Boiled, steamed, broiled, blackened, fried, grilled, scrambled, or raw?

=======================================================

Should call him on it!! LOL

Posted by: dart1961 Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:16:17 PM
In reply to: dumar who wrote msg# 32535 Post # of 44168

o.k. dumar than I am , if RCCH reaches .0003 I'll eat crow DEAL?

Chart is looking real nice!

Since we own stock in Spooz, we are part owners. While management can make daily decisions on our behalf, they must ultimately answer to the shareholders and explain and justify their actions. While my signature and your signature is not on that contractual agreement, or the numerous other contracts that Spooz has signed, as part owner of the company, we have a vested interest in Spooz and whether contracts are being fulfilled, or broken as in the alleged saga of Groves and He. Therefore, we have the right to demand management be responsible with ongoing conduct.
A quick glance at the last year end summary shows that Spooz owes money to everyone and at the time the 2007 Year end Summary or subsequently released quarterly statements, no revenues have been shown. Presently we are waiting for 3Q and 4Q of 2008 to be released, which may end up being consolidated into a year end summary. While Spooz and Capital are sharing an office, and most if not all of the employees have departed Spooz, they still have ongoing expenses carried over from the 2007 year end summary, in addition to the remaining employee's salaries, and expenses accrued this 2008 calendar year. What is clear is that dilution has stopped. Going by memory, dilution stopped in the first or second week of August of 2008. Money is coming from somewhere, how much money being received and the frequency of money being delivered to Spooz is not clear.
The percentage of the contractual arrangement between Kaitrade and Spooz can be debated ad naseum until we have a physical PR or better yet, audited financials it is a mute point. What is clear is that dilution has stopped, which means money is arriving. Hopefully in the form of revenues and not any toxic financing.
While less debated and discussed, the SWARM license and some features written specifically for Capital, may have been sold/licensed to BB, who in turn has a partnership with BofA, who in turn owns ML. Ever since reading the Nov 18, PR from BofA, I have believed the seat count was larger than the originally PR'd Sept 23 number of 1200.
The Spooz Poison Pill was Kaitrade. Capital's Poison Pill was preferred shares. Both were performed rather hastily which has always given me the impression that both were attempting to defend themselves in fear that the customer would be more inclined to buyout the company than to buy the products.

2009 will be interesting.

JMO.



=========================================================================================================================================================
I would say all of these filings and negotiations and written stuff between these companies is 100% worthless. Or do you think that SPZI ever got the money from XXIS for the SWARM license?

Same message on website:



http://rcciws.com/


Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server.

Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Apache/2.0.63 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.63 OpenSSL/0.9.8b mod_auth_passthrough/2.1 mod_bwlimited/1.4 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 PHP/5.2.5 Server at rcciws.com Port 80

Found it. Here it is.


http://www.pinksheets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=13814

Page 62 is the VIII. Termination of Agreement clause.
Page 67, under Exhibit B is payment terms.

This Exhibit B is attached to and part of the Software License between Spooz Technologies, Inc. (Licensor) and 141 Futures, LLC (Licensee).

Licensee will pay Licensor a License Fee of One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) payable as follows: $500,000 no later than September 15, 2007; $500,00 no later than September 14, 2008; and $500,000 no later than March 14, 2009.

As additional consideration for the grant of the SWARM License to Licensee, Licensee agrees to trade any monies provided by Licensor (or its parent, Spooz, Inc.) to Licensee at its cost plus a ten percent (10%) incentive fee. For purposes hereof, "costs" are defined as solely brokerage and transaction fees.

Still down. Where was that party going to be? If I remember awhile back it was going to be in one of the hotels in Vegas. I'm gonna have to go back through all those old posts to find out which poster offered free drinks. Less than 24 hours to 2009!

A number of mines are having difficulty, especially mines that came online in recent years. Same goes for small oil and gas companies, that were drawn in with higher prices. Look at Moly mining. Hammered. The important real question with all mining companies is the break even based upon spot price.

