Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What credible information do you possess that validates your statement: When you post: "you must know by now that we are a shell stock ready to reverse merge. Right! "? AAPU being a shell stock seems reasonable, however stating that AAPU is ready to reverse merge needs some substantiation, beyond guessing.
Thanks,
Howard
I sent an email to the transfer agent for AAPU. Below is the email and the prompt reply that i received:
From: Howard Bleicher [mailto:howardb4@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:48 AM
To: laurel@yourtransferagent.com
Subject: America Asia Petroleum
Dear Mr. Laurel Poffenroth
I am a shareholder of America Asia Petroleum. I have been unable to communicate with them since they do not
answer emails, postal letters, their phone has been disconnected, they have not reported any business activities for just about one year
and they no longer have a website.
My question to you is: are they still doing business or are they defunct?
I will appreciate a reply as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Howard H. Bleicher, D.D.S.
Mr. Bleicher –
Its been several months since I’ve had any communication with the company myself.
I do transfer shares that come in through a brokerage firm or an individual shareholder.
I have not been asked by the company to perform any corporate actions or to issue
any shares. I can only say, that I have not been terminated by the company as their
transfer agent.
I will try and forward your email to the company and hopefully, they will provide
you with some answers.
Best Regards.
Laurel Poffenroth
President
PacWest Transfer
If and when a major buyer recognizes this pr as an opportunity, particularly at this pps those 28000 shares will be gone in a microsecond. Personally, I believe this will happen.
Howard
"The Company believes it can ultimately achieve several thousand barrels per day from its field development program on the Vaca zone alone, using steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) methods where one wellbore is used to inject the steam for heat and pressure into the formation to drain the treated hot oil into a collector bore."
This several thousand barrels per day just from the Vaca Tar will add an enormous monthly dollar addition. That is if it all works as planned.
H.
And may the force be with you all.
H.
Thanks for pointing out to me those two Pr's.
What I don't understand is that both companies say that the SAB patent is theirs.
Both pr's use the same wording with Jack Bows representing AAPU and Chirico representing Accel. Does anyone here know which company the SAB patent belongs to?
thanks,
Howard
I am not kidding. I don't know the relationship between Accel Eneergy and AAPU, or the facts surrounding the SAB. It would help me greatly if those who seemingly are aware of the facts could courteously supply the information,or choose not to, instead of attacking my ignorance!
Thanks to all,
Howard
Is Accel Energy's Shale Asphalt Binder related in any way to AAPU's SAB? Does Accel Energy have some business relationship with AAPU? What is going on?
Howard
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES |
SHALE ASPHALT BINDER
Accel Energy plans to build a facility to manufacture a new patent pending product, Shale Asphalt Binder (SAB). SAB is a value-added petroleum product which is made from crude oil and prolongs the life of highways and roads. Accel Energy plans to purchase a site, develop a plant and manufacture and sell this product for road building efforts in China and other markets. Currently, China is embarking on the largest road building efforts in its history that will see its network of highways become comparable to that of the US. The Shale Asphalt Binder that will be produced by Accel Energy will help to effectively prolong the life of those highways. SAB has been formulated to enable governments, Departments of Transportation and contractors to have better road surface availability at a lower cost. SAB provides improved infrastructure, creates greater longevity and has lasting benefits to peoples of all countries, whether developing or industrialized. SAB has a proven history over the past 8 years and was shown to be effective in 11 actual road test locations, within all the major weather zones. The SAB product will provide a longer life to the roads and save taxpayer dollars. The asphalt business in the China and USA is a multi-billion-dollar business, and contracts under negotiation will put Accel Energy in a key market position both in China and subsequently the US, potentially utilizing 100% of its current production and generating millions of dollars in sales revenues. Accel Energy expects to earn revenues of $36 million in the first year of operations of this manufacturing facility with continued growth projected for years to come. Sales of the SAB product are projected to be over US$61 million by 2008. SAB solves five of the major problems facing the maintenance of roads:
Rutting
Water stripping
Thermal freeze-thaw cracking
Fatigue cracking
Aging
There has been no serious or even play money showing up to invest in AAPU.
1,000000 shares changing hands at an average pps of $.0025 is about $2500. That essentially is nothing. We have become accustomed to zero shares to 50,000 shares being traded per day. When the number of shares reaches 1,000,000 we can be deluded into fantasies that there is some real interest.
If something was happening that has not been announced, there would be some insider activity and not in the miniscule volume that we have been seeing. A few hundred million shares traded per day should stimulate some interest.
I like to see this days activity also, but I can't get any hopes up because of the still microscopic volume and the preponderance of negativity that surrounds this company. We still do not know if they are even open for business.
