RestoreFannieMae.us
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I worked for Publix for 5 years in varying roles throughout the company. Edible Gardens would be a perfect fit for them. Would complement their "GreenWise" products nicely. Not sure if the farm they have down here would be able to keep up with demand. Would need to sign a few more farms in Florida to keep up. $27.7 billion annual revs with over a 1000 stores would definitely need more than one farmer.
Extended article.
Marijuana Business Rewards Creative Strains
NEW YORK (MainStreet) — Diversify, diversify, diversify. For urban agriculture company Terra Tech Corp. (TRTC), which has a prominent marijuana bent, that mantra of versatility is of the essence as the uncertain future of weed legalization plays out.
Terra Tech CEO Derek Peterson happened upon that strategic arrangement in an unorthodox manner, backing into the public marijuana business as he did. The former Morgan Stanley investment banker launched GrowOp Technology in May 2010 as a side dalliance focused on developing large scale portable hydroponic chambers well-suited to growing cannabis. Morgan Stanley canned Peterson for his pot shenanigans seven months later, but he got his GrowOp investors together in February 2012 for a reverse merger with Terra Tech Corp., an agricultural research and technology company that was also ridding itself of a brief VOIP period.
The same principles that worked in cannabis hydro cultivators applied to traditional agriculture, and commercial hydroponic farmers and greenhouse farmers wanted a piece of the pie in terms of the easy-to-use GrowOp equipment and its expansion potential.
"They had a desire to expand that brand throughout the U.S., and we had an appetite to pick up a business that bifurcated our company a bit," Petersen told MainStreet. "We were a little bit worried that cannabis legalization was going to slow down, and I didn't want our public company shareholders to have all their eggs in one basket."
Moving beyond pot was a prudent business play for Peterson and his company.
"So we essentially diversified -- just in case this imploded on itself, we still had sort of a sound structured business that's symbiotic in nature," he said. "We collectively have all these green houses across the U.S., so if legalization takes hold and spills the other way, we can plant a seed and become large-scale commercial growers over night."
Marijuana Business Rewards Creative Strains
Garnishings and greens sold at Fairway supermarkets in New York City, for instance, can easily be exchanged for their narcotic cousin.
"We're just growing basil right now, and we can change that at a moment's notice," he said. "That's the longer term vision. We want to hedge on the negative side, but if things roll positive for us, we want to be able to have first mover advantage into the market place."
As marijuana grows in popularity and looks to expand in legal acceptance, Petersen thinks that the horticultural foundation of Terra Tech will serve the company well.
"Our kind of long-term mentality is, 'Who do you want growing your weed?'" he said. "Do you want a food-grade facility that has experience growing food in a GAP-certified environment, or do you want the guy who's potentially growing in his basement, or warehouse or whatnot with no standards?"
That agricultural basis will allow for a certain prestige as the company decides to grow marijuana and market it in particular ways -- for use as edibles, tinctures, concentrates and raw product for pharmaceutical companies.
And that last category may be most lucrative in the near term with medical marijuana approved in 20 states and Washington, D.C. Terra Tech has a main facility in Belvedere, New Jersey where it cultivates hydroponic produce (along with an acre in Lincoln Park, a facility in Indianapolis and a hub in Florida), but earlier this month through its subsidiary GrowOp Technology, Terra Tech announced its strategic partnership with nutritional supplement developer Inergetics, Inc. (NRTI) to create a line of natural cannibidiol-based nutritional supplements.
Terra Tech, however, does not want to limit its focus in terms of the eventual purpose of its cannabis crop.
"We'd be open to growing whatever," he said. "We just want to farm the commodity."
That's clearly a lucrative diversification proposition, as shown through the Oakland-based dispensary Blüm Oakland, of which Peterson is a co-owner apart from Terra Tech. This venture allows him further perspicacity into the industry. Salwa Ibrahim, a partner at Blüm and formerly involved in political fundraising, touted the business as booming, even recession-proof.
