Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
For first (or possibly second offense) they restrict you're ability to make purchases using unsettled funds for 90 days.
My bad uksausage, I honestly hadn't given thought to that aspect. Thanks for pointing that out (and not busting my chops). I noticed that SG&A increase as well if memory serves jumped to like $95Mil. Thanks also for the info share..GLTY
Time Travelers advice might have even a tiny shred of credibility if he could at least spell (correctly).
Man I'm actually relieved to hear that..I feel incompetent asking such questions...this time not so much.....lol.....thx....let us know
E E Euth, why would GSAT file this withdrawal request ? Thanks
Wow and I do mean wow, that's the most straight forward, seemingly non-biased, informative response I could ever have asked for. Thank you very much, GLTY, & now following you.
BTW - compelled to add the "seemingly" just to quell the bears!...lol Thanks Again
Thanks for the info, couple Q'ns - On Item 1, are there established date(s) when FCC or IB will give thumbs up / down on modification request? If not when do you think decision will be made?, what is your current opinion on approval vs denial (1 to 10 - with 10 being definitely)
Item 2) Forgive my ignorance but to which 4 countries are you referring to?
thanks!
signed by Governor June 27th 2017 https://openstates.org/ct/bills/2017/HB7036/
OMG, that's only posted on this site like 50 times (exaggeration) and yet somehow I manage to not see it..jaysus, I must be getting old ...sry bout that
havent seen Jay Monroes name mentioned nor do I have access to any attendee list. Are you speculating ? (I mean pretty good chance he's there) or do you have link to something?
I was right about the insider selling off shares, like we really could've seen that coming ...., Now I just wonder what his game is. Such a small float...good financials.... ???
thanks for the replies, only one of those filings have the Formerly Known As STEMCELLS INC. The others do not, I cant help but think these shares (if I'm correct) would most definately be impacting pps in a negative way. I'm trying to make sense of it.
Leon L. is selling shares of something (repeatedly - see SEC's)
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/883975/000121390017006651/sc13g0617a1lewkowicz_microb.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/883975/000121390017006727/sc13g0617a3lewkowicz_microb.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/883975/000121390017006847/sc13g0617a4lewkowicz_microb.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/883975/000121390017007284/sc13g0617a5lewkowicz_microb.htm
I agree with you entirely especially about obstinant short(s. What threw me is why the SEC 13G/A's were showing up on Edgars's MBOT SEC filings. Heck I thought the Co. (STEM) was long gone, that's why I'm confused. Heres link to one of the filings (Note the MICROBOT MEDICAL INC: F/K/A STEMCELL INC) https://fintel.io/soh/us/stem/lewkowicz-leon
I figured it out but still dont quite understand (yes I just said that...lol) The most recent 13G/A's which show Leon L. selling shares are for shares of STEM - I'll admit this has me confused. Any help explaining? thx . link to article on last sale https://fintel.io/soh/us/stem/lewkowicz-leon
One thing I'm trying to figure out is, did the CEO Leon Lewkowicz just sell another 450K shares? Look at most recent (6/22) SEC 13G/A and compare share holdings to that of SEC 13G/A filing dated 6/20. 75K sh sale is one thing an additional 450K gets my attention.
A couple weeks ago they raised $10MM through issuance of 3.75MM shares of common stock sold to "investors" at 2.70/sh. So yeah they gots cash and as you said virtually no debt. Current Asset's are 7X Current Liabilities.
