Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Denials, denials and more denials until he-was caught.
Why didn't Steven Zale address the pertinent issues that I-Glow and I have brought up:
No major retailer bought the Crayola jewelry collection...why?
Did Zalemark make the payment to settle the JTV lawsuit?
Why did they file to cease operations in California?
Why are they persuing audited financial statements when they could be using those resources to design and promote Crayola jewelry? You don't need audited statements when you are not selling anything.
Crayola didn't know about Steven Zales past. The video was a ploy to try and plead his case after he was found out to be a criminal. That is why Steven Zale is distancing himself from Zalemark. No major brand wants to be associated with a known criminal that could tarnish it's reputation.
No sales!
No profits!
No talent!
No nothing!
The stock is in the toilet. Zalemark can't get financing as the PPS is tied into the Kodiak deal along with the contingencies of getting audited and complete transparency and securities compliance.
The whole branding concept is bad. You need tremendous advertising dollars and marketing ability to make it work. Zalemark doesn't have the funds or talent to pull it off.
wishful thinking won't make it happen. No more whales are coming in to save this company.
Steven Zale: the failed vision behind it all.
As I view the different videos, I see a desperate person still misleading his investors to believe he was just an innocent bystander in his jewelry store when the cocaine transaction took place. As Zale explains it, the police wanted him to expose someone else to get his sentenced reduced. He chose not to do that, as he wanted to take responsibility for his actions. BUT why would he say no to that deal. If he really was innocent and just put two parties together with no knowledge of them selling and buying drugs then why didn't he say that to the police. What he told the police is that he wouldn't "tell" on someone else. It doesn't make sense. The police, for a few months, had made smaller buys from Steven Zale directly. Doubters; read the arrest documents and the articles in the L.A. Times.
Steven Zale portrays himself as an innocent bystander. He wasn't. And he still is trying to twist the truth. His stupidity in business has sunk this company for years. And now he says "you are not hurting me. You are hurting the shareholders"...referring to myself and I-Glow. I have only been here for a few months...Steven Zale started destroying this company from day one.
The only renumeration I receive from these posts is gratification in exposing this crook for what he is.
I'll write next about his involvement in the embezzlement arrest and how he continues to downplay that as well.
Crayola or Hallmark/M&M's must have put tremendous pressure on Steven Zale. That is why he made the video. Yes, he made and paid for the video. Why do you think he is trying to distance himself from the company. It's not because he wishes to just focus on design and sales; he is inept at doing both. There has been no appreciable sales or revenue ever. The company continues to lose money (millions upon millions of stockholder, stakeholder and investment funding). Meanwhile the PPS keeps dropping.
No sales
No profits
Coupled with inept leadership have put this company on a course to bankruptcy. So please, don't blame me or others for the stock price decline. Blame yourselves for not seeing what I and a few others have seen for quite some time.
No Zale loyalist will ever believe me. So I can't do the deal.
All the Zaleombies have been brainwashed to believe in everything and anything that Steven Zale says. There is not an ounce of critical thinking skills between all of them. I would pay to have Steven Zale take a polygraph test. I would ask him questions regarding the cocaine conviction, the embezzlement arrest, why Zalemark filed to cease operations in California, did any major department store buyer view the Crayola collection, has he ever taken jewelry from Zalemark without paying for it, are his "excursions" to Bangkok strictly for Zalemark business or is he going there for other purposes. I would also ask him about his illegal drug use (if any) in the last ten years. In addition, I would ask him questions regarding the recent video...like who paid for it. Plus some other questions about Zalemark's business practices. And if he comes clean in his answers, meaning if he passes the polygraph test, in addition to paying for the polygraph test, (which I would pay for whether he passes or fails), I would make a $500 donation to Operation Smile. All of this can be arranged anonymously through a representative of Operation Smile.
What the loyalists don't understand is that I am not in this for any monetary gain. I really think Steven Zale is a criminal that continues to take innocent people's money and should be "cloistered" behind bars.
The long loving Zale loyalists have lost money. I haven't. I don't make money on my posts as Steven Zale has suggested. I didn't cause this stock to drop. I came here when this stock was at $0.04. Now it's really sub penny. So from $1.50 to $0.04 was caused by Steven Zale's ineptness running his business. Nowhere does he address the real issues in his video. It's always passing the buck. Why didn't he address the fact that no major department store buyer liked the Crayola collection enough to place an order. He blames non delivery on packaging and factory certifications...more B.S. Try: "no buyers liked the merchandise". With Steven Zale it's always another delay or an excuse for his lack of business sense. And going back through the press releases there has never been a successful business or entity that Steve Zale had been involved in. He has bankrupted or closed numerous businesses leaving tremendous unpaid obligations. And still the stupid long loyalists believe this pied piper will bring them financial rewards. Bah Humbug!