"Basically, it was something that sprung and started specifically in Oakland and right in our backyard," Ibrahim said. "It was just easy to make that shift, especially in 2008 when the economy started tanking and everybody was losing their jobs. All of a sudden, we had this company in our backyard that was flourishing and hiring more and more people."
--Written by Ross Kenneth Urken for MainStreet
http://www.mainstreet.com/node/30970?page=1
Marijuana Investing: Terra Tech CEO Tells How to Get a Buzz
Just curious, what did everyone get as low of day today? I'm showing .32 on one and .35 on another.
"Family Relationships
Derek Peterson, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors is the spouse of Amy Almsteier, our Secretary, Treasurer and a Director and significant stockholder.
Ken VandeVrede, Mike VandeVrede and Steve VandeVrede are brothers. Dan VandeVrede, a beneficial holder of approximately 6.2% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock, is the father of Ken VandeVrede, Mike VandeVrede and Steve VandeVrede.
There are no other family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers and any other directors or executive officers."
From page 44 of the most recent (1/21/2014) S-1 amendment.
Nice, more exposure!
I missed that one. Nice find!
Not necessarily, we won't know for sure until they file. Anytime I invest in a company, I'm investing in management. In saying that, Terra Tech's board of directors has over 50 years of financial services experience (Wachovia, Morgan Stanley, MTN Capital Partners, Moore Capital Management, NMS capital group, and Arque Capital. Ltd), so I'm sure they know what their doing. Like a few other people on this board have stated, you need capital to create capital, and it's hard for start up companies in the MJ space to get access to traditional funding. I could see if they were selling shares and not producing, but that isn't the case. I mean it only took them a few months to build out a new high tech, 5 acre green house; capable of producing up to $10 million in annual sales at full capacity*.
*(The facility, at maximum production, can produce up to 25,000 plants per week, per acre, operating 52 weeks a year at an average sale price of $1.55 per plant. The Company believes that at full production, the facility is capable of producing up to $10 million in annual sales.)
*From page 6 of must recent (2014/01/21) S-1 amendment
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1451512/000147793214000286/trtc_s1a.htm
Thanks. I'll check it out once I get back.
"Authorized and Outstanding Securities
Our authorized share capital consists of 375,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which 350,000,00 are shares of common stock and 25,000,000 shares have been designated as “blank check” preferred stock. Of the 25,000,000 shares designated as blank check Preferred Stock, 100 shares have been designated as “Series A Preferred Stock” and 24,999,900 have been designated as “Series B preferred Stock.” As of December 18, 2013, there were 233,802,141 shares of our common stock (assuming the conversion and exercise of all of our currently outstanding preferred stock, and warrants into shares of our common stock) issued and outstanding."
From page 28 of must recent (2014/01/21) S-1 amendment.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1451512/000147793214000286/trtc_s1a.htm
Some info on shares outstanding vs shares authorized.
http://onswipe.investopedia.com/investopedia/#!/entry/the-basics-of-outstanding-shares-and-the-float,52e298b1025312186cc0a923
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shares_outstanding
http://wiki.fool.com/Shares_Outstanding_Vs._Shares_Authorized
Common Stock ownership
Derek Peterson: 2,036,181(2)
Amy Almsteier: 51,674,654(3)
Michael A. Nahass: 540,000*
Ken VandeVrede: 9,861,220(4)
Michael James: 300,000*
Mike VandeVrede: 9,861,220(4)
Steve VandeVrede: 9,861,220(4)
Dan VandeVrede: 9,761,220(4)
Steven Ross: 150,000*
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)
84,284,495
______________
* Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
(1) As of January 17, 2014, we have a total of 233,802,141 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, which assumes the conversion of 100 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, convertible at any time into 100 shares of common stock, and 14,750,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, convertible into 79,418,802 shares of common stock, and warrants convertible into 17,320,340 shares of common stock.
(2) 50 shares of which are immediately convertible from Series A Preferred Stock and 1,136,131 shares of which are immediately convertible from Series B Preferred Stock. Mr. Peterson disclaims any beneficial ownership interest in the shares of common stock, Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock held by his spouse, Amy Almsteier.
