on the open market and profit from it , build houses , whatever. We 'invested' in management a little bit , it was said they deserved it , for being a 'visionary' , or because they were helping the 'visionary' to help us.
So ex-management/directors got rewarded ... by selling high.
But other than that there's not much reward in otcbb land for 'patience' ... and our 'efforts' , well, WE are not supposed to put in EFFORTS are we, really? We buy shares and the company is supposed to do the right things, not the wrong things at every single turn. Does GE expect you to put forth 'effort'? Apple? HAL? No , these companies don't expect you to put in 'effort'. You CAN put in 'effort' but as we see , all the efforts of tens of thousands of posts and blogs and pictures and speculations and dots and manhole diving didn't help at all. Probably best to let the company handle the 'effort' part , otherwise they get spoiled.
So , we can reward ourselves by buying low and selling high. Let the other guy buy the high-priced shares and let HIM hope for the best. But we don't actually 'invest' in NeoMedia. If we actually did, they might treat us better , but they know the real deal, that otcbb share-buyers are just hoping for the big score, buying the story, telling the story to others, so if we screw up and take losses ... it's our own fault in their minds .... and here's the rub .... it's our own fault no matter WHAT they might have said they were doing or were going to do that they really DIDN'T do and may have never even planned to do.
As we have seen , they can SAY anything ... anything at all. With the right legal verbiage they can say and say and say and not have to be accountable for any of it.
Not much has changed. We heard that a substantial part of that last $1.7 million financing was going to be used to build a world class sales force.
That was over seven months ago wasn't it?
Any word on that? Where are they? Who are they? What are they selling? What do they even have to sell until the carriers get on board? Why tell us they were going to do that, then tell us NOTHING ever since?
We heard about a couple (three?) people coming on to a Technical Advisory Board, 'world class' people. Are they still there? How do we know? Would Chip tell us if they weren't?
We've seen a lot of Help Wanted ads. Any of those jobs get filled? How do we know?
When I visited NeoMedia there was a reception area and a receptionist. I heard her answer the phone. Is she still there? Why doesn't anyone answer the phone now? I keep hearing that people call, and nobody answers.
No new news.
'Rumor has it' hasn't gotten us anywhere but disappointed so far.
'Huge win' ... the same.
If it changes one day , fine. We'll see it in revenues or it doesn't count.
Yeah, we've had a lot of "huge win" hirings ....
.... in the past.
Martin Copus was a 'huge win' wasn't he?
As was Roger Pavane?
Even Jay Bonk was touted as being a 'huge win'.
And of course Chip was.
I guess I'll wait to call somebody a 'huge win' when he actually 'wins one for the shareholder' and not for YAGI or for himself.
BTW , I didn't see mention of Priddy in the linked-to GoMoNews article?
http://www.gomonews.com/ctia-showstoppers-neomedia-is-a-start-up/
Well that's because everybody knows ....
.... we have something hot going on with Apple and the iPhone.
Wait , the price would be going UP if anyone really thought that.
Oh well. I guess some just want us to believe we have something like that going on , and seem to have taken extraordinary measures to foster that belief.
outta here for a while, have fun today.
jonesie
p.s. Someone mentioned the most recent loan shark loan as sounding like a 'payday loan'. You know, I think they were right. Pay some salaries, keep the lights on, Frank is slow but sure when getting all the paperwork ready, the paperwork we do NOT want to see. Hope I'm wrong.
p.p.s. How's that averaging down working out for everybody?
Wow!
More, more! Up Simba, up!!
neom.com traffic up in March?
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/neom.com+scanbuy.com+scanlife.com/?metric=uv
ScanLife peaked earlier then dropped back towards the Scanbuy level.
Both ahead of neom.com
Neoreader.com , still no info.
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/neoreader.com+scanbuy.com+scanlife.com/?metric=uv
Thanks lemonhead1de
Interesting , especially to be hearing someone who was told to delete "ScreenShots or information" about NeoReader/I-phone yet he feels comfortable saying "Im pretty sure its not going to be on the new iPhones that come out though."
He may get yet another request .... to stop talking about it at all lol. I think some would rather that it look like NeoReader might be on the I-phone but this guy is blowing it.
Well , maybe not blowing it , the share price is saying that nobody thinks NeoReader is going to be on much of anything significant and that even if it does show up somewhere there won't be anything much going on to help revenues/earnings any time soon.
Thanks again.
jonesie
If it's okay with the DS ....
.... I suppose it's ok.
It's not a TOU violation to post it.
XXXXX out his email addy perhaps.
jonesie
So if that's the case ....
... why all the feigned 'upset' over that DS guy's blog and all the 'mysterious' removal of all references on blogs everywhere?