MC,

I remember reading in a financial statement that 141 was to pay a certain percentage based on dollar volume, was that canceled? I could go find it again, I think it was in the last end of year summary, if memory serves correctly near the end in a discussion page.

Thanks.

Nice to know they have been reading the dd here on IHUB. I guess the speculation that this thing was headed back to $0.0001 shook em up a bit? With no hint of anything productive,or anything conclusive that they can be trusted, this thing WILL NOSE DIVE! $0.0001 NEXT!

I would take it a step further by stating that after Capital finishes taking its version of a poison pill, we should see consolidated financials, and maybe more.

Option play on SPZI anyone?

Sprechen Sie Deutsch?

http://www.maxblue.de/?directJump=http://www.is-asp.pbc.maxblue.de/is-asp/mare0004.html?wosid=m30_e2acc67a571e9c6644c35cf0f43b93075fa8af212c5e765359542a847a4d8911&symbol=GLCC.NOO&hist=0&market=L9X.FSE&SoRt=3&Go.x=12&Go.y=11


http://www.maxblue.de/?directJump=http://www.is-asp.pbc.maxblue.de/is-asp/mare0004.html?wosid=m30_e2acc67a571e9c6644c35cf0f43b93075fa8af212c5e765359542a847a4d8911&symbol=GLCC.NOO&hist=0&market=L9X.FSE&SoRt=3&Go.x=12&Go.y=11

I reckon I need to learn how to sprechen! Hee hee.

JMO. GLTA.

Not always. The main driver for the present RCCH score was the previous drop in pps over the last year. You may find other nano-microcap penny stocks that are under 700, I have. While a lower score under 700 may be attractive, it doesn't tell the whole story as it fails to recognize instability with a stock, regarding leverage and macroeconomic conditions. While the score is important, it shouldn't be used exclusively in making a determination to buy. However, larger institutional buyers do look closely at the score, which was the point I was attempting to make and that is, as the pps goes up, and the score goes down, different investors will emerge to pick up the ball and run with it.
JMO. GLTA.
=========================================================================================================================================================

wow.......penny stocks are risky..........i was unaware

The present pps of this stock, makes it a nano-microcap stock, and therefore has an extremely high risk assessment. By investing in RCCH, it means your risk tolerance is very high.
http://www.nasdaq.com/services/riskMetrics.stm
Notice that any stock with a measurement over 700 is considered extremely risky? RCCH is presently at 3429. The measurement is based upon volatility, and a higher score can represent a decline in pps, while a lower score can represent increasing pps and stability. Therefore, the lower the score along with a higher pps, the more likely a new class of investor will step in, or rather be allowed to step in, which is the institutional grade investor. Anything under $5 at one time is considered “penny” and anything typically under $10, is not picked up in mutual. Therefore, critical mass points along the curve are respectively, $0.001, $0.01, $0.10, $.50, $1.00, $5.00, and $10.00.
“RiskMetrics Group empowers institutions and their clients around the world to make better investment decisions. RiskMetrics Group's risk management and wealth management systems, services, and data are used by hundreds of leading financial institutions, multinational corporations and many of the world's central banks. “
Once a run were to begin, we bottom feeders may be satisfied along the way with sell points of less than $1. However if you hypothetically invested $100, at $0.0001, which is 1M shares, at $1.00, that’s $1,000,000.00, or a 999,900% return. Most may be satisfied with much less.
JMO. GLTA.

===============================================================================================================================================

Hypothetically...if the pps does hit $1.00 and everyone rushes to sell, won't that immediately cause

At the bottom of the page is the amendments. However, the actual number of shares is not shown, unless I'm missing something.

https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=YypQXGt8O%252bzrnS610y3xVA%253d%253d&CorpName=ZCOM+NETWORKS%2c+INC.

...and that's maybe 80% of it. Just read from last Friday to get more.