Volume precedes price and that volume has not occurred.
Nothing has publicly realistically happened to warrant even the purchase of one share.
What interview?
H.
I just sent an email to info@americaasiapetroleum.com and it was returned with the following statement: MTP: host 208.28.184.6: 553 5.3.0 <info@americaasiapetroleum.com>... <info@americaasiapetroleum.com>... No such mailbox in the domain.
Hopefully it was an error as this happens occasionally with valid email addresses.
But, with the fact that they have not returned phone calls for months, have not responded to written letters, not responded to any of my emails, have not posted annual earnings for 2006 or any earnings or business activities for 2007 and now have no website, it doesn't bode well.
Howard
A trade of 8750 shares at the price of .001 costs $8.75. How can a trade that small be made through a broker? The broker's fee would be more then cost of the shares.
Howard
Does anyone have any information concerning the Brass Bulls company and their further involvement with AAPU.
Following is a copy of their press release in Dec. of 2006:
December 13, 2006 10:43 AM Eastern Time
Brass Bulls Corp. Accumulates over 6% of American Asia Petroleum Corp. (AAPM)
Request Increased Disclosure
CORAL SPRINGS, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Brass Bulls Corp. announced today that it has accumulated in excess of 6% of the issued and outstanding shares of American Asia Petroleum Corp. (Pink Sheets: AAPM). The shares have been acquired over the last two months in open market transactions.
Based on American Asia Petroleum's latest financial information filed on Pinksheets.com, the Company had over $11 million in shareholder equity. This represents approximately $0.005 per share. For the Nine month period ended September 30, 2006, American Asia Petroleum (AAPM) reported unaudited revenues of $29,934,935 and net income of $426,098.
Some of the items Brass Bulls Corp. intends to request of American Asia Petroleum (AAPM) management are:
1) Audited financials
2) File Form 10 to become fully reporting if appropriate.
3) File a 15C2-11 to update disclosure
4) Seek listing on a National Exchange
5) A monthly update on the shares issued and outstanding.
6) Increased communications with shareholders.
Brass Bulls Corp. is a business consulting company that provides advisory and financing services to private and publicly traded companies.
Safe Harbor
This press release contains statements, which may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of Brass Bulls Corp., and members of its management as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based. Prospective investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. Important factors currently known to management that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include fluctuation of operating results, the ability to compete successfully and the ability to complete before-mentioned transactions. The company undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results. Brass Bulls Corp. may buy and or sell shares of AAPM that it owns or may own at any time.
Contacts
Brass Bulls Corp., Coral Springs
Matthew Lovito, 866-342-2700
I did not and do not want to be involved with the personal attacks that seem to be present on most boards, including the juvenile worded ones that I just noticed on the private replys to me on this board. (I am new to this board and just noticed the Private Reply section) I will reply to the valid questions I just saw there:
I do not know how the SEC attorneys were in possession of my name as an AAPU stockholder. They knew how many shares I hold since they said they got that info from the stock broker. They knew the dates and amount of shares purchased, etc.
They would not answer any questions I posed to them concerning their investigation of AAPU. They wanted to know why I bought shares in AAPU.
Sorry. Would repeat the questions.
Thanks,
Howard
I also would like an explanation of "close to what".
Howard
Thanks for your reply. It helps. So did all the previous disussion concerning Chirico, Accel and APPU.
Howard
Reply to my request is not needed now as I have read some previous posts on this subject. Unless someone has some more recent news of the relationship.
howard
Will someone please describe the relationship between AAPU and Accel Energy.
Thanks
Howard
I am a shareholder of AAPU and am new to this board. I have been attempting to communicate with management or just any live human at their email address and their phone number in Nevada. A machine answers their phone and they have yet to call back no matter what kind of message I leave. Someone named Steve had been replying to my emails occasionally with no information, as he said they are a non-reprting company and are not required to report anything. Now there are no replys.
I sent a registered letter to the CEO just asking when they will report their annual earnings for 2006 and earnings for 2007 along with followups on their earlier reported business activities and pr's:
"Closing out the year on an active note, America Asia Petroleum (OTC Pink Sheet: AAPM) company officers are pleased to announce to its board of directors that the company is preparing to file its 15c2-11 which will provide updated information about the company. The company has hired an SEC law firm to represent AAPM. Plans are also under consideration to enlist the services of a public relations firm to launch a comprehensive ad campaign and the acquisition of other entities by AAPM is being explored. A NOBO (Non Objecting Beneficial Ownership) list that shows a more complete corporate ownership profile than is available from the transfer agent alone has been ordered."