Just some trying to plant a seed that the deal was on and trying to be kept hush hush?
That would be my vote.
jonesie
LOL , that's pretty humorous Drmyke ....
And be told that Yorkville is our friend and we're lucky to have them?
Or to see how close AT&T's building still is?
Or have my memory refreshed on 'if NeoMedia becomes insolvent it's a CEO's fiduciary duty to Chapter it'?
Maybe I could ask again exactly why we need a $336,000/yr+ CFO and again not be given an answer?
Or be told again that NeoMedia hasn't really been using GO's 'services' to any great extent lately , only to find in the 10-K that he got paid fully for 211 days of work in 2007 , all while he was providing similar 'services' to at least 3 or 4 other public feeding trou... er , I mean public companies , including being CEO of one in England?
Actually I won't be wasting any time again on that sort of thing.
Besides .... I'd hazard a guess that my research into the incestuous interconnections amongst NeoMedia-related entities/persons and the graphical presentation of same might just have me categorized as persona non gratis at NeoMedia. Since I'd be hard pressed to argue with that categorization , I don't harbor any illusions as to any welcome mat being rolled out.
JMHO
jonesie
p.s. Give me one more pop on fluff/good/great/any news and I'm blowing this popsicle stand.
Over , one way or the other , would be good.
Hanging on to my lottery tickets just in case but cognizant of the fact that most lotteries have odds starting at millions-to-one and worse.
Or in our case , billions to one.
jonesie
3 1/2 minutes from NeoMedia conference room to AT&T conference room. I guess that was supposed to make me think that was important.
And another new multi-year low ....
.... with .0039 printing , and with .0031 on the Bid.
If something's going on , if Chip Hoffman is really getting anything done , they are doing a great job of keeping it secret.
jonesie
clawmann, yes, 4 total that I know of so far ....
.... there may be more. I got on some other projects and have not revisited that one as of yet.
All 4 are indeed down big time, but I think Tobin himself would have to say that NEOM was his biggest success story with the biggest percentage runup from his non-stop touting.
NEOM's was a compelling story there for a while and he told/embellished it so well.
He also had a lot of help.
jonesie
p.s. re: 'complicated graphic' , I have yet to see another quite so involved. I've asked in several venues if anyone else has seen anything as involved or more involved , no candidates as of yet.
Unless there is some deal-making going on ....
.... deal-making of which we have NO evidence , I'd guess 'no' to that one as well.
Maybe Apple is willing to take a flyer and put applications in their store which are offered by companies (like NeoMedia) who have no known deals going on with anybody , who when filling out their 'application to the I-Phone store' include information showing they are nearly insolvent , who could simply vanish , rendering portions of the NeoReader system non-working.
Or , maybe Apple would just offer a reader which has a track record out there and is already used widely in other parts of the world and is supported by a company that on paper doesn't look like it's about to go under.
I don't know. If I'm Apple , what exactly do I need the NeoReader for?
JMHO and I would like to be wrong about that.
jonesie
With the addition of an asterisk ....
.... we could go after this one:
Most Innovative True* Mobile Start-Up
* To include self-proclaimed Start-Ups
Anyway , ya'll come on down to Atlanta!
jonesie
"How would we know if something is going on unless you happen to have insider info."
We would know something is going on if the execs who have a fiduciary duty to shareholders to apprise them of ongoing developments fulfilled those duties and told us what is going on.
"So please stop insisting that nothing is going on unless you absolutely know."
We can be fairly certain that a number of things are NOT going on , such as increasing revenues , due to available clues such as NeoMedia borrowing more money from YA. Other than that I'd say folks might logically assume that no news is bad news or no news is no news since historically that has been the case nearly 100% of the time.
"You keep insisting that CH release some news, then if he does release something you call it fluff, (Personal OT comment removed)."
CH hasn't released any news about core NeoMedia in over 7 months. Nearly the only 'news' in over 7 months has been about a hiring or two and something about what GSMA is doing although GSMA themselves never actually said it. Yeah, that seemed to be fluff as far as actual execution by NeoMedia is concerned and judging by the share price action it seemingly didn't please too many people.
"Ch will release news when there is some (Personal OT comment removed)."
When and IF there is some.
"As to your claims of BK, if it was going to happen it would have already happened before YA gave them anymore money (Personal OT comment removed)"
That is not necessarily a logical statement as YA could well want to keep NeoMedia alive and doing something for a while longer while YA assesses the relative likelihoods of generating more cash from continuing to dump shares or from dictating a BK and either selling the IP or running a newly restructured company without the hassle of a few thousand shareholders hanging around. What YA probably knows about YA-beneficial timing of a BK goes far beyond what any of us might know about it.