In a "perfect world" buyer would (rightfully so) want to see all applications/modifications/licensing approved. But EVERYTHING is negotiable, ie.price today is X, post approvals price is Y. In addition whats to say additional app/mods/lic may be initiated before in process ones are approved. Would become an endless Gant chart. (I understand the June 23rd date so please dont bust my chops) I am of the opinion that deal will be struck or at least offers / prtnrs disclosed between June 23rd and June 30th (June 30 being VIP date re: finance)
Statistics are meaningless, heck 7 out of 10 people know that...lol
good 2c someone point out the (what should be) obvious facts....esp. the mkt cap...miscalculation? (being generous to Xylan)just classic...smh...thx shotsky
Hey nsomni, did a little digging on whether CVR's are ever "tradeable". Turns out in some cases they are (sounds like it is more the exception than the norm though) It's a somewhat dated article but provides some additional info on CVR's which I found interesting ie. the qtrly update which indicates likelihood of achievement(s) https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2011/05/09/shadowy-shares-the-dark-side-of-contingent-value-rights/#24d3d8043343
LOL, thx, I worried that the question might come off as "dumb" lol..that 244 page transaction agreement, Holy Sheep Dip Batman!! I thought..Dammit Jim, I'm an investor not a Philadelphia Lawyer!...lol
Thx VERY MUCH!, I kinda figured the "CVR(s)" wouldnt be marketable but thought it worth asking. You and Surf really helped with clarifying the transaction process, I know I really appreciate it and I'm sure alot of others do too. GLTY
nsomniyak, first I want to say ty (2u & surf) for clarification on the transaction process for this "BO". One question, the CVR's which you say are allocated to SH's of record on BO closing date (amount's based on No. of shares held) Are they marketable? I feel dumb asking but totally unfamiliar with. I think there are 5 or 6 achievement dates, is there a separate CVR issued for each date? Thx
you are 99.9% correct, the only oversights 1) reduced liquidity of shares (inconsequential here IMO) 2) The negative connotation associated with a RS (which we just have to accept I guess) tyvm shotsky
Also still waiting to hear details on Inmarsat partnership (which has already been announced)
Another link with some info (and a link to the FCC auction 1002 site) hope it's of use http://www.broadcastingcable.com/news/washington/fccs-spectrum-auction-will-close-march-30/163333
A short article from earlier today (It reads television but all under the same auction "umbrella"). http://advanced-television.com/2017/03/29/fcc-spectrum-auction-to-wrap-march-30/
GSAT would be one of the sellers in the auction. The type of sale could take different forms (ie. partnership, merger, lease) Again this is only my understanding of it tho. Not trying to sway you one way or another. Sorry but I just get kinda sick of folks just throwing out BS. So I try to be cautious of what I say.
Part of the FCC Spectrum Auction guidelines is a "quiet period" (like a gag order) prohibits any public release of information. I'm pretty sure (not 100% positive) this restriction expires Mar 30 or 31st. At least that is my understanding of it, look for yourself FCC auction 1002. (I would if I were you, I'm skeptical of most). Please correct me though if I'm wrong ok? TY
I said, Hey! You! Get off of my cloud Hey! You! Get off of my cloud
Hey! You! Get off of my cloud
Don't hang around 'cause two's a crowd n my cloud, baby......c'mon it's Friday lighten up a bit
I caught that as well!! Some folks questioned the rationale behind selling an asset for 4 mil (act 4.9) that generated 11mil in rev./yr but seemed like a pretty shrewd deal 2me. Didnt want to get involved w/the BS bickering is what prevented me from chiming in B4. Thanks for your post KeepIt
So providing price doesnt fall a 1:4 RS quadruples the dollar amount of the authorized but un-issued shares. I havent yet done the math but given this, is the dollar amount of these unissued shares now sufficient to cover outstanding options / warrants should the holders decide to exercise/convert? Thanks
Happy to see when someone actually knows what he's talking about. Can you share your thoughts on why they hang on to the Applications and Infrastructure segment? It seems to me they would want to spin that off as it appears to be low margin business. I apologize, I'm not familiar enough w/this to know how much of a necessity it is to the rest of the business. tyvm & glty
You mean they share their VAST and their HALF VAST knowledge with us ...lol
Sorry to bother but hoping you can steer me to where I can find the $78 Mil coming in. RU referring to new + existing contracts? Theres no way I missed $78 Mil of A/R or asset sales in their financials. Appreciate it & GLTY .... Ohh you were referring to $78 Mil in total revenue for Fiscal 2016
Couldnt agree with you more. Seen the same on StkTwts and have always wondered "whats the purpose of comments like that" I like to joke around a bit but unless contributing something you can substantiate (via logic, articles, etc) then just taking up space. TYVM & GLTY
article dated Mar. 14, 2017 http://oracledispatch.com/2017/03/14/move-intercloud-systems-inc-otcmktsicld/
article dated Mar. 14, 2017 http://oracledispatch.com/2017/03/14/move-intercloud-systems-inc-otcmktsicld/