Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I expected a PR, but after a mild debate with other investors, I’ve changed my mind. If they PR’ed anything, it have to be an explanation that they are not on target to meet guidance. They could do a short PR confirming datalock, but it would only have to be one line. I mean...why bother when topline is about a month away?
You’re probably right Senti. I was only speculating that the process may generate information leaks. I also speculated that ladies of the night in New Orleans get around. I just can’t help myself today with all the speculation.
Thanks Beartrap. I’m assuming that they’re smart enough to know by now that missing this guidance would once again hurt their credibility and have a detrimental effect on their atock
More speculation. Is that why they deferred the warrants? They need cash?
If I get locked up, it better be with that New Orleans hooker.
I speculate a datalock PR sometime this week. That’s based on guidance that was shared by the company at the ASM.
There’s a fact. Guidance on datalock by the end of May was given at the ASM.
My speculation may be way off. They could just drop a bomb and announce topline results on the trial unexpectedly. Good data would cause all sorts of trading halts and heart murmurs.
Facts? When was the last time a fact was stated on this board? When scotty was calling .14? When jd was declaring bankruptcy imminent?
The facts will come from peer reviewed science, not from all the loudmouths here. That includes the speculation spouted here by yours truly.
Financial markets don’t deal in facts. They deal in sentiment and speculation.
Do you want proof that New Orleans hookers get around or that word about an NWBO PR is getting around?
The board found out through my speculation.
Because there is an attorney’s office in NYC that probably is reviewing a PR on datalock and unblinding that NWBO is about to release. Word probably gets around like a New Orleans hooker.
Unfortunately, that was before the warrant deferments. My guess now is 15-20 million. It won’t really matter after approval.
It really is that simple. Just a check mark to cross off. Next stop...TLD.
That probably means that Les is going to go back on the big biz show this week and announce that they have locked data.
I know where about 5-6 million shares are placed. Many added at .16-.18. Nobody is selling here. That’s reflected in the volume.
Exactly. These warrants are fairly tightly held. If LP is maddened by what was done to her company on the way down, what will she do to squeeze the perpetrators on the way up?
If you think about it...
233 million shares are off the market just as the market cap is being repriced for positive topline data. Depending on the new market cap, there is potential for financing at much higher share prices. Use those funds to buy back significantly more warrants priced at .15-.30, permanently removing those shares. All this while commercialization funds new trials and expanded label use.
NWBO could be at $100 in 5 years.
8k was neutral at worst. If the suspended warrants are off the market prior to commercialization, they could be bought back by the company with revenue over the next few years. As soon as topline comes out, we can start lookinh towards approval and revenue.
Cable is the best way to hide it from the DEA.
There are reported numbers on legal shorts. But you stating that illegal naked short numbers are posted on the web is like me stating that the cartels post their annual cocaine harvest on the web.
There are published numbers on naked short shares? Because there are places where illegal activities are officially published?
Ex - Where do drug dealers officially publish their sources? I haven’t found a cartel website yet.
I believe everything you say Scotty. You are always on point when predicting another dilution. Since you predict it every day, you are right about 5 or 6 out of 365 times. That’s almost a 2% rate of accuracy. Not bad for a blind squirrel.
If you sell this week with the 5 million other shares, absolutely.
Or...better explanation...the market is completely disconnected and ignorant to the physicians, scientists, and the study results that they are about to release.
So the market is the scientists conducting the trial?!?!
Such flawed logic here jd...
So...you think P3 is going to fail? For sure, if so, there will be toxic dilution.
If not...BOOM, to $20 we go.
On point diver. To change the game against a stronger enemy, one must be quiet and covert as they cross enemy lines.
It’s like Washington crossing the Delaware.
It will come right after positive topline and approval.
That’s the beauty of the US... you get to choose where you get your media and information. Some people choose YouTube, some choose Fox News, some choose MSNBC, and some choose the National Enquirer.
But don’t blame the media source for filtering their information. Some media sources have higher standards for truth than others. As a platform provider, they have that right to filter. The FCC eliminated the fairness doctrine in 1987.
Here’s my thought.
YouTube is a social media network. You want to publish there, then meet their terms of use. If you don’t, they can pull you.
If want to post anything you’d like, create your own website and video. People have been doing it for years. Nothing censoring about it. Any company or corporation can create a website and provide information or infomercials. Link it to Google and you’re in business.
You want to talk censorship? There’s this place called North Korea.
Makes you wonder who is moderating this board?
Please delete this link. There is no relevance to NWBO.
If DCVax is proven effective, it will be because Linda Powers chose to endure a very rocky road less travelled. While she also didn’t plan well financially for SO MANY delays (hindsight says she should have diluted early and often at higher prices) she also put in much needed capital at critical points and used her real estate capital wisely at a critical junction. My hope is that this company’s mission is as successful as the bin Laden hunt. It has all the makings of a long, covert mission ending with a triumphant win for GBM patients.
Thanks Tilt. Our technology appears disruptive, especially when combined with other immunotherapies.
I apologize. I’ll check out your post about warrant valuation. A three year warrant extension with a six month deferral seems like it should be worth something significant.
I agree that deferment of a warrant exercise period for her warrants also has a price value. Not sure that the 3 year warrant extension value matches the 6 month deferral value. That seems to be the issue you are raising.
I completely agree that it is a complicated exercise to value warrant deferments and extensions, but saying that it is worth nothing doesn’t fly with shareholders. We know that warrant extensions carry “something” of value. Either it should be added as executive compensation or paid in to the company as additional capital, the same as is required from other warrant holders asking for extensions.
This warrant extension is allowing a future gamble on a previous gamble that expired “out of the money”. When you bet on the 2019 World Series champion, if you lose, they don’t let you extend that to the 2020 champion for free. There’s a monetary value in extending warrants. Until the deal is priced, it is for sure unethical.
I don’t have any problem with her warrants being deferred and extended. I just take issue that there is no monetary value assigned to this action. Extending warrants carries value. Deferring and extending carries value, although probably reduced. I mean, I’d pay a monetary amount to defer for 6 months and have 29 million warrants at .30. That monetary value should be placed in the market at auction and paid by the CEO, or acknowledged as additional compensation from the company.
Failure to value these warrant extensions appears to be self dealing and that leaves the company open to legal liability, in my opinion
If we priced these warrant deferments in the open market, there would be a monetary value. I would expect the company to add this value to her compensation package. If they don’t, then they are setting themselves up for a potential lawsuit.
Let me make this clear. I would have paid money for 29 million warrants at .30 that I can’t exercise until November. How Linda was able to get this for free is troublesome and deserves the criticism that this deal is getting from shareholders.
There had better be a cost associated with warrant re-pricing. Cash to the company will be needed to get to approval.