I could go on and on but I have an office party to attend this evening with winners not losers.
Too many contradictions in the video. Very deceitful.
Over the holidays I will analyze each segment.
But just for now I will add this:
Steven Zale downplays his cocaine dealing as a one time thing helping a friend make a "connection". Which just so happened in his place of business. Not true. The police had been watching him and making small buys for months. But Zale's version is of an innocent party trying to help a friend. Repeatedly, time after time, Zale still does not take responsibility for his criminal behavior.
"DOWN" is the direction. It hasn't changed for-years.
Recently hitting news lows with nothing to stop this train wreck.
No sales and none in the future.
No profits and they can't borrow from Kodiak.
No talent. Continues to lose money on Steven Zales concepts.
The only consistency with Zalemark is the PPS falling even lower.
The-best "material-event" would be-to-see Steven Zale escorted out-in-handcuffs.
He is still trying to rip off innocent investors with his deceitful ways.
And the Zuppets are still drinking his Zool-Aid. The bids keep dropping as we get closer to year end.
The video was produced and paid for by Steven Zale or Zalemark as the website is only recent, with a few stories thrown in from other "real" jewelry websites. It looks like Mr. Zale and Zalemark violated some copyrights by not giving credit to those websites.
No success in 2016. Sell this year and take the write off. Buy back if you so desire in 2016 at much cheaper prices. Or, sell now, take the loss and buy at a discount direct from Zalemark next year. I mentioned this concept months ago when the PPS was much higher. There is no future with Zalemark. No legacy for Steven Zale to leave to his children and grandchildren.
You can't take percentages to the bank. What were the actual doller amounts. That is why Steven Zale hasn't learned from his criminal past. He is still trying to deceive the shareholders. Read the financials. Mr. Zale also projected $58 million in sales this year. This stock is laughable, but not to the actual investors who have lost millions of dollars. And they continue to lose millions. Again, read the financial statements.
Zalemark couldn't sell Crayola, the same with M&M's.
No amount of wishful thinking will make it happen.
No sales
No profits
No talent
No nothing.
Meanwhile the PPS keeps dropping.
Zalemark can't borrow the funds. Too many contingencies.
The funding is predicated on getting audited and up listed.
The funding is predicated on a much higher price per share.
The funding is predicated on the securities commission compliancy standards.
This is just more wishful thinking by a company that is deceitful.
Remember this post from months ago re audit.
Steven Zale, the convicted felon who went to prison for three years for dealing huge amounts of cocaine, is not a truthful person.
Beefhouse Friday, 08/14/15 10:43:01 AM
Re: I-Glow post# 2903
Post # of 6309
because they WILL be audited this quarter. That was straight from Steven Zale when I spoke with him.
Audit is again more B.S. from Steven Zale.
The third quarter financial statement wasn't audited and the fourth quarter probably won't be audited as well. If Zalemark was serious about auditing...then the last financial statement would have been audited as promised.
But why spend the money on an audit when you have no sales or incoming revenue. Just a waste of resources.
No sales
No profits
No talent
No nothing.
Just more effort spent on hyping the stock and not the supposed jewelry.
Steven Zale did not learn from his "mistakes". I am not sure which came first; the arrest for embezzlement or the cocaine conviction. But I just found out that California has a Three Strikes Law. Which means if you commit three serious crimes like embezzlement or dealing cocaine or carrying a fire arm when you were a convicted felon then the mandatory sentence is 25 years to life. So Steven Zale let his wife take the rap for the embezzlement so he wouldn't have to go bye-bye behind bars for his extended stay. Steven got lucky on that one but he is a two strike felon now.
Zalemark is looking horrible for 2016. Always excuses. Or delays.
Whatever
Denials, denials and more denials until he-was caught.
Why didn't Steven Zale address the pertinent issues that I-Glow and I have brought up:
No major retailer bought the Crayola jewelry collection...why?
Did Zalemark make the payment to settle the JTV lawsuit?
Why did they file to cease operations in California?
