Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You did answer my previous post?:
was16 Member Level Friday, 08/23/19 01:57:43 PM
Re: VeronicaFox post# 6510 0
Post #
6511
of 6517
Once again Wilf Blum has nothing to do with NRPI.
What do you think of this from yesterday's PR?
NRP Stone clarified and reaffirmed its intention to fulfill its Mission and Vision in providing unique products and creating profitability for all interested stakeholders. In July, the Company announced that old controlling management including the Davy and Blum families sold their interests in the Company to new unaffiliated management. To quash any further rumors and disinformation promoted by some who may still have ill feelings toward prior management, the Company reiterates that old management is no longer associated with the Company and new unaffiliated management has full control. Mr. Clark asserted, In my opinion, further fact-less promotion of this sort could be viewed as libelous or slanderous; especially if the attacks are baseless, unfounded rants intentionally spewed out in order to cause controversy, to damage peoples confidence in new management, or to impede the Companys progress.
Once again Wilf Blum has nothing to do with NRPI.
What do you think of this from yesterday's PR?
NRP Stone clarified and reaffirmed its intention to fulfill its Mission and Vision in providing unique products and creating profitability for all interested stakeholders. In July, the Company announced that old controlling management including the Davy and Blum families sold their interests in the Company to new unaffiliated management. To quash any further rumors and disinformation promoted by some who may still have ill feelings toward prior management, the Company reiterates that old management is no longer associated with the Company and new unaffiliated management has full control. Mr. Clark asserted, In my opinion, further fact-less promotion of this sort could be viewed as libelous or slanderous; especially if the attacks are baseless, unfounded rants intentionally spewed out in order to cause controversy, to damage peoples confidence in new management, or to impede the Companys progress.
You keep saying "due diliegence reveals all". I look at it that facts matter.
Show me facts.
Of course they do. You see the new management of NRPI following thru!!!
Djponder replied to my post regarding yesterday's PR saying:
ROFLMAO A friggin pr from a known SEC conartist.
CMON NOW!
So he was saying the PR came from an "SEC conartist".
Well NRPI issued a PR yesterday regarding Matt Palmer resigning and today he is no longer listed on the OTC Markets Company Profile page under Compnay Directors.
That's a FACT I can live with.
But facts are facts. You can't selectively take them when you want.
I'm just saying...
The facts show that NRPI management is new and not connected to the old management.
The facts show management has gotten the CE removed and their filings up to date.
the facts show they are moving the company forward with a recently issued LOI to acquire Rare Metals and Gems Investors, LLC.
Everyone can have their own opinion but not their own facts.
The past actions from old management has nothing to do with the new current management.
Yesterday's PR was great news for shareholders.
So to be clear, the person currently in charge of NRPI is president David M. Clark II ( so he would be responsible for all PR's coming out of NRPI). Are you calling him an SEC conartist?
And I like the part about no reverse"
"Therefore, we thought it best to keep the name and not reverse the stock."
I agree management is making great progress here.
My question was directed toward the poster who made the accusation.
Read today's PR. NRPI now has now relation to any of the previous management. And the previous management has no position in NRPI ( management or otherwise).
Also, per today's PR David Clark Sr. who has given the company around $200k just converted that debt into non convertible debt. No toxic debt.
First you say that SOLI doesn't own CareClix and everyone gives you proof of the bill of sale.
Now you say the issue is the VALUE of CareClix????
Just how valuable is CareClix based on your analysis?
SOLI for the win.
It's easy to make accusations. How about some facts, details or specifics to backup your claims.
SOLI management has done everything by the book. Became fully audited, reduced OS, acquired CareClix, hired a topnotch advisor (Greg Arms).
Soli for the win.
So they are in violation by not 8king it?
SOLI for the win
Everybody gets an 8k! LOL
BHAHAHAHAHA!
Wow with all the hiring CareClix has been doing the last few months we should see a whole bunch of new 8ks. LOL
SOLI for the win.
So every time Coke or Ford hire an employee they need to 8k it?
What a joke!!!
SOLI for the win.
Ed,
a big thanks for all you DD. You always dig deep to find great pieces of info..
Keep it up!!!
SOLI for the win.
Yes. Nice buy at $.42 (20K)
SOLI for the win.
The due date is 45 days from the end of the quarter. Since there are 31 days in July, it was due by the 14th. So 5 days from then is the 19th ( today).
SOLI for the win.
On CNBC they were just talking about TDOC. I can't wait until they are talking about CareClix/SOLI there.
SOLI for the win.
BB says you look good in heels!
How are your legs?
I don't see anyone serving drinks at the bar yet.
HAHA!
Hey Mike,
I like what you did to the place!
Looks good.
Good reading but not sure how this applies to CareClix. Per the regulation:
Exception: Financial statements for the earliest of the three fiscal years may be omitted if net revenues of the acquired business in its most recent fiscal year are less than $50 million.
SOLI for the win.
I have looked up regulation S-X and I don't see that it is required to be filed separately from normal Q filings.
Please provide the link showing it does.
SOLI for the win.
Please provide the link showing the "Reg S-X 8K/A" requirements.
SOLI for the win.
Where is your proof it was denied?
Please provide the link.
SOLI for the win.
The shitty part is I didn't break any rules. My posts were good and still got deleted.
Thanks! I have a MS in quantitative analysis. ( believe it or not from Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, Long Island. Same town as Stony Brook Capital is in.. Greg Arms)
SOLI for the win
Yes 1 + 1 = uplist.
SOLI for the win.
Laughable post.
Where is the pump? Detail?
SOLI is doing everything by the book.
Great management in SOLI.
SOLI for the win.
Yeah you do research on the previous management of SOLI. LOL
Has nothing to do with the current management that became fully audited and has done everything by the book.
SOLI for the win.
bdell, you hit the nail on the head with your post.
We know what management has already completed and where this is headed.
SOLI for the win.
Your opinion is very different than mine.
I have done all the DD possible on SOLI ( I'm not sure what you have done).
SOLI for the win.