Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'll take a link.
Thanks in advance.
I dont buy that it is regular practice for company officers to owe the company a ton of money for years and years.
so you think he was lying?
be careful, JD likes to threaten people that call him a liar.
Well they have owed it since 2006 and it has grown since then.
The only way it did not cost JD the patent is if he was lying about those cabinets.
We both know that is a real possibility.
But on the off chance JD told the truth. The patent is toast.
I guess it is one time shareholders can hope JD lied.
While the U.S. provides a one-year grace period after publication, public use, sale, or offer for sale, most foreign countries have no such grace period.
Its a clean sweep.
Ouch.
Web experts?
Come on. He would have just needed a high schooler that liked to dabble.
JD's own words and the financial statements prove you are wrong.
You mean like retracting it one day later?
I still can't believe that happened. EXPH is like a whole 'nother planet.
Great post SBB.
Doubt is the only logical sentiment right now.
The company, and more importantly the CEO have not acted like a legitimate entity.
The CEO lies. He is a bully.
Owgur put it best when he said...
JD "sounded like a drunk person trying to say neeeeener neeeeener."
that would mean the company would have a market value of.....$1 million dollars
Pretty overvalued still at that PPS.
JD is still using unregistered and unauthorized software.
Good job JD.
8. The California Closets pictures. Were these just an accident made by
the web designer getting carried away?
8) California Closets was a competitor when we focused on the 1st
choice brand. We also manufactured displays, and yes a photo was out
there that had our display, and a California closet "program" on it.
The person responsible for making the document has moved on a very long
time ago, and quite frankly it wasn’t brought to my attention until some
emailed me that that you (or maybe someone else) had found it. I
removed it promptly and apologized formally to California Closets
Corporate.
I love this whole scenario. JD gets caught using unauthorized pics. He has no idea how to just take those pics off of the expo site so what do they do?
They take the whole website down. And the site stayed down for months. Does that kind of stuff happen to legit companies?
5. The advances on the financials. These are listed as a current asset.
This would mean that this is money owed to the company.
5) Yes, it is money owed to the corporation by myself and Glenn Harrs.
However, it is important to note that GAP requires us to report this in
this fashion. It does not show the other side of the "coin" where the
company owes us significantly more in terms of gaurantees and loans.
I enjoy this one too. It is why I think JD is a crook. The guy owes Expo money. Lots of it.
He brushes it off by saying that they guarantee loans so it makes it ok.
Sorry. It doesnt work that way. If Expo pays off all of those laons, JD and GH still owe the company money.
They have owed it since 2006 and the debt has grown a bunch.
I dont think they are going to pay it back anytime soon.
Re: Question #7 The website pictures I am specifically referencing are the pictures on the www.expoholding.com website. They are marked before and after and these are pictures that have existed on the DD Displays site since July of 2008. I was told by a unreliable source that these pictures represent etc. cabinets. I would like to know if this is true. If it is true were these cabinets paid for and where were these installed? They are from a condo if that helps you.
7) Give me some time and I will research.
This is my absolute favorite one.
This is probably the whole reason why he ran away from answering my questions like a coward.
People have wondered why I have pushed this issue so hard. It is because those pictures have cost expo their patent.
Hahahahaha. Nice work JD. Sorry guys. The patent for etc. is done for.
July of 2008 is more than one year before September of 2009. Pictures of etc. were being displayed on a website over a year before filing as well as having been installed in somebody's house.
You only have one year from the first public disclosure to file.
Thanks for exposing the patent error 4kids and pennyguru.
Re: Question #5 What loans specifically are guaranteed? I know that the financials mention a vehicle loan guaranteed. Are there any UCC filings for the bank loans that mention you or GH as personal guarantors, so I would like some clarification.
5) All of them (with the exception of the auto loan you mention which
is not guaranteed by me). Don’t know what you mean about UCC filing for
the banks, but I assure you, we are the guarantors.
Translation: please dont bring up the UCC filings that show our bad business decisions.
You know like paying over 100k for Bite back.
That one cracks me up. OVER 100,000 bucks for Bite back.
What a bad CEO.
Question #9 Why is the TA gagged?
9) No Comment.
Interesting that he said no comment to me, but was willing to give a confusing explanation to another shareholder that visited him.
Gagged TA is NEVER a good thing.
Re: Question #1- The O/S at the time was 980 million plus, so they were not referring to the O/S as they gave me that number in addition. This was verified by multiple people and that information has been unavailable since that day. Do you think you could call the TA and find out why the number was in fact 930 million on August 25th?
1) I will inquire. Give me a little time.
Hahahaha. Obviously he lied here. He did not look into it at all.
The financials for Q3 2009. I cannot fathom any logical reason for
why they have not been released.
I have not released them yet. I do want to point out, we are not
required to release them on any timetable. We are, as I have stated in
the past a non-reporting pinksheet company that electively reports on
the company's timetable.
Translation: Springroll is right. There is no logical reason other than they are not good.
There is a good chance JD will never release them.
The 2/3 of the revenue typically falling in the second half of the
year. Now somebody the other day sent me a private message [PM
hereafter] that brought up that you could be making this statement based
on numbers from when D&D was private. Perhaps that is the case, but I do
know that of the numbers released for Expo that statement is false.