Why are they persuing audited financial statements when they could be using those resources to design and promote Crayola jewelry? You don't need audited statements when you are not selling anything.
Crayola didn't know about Steven Zales past. The video was a ploy to try and plead his case after he was found out to be a criminal. That is why Steven Zale is distancing himself from Zalemark. No major brand wants to be associated with a known criminal that could tarnish it's reputation.
No sales!
No profits!
No talent!
No nothing!
The stock is in the toilet. Zalemark can't get financing as the PPS is tied into the Kodiak deal along with the contingencies of getting audited and complete transparency and securities compliance.
The whole branding concept is bad. You need tremendous advertising dollars and marketing ability to make it work. Zalemark doesn't have the funds or talent to pull it off.
widhful thinking won't make it happen. No more whales are coming in to save this company.
Zalemark is a loser company. Led by-a loser.
After months of denials, now Steven Zale finally comes forward and admits he was inprisioned for three years for selling huge amounts of cocaine. Crayola and M&M's finally must have found out. Of course that is the reason Zale states he is not an officer or director of Zalemark. He is trying to distance himself from the company. And after hyping the big Crayola launch for the third quarter of this year, he still says nothing about any major retailer carrying Craola jewelry for this year or even next year. Steven Zale is a loser and so is Zalemark. Steven Zale has never had a successful business. He has left a trail of bankruptcies and closed businesses leaving substantial unpaid obligations. They have lost millions of dollars in stockholder and stakeholder equity plus hard cash loans to Zalemark. Steven Zale's branding concept hasn't worked EVER. You need a tremendous amount of advertising and promotion dollars to make the consumer aware of the product. Zalemark doesn't have the funds or the talent to make that happen. This scam company puts it's resources into promoting the stock. They should have put the funds into design and promotion of the jewelry. Too much money and focus is on audited financial statements. If that was going to happen then the last statement would have been audited along with this fourth quarter statement as well. If and when that happens all hell will break loose as the way they are doing their phony accounting now will be revealed. Forget about audited statements and uplisting as it won't happen. This company needs huge sales revenue to survive and they just don't have it. Wishful thinking will not make it so.
The video was produced and purchased for Zalemark. It is not independent reporting. Just more hype by the convicted felon Steven Zale who served THREE YEARS IN PRISON for dealing cocaine.
Any news on the JTV lawsuit?
Any news on any major department store that purchased Crayola.
Just more diffusion by Zalemark to get away from the fact that no major retail chain of stores bought Crayola.
Remember this post. Don't believe ANYTHING from Zalemark.
But these investors WANT to believe everything that Steven Zale or Zalemark says because they bought high and now they are hoping for anything to bale them out. It's all wishful thinking that just won't happen. Just because ZMRK tells you something...it doesn't mean it's true. They just keep stringing the investors along.
Beefhouse Friday, 08/14/15 10:43:01 AM
Re: I-Glow post# 2903
Post # of 6231
because they WILL be audited this quarter. That was straight from Steven Zale when I spoke with him.
No major retailer bought Crayola. Zalemark shipped NOTHING to any legitimate major store. The desperate longs are flapping their jaws again. Don't tell me the "launch" has started when they shipped something of very little value to one small mom and pop retail shop. How much in dollars was shipped? Which little retail store bought it? The zuppets are still drinking the "Zool-Aid".
"Going great!"? Really??? I DON'T THINK SO!!!
But then again, the forever faithful followers of Steven Zale (the zuppets) will probably never believe the truth, only the lies that come from Zalemark. Meanwhile the bid and ask keeps dropping. The cheerleaders have lost so much equity that they get a lump of coal in their Christmas stocking. I wonder if they still believe Zalemark will achieve the projected revenues of $58 million dollars with a $24 million dollar after tax profit.
And what about the JTV lawsuit? We have heard nothing. Is Zalemark in default for non payment on the settlement that they agreed to?
Golden Crosses and Iron Crosses are important chart-patterns.
Look carefully at Zalemark's charts.
A Golden Cross is when a short term moving average crosses above a long term moving average when both are rising, and it is considered a bullish pattern. An Iron Cross is the opposite. It occurs when a short term moving average falls below a long term moving average when both are falling, and is considered BEARISH.
For those that believe in crosses: BEWARE.
Can someone tell-me what-the following people do-in "real"-life?
Caren Currier, Secretary/Treasurer, Jeff Ringer, EVP Marketing, and Hie Su Moon VP of New Business development.
