Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Bkshadow you absolutely never stated anything about why the fdic is not released except that you understand why but you do not tell why because you discussed it already ... But you did not . Great reasoning from your side .... Lol .
Thanks .
Lg/everybody , did you/somebody download that filing ?
If yes please upload it somewhere ...
NOW JPM HAS RESTRICTED the FILING OF 173 BILLION .
http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/filingFrameset.asp?FileName=0001193125-16-529435.txt&FilePath=%5C2016%5C04%5C04%5C&CoName=JPMORGAN+CHASE+%26+CO&FormType=S-3%2FA&RcvdDate=4%2F4%2F2016&pdf
bkshadow since when is the fdicr fully released ?
bkshadow great that you understand it ...
So where is it then?
Why do you think the fdicr is still not released ?
Thanks for your input .
Keep dancing .
Haha .
You forgot to answer the question . Why do you think the fdicr is not released ?
Do you have a personal timeline for these future events ?
And thanks for your dd.
Bkshadow are you implying right now that the 78billion in repaid mortages sitting off balance at jpm are not claimed by jpm ?
You surprise me bkshadow. Haha .
Who has a claim on these repaid mortages then ? Is it me ?
"it's currently hidden."
Bkshadow here is your link to jpms 10k with the billions over billions in repaid loans .
Jpm 10 k
R203 — Off-Balance Sheet Lending-Related Financial Instruments, Guarantees and Other Commitments – Loan Sales- and Securitization-Related Indemnifications (Details)
http://www.secinfo.com/dJ5e.m8v.b.htm
Maybe you should save youself this link ... It seems like you keep forgetting about these off balance assets quite a lot .
You also forgot to explain WHY the fdic is still not released if there was no wrongdoing from their side .
Have a nice day .
bks why is the fdicr not released and where are wmi 24 billion considering the fdics inability seize or sell assets of a holding ?
Bkshadow here is your link to jpms 10k with the billions over billions in repaid loans .
Jpm 10 k
R203 — Off-Balance Sheet Lending-Related Financial Instruments, Guarantees and Other Commitments – Loan Sales- and Securitization-Related Indemnifications (Details)
http://www.secinfo.com/dJ5e.m8v.b.htm
Maybe you should save youself this link ... It seems like you keep forgetting about these off balance assets quite a lot .
You also forgot to explain WHY the fdic is still not released if there was no wrongdoing from their side .
Have a nice day .
bkshadow since you understand the FDIC regulations and...
...operating procedures, including those in its role a receiver ... so well ...
Could you please tell us where the wmi 24 billion from filing 1 are currently considering the fdics inability to seize or sell assets of a holding ?
Thanks .
Thats my guess too ... Some assets will come back in a big chunk of cash , some in shares and some in quarterly payments until everthing is resolved .
He/she is not allowed to talk about that . Haha .
Jpm 10 k for the bk alzheimer patients
R203 — Off-Balance Sheet Lending-Related Financial Instruments, Guarantees and Other Commitments – Loan Sales- and Securitization-Related Indemnifications (Details)
http://www.secinfo.com/dJ5e.m8v.b.htm
It is so hilarious how bk is dancing around the fdicr non release. Haha.
I only know that they have to get it done by 2018 . I stopped having any expectations on any other predictions .
As willingham said it with a smile ... Do not hold your breath .
Remember the presentation with the chart for 30+ billion from mr nelson ?
The one the judge refused to discuss ... I think thats a part what it is .
And that was only for what was known at the time by susmangodfrey . I would be not surprised if goldman showed them where to look for more than that for a golden outofjailcard .
Think about the wamu tower / the art collection in it ... which was all owned by wmi imho ... and given away by jpm for a firesaleprice / given away to charity in jpms name ...
All that happened and then "they" discovered that wmi is a holding and that all the assets of it cant be touched or seized or sold by the fdic because wmi was not a bank ... What a bunch of incompetent idiots .
No wonder "they" lost the asset list 3.1a ... Would be way too easy to determine how much was owned by whom ... Oops scrivenerserror .
But i can understand these people ... Would be kinda embarrassing to list all the assets they never could have seized or sold legally ... Haha .
Anyway billions will come back , no doubt ... but "they" will delay that event as long as "they" can .
...personally, I would have rather had commons get nothing. .... No way rofl .... Greetings from Freud again .
Edit : 24 billion + interest minimum for the estate .
bkshadow could you please explain where wmis 24 billion are currently considering the fdics inability to seize or sell assets of a holding ? Do you know why the fdicr is not released ? That would be great thanks .
Thats also their job .
bkshadow could you please explain why the fdicr is still not released for their actions by me and all other investors ? Thanks .
bkshadow , what happened with wmi 24 billion assets considering the fdics inability to seize or sell assets of a holding ? Please enlighten us on that topic
Thanks bkshadow "There is no explanation that I can make you... "
Nailed it for me .
Greetings from Sigmund Freud .
@bkshadow
Do you know where wmi's 24b were for the last 8 years considering wmi positive balance sheet and the fdic's inability to seize or sell assets of a holding ?
I would take a simple "no" for an answer although not responding is almost the same . ;)
have a nice day
@bkshadow
Do you know where wmi's 24b are currently considering wmi positive balance sheet and the fdic's inability to seize or sell assets of a holding ?
have a nice day
@bkshadow
Please explain to us where wmi's 24b are currently in your opinion considering wmi positive balance sheet and the fdic's inability to seize or sell assets of a holding.
have a nice day
24b + interest will come to escrowholders anytime between now and 2018 .
