Not a marginable stock under 2.00

I will reply to you. But plan on taking a leave from here.
Things have not looked good TA wise for awhile. Today lower bb was broken and we made lower low on volume. Not good. That said what I suspect MAY happen is a capitulation bottom and reversal up as happened in 2010. The good news is that the RSI is below 30 so oversold, but I will be watching for reversal day, big down, big volume close up. When and where? No clue. Support is nowhere.

Do what I do. Block those who you consider low IQ or immature or both. I decided to go back to not posting here any longer. It is an exercise in futility. I much prefer our two rooms on FB where minimum IQ required is 100.

So .05 is coming?
Okay, that tells me your IQ.

When the asylum is taken over by the inmates it is time to look for a saner room.
Good luck with your order at .05. Maybe you should wait for sub penny.

Since you are trying to instill fear, why not say .10 or .05?

I am with you. I have been in for 4 years and share everyone's frustrations. 2 years ago the rationale was that there would be a BO and we were looking at HIV only. Today we are much closer, the science has not shown any side effects and the list of potential candidates range from Cancer to Nash.
I am more optimistic today then I was 2 years ago regarding upside potential.

If and when a deal is cut the pps will gap higher. It is difficult to pick a bottom but I feel buying in this neighborhood favors reward over risk.

Correct. If you had been here for any period of time then you would know that. There are those who request it.
For those I do it.
You are not the first person I have run into in the last 50 years who does not believe in TA for ______ (pick one) penny stocks, commodities, anything. But you do not dictate the board so when the time comes just ignore my posts. Or you can start now.

Agree

Lose

Sometimes it is an opportunity to lise money

My only contention had been with his salary the rest I put on FDA delays.
Having learned he had risked his house and his savings to back Pro 140 I am less prone to blame him for wanting to get it/some back. I know how wives can be.

At the risk of sounding redundant I will repeat, anyone taking the helm now is in the situation of low pps and no cash. Yes, a bad negotiating place to be but no one will pull a deal out of their butt.
I am not going to Monday morning quarterback. It is what it is. I blame FDA, you blame Nader. The only prudent thing is to not give the company away down here because we need cash.
I am in no hurry.this is for my kids anyway.

Another CEO is still going to have the same liability of low pps and no cash. Anyone negotiating with us will use that to their negotiating benefit.
Imo a different CEO could do nothing different to get a deal done.

Imo not a waste. Delays are FDA not Nader.

I do not know the particulars of how much personal $$ he risked but from what I heard he took a big risk. So that merits big in my opinion. I agree and have agreed that his salary is inflated and borrowing $$ by selling stock at .39 in order to pay it is nuts. But I am slow to call for a coup.

I have suffered enough to feel the opposite. My pain deserves compensation which does not translate into selling for pennies on the dollar just because big bucks want to steal it. I know they know that we are running on fumes and they use that to their advantage to try and steal a deal. Screw that. Stay with the small raises another year if they have to rather then let someone steal our product.
IMHO ofcourse.

Most options, I would speculate, have expired, or are out of the money, except for recent ones. Only the amount above "reasonable" salary would be considered ROI. unless you belueve he should work for free.
I withhold judgment until the final page is written.

Those two posts made my day.
Lol.

Lol

It is hard to do.
I watch but have initiated self induced exile from this board. But even then I break from that because I can not believe what I read.
I will learn.

I felt the same way and also thought he should have skin in the game but someone pointed out that NP risked everything to start this up.

Ahhh, interesting. So dumpass.

Lol. Actually I was Vice President at UBS and was foreign institutional broker. Mostly Iceland and Luxemburg. But we were not allowed to purchase stocks under $2.00. If so then we had to have non-soliciation form signed.
Pink stocks are a special breed of fungi. So many tools missing to help guide an investor.
Yes, bio stocks I have avoided throughout my 35 year career. I am only here because my good friend Misiu is a big believer in the science. So far she has not been wrong but when you deal with an industry that speaks in terms of "burn rate" in regards to how much cash they spend on R&D then you know you are in a very tumultuous indudtry.

But not so dumb as to not know how to spell dumb (twice).
Thank you for reminding me why I choose to no longer post here.
Enjoy your masochism. Or should I say hate your masochism.

When I was a financial adviser I NEVER had a client who felt this way about an investment in their portfolio. If I did I would direct them to a therapist for symptoms of accute masochism.

I do not believe he sold it all. No one is that stupid after having suffered so long.

He drinks Irish coffee. $7.00

Lol. I am sure he is long. No one spends so much time here with no position.

I have traded it within the Bollinger bands a few times.

My most hopeful sign is the MACD looking to start turning up.

Please elaborate. I am a TA guy and would like to know what indicators you use to dedermine that .035 is the bottom. TIA

Hi Chump. Just started re-lurking. It had gotten too much to handle so only FB msg brd'd my CYDY info.

Sandy, I must admit that you have had more influence in keeping me out of a room since my ex-wife.
I seem to detect a certain tone of,dare I say, bullishness. I certainly hope this is the case as I would enjoying popping back in here on a more regular basis.

That is only if on contingency. I had a lawyer who declined my case on contingency but took it on non-contingency.
I won.

I have agreed with you that this chart looks horrible. Despite that I had been able to flip this twice but now with the pps definitively below the 200 day sma those bi weekly rallies are scarce.

Link

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=LFAP&p=D&yr=0&mn=6&dy=10&id=p43726878726&a=681568194&listNum=1

No one is more disappointed then I in the lack of progress, even before Dr. P. Came on board. I am still fuming over the 60% raise that we paid for with borrowed money. Was that Dr P's doing?
I do not want to say any more for fear of sounding like a basher. I am going back into hibernation for another week and see if more unfolds. Sorry to ruffle feathers here.

I am saying that if all is quiet this week regarding the firing then obviously Pestell has nothing to defend. But the jury is still out for me. I will say that I was very very pleasantly surprised to see the pps hold up as well as it did Friday.