Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What is Bambuser's product?
How does it compare to VERB's?
Which is more interactive?
Which sells for less?
Which has more customers?
Knowledge about VERB's peers before trying to compare is often helpful.
Care to comment about VERB instead?
Many questions still unanswered...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164329743
I'm still waiting for a link to this ridiculously false statement that was made a few days ago.
"A short squeeze requires three ingredients...
1) short interest that is above 50% of the OS
2) days to cover of over 7-10 days based on the 30 day volume
3) significant failures to deliver (this adds the “buy-in” force or the “squeeze” component)."
I've searched and searched but can't seem to find anything that backs up the following:
1) Short interest must be above 50% of the OS.
2) A short squeeze can only happen if only the 3 conditions above exist.
3) A short squeeze can't occur if a positive change in fundamentals happens such as becoming cash flow positive or signing up a huge customer.
4) A short squeeze can't happen if there is excessive buying pressure.
Whether VERB is about to have a short squeeze or not, I wish there was a link to back up this free financial advice that was given to me a few days ago...
I believe they have already started with the head of the snake (Fauci).
VERB newsletter yesterday talked about verbMAIL + Microsoft. "With our app store release right around the corner, we wanted to give you a sneak peek of what you have to look forward to! One of our beta users has even compiled a list of over 50 different ways to use verbMAIL!" On another VERB board, real DD has helped the company with innovative ideas. Wouldn't it be nice to have similar effort to not only help the company, but also everyone's investment in VERB?
That was just to, too, two funny!
I don't recall ever saying there is an SEC rule that stops insiders from buying, unless it is done with non-public information that could influence the SP.
Let me know what you find on illegal insider trading and the SEC. When can tons of shares be bought or not be bought by insiders.
I agree, not all insider trading is illegal. That was my point.
Has the short squeeze started yet?
LMAO!
I agree!
Worrisome and fearful anti-VERB chatter is increasing about the MSFT Outlook integration.
It is definitely an indication that the MSFT Outlook integration is very near and imminent...
$VERB
There's always a sell button for those that think that a 60% increase in institutional ownership is a bad thing. Lol
2 years on NASDAQ is not old. Lol
Holy cow! That's even better than I thought!
That means it is even more significant that VERB has as much as 8.31% institutional ownership.
Has anyone noticed how much institutional ownership of VERB has gone up? I've said it before that they were buying more shares of VERB.
Almost 3 million more shares went into institutional ownership.
8.31% of the OS are held by institutions.
https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/verb/institutional-holdings