Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I just noticed on this one the person specifically sided with us. Dialed into Rams vs Chiefs #HornsUp #UOIP
Unless I am reading that wrong? Nobody else care?
TKO ARRIS
" It also isn't/won't delay financing"
Elaborate thats a scary phrase
I felt like this could have been going on in the background but I also feel like it would have cost more $ and that the company would have had to say something. I like AO & GM opinion that they are waiting on direction from the govt. first
So were you selling or buying?
This dips into .30s and im loading
Ehhh that I doubt
I actually just tried and its not filling so here we are stuck wondering....
If there is any other TDA peeps here and you have some extra $ / free trades lying around, I would be curious to see if hitting the ask for the exact size and limit would work to move this thing finally. ask is .02 for 100 shares
Google "Dividend" or "winding up a corporation"
I feel another PACER for Arris coming
hit the ask .021 at tda
That was my thought...this isn't about the appeal being timely it was the original IPR itself
Great Post
seems easy for an average joe to keep the price down
Probably..Looks like a bid of .01 and ask of .02 at TDA 1000 x1000
nope both at tda
I specifically attempted to match your order to see..7500 to sell .04 limit and gtc no special instructs... I Dont Get It
is it still sitting there as an open order? no special conditions like AON or anything right?
yea but at least its not in favor of one party I suppose. I just want the CAFC to decide with us on Cisco appeal and im good
Based on history, the defendants are the ones who have dragged their feet so to speak, they have proposed new deadlines a good 5+ times. The judge denied the stay and tossed looks to have sided with us on the privileged documents. Hopefully another pacer pops up today from the judge decision
ChanBond cannot accept defendants’ proposed deadlines
Hopefully judge will side with us
That was my questions as well...
destroyed as in need to be re submitted?
or
destroyed as in they are privileged?
as well as
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1686/60335/20180822134311834_ChanBond%20Brief%20in%20Opposition.pdf
beating a dead horse at this point
https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A7d0f2b23-d4ae-42fa-b434-8924a4f761ce
Page two shows UOIP as parent to chanbond
.01 x.03 @ TDA currently
$$UOIP$$
Good Stuff
Hey good sir. With the last cisco entry, our opening brief that is, does it mention when redacted version would be available?
Khenry, From your recollection, was 10/14 is the next date to see anything new on Pacer related to Cisco?
Tim Worstall quote in relation to the scandium news:
"That astonishes me. Would need to see the details of that contract before I formed a view of it"
Despite Arris Lawyer Credentials:
https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/ptab-filings%2FIPR2018-00573%2F25
Just Read
and it was in the 10k for Arris 2015
CAFC: Just toss this please
The things people say on here...
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
.01 x .03 @ TDA currently. 1000 size
Yes I see, I just read them. Thank you again the board appreciates your contributions
...not what i was looking for but Evilbean came in with the assist.
Thanks Again
D