Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Some seller trying to get a bite.
Impressive. Almost $3000 for 204 shares. Average price $14.23
Well dividends haven't happened.
Published annual positive earnings have not happened.
Published FTD have not happened.
All simply your unsupoorted opinions.
Except all your claims - shorts, dividends, etc are opions yet you claim them as if they were facts. At least I use published data.
I was being generous with my figures based on 2013 financials. Let's wait for 2014 results which will come out in about ten months before claiming phantom figures.
If they ever have net earnings of $650,000 one year and paid it all out in dividends that would only be $1 per share. At a PE of 20, that would only justify a $20 share price. That would hardly make the sp skyrocket.]]
As well, few companies would pay out 100% of their profits in dividends.
What does the imaginary dividend have to do with someone buying a few shares at the offer?
And why would the price skyrocket?More shares at slightly higher would simply come on the market.
And how would you double your money when the bid is $10.91 ?
Yes, 2 shares are important because there is virtually no trading in the company. 50 shares for 500 makes for a big day. Too funny.
You're the one who's supposed to explain and demonstrate short selling. Please do so.
This is your proof?
I don't think you need 2500 screen shots to show conclusively ONE short sale that has not cleared. So show ONE.
Funny how you keep saying you can document shorts from 15 years ago, but you never have done so.
Here is your chance. Document away.
Proof please.
Thanks for posting.
Last sale - 48 shares at 10.91
The conclusion is just your opinion.
This is truly disturbing. Buying at the ask and selling at the bid. Unheard of in the world of stock trading.
Well if people want to sell they sell at the bid. You must be with a full service broker. Selling at the bid still netted them $50 bucks after commission. Better than nothing, I suppose for someone who's had enough waiting.
Oh don't overdo it. There are offers at 11, so some could be sold.
And you say no one sells, yet 5 shares were sold today.
Point is there is very little trading with such large gap between bid and aski.
Yes, they compare TEVE to a real company that pays dividends and posts financials to show the stark difference between a real company and TEVE.
I said the negative earninsg were based on 2013. It's early in 2014 so annual earnings are not out I'm not interested in getting a couple of shares. What for?
I can talk about 2014 earniings (not that I have) without shares just as you talk about shorts with no facts!!
From the last full year of earnings (2013) put out by the company. The rest is hearsay.
As Joe has said before and most agree, no one is getting out ever.
When you believe, you stay to the bitter end.
Why would I be interested in you or any other poster? I'm talking about earnings in 2013, and market cap. Those are public facts. Talk about that. A loss in 2013, 650,000 shares, $20/share and a market cap of $13 million. So, overvalued. Has nothing to do with you. Why should it? You're just a shareholder with a short conspiracy theory and too much time on your hands.
The float might matter if there was a demand for the shares, but thre isn't, so the float makes no differnece.
What matters is a lack of earnings and a market cap of around $12 million. Currently then, overpriced.
Here is a review of internet TV set top boxes.
Where does TEVE fit into this as it's not mentioned.
http://www.switched.com/2010/12/02/best-internet-tv-boxes-apple-tv-roku-xds-tv-live-hub/
Right. Someobody bought shares for %19 that someebody SOLD for $19.
That's what normally happens when shares trade.
Not in this market or you'd have trading daily. It's the occasional seller getting fed up waiting.
When someone buys, someone else sells. elememntary my dear Joe.
I didn't say it's going under. I call a paper loss with a good chance of not recovering that loss a loss. You don't see a paper loss as a loss.
Are you saying that if a company goes under and the shares go to zero with no one selling, the holders are not losers?
Same here if you can't sell and are sitting on a loss, that to me is losing.
Not personally. But shares traded at 50 cents pre=split, which is $100 today. Anyone who bought then is down 80%.
Yes, who wants to lose money.
Makes senee to wait if you expect the sp to fall further.
There are cheap shares for sale. Isn't $17 cheap? That's less than 9 cents pre-split. Still no buyers.
You don't get my implicatoin. If you are still here in fifteen years that suggests that you havcen't been able to sell at an acceptable price.
No doubt.
The 3000 shares on offer are back.