Actually, regarding this statement, I may have mispoke (cant remember
exactly what I said, but it should have been something like "2/3 rds of
our business is conducted in the last half of the year." which is a true
statement, however, that if from a manufacturing point of view not
actually shipments. Most of our actual work, not the shipments or
billing does occur in the last half of the year. Its pretty typical.
Translation: JD got caught in yet another lie and tried to wordsmith his way out. Classic move by him. Too bad we have caught on to him.
The restricted shares. On August 25 I spoke to the TA twice. Once to
Elson and once to Maria. Both of them told me that the float was
930,538,167. This was also confirmed by other people. I also had a phone conversation with you where we discussed this. During that conversation you told me that the company hadn't put a restriction on all of them, but that regardless the SEC placed restrictions on them and that only 1% per quarter could be sold.
I have no clue what Elson or Maria told you...It would seem to me
that 930ish would be the outstanding at that time...however, don’t quote me on that, because I simply don’t know what they said to you. We are held by rules, SEC, FINRA, tranfer agent rules, those guys, that do restrict insiders to 1% per quarter (I think), I don’t know for a fact because I've not exercised that option, nor have I ever removed a restrictive legend on any share I owned. Further, I've never sold a single share of mine since inception.
Translation: I am going to dodge the question and try and pretend the TA was talking about something else. Notice how he never followed up on this issue like he said he would? Yep. He lied.
I like catching him in lies.
with as ridiculous as JD has acted the question needs to be asked.
IS JD deliberately trying to tank the PPS so he can rebuy the shares he may have dumped?
Quoting EXPH PR's is almost as accurate as quoting the farmer's almanac for the weather.
When I think of JD holding all of his shares throughout this and I look at the PPS I smile.
Unfortunately then I look at all the data 4kids has posted and realize that there is a very slim chance that JD held his shares.
The volume numbers show that him and many others dumped.
The delay in the divvy also lends its hand to that theory.
Notice how the majority vote was never posted anywhere?
Shocking I am sure.
available for rent means acquired?
Dont think so.
I feel bad for JD that he's having such a hard time with PR
Baloney. JD made his own bed.
I actually hope he never has sold a single share. That gives me a smile when I look at the pps.
Fairness?
Is it fair that the CEO misdirects people?
Is it fair that he hasnt filed the financials yet?
Is it fair that this stock is down 95%?
Lets stick to what is actually unfair around here.
Is it fair that the CEO and president have borrowed thousands of dollars from the company and justify it because they "guarantee" loans?
Big deal. If Expo is paying their loans then that means nothing.
I wonder how many cabinets got sold in the one day that WW was on board with etc.
Hopefully enough to pay the energy bill so they don't have to dilute more.
I wish all of the insiders did own every share and would take it private.
No more raising money on the backs of shareholders after releasing misleading PR's.
That would be nice to see.
finally heard back from JD.
I am just now settling back into the office after the events of late. I have been advised to stop all communication with you.
I will follow that advice.
Respectfully, JD
Hahahahahaha.
I guess my questions weren't the softballs he was used to. Raise your hand if you are actually surprised.
No hands? Didnt think there would be.
How about APTD?
140k out of 200k on Feb 9 leaving 80k "short" at the very least.
Then the next day 96k out of 111k meaning only 15k more could have possibly been covered.
Then the next day only 5k total volume meaning only 5k more could have possibly covered.
Then zero volume.
What was the short interest on the 12th???? 3k.
80k-15k-5k-0 is and always will be more than 3k.
And this is taking the numbers into the most favorable light possible for your position on this matter. Even with that it STILL doesnt pass the sniff test.
This board might as well get locked now.
how about HWSY.
How do you cover 136k shares with 94k shares????
More magic?
I am not a convicted Con Man
This is simply not true.
You plead guilty.
Where is the warehouse????
Where are these products stored?
Why doesnt that grocery store mention the foods on their website?
STILL NO REPLIES FROM JD.
Where did he go?
So you admit my math is correct?
Thanks.
Why the dance then?
Who cares if it is MM's, hedges, mysterious aliens, or whatever?
It doesnt matter.
The bottom line is the math proves you wrong. Why arent you addressing the math instead of playing word games?
The math stings huh?
Sorry.
AERP is clear proof you are 100% wrong.
Any data set from any of those days doesn't allow for all but 5 shares to have been covered.
Absolute proof.
lets stick with my original example of AERP.
Lets go to December and look at the volume from December 9-15th where "Short volume" was 47448629 out of 48721599 and what was the short interest on December 15th??????
Yep.
5.
Amazingly the MM's were able to cover 47.4 million shares with 1.2 million shares. Its magic!
and the daily short volume broke down as follows
31724600-9th
1000000-10th
12724030-11th
1999999-14th
0-15th
Magic I say!!!
hahahahaha.
First off...
The short interest report says "The mid-month short interest report is based on short positions held by members on the settlement date of the 15th of each month."
It doesn't say settled short positions.
Second of all even if it did say that how would you explain a stock that had "short volumes" of 32500 from Feb 9-12 and a total volume of 33500 over the same time frame and a short interest of 3451 on February 12.
Math doesnt lie.
AGTI is the stock if you are curious.
There are many many others.
Try to spin. Have fun.