Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I expected it, i mean trustwave and centrify already put this as an argument. It would be obvious they would make this move as the next step.
They knew
It works where most times the stay is given on IPR’s and it can hold things up to a year on that one patent. I can’t say what we will do, but we expected it, thanks
Mark
Sincerely,
StrikeForce Customer Support
StrikeForce Technologies, Inc.
1090 King George’s Post Road, Suite 603
Edison, NJ 08837 USA
also considering we're taking on the title for #2 seller... Next will be contesting for #1. We're gonna take out the competition!
They might not be able to pull the, "oh you don't own the patents play either cause we're currently dismantling that argument in the 3 lawsuits with duo, trustwave, and centrify. Might make for a faster case.
The way I see it, with the taking out of phone factor we're moving up the list for the sales of oob authentication. Next target is Gemalto, and there is a chance it could be CA technologies next after gemalto. Eventually we'd be #1, and only swivel and the rest would be below us.
Of course if a buyout occurs for 8bill or higher then all bets are off.
Be careful not to be burned. We're in unknown territory when it comes to above penny.
Not that I can see.
Maybe if we sue we can get into NASDAQ cause they gotta compensate somehow :P
That better be a high percent lol
The real question is that since our connection to Intel is via a secondary source. Namely advice cyber security. How much would we be expected to earn?
the millions upon millions holding here are the good guys my man. We hold till the time is right before taking profits. I myself only a milly, but i know what i hold!
already happened. :^J
Needs to break that 0.0125 to really go.
So i asked about the IPR
It works where most times the stay is given on IPR’s and it can hold things up to a year on that one patent. I can’t say what we will do, but we expected it, thanks
Mark
Sincerely,
StrikeForce Customer Support
StrikeForce Technologies, Inc.
1090 King George’s Post Road, Suite 603
Edison, NJ 08837 USA
trust me on this, you don't want to be going praising that ((guy)) for his TA. Do your own TA, and ignore, hide and/or delete those posts.
Here is something to look forward to. Mark said in an email to some guys on ihub a few days ago, that or soon few days after wednesday. And possibly pr in april. The pr is most likely new infringers like what we got yesterday, but perhaps pr on all of the new infringers. This could mean Friday or next week, unless he intends to feed us info on the new infringers over the next couple days.
It's cause these guys don't have anything. I mean at least authentify and strikeforce has patents. Without patents, you could be infringing on someone who registered it as their invention. Only way to avoid that Is buying licenses to use their tech.
I wonder though who has more power? A circuit court judge or the uspto. For sure the judge is gonna be pissed with the same argument being brought up. Probably.
3 months, hmm.
got an estimated time frame of how long it might take?
perhaps the proof that a reexamination had already occurred can help deny this reexamination faster. Can't keep beating a dead horse you know.
hahaha the car exploded.
good to see ye Zpaul, glad you're back on board!
since the new lawsuits isn't what mark is working on, there must be something more i believe. He mentioned? today or a few days after today? So it really makes you think.
it's funny how the shorts are no where to be seen eh?
Also
Companies are current in their reporting to a U.S. regulator or are listed on a qualified international stock exchange
Minimum bid price test of $0.01 removes companies that are most likely to be the subject of dilutive stock fraud schemes and promotion
Improved investor confidence through verified information, confirming that the Company Profile displayed on www.otcmarkets.com is current and complete
Annual management certification process to verify officers, directors, controlling shareholders, and shares outstanding
Greater information availability for investors through the OTC Disclosure & News Service
Transparent prices for investors through full-depth of book with Real Time Level 2 quotes
possibly, especially when they're nearing a date they might not have time to answer emails at all. I wonder what they're working on though.
remember when they were super busy that they wouldn't answer our emails? Perhaps they're working on something. Cause normally he would be quick to answer even if we didn't quite get the answer we wanted.
question is it good or bad
yeah I hope not, Zpaul is important to alot of people including us...
what if it's about new lawsuits?
few could mean friday or the week after. hmm
delayed Wednesday of last week or will be delayed this week?
if anything penny, you can still doubt since kay said "we will" put out pr on Wednesday.
Two things pop up out of this sentence.
1. you can hold it on kay to deliver a pr on Wednesday, and if he doesn't you can tell us that you told us so.
2. We don't know what kind of pr he's going to put out unless he really meant it has something to do with the lawsuits. To which if he does deliver then it could be good.
Either way I'm looking forward to see what kay and co. has to say.
Is everyone waiting for the ides of march?
if you're like gravel, then i'm just a drop of water in an ocean of shares!
I stand corrected.
Wrong firm?
Interesting stuff. I wonder what's happening.
Duo pacer?