More often than not, when something is real, those types of promotions aren’t necessary. Price action here is certainly questionable, and no conspiracy is at play regarding it.

Money would be better spent elsewhere if that’s the case

Same results? Goldman is a paid promoter not a financial analyst

I find it strange that “real businessmen” hire third party “analysis” hacks to regurgitate their own price targets and forward looking statements. No doubt, there are many inconsistencies here.

Can’t wait for that “uptick newswire” interview lol

Never heard that before

Paying a little to sell 3M worth of shares? Figure it out

What about all those revs you guys talk about? What is a 3M to a company with 250M in assets lol

Not too far from the truth. If the think the sec is around to protect your investments, forget about that

A reg A offering does little to prove legitimacy. There are no audited financials backed by an accounting firm. There is not an investigation conducted by state or sec to prove accuracy of claims; just paperwork filed. No one has seen the offering circular yet.

Where is the offering circular for the 1-a?

Have you even read that Goldman Sachs report? Lol

Lol

https://www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-bulletins/ib_regulationa.html

That’s funny...the research report you mentioned has nothing to do with GS; just a guy named Goldman lol

What is GS?

“It is therefore important to know whether an offering has been qualified. Investors, however, should understand that the SEC’s qualification of an offering statement does not mean that the SEC has assessed or approved the accuracy of the offering statement or the merits of the securities offered.

Be aware that fraudsters have in the past characterized certain SEC filings and actions, such as qualifications, as formal approvals in order to mislead investors.”

Straight from sec.gov

Explain this “vetting” process. How do you “vet” unaudited financials? Lol

Tier 1 requires unaudited fins...you are making it sound as though a tier 1 offering is highly scrutinized

That’s why I had it in quotes lol

Better question is why his “partners” are backing out or not committing

That’s absurd

Pfff! This thing hardly ever trades even 1% of its os. No interest, no shorts, no manipulation...unless you count paint jobs

Pretty sure this guy has been doing this for decades and has defaulted on multiple dividend payments. Why people treat penny plays as “investments” I’ll never understand. Might as well buy mercury and let it decay into gold lol

Goes by previous close

I wasn’t bitten lol made out like a bandit. But I also wasn’t married to it. Thanks for the advice lol

Ever heard of CR*GP? Company didn’t exist, but I received a dividend still lol

There’s no proof of anything lol that’s my point

For example, HP*MM is a pink and they filed an audited 1-a offering at
.005 per share. With all Axxa’s success, there numbers are unaudited and they are seeking so little in return it doesn’t make sense when holdings are supposedly 100M+, and with rev increasing

They can’t stop a fraudulent company from filing a 1-a. How would they know unless financials were audited? Lol you think there’s an employee overlooking every individual filing? Ever been to the dmv? Lol

Read the 1-a. Nothing is audited. No gov agency is going to hold your hand. Buy at your own risk

You would think that 2nd payed for update to the Goldman “report” would have convinced the penny community to buy this all the way to .40

When does the 500k in convertible debt hit?

Yes! 150s up now lol

How so?

Still touting that paid for price target? No credibility until audit.

Wrong

Check the appropriate box to indicate whether you are conducting a Tier 1 or Tier 2 offering x Tier1 o Tier2
Check the appropriate box to indicate whether the financial statements have been audited x Unaudited o Audited

Doesn’t work that way. Only tier one is checked

It’s tier 1, unaudited

Well tier 1 is checked off on the 1-a if you read it