I subscribe to WSJ and after reading about the credit mess developing, I pulled my position in big board in October 2007. After reading an article in WSJ about how small caps were hammered almost as hard as financial stocks, I decided to invest at the very bottom, using less than 2% of what I had in Oct 2007 and have tried to focus on stocks that started to fall for no apparent reason before the conclusion of 2Q of 2008. Therefore, it wasn't until recently that I really became aware of the games at the bottom, which have been entertaining.

My personal theory with this stock is that there was enough confusion as to the number of shares outstanding, just long enough for more shares to be sold than outstanding before the matter was cleared up. Not really sure about how may real shares vs fake shares there are, but it certainly is interesting and won't miss the show. (Thus the charting problems, which have also been described on the chart board). I don't know quite what to make of all the dd on the board, as RCCH seems bigger, once investigation begins and therefore mystifying why the current pps.

I will be looking closely at the FTD chart on the next release and a very nice PR.

Long and holding my cookies, but not the crumbs... hee hee.

JMO


=============================================================================================================

Interesting analogy from chart reading. I am taking the DD approach. EZ debt solutions looks pretty big and that was purchased with restricted shares that has a performance clause attached to it.(Gene's words from what he does with shares). Can a MM borrow against that to create liquidity if nobody is selling? They can borrow against almost anything from what I understand. Your shares, my shares, restricted shares etc....

MM need to create a market, and it is a pinky..They don't care for pinkys.

Is this it?
Pine Hills Golf Course, NC
http://www.golflink.com/golf-courses/course.aspx?course=662945

Hey Durk,

Since I'm a cheap @$$ and don't have PM, I wanted to throw out a question to you on RCCH here. I was following RPDM and watched some pps jumping around and brought up FTD. Got into a discussion with another poster, which is a 3rd party good guy, IMO. I just introduced him to FTD chart. This is his reaction...
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=34441066

and mine...

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=34441798


Long on both.

JMO.

As always, your analysis is excellent. The question you brought forward earlier was if there was perhaps another stock showing 3Q FTD/NSS, which is July - October. Your point of dillution is well taken as the T/A is presently gagged and therefore its anyone's guess how many shares there are. The release of 4Q FTD and knowing the exact number of shares would certainly help in making an exact science in spotting this development, until then my guess is the spike in FTD, caused counterfeit shares to be passed around, and if for no other reason worth a lotto ticket to see if it squeezes. The squeeze would start once a formal announcement is made that an uplist to a foreign exchange will occur.

I'm eagerly waiting on the 4Q FTD for both stocks presently to see the charts.

Thank you for your valued time and comments on the stocks.

-JMO

Hey, I picked that date!


======================================================


Per Gene, we aren't going to have a PR this week, for the same reason we didn't have one last week. The markets are closed on Thursday so it would be a waste almost. He said it cost money to put those PRs out so the timing is everything. We'll see on the 7th for sure! Uplist?

Yes, I expect a higher price as well. At the last close some of the posts were talking about the MM's left on bid/ask... After the flurry of posts in the last day, it will be interesting to see what Monday will bring and of course, the new round of bashing. They new bahsers of late are getting me really excited.

JMO GLTA

Is that Monday's shareprice?

Tothe,

Check the NSS/FTD on this one as well: RCCH

Interesting play developing on this one which may be worth following and the game plan to escape the MMs by uplisting to an international exchange. GLTY.

I've been reading the huge amount of posts on RCCH, and no one knows which "International Exchange" the uplist will go to. HK or LSE is the latest speculation. The desire is to uplist to an international exchange to escape the MM's that NSS the stock from .95 to 0.0001. Someone posted that Knight is now on LSE, so HK? Since an uplist from Pink to an International Exchange has not been achieved previously, perhaps this may be one to follow, to see what happens as this may be history in the making? JMO.

Uplist for LSE
LSE: http://www.londonstockexchange.com/NR/rdonlyres/32CAAFBF-0ACA-4D78-A328-CA3E189B76F3/0/PracticalGuidetoListing050706.pdf

Without any legitimate news and/or assays, 000 is next.

Thank you for your posts, I will be buying more on Monday.

