Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You have argued at length about these issues and have constantly been proven wrong by other posters. If I remember correctly, you were also the poster adamantly saying that the dendritic vaccine used by UCLA was not the same as NWBO’s. You were clearly wrong. Whatever you think the issues were with the trial is now irrelevant. The JAMA article with 70 neurosurgeons trump any issues you believe the trial had. Was the trial perfect? Absolutely not. The question is whether or not it is good enough for approval and I, along with multiple other posters, believe it is. Time will tell.
I never said anything about Berkshire. Get your facts straight moron.
Are you a moron? Where or not they are uplisted again makes no difference as to whether or not the SEC can investigate them. This just proves you have no idea what you’re talking about.
You keep looking at the past while I’m seeing the future. That’s the difference. I hope you were telling Apple shareholders the same thing in the 90’s.
Because it’s a nonissue and you continue to try and make it an issue.
Does independent consultant mean anything to you? Yes, they self identified a weakness and reported it. That’s exactly what a company is supposed to do. The delisting occurred in 2016. Not related to what you posted. Also, OTC companies are still within the purview of the SEC so your argument about delisting makes absolutely no sense. Keep reaching with your garbage arguments. Do you have any more?
I’m glad you brought that up. Read the last part. Those issues are resolved. Do you have any proof ANY of the issues still remain today?
As a practicing attorney for close to 20 years, I am extremely familiar with corporate governance. Your arguments about expired contracts and various other issues are a joke. I have zero concern about any of it. Continue on with your weak attempts to create concern in regard to management. Anyone invested in this company should have one concern at this point and that is approval. If management gets us there, you will see everything else fall into place, including SP.
There’s a lot you’d like us to believe but you’re detached from reality. Will your head explode upon MAA approval?
I agree a Saturday ASM is strange. However, they are a small company. It’s possible that they are keeping their weekdays open in case of MAA related inspections.
Can you show us some of these trials that are further along?
We have a bet.
How about we make a bet? I say this hits .50 before .39. I lose, I’ll stop posting for a month. You lose, you stop posting for a month. Deal?
Apparently you don’t know what a preposition is…..
Aren’t I helping by countering your lies?
I have a pretty good track record with “my strategy”. You’ll find out in less than 90 days.
Then I lose money and move on with my life. What will you do if it gets approval?
Came to warn us about the vaccine and now is giving investment advice. Good job Rat
Do you know how to read? All I care about at this point is MHRA approval. I’m not worried about revenue and profitability when they don’t have an approved drug. You have to be a moron to worry about that at this point in time.
I care about MHRA approval at this point. I don’t care about employee agreements, CDMOs or whatever garbage you think I should care about. Get your posts in now, you’ll be gone in 3 months or less.
If a shareholder cared, they could inquire. Maybe you should buy some stock and ask.
How do you know their contract doesn’t have such a provision? It’s common that the contractual terms stay in effect even after expiration during the term of employment.
You don’t have to be under contract to be an employee
Did anyone say that? It was a comparison of the proxy agendas. That was the point. Try reading my post again. Continue the gaslighting
I answered your questions. You just have a problem with reading comprehension. When you have no valid response, commence the gaslighting. Continue on troll
You missed the point. You’re complaining about the proxy and I just showed you it’s similar to other proxies. You will get some answers as to the state of the company after the agenda items just like they did at the last meeting. That’s how these meetings work. Just because you expect more doesn’t mean those expectations are reasonable.
You’re the one posting on a message board for a stock you don’t own. That screams successful clown 🤣🤣🤣
I was comparing the proxies moron. They’re both corporations. Do you know how to read?
Read Merck’s agenda. It’s essentially the same. Here is Moderna’s. Look on page 4 All these companies must be screwing shareholders.
https://s29.q4cdn.com/435878511/files/doc_presentations/2024/Apr/16/mrna-2024-proxy-statement-80.pdf
And what exactly is supposed to happen on a message board?
Here is Merck’s proxy from 2024. Scroll down to page 8 for the summary. Is Merck screwing shareholders too? Or do you just not understand how these meeting work?
https://s21.q4cdn.com/488056881/files/doc_financials/2023/ar/2024-merck-proxy-statement.pdf
Why didn’t they delay it 10 months? What’s your point? It’s still necessary whether or not it’s late.
What else did you expect as an agenda item?
The ASM is to take care of corporate affairs. I’m not sure what you expected on the agenda but this is normal. Following the meeting they should speak to give updates.
Validation
The assessment timetable for new active substances and biosimilar products or existing active substances will begin after the validation of the application.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/guidance-on-150-day-assessment-for-national-applications-for-medicines
You care enough to continue posting here….
They like to beat a dead horse. After MHRA approval, they’ll move on to why the FDA won’t approve it.
I am and I will. Don’t worry about me.
No use arguing with ex. He might still argue that UCLA’s vaccine is different than DCVax
Did you skip the part that said the company was blind to the results?