Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Please note was also a resident agent change for PIRANHA INTERACTIVE PUBLISHING INC. (PNHI) on July 27, 2007 in the State of Nevada.
Info on Intermountain Ventures Inc. as per State of Nevada:
http://tinyurl.com/yvvc74
I ain't selling!!
Info on Intermountain Ventures Inc. as per State of Nevada:
http://tinyurl.com/yvvc74
Intermountain Ventures only has 53 million shares authorized as per State of Nevada. METP has approx 27 million shares outstanding and Kip owned 55.2% if I am not mistaken.
WOO HOO!!
http://www.otcbb.com/Otherdailylist/
Type in METP in search criteria
METP (Kip Eardley shell SOLD! No RS!
Other-OTC System Changes - 08/27/2007
OTCBB Daily List
Other-OTC / Portal / PPS Daily List
NAME/SYMBOL CHANGES
Updated Date Old Symbol Old Name New Symbol New Name Comment
13:40 8/28/2007 METP Metropane Inc Common Stock ITRM Intermountain Ventures Inc Common Stock **
Did I tell you something was up!!
It was green (up 100%), before I posted this. I am sure something is up now especially with this new Nevada development.
Kip Eardley is president of new company in Nevada.
Try this link, it will work.
http://tinyurl.com/8aby2
Anyone notice that there is a new company that Kip Eardley is a president/treasurer/director (listed as an officer since August 22, 2007) in the State of Nevada. This company was added to the State of Nevada on July 26, 2007.
Search by Officer Name: Kip Eardley
Interesting....this NEW company is active in Nevada, yet METP in Minnesota in now inactive.
Please note there was also a resident agent change for his other company PIRANHA INTERACTIVE PUBLISHING INC. (PNHI) on July 27, 2007 as well.
Anyone notice that there is a new company that Kip Eardley is a president/treasurer/director in the State of Nevada. This company was added to the State of Nevada on July 26, 2007.
Search by Officer Name: Kip Eardley
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpSearch.aspx
Please note there was also a resident agent change for his other company PIRANHA INTERACTIVE PUBLISHING INC. (PNHI) on July 27, 2007 as well.
The person selling METP is going to be sorry in the next little while as something is up with METP. It is a great buying opportunity in my opinion.
Did you try these numbers?
561-801-3710
When you call it, you get a message stating that the voicemail for this number has not been setup yet.
The other two numbers you can leave messages for Darrell are:
267-350-9203
267-350-9443
I don't think it has anything to do with METP not paying their registration fee with the state of Minnesota IMO. I am optimistic that the status change has something to do with METP and a possible reverse merger that we have all been waiting for over a year now.
http://www.tinyurl.com/323udj
Something is going to happen very soon IMO. There has to be an explanation why METP went from status active to inactive on the State of Minnesota corporation records.
I received an email response from Steven Dorrough regarding legal activity. Please read email below.
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: "steven dorrough" <dorroughmail@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Quick Question regarding BHUB
To: "Quikfix"
Yes however counsel wants to move forward with getting the Company trading in order to ascertain all damages...
----- Original Message ----
From: Quikfix
To: dorroughmail@yahoo.com
Cc: wlstreet@bellsouth.net (Darrell's email address)
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 5:23:42 PM
Subject: Quick Question regarding BHUB
Good afternoon,
As per today's PR, you mentioned that:
"The BigHub.com is currently in the midst of preparing to file an Information Statement Pursuant to Section 14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which will allow the Company to move forward with its plan to increase its authorized shares of common stock. The BigHub.com noted that it plans to take such action in order to enable it to take quicker advantage of acquisition and/or merger opportunities that may become available by having sufficient shares authorized to enter into such transactions, as well as account for shares that were issued erroneously in the past."
My question is:
Are you still taking legal action against Select American, and the other parties involved in the unauthorized share scheme that caused BHUB to be in this predicament? Will investors be getting any updates on the legal action that was/is currently underway?
Thanks in advance.
Docucon (DCCN) update.
From: "Robert W. Schwartz" <rschwartz@shggroup.com>
To: "Quikfix"
CC: "Larry Heslin" <lheslin@shggroup.com>
Subject: Re: Docucon Inc - DCCN
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:01:26 -0400
If you can help sell it, speak with my partner, Larry Heslin at the number below. We have had several deals which fell apart. It is clean.