Well, take your pick:
1. End of year selling for Tax Write Off.
2. The last junket trip to South America for the Coochie girls didn't settle well, (speculation).
3. Political instability in South America, and confusion over which Franklin Company was being discussed after the spanish to english translation.
4. Prior to the 0.0007 to 0.0001, the instability in silver as well as other commodities, which would greatly affect the speculative value of this stock.

For some reason, I like seeing the red ink associated with this stock and therefore don't sell, because in the outside chance that the political instability should somehow end in a positive manner for foreign investors, commodities increase, the company starts something productive other than the junket trips, then there might be something to this one. They might just turn a real profit and issue dividends if they would just post pictures of the coochie girls on the internet.

The worst thing that could possibly happen with buying at $0.0001 is that the company folds and you only lose all your money. The upside, is everything is up from here, unless we start to see the MOARS (mother of all reverse splits), follwed by more dillution to 0.0001. Just my opinion, mixed with humor, not intended for investment grade advice. Still long and waiting for someone with solid DD pictures.
==============================================================

Why would this stock be stuck at .0001 if it was only last month that it ran up to .0007? What happened then?

My little one stayed up all night looking out the window for Santa Claus, so I'm a bit tired. Thank you for providing such a wonderful treasure of information. Since you like to research, and I'm feeling a bit lazy today, can you kindly provide the uplist requirements for other international exchanges? Thank you kindly in advance.

It is not a matter of being one up, one down. Your beliefs are yours, and therefore confirmed.
My previous message was meant to be inspiring, so kindly do not take offense.

===================================================================================================

O.K. , you believe it will be history in the making. I pretty much believe it will turn out like the dozens of
other MOASS's I've seen before. Who's right?
If I'm right, does that mean that my mental powers of visualization are stronger than yours?
Would that tell you that my intuition is much more finely honed than yours?
I don't think either one has anything to do with anything and yes, I've seen the movie!

May you and yours be blessed and your blessings multiplied.

Thoughts become actions. Whatever you think you will bring more of into your life, which confirms what you were thinking in the first place, because you attracted it, and wanted it. That's the secret to life. Believe you already received it and it will be manifested.

Anything.

I won a multimillion lotto jackpot, and gave the winning ticket to a homeless man with a sign that read, "Hungry, please help." I knew I was already blessed and therefore gave him the ticket and as I handed the ticket over, I said with a smile, "I hope you win!" True story.

I wish everyone only the very best. Some have mentioned islands or cars, what is your desire? Visualize it, make it happen. Take a moment to watch the following inspiring videos to understand and enjoy the gift you already have.



The Secret Law of Attraction, 3 min

Why would the secretary sit behind the desk anymore? Why not sit behind a giant beach umbrella with a pina colada? Microsoft had the same problem of having a number of employees who became very wealthy. Microsoft just hired new employees. No Big Deal.

Merry Christmas!

(...including the soon to be bankrupt MMs who NSS and those who will be going to jail for fraud and illegal NSS).

=============================================================


lol. not a chance without splitting our shares.

let's think here ...

let's say the share price jumps up to a dollar without splitting our shares. now you have a large group of investors (us) who are able to make out with multimillions ... while the secretary of RCCH still has to sit behind her desk and make $40,000 a year.


you have a better chance at winning the lottery than getting rich off this stock. i'm going to buy a ticket right now, wish me luck

Yes, I agree. Initially, I didn't want to believe in the concept of NSS outside of a fail to deliver occuring with a short sale. The more I research, the more shocking it really is. I'm posting a section of the article for those who didn't take the time to read it below. Note, I failed to provide a disclaimer: Always do your DD, your investment decisions are yours and you face the MM problem in every U.S. Exchange.

