Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The only inconsistency here is your thought process. I’ll break it down for you. I hope for a good outcome on this stock. Prognostications, theories, calling people fools for investing in VPLM, crying fraud without evidence, none of this is useful in any way shape or form in trying to decide on a hold or sell strategy. Facts are useful but there isn’t enough verifiable information out there to make it an absolute. So I gather those facts that are available from yes POSTS and other sources. This informs my view of the possible outcome of my investment. That is decidedly positive regardless of the unverifiable nonsense spewed by many on this forum but by no means will I ever say it is a slam dunk. I hope and I hope based on facts not unsubstantiated predictions posited by single metric fortune tellers anonymously posting to this board and asking for my trust. So yes I like facts, despise useless self serving garbage pretending to be facts, and I hope.
Still above .02
Anyone who trusted your judgement
when you predicted that little gem should take that into consideration when evaluating any pleas from an anonymous, single metric prognosticator.
I predicted that it might rain, or snow, but then again it could stay cloudy or the sun could come out.
Wow, everything I said and predicted over the entire time have all panned out! See how that works? If you predict every possible outcome and don't tie it to a specific date or time you will always eventually be right. Genius! Absolutely indisputable, but indisputably useless as well.
"Everything I've said over the entire time, whether fact, opinions or conjecture, have all panned out close to 100% indisputably."
Can’t say his name? Wtf are you afraid of? Being sued? If so you’re smarter than your posts or picture would leave readers to believe.
3 and out.
You sound like a checker player to me LAY Z Dull az Dills. What’s your next 4D move on Emil, Einstein? Calling him a scammer 4 times in a row? And for F sake get a new keyboard! My apologies in advance for my less than thoughtful response, if yo are expressing a genuine sentiment.
Now that's funny!
Three and out.
Be balanced? What predictions on this board are balanced in the opinions of anyone who disagrees with them?
DB has been here since I originally invested in this stock. He has been a source of a ton of valuable information over the years for many people on this board. Especially valuable with technical, legal and easily verifiable information. His opinions and predictions are his own, as are those of every other person who contributes to this board. I haven't seen him dressing up his opinions or predictions as facts and he has demonstrated that he is bright enough to know that since opinions and predictions are not facts, they are subject to change as newly revealed facts dictate.
Unlike those that I challenge on their ridiculous theories and unverifiable accusations, he has been here consistently throughout the last ten years, and he doesn't only show up when the stock begins to move. He and many others I respect on this board (GBC, RAPZ, Stef, Hayday, InvestorinAZ) and persons that don't immediately come to mind, are clear where they stand on the merits of this stock and back it up with facts and other verifiable information as opposed to crazy conspiracy theories that would require Emil, the board of directors, every lawyer that has litigated for VPLM, the USPTO, IR, the SEC, the judge, posters on this board, and virtually everyone even tangentially associated with this stock to be willing participants in a sprawling unbelievably huge conspiracy to defraud every investor of their money.
By having hidden motivations, a variety of motivations that change with every challenge or claiming less than believable reasons for their positions, further damages their diminishing credibility. My personal favorite "I'm here to save these poor people from themselves"...yeah right! Pleas help me oh anonymous poster person and altruistic stranger.
I'm here because I have a position in this stock. I have been here consistently throughout the last ten years and I don't claim to have any crystal ball or deep technical or legal knowledge when it comes to the stock market. What I do know is that if one's motive for writing negatively about the stock in a manner that disparages all who invested (Marks, Losers, etc) then it is not only insulting but the lack of a clear intent for being here is suspect based on that pattern. Why not just say I want the stock to fail? Perhaps because it would immediately destroy the wolf in sheep's clothing facade that they have so carefully crafted. News flash, everyone knows! So drop the sheepskin act already.
Additionally, why would anyone personally disparage people they know very little or nothing about? Frustrated with the progress of the stock? Me too! But I don't think that's the reason. Sure frustration is a part of it but it's also easy to attack people by name that can't fight back (regulatory reasons) or personally attack posters on the board because it's too easy to forget that there are actual real people behind those board names who invested for a variety of reasons and are hoping it pays off.