RWS
www.shggroup.com
518-786-7733 Office
518-786-6558 Fax
----- Original Message -----
From: Quikfix
To: rschwartz@shggroup.com
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 5:24 PM
Subject: Docucon Inc - DCCN
Hi Robert,
Docucon has been a shell now for almost three years. Any new developments? Is there a reason why a company won't acquire this shell? Is it not clean (lots of debt), preferred share issue. etc.
As of today on www.shellstockreview.com (please see my screenshot in word doc) DCCN is listed as the 6th most inexpensive Shell on the market ($123,398.00) with approx 243,918 common shares outstanding.
Is the outstanding common shares correct at 243,918 or is it closer to 350,000 shares.
Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Something is in the works, I am sure of it. Metropane Inc. is now Inactive as per the State of Minnesota while a couple of weeks ago it was Active. It's just a matter of time before we hear some news IMHO!
At this point, I honestly don't know. All I know is something must be up as METP is currently trading on the pink sheets although the company is inactive. In my opinion, this is good news and we'll hopefully hear something soon.
Has anyone confirmed if those multi-million dollar contracts have been actually approved by Komex?
Has anyone contacted Komex regarding this?
Anyone notice METP lately?
Read post 5942 and 5949 on the METP board.
That was a beautiful paint job at the end!!
4000 shares at 0.02.
Anyways, I have been trying to get the editor of shellstockreview.com to add METP to the profile list. He said he needed the CIK number as his spreadsheet required it and once he got that, he would add METP at some point.
So I provided him with the CIK 0000929787. The editor also confirmed that he does own shares in METP.
Next week should be interesting, something is in the works especially after the recent change in status in State of Minnesota (see post 5942).
Why is Metropane Inc. now inactive?
My spider senses are tingling...
I have proof that METP shell will pop!!
Only 27 million outstanding shares and most of them controlled by the CEO (55.2%). The float is tiny! There has been higher volume than normal the last couple of days.
Also, anyone take a look at the Minnesota Secretary of State for METP lately?
http://tinyurl.com/323udj
Notice that the Entity Status is Inactive. This Inactive state started last week. Last time I checked in early July, the Entity Status was Active. I have a screenshot to prove this. If you want to see it, PM me your email address.
Anyone take a look at the Minnesota Secretary of State for METP lately?
Notice that the Entity Status is Inactive. This Inactive state started last week. Last time I checked in early July, the Entity Status was Active. I even have a screenshot to prove this. If you want to see it, PM me your email address.
Could this be the reason we are suddenly seeing volume?
Here is the link:
http://tinyurl.com/323udj
Here is the summary:
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS INQUIRY - VIEW ENTITY
Filing Number: 1D-769 Entity Type: Domestic Corporation
Original Date of Filing: 6/4/1963 Entity Status: Inactive
Chapter: 302A Good Standing:
(date of last annual filing)
Duration: PERPETUAL
Name: Metropane, Inc.
Registered Office Address: 3512 35th Ave S
Mpls, MN, 55406
Agent Name: Incorp Services Inc
Has anyone confirmed the contracts by contacting Komex?
Do you know of any shells that are ready to merge?
I sent two emails to Darrell requesting any type of update. I know Darrell reads this board and posts as BIGHUB (last post June 13). Darrell, throw us a bone, will ya?
Here is what I wrote:
Hi Darrell,
Any new developments with BHUB? I have been on http://www.thebhub.com/ and there has been nothing new posted on this website in quite a while. Also, we haven't heard from you in quite some time.
There was some activity (volume) on July 12th and lots of volume today. Do you anticipate BHUB trading soon and what hurdles do you currently face?
Any good news regarding the litigation on Sparrow, Wong, and Select American?
Talk to you soon.
Remember these PR's
1) http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/070322/0229783.html
"Sneak peeks of the products will be available in early May on the Pocketop website and legitimate industry hardware reviewers may contact the company for samples in July. The company will be setting up a pre-order web page that will allow you to get it first by directing and holding the first stock shipped for retail sales stock at the nearest retailer and via the web site if none are available."
Where are those sneak peeks, we are near the middle of June?
2)http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/070405/0235519.html
"For those that always have to have the latest and greatest, or are simply glad to see a renewable charger on the market, the company will be field testing a limited number of beta units in June of this year. Interested parties will be able to sign up through the web site's new beta testers section on the support page at www.pocketopcorp.com which will be completed by month end."