JMHO
jonesie
p.s. Personally I think YA might keep the company public and non-restructured for a while , dumping free or cheap shares has to be fun and fairly easy , and they can always throw in a R/S if they deem it to be in their best interests , possibly allowing them to sell shares even longer.
re: Short Interest
During the time period 3/27 thru 4/10 while the short interest changed downward by net 27,744 shares , the PPS increased from $6.09 per share to $6.28 per share.
Most of that share price increase seems to have taken place on April 9th , the day before the last trade date in this particular short interest reporting period.
Closing Prices
4/8: $6.00
4/9: $6.22
4/10: $6.28
SHORT INTEREST AS OF TRADE DATE 4/10/08
Short Interest for TIV as of Trade Date 4/10/08:
2,358,507 shares
Short interest was down 27,744 shares during the most recent reporting period. This period covers trading from 3/27 through 4/10.
Month-----ShrsShort---- % Change
---------------------------------
Apr 2008 - 2,358,507 ----- (-1.16%)
Mar 2008 - 2,386,251 ----- (-0.30%)
Mar 2008 - 2,393,494 ----- (-0.37%)
Feb 2008 - 2,402,283 ----- (-0.43%)
Feb 2008 - 2,412,708 ----- (-0.17%)
Jan 2008 - 2,416,782 ------ +1.88%
Jan 2008 - 2,372,266 ----- (-0.40%)
Dec 2007 - 2,381,745 ------ +0.02%
Dec 2007 - 2,381,262 ----- (-0.02%)
Nov 2007 - 2,381,837 ----- (-0.83%)
Nov 2007 - 2,401,841 ----- (-3.97%)
Oct 2007 - 2,501,137 ------ +0.71%
Oct 2007 - 2,483,500 ----- (-0.30%)
Sep 2007 - 2,490,932 ----- (-0.84%)
Sep 2007 - 2,511,943 ----- (-0.56%)
Aug 2007 - 2,526,079 ----- (-3.35%)
Jul 2007 - 2,613,736 ----- (-4.92%)
Jun 2007 - 2,749,037 ----- (-0.42%)
May 2007 - 2,760,565 ----- (-0.39%)
Apr 2007 - 2,771,400 ------ +1.82%
Mar 2007 - 2,721,853 ----- (-0.57%)
Feb 2007 - 2,737,463 ------ +1.64%
Jan 2007 - 2,693,334 ----- (-2.77%)
Dec 2006 - 2,770,185 ----- (-1.5%)
Nov 2006 - 2,811,009 ---- (-11.9%)
Oct 2006 - 3,192,293 ---- (-2.27%)
Sep 2006 - 3,266,297 ----- +0.09%
Aug 2006 - 3,263,093 ---- (-5.04%)
Jul 2006 -- 3,436,104 ---- (-17.3%)
Jun 2006 - 4,156,544 ---- +13.87%
May 2006- 3,650,143 ------ +1.83%
Apr 2006 - 3,584,379 ----- (-5.41%)
Mar 2006 - 3,789,445 ----- (-4.23%)
Feb 2006 - 3,956,897 ----- (-3.56%)
Jan 2006 - 4,102,837 ------ +3.86%
Dec 2005 - 3,950,446 ----- (-1.88%)
Nov 2005 - 4,025,937 ------ +5.01%
Oct 2005 - 3,833,789 ------ +1.39%
Sep 2005 - 3,781,376 ------ +9.56%
Aug 2005 - 3,451,421 ----- +24.25%
Jul 2005 - 2,777,900 ----- +39.66%
Jun 2005 - 1,989,039 ----- +20.65%
May 2005 - 1,648,631 ----- +40.68%
Apr 2005 - 1,171,931 ---- +113.52%
Mar 2005 --- 548,854 ----- +86.95%
Feb 2005 --- 293,590 ---- +327.46%
Jan 2005 ---- 68,682 ----- +96.67%
Dec 2004 ---- 34,923 ----- +37.38%
Nov 2004 ---- 25,421 ----- +10.40%
Oct 2004 ---- 23,027 ---- +408.66%
Sep 2004 ----- 4,527 ---- (-59.68%)
Aug 2004 ---- 11,227 ---- +132.59%
Jul 2004 ----- 4,827 ---- (-31.31%)
Jun 2004 ----- 7,027 ----- +55.22%
May 2004 ----- 4,527 ------ TWBFTS-
Apr 2004 ----- 4,527 ---- (-94.73%)
Mar 2004 ---- 85,881 ---- (-13.21%)
Feb 2004 ---- 98,951 ---- (-00.88%)
Jan 2004 ---- 99,833 ----- +00.89%
Dec 2003 ---- 98,951 ---- (-18.30%)
Here's a juicy fact about CH ....