Here some quick DD on NSS/FTD:
http://failstodeliver.com/default.aspx
http://www.counterfeitingstock.com/
http://www.rgm.com/shortselling.html
http://shareholdersfoundation.com/
http://www.sec.gov/

From the previous article posted: http://www.rgm.com/articles/Herald-Star.html
The suit alleges that as much as 4.1 million shares of Eagletech were sold in such fashion into the market, with some brokerage firms selling more than they purchased, meaning shares were being sold that Eagletech neither issued or registered, from at least 81 different firms.

The suit details that in a legitimate short trade, a seller borrows a stock to be sold or has a documentable arrangement to borrow it so it can be delivered to the buyer by the required settlement date. A “naked” short sale, which is alleged to have destroyed Eagletech, occurs when the seller does not have the share or has not borrowed it to deliver it by the settlement date. Such sales, the suit says, allow naked short sellers to manipulate the market for riskless profits, increasing the supply of shares in a given stock for sale without the company actually issuing or registering the stock. Prices can thus be depressed through a virtually unlimited stock supply until the price of the stock is down to zero at the end of the death spiral.

The suit alleges the financial industry deals in a pattern and practice of stock manipulation by organized crime and others in the financial services industry.

Here is another company that faced a NSS, that is now attempting a court battle:

http://www.rgm.com/articles/Herald-Star.html

Please add me to the LONG list.

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

(..including the soon to be bankrupt MMs)

$0.0001 next?

I'm on Zecco as well. The ACH method is much better, however getting it started takes a few days as it is similar to opening a Pay Pal account. A small amount is deposited, then you confirm it, the amount is removed and then you can start the transfer from bank to zecco.

On the upside, Zecco is cheap. The downside is back in that high volume days of Sept, the site crashed. Zecco claims to have updated their servers since. At around mid night the site, goes through an updating process. So numbers may be off until morning.

Only one time did I receive the "restricted" notification when buying RCCH and that was when RCCH was having billion share days. GLTY

Yes, Wednesday January 5, 2009 is the day I picked for the uplist announcement.

Please read the following links:
Embroiled with Wall Street: http://www.rgm.com/articles/Herald-Star.html
Citizens for securities Reform: http://www.counterfeitingstock.com/
http://www.counterfeitingstock.com/CS2.0/CounterfeitingStock.html
http://failstodeliver.com/questions.aspx
A fail to deliver is recorded when a seller does not provide the shares of stock that were sold within the required settlement timeframe. From the SEC: "Fails-to-deliver can occur for a number of reasons on both long and short sales. Therefore, fails-to-deliver are not necessarily the result of short selling, and are not evidence of abusive short selling or “naked” short selling."
FTD: Fails to Deliver http://failstodeliver.com/default.aspx
http://www.sec.gov/index.htm
While some attempt at FTD is being made by SEC, I'm not certain it goes far enough, especially with OTC and Pink as MMs are still required to make a market, even if they don't have shares, they sell them, which creates the counterfeit share and thus the FTD.
http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2008/34-58107.pdf
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/sec-actions.htm
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-204.htm
http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml
With regard to the paragraph in question: RPDM is stuck in a situation of falling into the hands of the MMs. If RPDM delivers on its previous PR the pps should go up. If no confirmation of buyback is complete, the triple zero is here to stay. Even with the buyback, due to the macro economics, the pps may remain below previously held higher expectations, unless a PR is provided to prove otherwise. Just what is the expectations of RPDM shareholders is yet to be determined, and therefore solid numbers need to be shown to determine that value and pps.
MMs remind me of the mafia, and a line from the Godfather where Michael says to Kate, "I promise you Kate, the Corleone family will be legitimate in a few years!" Organized crime may not be running around with baseball bats beating knees as in the Sopranos, instead they are doing it in a quasi legitimate manner on the US Stock Exchanges. The only difference between Pinks and NYSE, is that in Pinks, you get to see it better.
In short, (excuse the pun), MMs are required to make a market in the Pink equities and they do in fact trade between themselves, they have certain rules that they still must abide by. The most important one which appears to be affecting RPDM, is to deliberately drive the stock into the ground, in a death spiral, which is illegal. It can be difficult to prove as the SEC has in recent years looked the other way when it comes to fraud, manipulation, illegal activities, corruption, ponzi schemes, etc etc. MM's hide behind an argument that the stock was Pink, and therefore was doomed for failure and therefore the death spiral is justified and the SEC has tended to uphold the MM argument. The penalties against the MM's have been no more than a slap on the wrist, and courts have treated them gently as well.