This PR was written on April 5, there still isn't a completed beta section on their website.
http://www.pocketopcorp.com/support_beta.html
If you are going to issue a PR with specific dates and events on them, DELIVER!! PKTO has not delivered yet and this is one reason (I've mentioned other reasons in prior posts) why it trades so low.
Wht isn't there any volume?
Nope, nothing new to report
Kip is out of town until June 12th. I am sure if there is anything new to report, Kip will let us know. Patience people.
Joe, I got my answer (see post 3750). I would like to see more transparency and any verifiable info regarding Apparel One and Nino, our beloved CEO though. I guess we will know this in due time.
Email from Michael Burke:
Mike Burke <mburke@cyberhand.com> wrote:
Sorry I was away on business.
1. There are two diametrically opposed positions when it comes to small pink sheet companies. The small investor who never wants the company to issue stock to dilute them and the company who went public in the first place to raise the money to complete its business plan. They are not compatible at the onset as the company is trying to grow the business and is at its most fragile and time sensitive period. This is the reason the overwhelming majority of the Pinksheet companies FAIL. EVERY company goes public to raise money for its business, the REAL world does not wait for procrastinators, and will virtually cease to exist and miss any edge or opportunity it may have had by waiting for anyone and the reason does not matter. Every business that does not announce to its shareholders that it will be selling stock to raise money for its business is a SCAM and it has no business to promote therefore no need for capital. If you have all the money you need NO ONE would entertain the idea of going public unless the private investors want to liquefy their previous investment and exit. Either way the company must raise capital.
Cyberhand had reached a point where any financing was unrealistic at the trading value that it was at and something had to be done. If you do the math, we would have had to increase the float by hundreds of millions of shares to upgrade its manufacturing and design abilities even after it spun off its subs. The stock was simply churning for the benefit of the day traders (it’s easy to move a stock from .0003 to .0006 double your money and then do it all over again) and the company was being held hostage in the process. The stock is now stable, at a level where it can obtain money reasonably, is starting its audit and will move up the scale on its way to the OTC:BB and beyond. The public float is incredibly tight and will stay that way even as we finance and expand its business to increase shareholder value. I have said this before, our companies have millions invested, are real and we will build them into the businesses that they should be and will not allow ourselves to be distracted. Strong companies make for strong shareholder value and we have a duty to all to ensure its survival by raising the money it needs, build it right and overcome all obstacles in its path.
2. I nor anyone within VShield Software Corp. has ever met, written, spoken to, requested a meeting with, or even walked by them in a crowd or has any knowledge of David Duncan or Jason Wong or any of their activities in the past or now. All previous Director’s and Officer’s resigned long ago and before the name change. As a matter of fact, everyone seems to know more about them than we do, good and bad.
3. I have asked our compliance people to check all public information and bring it up to date. Thank you for the information and feel free to point out anything that they have missed.
Mike Burke
From: Quikfix
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 4:18 PM
To: mburke@cyberhand.com
Subject: Please answer these 3 questions
Hi Mike,
Glad to see your the CEO of VShield and Corporate is the new TA for Vshield as per pinksheets.com
These 3 questions still remain unanswered and to be quite frank, your lack of communication regarding these 3 issues is leaving investors (myself included) with doubts concerning Pocketop and management's actions regarding this whole Select American fiasco.
1) Why did you reverse split Cyberhand?
2) Please clarify why David Duncan is linked to Jason Wong as per below?
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/company_profile.jsp?symbol=vshd
Notice David Duncan was listed as President/CEO of VShield.
http://tinyurl.com/2fu9ph
Click on Domestic Profit document dated July 7, 2005 and go to page 4. You will notice notice David Duncan's name right beside Jason Wong's name and both share the same address.
3) Why is PKTO still listing Fairross and not Corporate as their TA on pinksheets.com?
Just sent this email to mburke@cyberhand.com
Hi Mike,
Glad to see your the CEO of VShield and Corporate Stock Transfer is the new TA for VShield as per pinksheets.com
These 3 questions still remain unanswered and to be quite frank, your lack of communication regarding these 3 issues is leaving investors (myself included) with doubts concerning Pocketop and management's actions regarding this whole Select American fiasco.
1) Why did you reverse split Cyberhand?