He has not answered my letter.
I received a phonecall last week from an attorney from the SEC who questioned me concerning their investigation of America Asia Petroleum. She would not give me any info about their investigation.
Does anyone here know if AAPU is still in business?
Thanks for any info you can provide.
Howard
Castor Troy..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Face/Off
Howard
"The buzz around Pleasant Valley is very encouraging for TIV shareholders"
So this statement does not get put into the lengthy "rumor" folder that I have accumulated for TIV over the last 6 years, I will appreciate your explaining where and from who you have heard this buzz. Is this a "buzz" that you yourself have heard from a singular source or from more than one source. Is this source or sources, credible? And if credible, please define what makes him/her or them credible. Would there be enough credibility in this buzz, in your opinion, for you to either invest in TIV or suggest to others to investigate further as to the investment potential of TIV?
thanks,
Howard
Lynn's reply to my email asking for his rational as to why existing stock holders should vote for authorization for more shares.
Howard
Dear Dr. Bleicher: Tri-Valley has been quite judicious in its occasional dilution and has typically used stock to buy assets. In this case we are buying human assets to accelerate the build up of production, revenue, reportable reserves and share value. We have made steady progress in enhancing share value and positioning the company for greater gains which have yet to be fully realized and need qualified people to achieve that. We are looking for more options to use in attracting NEW people to the Company as we cannot compete head to head with the big boys on salaries and major benefits. These options are not for existing employees who already have their packages although I may need some for the CFO whose package is rather small compared to what the market is offering and we want to keep him. Our goal regarding dilution is always to enhance stock value even if we dilute ownership. So far we have been able to do that and have a much better staff as a result to push the Company forward. We solicit your vote of support in this matter.
Yours truly,
Lynn Blystone, CEO
Can anyone post a good reason why existing stockholders would vote to further dilute their holdings by voting for this dilution? I mean a real good reason, not just some speculation.
Howard
The only difference in Kandles two statements concerning the two projects has to do with his years in the oil business.
Oil Creek"38 years" and now four years later "42 years" in the oil business.
Thanks for the correction.
Howard
I have not received this new email. Would you post that tiv email here?
Thanks,
Howard
If I remember correctly, it was at the end of 2003 when Kandle said the same of the Oil Lake exploratory well. The oiliest he has ever seen.
Howard
Gamble thought this company was a buy at the 9.00 pps. His knowledge of the current business activities, production included, being a director, certainly has to be more up to date than what shareholders are aware of. So, assuming that his reasoning for purchases at 9.00 have not diminished, if it represented a good buy at 9.00, it must be an exceptional buy, an outright steal at 6.30, 30% less.
Howard
Yes it still works for me. Here is a copy of that article:
Oil in bedrock granite
off Vietnam's shores
Posted: December 1, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
"In the aftermath of a series of pullouts by Western oil majors, Vietnam has gone into partnership with its former Cold War ally Russia to develop its oil industry." This development was reported by the Asia Times Online on Dec. 3, 1999, a report loudly rebroadcast by Vietnam News at the time.
The Russians were confident they would succeed where Western countries failed. Why? Armed with what has become known as the Russian-Ukrainian theory of the deep, abiotic origin of petroleum, the Russians planned to find oil where traditionally trained "fossil-fuel" petro-geologists had failed to look. So, in 1981 the Russians teamed up with the Vietnamese to form a joint venture oil company named Vietsovpetro (PetroVietnam). Together they headed into the South China Sea off Vietnam and drilled deep wells into the crystalline basement structure of the sea bottom.
As a result, seven production oilfields were discovered, the largest of which is known as White Tiger, which is on the continental shelf of Vietnam. The main reserve of the White Tiger oilfield is "concentrated in fractured granite basement that is unique in the world oil and gas production practice." Western oil companies typically expect to find oil only in sedimentary rock. Generally, Western oil companies refuse to drill unless they find "source rock" – sedimentary rock that contains oil the petro-geologists believe derived from decaying ancient biological debris, dead dinosaurs and pre-historic forests. That the Soviets and the Vietnamese have found oil in granite structures is revolutionary, unless, of course, you think from the perspective of the deep, abiotic theory.
From the granite basement offshore Vietnam, the White Tiger oilfield produces almost 280,000 barrels of oil a day. A second oilfield, known as Black Lion, currently produces 80,000 barrels of oil per day, but within three years PetroVietnam expects to increase that output to 200,000 barrels per day.
The White Tiger oilfield is at a depth of 5,000 meters (approximately 3 miles), of which 4,000 meters (about 2.5 miles) is fractured granite basement. How can the "Fossil-Fuel" theory possibly explain finding oil at these deep levels in granite rock?
