Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Exactly the reason but stupid if it would be as promising as they say. I highly doubt they are. Can`t wait for a full disclosure.
Exactly, you only have to read sentences like this and desperation comes in..“The achievement of the Company’s new CTA status provides momentum toward the successful accomplishment of the critical steps necessary to successfully solicit clients,”
Who knows but for sure not the insiders.
From the ibox..
The Insiders own none of the float, however they retain approx 55% control of the voting shares and a majority of the 144 shares.
*Per CEO of Company*
It makes you wonder...
And Paul, lol
Do you expect anything else there? The structure is still a secret. I bet, they will have a gazillion o/s too.
That would be way above five cents. lol
Lol, even you can do it better. I would be pleased if just a single one of the pros with the fortunate ability to play exlusively with that disruptive tech would happily open his private wallet.
No, I don`t mean 1000 shares at the close to paint the chart of MC!
Do I have I to repeat "my" chart? Please stop the bs and try it again after a move to something like an exchange and after basic essentials which are needed to make a chart useful. Everything else is just ..well,like written above.
BS as usual because it says what?..Nothing!
5 weeks after the launch and still no interest at all says a lot. I`m still saying I hope it didn`t occur. If they launched it to more than two screens anywhere, it is a catastrophy. Jmo
Why else would they have to increase the A/S? Seems a lot here have lost their illusions. Good posts snow, wouldn`t have thought it after your dilution is good comments.
That`s right, if you are current with filings and if you have an mm, it could be a matter of days. But.. it makes no sense to move if you don`t have something to tell and I don`t mean a story. Spooz needs facts if it has to be successful and worth the audit costs. Interesting days ahead, no doubts.
Let us first become a reporting company and uplist to the otc..and survive. The next step would be a luxury discussion.
Not really but I see a need for it. Almost daily when we see the increasing share count. On a positive note, the lawsuits are also confirming the need for a stealth mode launch.
Now MC, thanks for your call. You can now remove the OT..and the MR too, lol
It would be nice to talk about spooz here. 141 seems to be ot now.
I`m saying this for a long time. PS is a liar! It is a usual pinky, nothing else.
And, it seems they are desperate, not even enough money to pay the shoeshiner for the numerous court appearances, why else would they hire pros to sell the stock?
Still optimistic if the launch really happens in december, lol
The wrong Andy? Lmao
We can only hope that the "Launch" covers only one or two desks somewhere in the area. Anything bigger combined with the obvious lack of any interest after four weeks now, would be devastating.
OT: Thanks Traderfan.
An email is now in the profile
Traderfan, I did send you a PM last Friday with a question
No pun intended, but aren`t you able to reply to a post or question? Besides blue hour, there are a lot of opportunities.
Lol, archyis, this is pretty funny. You mean, they increased the A/S just to buy them back a few weeks later?
Good for you
I think, this one fits currently much better.
http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/5408/chartrs3.jpg
Andy, is it you? Have you finally found your wallet?
Bunglers in whatever they do. Thanks for confirming that fact!
4. It does not prove anything about FOLO, the tech that Huppe claimed to have developed when he was running a WEB DESIGN FIRM.
Oops, that really hurts, I didn`t know that. Thanks!
All nice and right on target..if we would talk about a real company. What did we own? A garage sale company without anything but overblown PRs and lies. It would be enough for me if he had to pay what he earned from the printing press, nothing for me but a lot from him.
Lol, and since you are in the know, you are buying, right? Like all of the other ones. Sorry, but sometimes, there isn`t a way out without losses.
"We now know the truth about it!" Strong words again. I`m saying all we have are guesses till I see an 8k or other filings.
Remember this post from songbirdia, it is still on the ibox
Hmm...
Question 3. Is Spooz in a strong enough financial position to accomplish its mission? Can you say anything about "those who are seeking to inject millions" into the company? You mentioned at the expo that Spooz is not looking for money at the moment - could you elaborate on that at all?
Paul: We are turning money away, however, if what we believe may happen actually does happen, I will be looking for investment dollars in the $50 million range. I am tired of being asked about “those who are seeking to inject millions.” I wish I had never said it, but in all honesty, we are, in some cases, walking away from deals for various reasons. We believe we have the best of all worlds in our investment partners and financial consultants, namely, The Kauderer Group. The best of all worlds means extremely deep pockets, a deep understanding of our industry, world class connections, skin in the game, steadfast belief in the company’s mission and management, sweat equity.
Now MC, that sounds finally more realistic.
.. don't think that anyone, including myself, like seeing the PPS drop to its current levels. But if I have an explanation that sounds reasonable to me, I can live with it. MC
A few days ago, you were happy with it. Seems it is still the ole
normative effect of facts. If your background is what you did tell me, you should understand it.
Yes, what did you try to tell me and why is this an answer to my reply?
Did you follow this stock over the last two years? Did you read the statements of Strickland in his blog or in his answers to questions of shareholders? Some of them are still in the ibox here. You don`t have to tell me what a lie means, the other one on the spooz board even less. All what you need from the post from keeger is this statement.. Did he do it knowing that his forecasts and statements were incorrect already? No...
Yes, he wrote no and that´s why it isn`t, lol
That seems to be needed, I also wrote about the importance of yours.
They would add a lot of credibility if I could see just in a single post an even homeopathic dose of reality. I don`t know if we have been scammed, doubt it, but we have been lied to, several times, and who can and would trust a CEO who did it so often? That`s unreal and also something totally out of their daily lifes.
Yeah, and if you read nothing than what a nice opportunity from the usuals, you know what`s wrong. This isn´t funny anymore but hilarious.
I can see some connections so it isn`t ot. Since we don`t know the structure of 141, it is spooz.
Then it is time to use some common sense. If you are happy to wait and watch (huge) dilution, you should consider to invest in something else. You may write willing to wait but happy, come on man, that`s not funny.
You can do the math like you want, in the end, it`s another lie at our costs from them