2) Please clarify why David Duncan is linked to Jason Wong as per below?
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/company_profile.jsp?symbol=vshd
Note: David Duncan used to be listed as President/CEO of VShield.
http://tinyurl.com/2fu9ph
Click on Domestic Profit document dated July 7, 2005 and go to page 4. You will notice notice David Duncan's name right beside Jason Wong's name and both share the same address.
3) Why is PKTO still listing Fairross and not Corporate Stock Transfer as their TA on pinksheets.com
David Duncan has left the building!!
Take a look at the company info for VSHD on pinksheets.com
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/company_profile.jsp?symbol=vshd
Michael Burke is now stated as the President of VShield and Corporate Stock Transfer is the new TA for VShield. Please note Fairross (formerly known as Select American) is still the TA for Pocketop as per pinksheets.com.
Question remains, where is the former VSHD CEO/President David Duncan now and was he involved with Jason Wong and Select American.
Why does Burke refuse to answer my question(s)?
Pascal, I have no hidden agenda.
Why don't you read all my prior posts. I report my DD findings and post on this board. I have never lied and nor will I start today.
Michael Burke by not answering my questions is hiding something.
Don't we deserve to know the answers to those 2 questions especially when those stocks (PKTO included) in the Ontario Securities Commission document are on the verge of being halted (in my opinion)?
Still no answer from Michael Burke (mburke@cyberhand.com) regarding my questions:
1) Why did you reverse split Cyberhand?
2) Please clarify why David Duncan is linked to Jason Wong as per the links provided in this email? (see post 3697)
I don't trust people, I trust facts. Once I get proof that David Duncan wasn't involved with VShield with some clarification on this issue as well who is Apparel One and the wherebouts of our beloved CEO Nino Calderola, only then will I start trusting Michael Burke.
Last time I spoke to Burke, he would not tell me where Nino Calderola resides. Why hide this info I asked him? His response was "Does it matter where he lives, if he is married, how many kids he has".
Sure, Nino' information will probably be disclosed soon since PKTO is becoming fully transparent, but why did all this secrecy have to take place from the beginning.
If Michael Burke put his pride aside and actually responded to investor questions when the merger happened instead of dancing around the issues, we would be trading in pennies now and not subpennies.
One more thing, if PKTO eventually does "graduate" to the OTCBB, do you trust Michael Burke enough that he won't reverse split this stock? I asked him this question already and he wouldn't confirm that he definitely would not reverse-split the stock. He did say, a reverse split is not out of the question, but it depends on the circumstances at that point in time and doing so would be one of our last options. Mind you, he has a history of reverse splitting when it comes to Cyberhand.
I trust people who are open and honest, Michael Burke hasn't proved that to me yet. Does that answer your question?
I am not recommending anything to anyone. All I do is state facts. Please read all my posts regarding Pocketop. I have done lots of DD on this stock from day 1 of the merger, tried to gather as much information from sources, Michael Burke himself, etc. I hope all I find is good news but sometimes that's not the case.
I hate the fact that the moment I post anything truthful (with proof) but remotely negative (David Duncan for example), I am called a basher, I am told that I sold my stock, I am here to bring the price down, etc.
Look, I don't believe in big brother and will report my findings whether good or bad. It is up to you to decide what you want to do with that information, and if you don't want to hear it, ignore it, and move on.
Be objective, look at where Pocketop is trading today. Pocketop should be trading over a penny but Burke is one of the reasons why the price is where it is today. He should have been transparent from day one with the share structure instead of refusing and insulting investors who were emailing him from the early days of the merger regariding share structure. He should have disclosed who Nino "Professor" Calderola is and where we can contact Apparel One. Pocketop has a CEO that no one has talked too or is in contact with (but we did hear him in the Wall St interview). I have been warning Michael Burke about (I have proof of this, see my prior posts) to stay away from Select American and he should have moved TA's in late March or early April when the BHUB fiasco came into play.
Don't get me wrong, Burke is doing good things now, and we will be transparent soon, new TA to follow, but this should have been done months ago. I know for a fact that due to my reasons listed above and the whole David Duncan thing, a lot of people still don't trust him.
I hope he proves us wrong.
I am not attacking. I have been a PKTO investor from day 1 (USAC-PKTO merger on March 7th, 2007) and would like these questions answered for my peace of mind. It's called due digence, ever heard of this?