Caren Currier: This is a person that has signed off on the unaudited financial statements that even a fool could see are blatantly false. The cheerleaders have turned a blind eye to the financial statements as the PPS continues to hit new lows.
Jeff Ringer: Hopefully he has a real job somewhere else, but not in Zalemark marketing. Or in any marketing job whatsoever. It seems to me he is just a "yes" man to Steven Zale who is a severely inept jewelry designer and businessman.
Hi Su Moon: Did we get any new business? What did this person do in the time he/she has been "working" for Zalemark? Possibly related to an investor.
And then there is Ray Ruiz and Ernest Martel:
Ray Ruiz, from past press releases and news announcements, has been at Zalemark for quite some time and has to be extremely upset with getting paid in stock. He doesn't have a chance to receive a dollar amount anywhere close to what he's really due. But it's his choice to stay there. If he is a married man with a family, then his family is also not happy with his choice as the stock is basically worthless.
Ernest Martel: He is a big investor in Zalemark who is desperately holding on for an increase in the PPS. Both for his personal investment and also for his "sweat equity" in the company.
Mr. Martel...what made you think this was a good investment? Do you still believe that Steven Zale will lead you to the "promised land"?
This stock has a low float. Many cheerleaders have accurately stated that with buying pressure this stock will go up like a rocket. What they didn't mention was that with selling pressure Zalemark will drop like a hot potato.
Remember; the greater the risk, the greater the profit...or LOSS.
There is no good news for Zalemark, even though the cheerleaders are still buying into the hype. It has been that way for years. They are ever hopeful wishful thinkers based on fantasy and greed.
Zalemark has constantly and consistently LIED to investors. The PPS was $1.50 not so many years back. Investors also believed then at $1.50 what Zalemark was telling them. It's no different today...except the price per share is hitting new lows of $0.008. And it has to go lower. But somehow the cheerleading longs (who purchased shares much higher) think they are much smarter than everyone that came before them. Some really smart investors (who put in over $1,000,000 each) have lost all or most of their equity. They didn't do proper DD and neither did today's investors. The PROOF is the PPS and not what someone at Zalemark tells you. I didn't like this stock at $.04 in August. I READ the past financial statements with all their glaring inaccuracies. I saw and understood how wrong the "branding" concept was for a company with no strong leadership and no money to fund the advertising and promotion that was needed to get product in front of consumers. Zalemark spends resources to promote the stock, when they should have spent those precious resources on building a terrific collection of jewelry. They spend enormous sums of money (that they do not have) on "professional fees". Those funds, again, would have been better spent on getting department store buyers to view an incredible, unique and salable line of jewelry. Zalemark has no sales, no leadership and no credibility.
I wouldn't call anyone at Zalemark to get an answer or opinion as l am not STUPID. I wouldn't believe anything they say.
Pand: Audited financials will-not save Zalemark. SALES WILL. Unfortunately ZMRK doesn't have the sales/revenues to survive. Without huge orders from any department stores or big jewelry retail chain stores, ZMRK will just drain more funds from investors. Steven Zale, Ray Ruiz, Caren Currier and Ernest Martel are incompetent business leaders. The whole "branding" concept, even with recognizable names like Crayola or M&M's, needs millions of dollars in advertising and promotional funding to even attempt to make this concept work. It's obvious that Zalemark doesn't have the talent in any aspect of sales, design and marketing as evidenced by the recent bankruptcies and all the other failed businesses that Steven Zale has been involved in.
Audited financial statements will reveal all the B.S. that these so called officers of Zalemark have put in past unaudited financial statements. Why wasn't their last financial statement audited? A real audited financial statement will bring to light all the past inaccuracies and phony numbers and then this company's PPS drops into trips. That is if it lasts that long.
Famous stock guru I.M. Gloating forecasted sub-penny before-year-end.
But the loyalists still believe Zalemark will achieve their lofty goal of 58 million dollars in sales with a 24 million dollar after tax profit. And the Zalemark loyalists never questioned that amount...they just accepted it as fact. When has Zalemark ever been profitable? Steven Zale is a horrible businessman. He is still chasing his "branding" dream. It doesn't matter how big the brand is. He has no positive marketing experience...he really is a "flim flam man", a lot of hot air. And he gets stupid investors to back him. Who is selling, seemingly smart, people on Steven Zale. Somebody is getting a commission to get these big whale type investors in. I finally think that spigot has been shut off. Didn't anyone read the phony unaudited financial statements? But hey, some investors are still comfortable with their holdings. They don't need good luck...they need good sense.