And that is only for wmi assets which were never solid to jpm because the fdic could not even seized these assets legally back then , assets from wmi indirect owned companys like fsb etc. will be worth a lot too .
Also assets that they could have never been seized or sold to jpm .
We will see how much all of that was/is worth in our escrow accounts.
Too bad the fdic "lost" the assetlist 3.1a and marked it als a scrivenerserror instead , haha .
What is your own opinion ?
WMI Bankruptcy Docket and WMI POR 7 is NON-FICTION...
...the WMI Disclosure Statement is CLEAR as to the treatment of all creditor classes and residual equity.
...WMI POR7 is CLEAR as to the results of the "mediated settlement" as approved by all parties in interest, including equity.
...WMI shareholder ballot approval of the 7th Amended Plan is CLEAR.
...the WMI Equity Committee and the Chairman of the Equity Committee filed "support" documents for the 7th Amended Plan, described the terms of the settlement (what was coming) and indicated that (what they "actually filed") was, to them, fair and reasonable.
...all WMI real world happenings, fully documented.
...since WMI effected the WMI Liquidating Trust (WMILT), the facts of tens to hundreds of billions that are coming to such WMILT are just that; facts.
...such WMILT facts are made by ANY PARTY IN INTEREST in ANY FORMAT on ANY PUBLIC RECORD.
...the WMILT facts exist in the real world of the docket, any SEC filing party, any publication or comment by any party, counsel or advisor.
As such facts...
...$100B of FDIC-R deposits stored at jpm under the wamu name WILL BE TAKEN AWAY TO GIVE TO WMILT ESCROWS. Although it may be less value than 100 but i am shure these are worth more than 1.888 .
...the FDIC-R does have a staggering amount off-balance assets to re-appear TO GIVE TO WMILT ESCROWS.
...WMILT does not own the land under bank branches , the 2200 bank branches + 5000 atms BUT JPM HAS TO PAY FOR THAT AND THIS WILL BE GIVEN BACK TO WMILT ESCROWS.
...the $30B of "well performing JPM commercial apartment loans" are on the books of JPM, they didn't "just find them," and THEY ARE NOT BEING GIVEN TO WMILT ESCROWS BUT JPM STILL HAS TO PAY FOR THIS .
... Since the FDIC-R IS NOT RELEASED they will make shure that all of the above mentioned will come back to
GOLDEN ESCROWS.
...period, paragraph and comma.
I found some mistakes in bkshadowys old magic sticky and corrected them according to our documented proof presented by several posters on this board. Please sticky this post or I will repost with pleasure . Rofl .
And always keep on asking why the fdic is still not released from their past wrongdoings like seizing the assets of the solvent wmi holding in 2008 .
Washington Mutual Bank vs Benedict
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2015 - 11:20PM
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that default has occurred in the conditions of the following described mortgage:
DATE OF MORTGAGE: October 7, 2005
ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF MORTGAGE: $354,960.00
MORTGAGOR(S): Joni M. Benedict and Steven A. Benedict, wife and husband
MORTGAGEE: Washington Mutual Bank, FA
LENDER OR BROKER AND MORTGAGE ORIGINATOR STATED ON THE MORTGAGE: Washington Mutual Bank, FA
SERVICER: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
DATE AND PLACE OF FILING: Filed November 3, 2005, Dakota County Recorder, as Document Number 2377311
ASSIGNMENTS OF MORTGAGE: Assigned to: JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association; Dated: May 28, 2015 filed: June 9, 2015, recorded as document number 3071604
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:
Lot 6, Block 2, Chateaulin 7th Addition
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 406 Oakland Ln, Burnsville, MN 55337
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 02-17006-02-060
http://www.farmingtonindependent.com/legals/3874770-washington-mutual-bank-vs-benedict
It seems this mortage and the payments on it was not in jpms hands til may 2015 .
This therefore means that all the payments for all these mortages had to go somewhere else for all these years.
Jpm was only the servicer .
127 billion already collected . Thanks .
When jpm broke into the wmb vault the banksters ran away with a lot of servicing rights . Haha .
The gold was at wmi all the time .
Large , i think ,in the end , we will do just fine with our escrow shares .
24 billion for escrows . Jpm has nothing to do with wmi assets , jpm only bought 7 % of wmb so far .
All of wmi assets have to come back to escrows .
I hope everybody got plenty of them . Haha .
A little 32/8 reminder .
Page 4
https://www.kccllc.net/wamu/document/0812229080926000000000001
It still baffles me how it is possible in the us of a that a non bancrupt company can go bancrupt .
24 billion for escrow .
Imho .
Definition of book value .
A company's common stock equity as it appears on a balance sheet, equal to total assets minus liabilities, preferred stock, and intangible assets such as goodwill. This is how much the company would have left over in assets if it went out of business immediately.
Jpm has to pay the remaining 93% since the documents clearly state that wmb was sold at 100% book value and not just 7%.
100% book value for wmb would be ~ 27 billion based on jpms 1.9 billion "initial payment" .
Wmi was worth ~ 24 billion + interest .
51 billion + ~ 16 billion interest at 4% for 7 years .
I am ok with 67 billion .
But this is still a low price for jpms "project west" .
Whistlebloweress Alayne Fleischmann
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alayne_Fleischmann