Hopefully, the SEC has become embarrassed by the lack of enforcement of existing regulations, and other government agencies as well as Congress are stepping in to investigate the corruption. Bernie Madoff, one of the largest MM's, recently confessed to running a Ponzi scheme. Bernie Madoff was a market maker and helped create NASDAQ. Sing Bernie, Sing!
=================================================================================================

If you chart techs would like to explain the last posts in non technical terms I would be happy to shoot this over to management via email and return the response to the board asap. What is FTD (force 10 ?) for example. I am especially interested in the mm accumulation theory which I subscribe to and believe they are playing the market psychology to create a desperation scenario while accumulating so that they can run up RPDM and reap the benefits. I think you might be right about the finality of the buyback in a pr causing a non response from investors.
I may not necessarily agree with the strategy to conduct a buyback is a valued use of funds to increase pps, but by not completing the buy back and providing a completion PR, would be very bad and the stock would be permanently cellar boxed. Therefore, RPDM will need to provide the status of completion on previously issued PR's which should adjust the pps back to previous evaluations, however skewed and tempered by macro conditions (not sure about this paragraph can you clarify)

Compare the fluctuating pps and FTD going back to June. Now the last link provided showing the reply of MaryKateAustin, someone who I will have to say is impartial as a chart god, is pointing out accumulation by MM's on Chi Osc starting in June. While I have not bothered to subscribe to a shortsqueeze membership to obtain current data feeds, I simply look for the pattern development. Your analysis on the board of charts is very good in pointing out Accum/Dist, Chi Osc and Wilder, etc and I respectfully value your thoughtful input. However, by reading the board going back a few months, the MM games being played hasn’t been brought up by anyone. RPDM management needs to recognize it and call it out for what it is and proceed with legal council and their business plan.

I may not necessarily agree with the strategy to conduct a buyback is a valued use of funds to increase pps, but by not completing the buy back and providing a completion PR, would be very bad and the stock would be permanently cellar boxed. Therefore, RPDM will need to provide the status of completion on previously issued PR's which should adjust the pps back to previous evaluations, however skewed and tempered by macro conditions. While not all new posters clearly indicate their agenda for posting, I shall clearly state mine, and that is I look for variations as described and try to determine pps fluctuations and then go long. Depending on time and pps, I set a target and sell. Sometimes, I don't say anything at all on a board, but this one was really too painful for some, and therefore I had to say my peace.

In order for the perfect MOASS to develop: #1. RPDM management will need to drop a nice big PR present before the 31st, #2. There is enough dry powder from retail investors to blow it up. Those that manipulated for the purpose of NSS had to have made the calculation that #1 and #2 would not happen.

Next week will be a new year, hopefully better. At that time, we will have a fresh set of data available regarding FTD, and a valuable PR, (if it didn't already occur). Until then, I'm going to try and relax a bit, enjoy the reason for the season and not bother MKA.

Merry Christmas to all!
(Yes, that includes the MM NSScroogies).

JMO.

Yes, that is almost like #1. That would be really really bad.

The upside: If there really is gold in the ground, and the gold spot continues to climb, we could have roaches running the joint and still see the pps go up, eventually.

I know about that fools gold though. While digging a hole in my yard, the little foolsgold covered my shovel, feet and hands. Thoughts of being the Beverly Hillbillies went through my head. Hee hee. Did some research and discovered that the first gold mine and mint in America was in NC. One farmer used the big 17lb gold nugget for a door stop because he didn't know what it was! An enterprising person bought it for $3.50.

At this point it feels like playing a game of chicken with TAOL.

==============================================================

The third outcome:

3. The financials are bad and production has not started.