I guess Mr. Gloating is getting the last laugh.
OMG-the Zaleombies still believe Zalemark and Steven Zale.
You can lead an idiot to water and he will drown.
From a Zaleombie post:
Post 3778 September 15, 2015
PPS closed that day at $0.0229
"I'm going to go on a limb and say in a months time when this starts to run your posts will just look humorous."
Well a months time has come and gone and the PPS is not running, in fact it's in the toilet.
I could re-post numerous posts that state Steven Zale sent them an email or they talked to Ernest Martel and the financials will be audited in the 2nd or 3rd quarter at the latest. Or that the jewelry will be launched in the 3rd quarter. They swore by it. Then delay after delay. And never a mention of it anywhere except by wishful thinking longs...who are locked in and taking a bath. Then we hear just last week from a hypester that the Crayola collection will be available to "view"in the fourth quarter. For first quarter 2016 delivery. Or a poster states that the jewelry will be in stores this month. Is it s major department store? Or is it a single mom and pop retail store somewhere?
Never an actual word from Zalemark. Only puppets (Zaleuppets) talking and posting. They have been doing this for years while Zalemark's PPS hits new lows. YES...NEW LOWS!!!
A paid hypester recently posted Zalemark will "preview" the Crayola collection to retailers in late 2015 for a first quarter launch in 2016.
This is not an announcement coming from Zalemark. This is an entity that, in my opinion, gets either stock or money from Zalemark to hype it's stock across many boards.
It's also interesting that this person has made so many other "announcements" regarding Zalemark that have never come true.
I will post those for all to see later this week.
First of all, we are in December of 2015, so I guess late this year is NOW. No major department store buyer is looking at new product now. It's their Christmas/Holiday retail sales they are concerned with. They have no time to see vendors. In addition, their Spring 2016 buying plans were finished in November. So it seems Zalemark is now hoping to keep investors "on the hook" with a non credible shyster hypester...telling Investers to wait until next year.
Look back at the timetable: Zalemark acquired the Crayola license well over one year ago. They had over 7 months to get the collection ready for it's Las Vegas jewelry show debut in June. The publicized launch in retail stores was internally scheduled for 3rd quarter of this year. It didn't happen. Zalemark never explained why but the paid pumpster stated the launch was delayed to October. Then that was changed to 4th quarter. And now the same paid pumpster is stating 1st quarter of next year. The reason that you can't find Zalemark's Crayola jewelry collection in any major department stores is that no major department store buyer/purchasing agent bought the Crayola collection. But never a word from Zalemark stating the Crayola jewelry collection bombed. They have remained silent on this matter. Leaving paid pumpsters to keep trying to fool the investors into holding on to their shares. Meanwhile the PPS keeps dropping to new lows.
The company can't fool the investors any longer. Zalemark has run out of operating funds. The "sweat equity" workers are tired of the B.S. and are tired of Steven Zale. And the private money investors see no hope.
And that is not to mention that a payment was due yesterday to end the JTV $4,000,000 lawsuit against Zalemark. So if that payment wasn't made then Zalemark is in default and the settlement isn't finalized and the lawsuit stays open.
This is really going to be an interesting stock to watch all the way up until year end as Zalemark has absolutely nothing going on that is positive. The PPS has to drop much lower as buyer confidence is just not there and investors start to bail out.
From post #5979, on November 18, 2015 when the PPS was $0.0185:
Longterm investors will dump their holdings prior-to year-end. They have waited too long in the hopes that Zalemark will achieve any success. No Sales = No Profits = No Confidence.
They will do this to take a tax loss. If they want to buy back in after the new year they will. And probably the PPS will be cheaper. But in reality why would an investor do that? This stock is "barking".
The bids today (Friday, December 4) are from $0.005 to $0.008. Four times today a purchase of 888 shares was made at the ask. And there was also one purchase for 100 shares at the ask. Otherwise this stock would be at $0.008 or less.
Investors are losing patience. End of year selling.
These are the smart ones (although they should have got out in the 2's and 3's) but getting out now with more than they will get closer to the end of the year. That's if Zalemark makes it through year end without filing bankruptcy. Remember the JTV lawsuit settlement money is due tomorrow.
Why would anyone want-to put in a bid?