Since when is hoping for a good outcome for all, deserving of derisive comments and character assassination? It seems it is only when there is no other argument to be made on the technical or legal merits. Failing argument? Smear your opponent!
To have someone with unclear intentions call you and everyone else who honestly invested and hopes for a profitable outcome, stupid, tells me that stupid is more of a commentary on that person than the people they are insulting. And if communication skills are any indication, they quite honestly are probably not capable of mounting an argument of any merit.
Any disagreement taken far enough will eventually end in an argument over semantics, and in the absence of verifiable news and information, the baser instincts make for a crass and unreadable board. I'm not innocent here either.
So for all those reasons that is why I chose to make predictions about some over others.
I don't blame you if you respond with TLDR. This has been quite a screed on my part.
Good luck to you and go VPLM!
As the stories of Ford, Edison, and Rowling plainly demonstrate, the road to success typically involves more than a single setback. “You don’t just fail once,” Wang says. “You fail over and over.” And while that litany of failures may make the Edisons of the world better off, it seems to thwart many other people.
BASED ON THE RESEARCH OF
Yian Yin
Yang Wang
James Evans
Dashun Wang
Do a little research before you make foolish statements. Emil is still fighting when many others would have long ago given up. That is not a thing to be dismissed. The successful people mentioned above are just a few of the names you may recognize who have failed again and again before achieving success, if you used Google to actually learn something that would be obvious.
I generally don't make predictions but I feel pretty good about the list below:
The Gray Lady will continue to be all over the board taking multiple positions in a single post and spending an inordinate number of words and time explaining why she is correct through logic and research...over ten years of it!
Solar minimum masquerading as the maximum will continue to pop up every now and then especially just before some positive event to lend his special understanding of all things vplm that prove it is a scam.
The gentleman that is unfortunately one letter short of an alphabet will continue to blitz the board with repetitive claims of lies, pumps, insider selling and other nonsense , all unreadable due to being alphabetically challenged yet as the others, his number of posts will increase geometrically and simultaneously with rumors that have a positive slant regarding the stock.
Fred Gnuf will also pop up from time to time and more often during times of pps movement however his posts do actually seem reasonable most of the time.
Palabra linear will predictably continue to tell us the only thing we need to know, Invite us to get back to him and when someone does only then, will he reveal that his day job is relocating goal posts.
These are my predictions, prove me wrong.....oh please, please, please, prove me wrong.
"Some people on this board accused him of lying - WRONG!
That is the most nytiotic thing posted today. Look again….it’s not that hard to find if you can read.
No just some proof that what you thought you “said” wrote matches what you wrote “said”. Good luck with that.
2 and out you’re wasting my time.
Btw your words above 2 not mine pokey. You’re missing a .0 in 2 posts now ascribing the words to my story being above 2. Read your posts! Who needs tutoring? You’re Still wasting my time.
I’m glad you are happy about something. But you still muffed it on the under .02 premature celebration. Live with it. I get so tired of the changing goal posts when the call is wide. Do you want points for hitting the upright? Sure, 3 points for PP. Feel better?
UH, yeah it is. .021 will always be above .02. You are a victim of your own premature posting, a lack of understanding basic numbers or decimal challenged not sure which. Dot zero is what you missed. Honest mistake or a beer too far neither of which is a fatal flaw. Good luck on your next math test.
3 and out
Try again pokey! Still above .02
Numbers can be confusing Pickle.
Last I looked .0345 is above .02.
No? .01+.01=.02 + any positive number = a number above .02
In my world anyway.
Dumping implies a negative intent to the selling. Do you know wll the reasons behind the selling...uh dumping?
I see columns indicating sells and buys, I don't see a dumping column. I guess I need a wider monitor for that. The sells and buys add up to the total traded anyway so a wider monitor probably won't help. Not my opinion, just an educated guess.
Is that all you got? Play by play on the current pps? Is that that your profound prognostication for today?
Still over .02.
The one prediction you have made that is measurable and you flubbed it.
It comes with the job. Unfortunate side effect in any event.
