InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 2087
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/14/2015

Re: None

Friday, 12/25/2015 9:24:40 PM

Friday, December 25, 2015 9:24:40 PM

Post# of 26028
Denials, denials and more denials until he-was caught.
Why didn't Steven Zale address the pertinent issues that I-Glow and I have brought up:
No major retailer bought the Crayola jewelry collection...why?
Did Zalemark make the payment to settle the JTV lawsuit?
Why did they file to cease operations in California?
Why are they persuing audited financial statements when they could be using those resources to design and promote Crayola jewelry? You don't need audited statements when you are not selling anything.
Crayola didn't know about Steven Zales past. The video was a ploy to try and plead his case after he was found out to be a criminal. That is why Steven Zale is distancing himself from Zalemark. No major brand wants to be associated with a known criminal that could tarnish it's reputation.
No sales!
No profits!
No talent!
No nothing!

The stock is in the toilet. Zalemark can't get financing as the PPS is tied into the Kodiak deal along with the contingencies of getting audited and complete transparency and securities compliance.
The whole branding concept is bad. You need tremendous advertising dollars and marketing ability to make it work. Zalemark doesn't have the funds or talent to pull it off.
wishful thinking won't make it happen. No more whales are coming in to save this company.