A survey of worldwide oil exploration in fractured basement formations is maintained on the website of GeoScience, a U.K. consulting firm specializing in ultra-deep oil and natural gas exploration and production. The GeoScience compilation further documents that the oil found offshore from Vietnam is being found in bedrock structures that are volcanic in nature:
Granites constitute the basement in the central part of White Tiger and predominate in the basement of the Dragon field. They also occur in the basement of the White Tiger northern block, together with microcline, hornblende-biotite and biotite-granodiorites. Microcline, hornblende-biotite and biotite-granodiorites also occur in the basement of the Bavi and Big Bear structures.
The basement rocks of the southern Vietnam shelf contain very large oil accumulations.
Craig Smith and I, in writing "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil," have found that anyone advocating the abiotic, "Deep-Earth" theory of the origin of oil is going to invite nearly hysterical attacks from diehard supporters of the "Fossil-Fuel" theory.
Regarding finding oil in bedrock, one industry forum had a typically-uniformed, but vehement comment posted by a writer identified as "Uncle Al." In addition to claiming that no oil had ever been found in igneous rock, "Uncle Al" maintained that the "Russian-Ukrainian" theory was just another example of failed communist ideology:
Cite ONE instance of a substantial petroleum deposit unassociated with sedimentary rock. The planet is overflowing with granite and basalt. Not ONE instance of a petroleum deposit in igneous rock exists. The nutcase who drilled into an ancient meteor crater in Sweden discovered small amounts of his own lubricants and drilling mud additives.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs. You have no empirical support for your outrageous contention. Whole libraries are filled with Lysenko's "modified" wheat seed starved when the usual Russian winter temperatures destroyed their crops.
Go drill for oil in granite. The rest of us will look in sandstone and under halite domes.
The "nutcase" who "Uncle Al" mentions was a reference to Cornell University astronomer Thomas Gold, who in his 1998 book "The Deep Hot Biosphere: The Myth of Fossil Fuels," discussed the drilling done in the Siljan Ring, drilling which did find oil, though not enough to be commercially productive.
A subsequent poster noted that "Uncle Al" had an "obvious prejudice against Russian scientists," and commented that "Uncle Al's" only grounds for dismissing the Russian scientists' theory of abiotic oil seemed to be "bigotry." Other posters referenced Vietnam as an obvious refutation of the contention that oil had never been found in igneous rock. Mexico's Cantarell oilfield off the Yucatan in the Gulf of Mexico refutes the idea that meteor impact sites are a bad place to explore for oil. "Uncle Al's" information was bad, but that did not deter the insulting "true believer" nature of his invective.
The point is that many "fossil-fuel" adherents have their blinders on. The available evidence is that oil and natural gas are being found around the world in bedrock structures, at distances as deep as 8 to 10 miles below the surface. How deep-Earth oil and natural gas found in bedrock is formed is a legitimate question meriting serious scientific debate. When "fossil-fuel" and "peak-production" adherents resort to name-calling, they make us wonder if their position is so scientifically weak that ad hominem attacks are their only available rebuttal.
If the abiotic, "Deep-Earth" theory of the origin of oil were patently ridiculous, the only argument "fossil-fuel" and "peak-production" believers would have to make would be to show the scientific evidence that refutes the abiotic oil case. No name-calling would be necessary. The problem is that abundant scientific and geologic evidence about oil and natural gas exists that doesn't fit neatly into the expectations and explanations of traditional thinkers. As Thomas Kuhn explained in his famous 1962 book, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions," paradigm shifts occur in science when old theories can no longer be stretched to accommodate accumulating evidence to the contrary.
The debate over "Black Gold Stranglehold" suggests that the abiotic, "Deep-Earth" theory may be a paradigm shift whose time has come, despite the sometimes angry resistance of conventional thinkers in the petroleum industry. Vietnam is a case in point – one that argues strongly for the abiotic, "Deep-Earth" theory.
Jerome R. Corsi received a Ph.D. from Harvard University in political science in 1972 and has written many books and articles, including co-authoring with John O'Neill the No. 1 New York Times best-seller, "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry." Corsi's most recent book was authored with Michael Evans: "Showdown with Nuclear Iran." Dr. Corsi's other recent books include "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil," which he co-authored with WND columnist Craig. R. Smith, and "Atomic Iran."
"Oil In Bedrock Granite"
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47673
Howard
It has been said here that the "shorts have put a cap on the pps of TIV." It has always been my understanding that a short sale can only occur on an uptick in the pps. If so, then short sales would tend to raise the price per share, not lower it.
What am I missing?
Howard