Also, pretty sure Emil could exercise his warrants/opinions in any lot size of transaction he chooses as long as they are exercised before the expiration date. Could be a single transaction or 1,400+ transactions…his choice.

Yep! It’s just a paper transaction and not an actual “sell” in the open market like Babs is doing.

Weird thought…if there were no volume to speak of, Babs & other insiders wouldn’t be able to continually dump their shares into the daily transactions.

You’re correct Butter. No need for cash out of pocket when exercising warrants or option on equity positions. The cash needed can be taken from the sales of some shares when exercising the position.

I have done it many times in my past with equity positions I held. Purchased hundreds of thousands of shares over the years without putting up a single penny out of my pocket.

Looks like “honest” Apple is going to be short another $ 2 billion after fine from EU.

😂😂😂

https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/04/tech/apple-europe-antitrust-fine-music-streaming/index.html

Go to Pacer Monitor & look up the cases.

Not just TMus…Verizon as well

Who’s “the company?” Points us to any public PR that confirms this.

No, you got it correct. Apparently some don’t understand what a derivative is.

No thanks DB…I’ll stick to Peet’s or Dunkin Donuts!

Bravo Dung! Well said!

Glad to see the Locksmith/Kipping case done. This thing has gone on so long, I’ve lost track of all the gyrations.

Since this case was already appealed once & the appellate court remanded to district court for trial, can the verdict be appealed again?

I’m hoping this saga is finally over but I’m no attorney…and don’t play one on tv either.

Thoughts?

“Wax on…wax off”??? You mean like she’s getting a VPLM Brazilian?

Karate Kid…na. Teaming up with the Iron Sheik (pro wrestler from back in the day) would be more apropos…and he wore “elf” boots.

Bro, give it a rest. None of us like the continued selling by insiders but it’s not illegal. There’s a difference between stupid & illegal.

Also, I believe a hold up in furthering any settlement talks may have been the re-exam. I know is the re-exam was on a different patent but it is still part of the whole enchilada (ie patent suite).

Is it possible Albright is waiting on word from the parties to confirm they cannot reach a pre-trial deal? It’s not out of the question that the judge is deferring to the parties involved if they’re in talks to settle.

Exactly right Butter! There’s enough misinformation here about VPLM. We don’t need a newbie showing up with BS claims.

All 6 cases with Apple have already been terminated. If you want dates & cases, I got receipts. Sure, some were dismissed with prejudice so they can be re-filed but as of right now, there is zero proof in any court dockets showing any new cases.

“Ongoing litigation”…really? Which court? Waco, N CA, somewhere else?

Proof?

Keep the faith & hang in there. We’re closer now than we ever have been.

Prophet…you’re probably correct on the stock price. Too many day/swing traders jumping in and out cause lots of volume/price gyrations. It’s hard to avoid the constant beating & poop slinging here so stay focused on the progress in the courts. This is taking way the f’k longer than any of us hoped for but it’s moving in the correct direction. Don’t know for sure but thinking next VPLM SEC quarterly or year end statement will hopefully reveal some pertinent info we’ve all been waiting for.

Got it. Thanks for the clarification.

I’m with you Frio…I’m missing the connection between VPLM & this guy.

Lol! Preach Bird!

Many times they also post a redacted public copy to the dockets with only certain sentences/sections block out. We learn a lot from those redacted filings.

I like your excitement & thinking! Stay tuned to the court cases.

Understood on the news point. No worries on the mistake…we’re all human and trying to keep up with complex cases with very little info.

Be well.

Prophet…with all due respect, please double check the dates. TMus just filed their motion for sanctions on 10/11/23 for some crap they claim VPLM did and did not do back in February. Honestly feels like more desperation from TMus.

After all, it was TMus that hid their “expert witness” from VPLM until Hudnell challenged her sudden appearance & allegations in a TMus motion then fought for herto be deposed. Albright agreed and she was to be deposed. Don’t recall when or if it the deposition happened yet.

Hudnell’s opposition reply to the sanctions provided very compelling arguments as to why Judge Albright should deny the sanction request. Now we wait for Albright to decide.

Been gone for awhile…What’s going on here? New product for sale and stock price goes sub zero? WTF Doc?

Agree Butter!

Guessing most sane people are just watching the crap show this has become from a distance. VPLM will move when there is a reason. There are still a few court motions & 1 outstanding issue at the USPTO that need to be decided.

Besides, my Momma told me long, long ago to never argue with stupid people because they’ll drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!

Yep…it’s available. Just received my purchase. I used to old stuff and was great on MRSA infections. I hope the new stuff is as good or better without the staining!

For those who don’t believe…here’s a picture of the product & shipping box!


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yXgVLzNw8LNbnv3gJDCIanZ4xLG-mV0m/view?usp=t

Cut off her nose! Not his…she’s the messenger!

Key phrase…”REVIEW DENIED”

Straight from the NSC docket:

LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORPORATION, A S u p r e m e Court No. 84267 District Court Case No. A807745 BRITISH COLUMBIA CORPORATION,
Appellant,
VS.
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., ANEVADA CORPORATION; AND NEW HORIZON TRANSFER, INC., A BRITISH COLUMBIA BUSINESSENTITY,
Respondents.
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
STATE OF NEVADA, ss.
I, Elizabeth A. Brown, the duly appointed and qualified Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada, do hereby certify that the following is a full, true and correct copy of the Judgment in this matter.

JUDGMENT
The court being fully advised in the premises and the law, ti is now ordered, adjudged and decreed, as follows:
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order "

Judgment, as quoted above, entered this 25th day of January, 2023. JUDGMENT
The court being fully advised in the premises and the law, it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed, as follows:
"Review Denied"

Judgment, as quoted above, entered this 8l day of June, 2023.
NI WITNESS WHEREOF, I have subscribed my name and affixed the seal of the Supreme
Court at my Office in Carson City, Nevada this June 08, 2023.
Elizabeth A. Brown, Supreme Court

Overturned? Weird…the Nevada Supreme Court ruling says upheld in part and remanded in part back to lower court.

How does upheld in part correlate with being overturned?

Read & follow the court documents! They’re public info and anyone can download them.

Lol…feels like deja vu.

Totally agree bird. Especially be gone with the “Johnny come lately” experts

Point?