.... and what he has or has not done to date to add to our value:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=NEOM.OB&t=1y&l=off&z=l&q=l&c=
To date , that's a juicy fact that counts.
jonesie
.<font color=#006400> SYMBOL CHANGES
WGATE.OB lost the "E" and is back to WGAT.OB
Absolutely true.
And I'm hoping that one way or the other these guys will somehow make NeoMedia an exception to the YAGI rule: ~95% of YAGI-financed companies tank .... and stay tanked.
Note: of the ~5% that didn't tank and/or stay tanked ... they all have outstanding share counts ranging from 17,000,000 to 258,000,000.
Not over a billion , with another 4 billion being spoken for.
jonesie
Another week.
Another week of new sub-half-penny multi-week lows.
Another week without any mention of a Shareholders' Meeting although it has been nearly 2 years since the last one was held.
Another week without any mention of a what used to be a regularly scheduled Conference Call discussing annual/quarterly results and offering an opportunity for management to field questions put forth by actual shareholders.
Another week with no news about anything related to 'core' NeoMedia , bringing the total number of days without such news to a mind-boggling 227.
Another week with no news about anything at all except a smallish toxic financing heavily favoring Yorkville , potentially requiring nearly another 100 million shares to be printed at some point in the future , and providing NeoMedia with a quarter's worth of pay packages for CH FP and GO but nobody else.
A week which saw another company PR'ing the upcoming inclusion of their application on the iPhone while we are supposed to believe NeoMedia is shackled with NDA's in a cloak of secrecy , when all we're talking about here is a 2D barcode reader.
A week in which instead of some market-wowing NeoMedia-favorable USPTO patent reexamination news being released by what was a much-touted 'deadline' of 4/16/08 .... we were rewarded with notice of a 3-month extension added to the length of the stay placed by NeoMedia on our patent infringement lawsuit brought against Scanbuy.
Hey , don't tell me there's nothing going on LOL.
It's just that what we can actually see is going on isn't necessarily all that good for the value of our investments in the company.
Judging from all that .... what's going on 'behind the scenes' and 'in the manholes' and 'behind closed doors' must logically be astoundingly great!!
JMHO
jonesie
No guessing about it ....
.... I missed that post of yours, or didn't read it all the way through.
You're welcome lol. For me doing and posting the comparison , I mean :)
jonesie
So, with companies like this able to announce ....
.... the upcoming placements of their applications on the iPhone , why would anyone try and have us believe NEOM is handcuffed with NDA's and a shroud of secrecy regarding similar?
I always thought this a little bit , but reading things like that makes me think this more strongly: the little 'game' which was played between bloggers and the blogger on that NeoReader-tweaked-to-work-on-iPhone website and the removal of all references to it here was just that ... nothing more than a game.
Would love to be proved wrong!
JMHO
jonesie
Is that a positive fact or a negative fact?
I'm not sure what you're saying.
Hey, speaking of Yorkville getting all those shares , when in March was that?
I imagine you see the same thing I see with NEOM daily volume starting March 28.
3/28: 9,213,183
3/31: 425,600
4/1: 5,276,336
4/2: 3,443,741
4/3: 9,455,500
4/4: 7,413,197
4/7: 6,620,956
4/8: 1,756,788
4/9: 3,501,636
"the share price to recover" (edited)
Message boards are not supposed to be used for manipulating the share price, but rather for discussing known facts and various speculations.
(edited to add:) No quantity of positive posts on this message forum will provide a sustained upward price movement. Only company action can do that.
The fact that the known facts are negative and/or depressing and/or sparse-to-nonexistant can't be helped by any of us.
(edited to add:) The fact that there are as many or more realistic negative speculations as there are realistic positive speculations can't be helped by any of us.
It's the known facts and the constantly eroding share price and even more recent additional dilution which gives investor sentiment , and as a tiny subset of overall investor sentiment gives this board , a somewhat negative tone.
Only the company can change those facts , provide new positive facts and move the perceived value of the company and thus the share price upwards.
"something on the horizon here".
That was said at .40, .35, .30, .25, .20, .15, .10, .05, .04, .03, .02, .01 and now at .005.
The horizon may be getting closer , but based on what the company has actually told us we have no way of knowing that.
Good luck to us all , we need it.
jonesie
Hey hey .005 on the Bid x2 ....
.... we haven't seen that since Tuesday.
"restructure the company"
With that being the only actual company-related comment ... do you (or anyone else) have any thoughts on possible options as to how that might look?
Or even what possible options they might have?
jonesie