Prove to me that I am wrong on my ridiculous statements because I am so important that all you people should do what I tell you! And get back to me while you’re at it and maybe a cup of coffee. Oh, and a donut would be nice.
Still above .02.
When you reference yourself as the authority or source of your own assertions you diminish your credibility. The phrase “As I have said, written, posted, many times before” does not bolster your case as you are supporting yourself and if your credibility is already suspect referencing your self doesn’t help.
But, but, but, I posted it before!
So what!!!
Opinions designed to masquerade as fact are only as effective as the costume they are cloaked in and ultimately devoid of truth once the veil is lifted. The only questions that has never been answered is do you truly believe in what you are posting? And if you do, how do those beliefs comport with the facts? You derisively call everyone who thinks this stock is worth investing in MARKS and BELIEVERS. Why?
If you have some information that could make a difference in people’s fortunes, share it! Otherwise you are just serving yourself and in that case…good luck to you. VPLM will do what it does regardless of your machinations. But good luck anyway…
And yet they have decided to ignore YOUR advice… what does that tell you?
Any other keywords we should be aware of? Still over .02
Regarding below .04 and falling fast, amazing you picked that up! Your grasp of the obvious far exceeds your predictive skills. Please inform us of other developments after they occur.
"I have yet to be proven wrong."
Still over .02. You were wrong!
"Would be like people owning Microsoft and the price per share being less than .10"
I suppose you are right, if apples look like oranges to you. For the vast majority of people in the world, they do not.
Try again.
Still above .02
Seems like 6 months is a “length of time”! You used the same lame argument at 2 months. What is the standard for any “length of time”? Get back to me when a standard has been set.
Also, what is billions and billions? Is it 4 billion? Would seem so. Unless of course your benchmarks are purposefully vague. If that’s the case let us know so we don’t have to keep getting back to you. Thank you in advance for attempting to clear this up.
Your single metric of current PPS proves NOTHING as does your prediction of never going over .02.
The PPS is not static and the timeline upon which it moves does not take into account your "analysis" or your personal calendar.
THAT is all you need to know!
How many of Barbara's shares do you think you bought before this became a hot topic on the board?
Still above .02
Just getting back to you on your previous never ending challenge.
When you have nothing to say just post away. In that case words don't matter and are rarely even read if at all.
Still over .02
Still over .02. That prediction hasn’t aged well. You asked that we get back to you when it held above .02 for an extended period. Still no comment other than to move the goal posts. Yes, the truth can hurt and facts matter.
Getting back to you, still over .02!
You still have your original $100 that you invested. It makes no sense to say you lost any part of your original investment if you still have $100,YOU STILL HAVE IT! The gains you had are gains not your original investment. Until you lose a portion of your Original $100 without gaining anything, you have lost 0$ and 0% of your ORIGINAL INVESTMENT. Those are unrealized gains until you cash out. Once you cash out at say $1000 after gaining 900%, you can cash out and reinvest it all and lose $1000. Now you've lost your original $100 plus $900 in gains from that investment, 100% of your second investment and 10,000% of the original $10 your mommy gave you for your birthday when you were 6 years old that you parlayed into the original $100 investment through buying and selling second hand math books. I think...
Never mind
Go VPLM
Couldn't agree more!
Be well Mr. Bird!
3 and out.
I agree. We are constantly given predictions that the pps will never surpass and hold above .02 but it has. I hope you didn't hold your breath folks , if you did you'd be dead already. My challenge stands on the foundation of quicksand upon which it was built. Get back back back to me when when when all you need to know is is is billions billions billions ongoing ongoing oh noooo melting down glitch glitch....
When will people face reality?
The sky is blue. Therefore it must be made of water. And since it’s made of water it will continuously rain billions and billions of fish. That’s all you need to know. Get back to me when it continuously rains fish.
Goal posts are designed to be moved. Prove me wrong!
If it hasn’t happened yet it will never happen. That’s also all you need to know.
Deep analysis of the why VPLM is a bad bet.
Getting back to you on staying above .02.
Just checked again, still above .02!
Thirty seconds later, still above.02!!!
Actually above.02, .03, .04, .05, .06, and .07!!!