Especially a "decent" bid. But then again what is sizable to one investor could be either peanuts or possibly quite substantial to another investor.
If it really has some substance than go to Zalemark directly and get your shares at a discount. If you truly believe that Zalemark will be substantially higher in a few months than go for the restricted stock. Zalemark needs money, they will make a deal below $0.005. Possibly $0.003 for $10-25,000.
What has Zalemark ever-stated that has come true?
The Crayola retail launch...delays upon delays but NO word from Zalemark. No major retail department store bought it. The collection bombed.
The audited financials...why spend the money when you have no sales or revenue. Plus they have been saying this since 2010. So no uplisting either.
Steven Zale has projected $58 million dollars in sales this year and in the last quarter the sales were $973.07.
The new $1,000,000 line of credit...there are more contingencies that have to be met and secured. Plus the stock price can't warrant the million dollars. Zalemark will have to issue more shares which will further dilute the PPS so you can forget about Kodiak trading stock for much needed funding. It won't happen.
Steven Zale has a criminal past that can't be dismissed. He has taken companies into bankruptcy. He has borrowed money that he can't pay back. And Zalemark continues to lose millions. Plus in his many years having businesses...he has never been profitable.
Plus, he is no great jewelry designer. No stores carry his products.
All in all; just a lot of hype but nothing to show for it. Steven Zale has been "crying wolf" for way too long. But what amazes me is how he continues to get big investor money to believe in him. You would think a million dollar investor would have some brains. It's so obvious that this is a scam and yet some of them bought in for over a dollar a share. And all those smaller naive investors that purchased restricted stock directly from Zalemark at half price or less than what was the current market price. Now that their stock is unrestricted it's not worth anything. And all the "sweat equity" employees who got stock, along with consultants and suppliers and so many others who received stock instead of payments...all pretty much worthless. These are not the brightest bulbs in the lamp.
Real DD is as follows: NO SALES/REVENUE.
Always excuses to keep investors on the hook.
So now we are reading (but not officially from Zalemark but from a pumpster) Crayola will be in stores in the first quarter of 2016. It's NOT going to be in any major department store for Valentines Day as those major stores have already made their V-Day purchases for delivery this week and next. And Zalemark would have announced it not some pump and dump hypester. It the Crayola line had any merit it would have been in the stores for Christmas.
Buy your discounted restricted shares directly from Zalemark. I heard today's price was between $0.003 to $0.004. Zalemark is so desperate for funding that you could probably make an even better deal. But don't forget that the company doubled the A/S. So you should pay even less considering that dreaded word DILUTION.
These levels won't last. They are going lower.
Much lower.
Zalemark has no sales or incoming revenue.
Others have said the PPS is going higher. They have been saying this for many months as the price continues to drop. Zalemark is a candidate for bankruptcy.
No retail news on the horizon. Crayola bombed!!!
Not one of the department stores bought the Crayola jewelry collection. Steven Zale and his scam artist team blew it again. Continued silence from the usually loquacious Steven Zale is a really bad sign. He would be talking very loud if he had anything to say. The silence is very telling. Meanwhile the clock is ticking loudly to the lawsuit settlement date...December 5th.
5,000,000 shares purchased direct from Zalemark at $0.01.
That purchase was made by Eugene Hyun Kim on May 27, 2015 when the price per share was at $0.019.
Or:
Lisa Toland made a 333,333 share direct purchase from Zalemark on April 15, 2015. She paid $0.015 for her shares on that day when the market price was $0.0297.
The above information comes right out of the Zalemark Q2, 2015 financial statements.
This has been going on for years. Every quarterly financial statement has to show shares that were purchased directly from Zalemark.
Here's a couple more from the Q1, 2014:
Gary Kono Trust UAD, purchased 700,000 shares on February 21, 2014 for $0.05 when the stock closed that day at $0.12.
And you don't have to purchase huge amounts of shares. Here's another:
Gene Pennywitt only purchased 20,000 shares directly from Zalemark on February 19, 2014. He paid $0.06. The stock closed that day at $.012.
So if you truly believe this stock is going to skyrocket sometime in the future then buy your stock from Zalemark at a hugely discounted price. It's got a few months restrictions to be able to freely trade the stock. But you are getting a "deal" so you wouldn't care. All these shares were purchased prior to Zalemark doubling the A/S. So when dilution comes about, then the current PPS will drop in half.
By the way; I post facts and not wishful thinking.
Good morning to all and have a great day.