(3) 50 shares of which are immediately convertible from Series A Preferred Stock and 43,074,604 shares of which are immediately convertible from Series B Preferred Stock. Ms. Almsteier disclaims any beneficial ownership interest in the shares of common stock, Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock held by her spouse, Derek Peterson.
(4) 9,473,721 shares of which are immediately convertible from Series B Preferred Stock.
From page 48 of the most recent (2014/01/21) S-1 amendment.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1451512/000147793214000286/trtc_s1a.htm
Right on, it's a non-issue. I just figured I would post it for what it is (non-issue), before "you know who" found it and tried to turn it into something else.
"None of my DD to date has turned anything up that would suggest Dominion has done this in the past."
The only thing I could find (and it's a bit of a stretch), was that Alon Brenner "Director of Operations & Senior Trader" for Dominion Capital Investments, LLC use to work for Andover Brokerage, from 1998 to 2006.
On January 22, 2003 a Cease-and-Desist Proceeding was ordered against Andover Brokerage, LLC ("Andover"), its president, Michael Picozzi, III ("Picozzi"), and two of its traders, Elias Schechter ("Schechter") and David Daily ("Daily").
It alleges that between May and October 1998, Andover, Schechter and Daily willfully violated Rule 10a-1(a) of the Exchange Act ("Short Sale Rule") when Schechter and Daily executed for Andover's proprietary account 202 short sale transactions in New York Stock Exchange listed securities on minus-ticks. The Short Sale Rule prohibits the short sale of a listed security on a minus-tick. In each of these 202 transactions, Andover, Schechter and Daily did not identify these trades as short sales, but rather incorrectly marked them as "long" sales. The Division also alleges that Picozzi failed reasonably to supervise Schechter and Daily within the meaning of Section 15(b)(4) of the Exchange Act. Picozzi instituted an inadequate supervisory system by, among other things, failing to implement procedures reasonably designed to prevent traders from mismarking sell transactions or executing short sale orders on a minus-tick.
This appears to have happened the year (1998) Alon Brenner was hired by Andover Brokerage. So I doubt he was involved or had any idea it was going on.
Like I said its a stretch. It's the only negative thing I could dig up with regards to Dominion and shorting.
Supporting links below:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-47228.htm
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-48338.htm
http://dominioncapitalinvestments.com/wp/meet-the-team/
I'm with you bro. I'm not here for a few nickels, dimes, or quarters.
Thanks Dmcc!
From the press release:
"Under the terms of the convertible debenture agreement, the investor may convert their debentures at any time at a price equal to 90% of the 20 day VWAP of the Company's Common stock in the period preceding February 5, 2014, subject to adjustment in the event of dilutive issuances or events of defaults. The debentures are being issued at an original issue discount of 5% and will accrue interest at the rate of 12%. Additionally, the investor will receive a warrant to purchase a number of shares equal to 50% of the shares underlying the debenture, exercisable at a price equal to 90% of the 20 day VWAP of the Company's Common stock in the period preceding February 5, 2014 for a period of 5 years, subject to further adjustment therein. The Debentures bear an 18 month maturity from the time they are issued and may be retired in shares of the Company's common stock subject to certain terms and conditions."
The language is a bit confusing. Not sure if the "20 day VWAP" is fixed as of "February 5, 2014" or if it rolls forward. Will know more once they file.
Let us know if you find anything interesting.
From the recent press release:
Terra Tech Announces the Launch of GrowMass Program and $6,500,000 Convertible Debenture Financing
"In order to fund the program, create capital resources for potential mergers and acquisitions, implement automation systems at the farm and increase working capital, the Company announced the closing today of a financing that will provide approximately $6,875,000 over the next 12 months. The financing, in the form of convertible debentures (the Debentures") led by Dominion Capital (the "investor") will be purchased by the investor over the course of the next 12 months in a series of tranches, subject to certain customary market-out conditions."
"Aegis Capital Corp. acted as the sole placement agent for the offering."
So the investor looks like its:
http://dominioncapitalinvestments.com/wp/meet-the-team/
The founder of Dominion Capital, Daniel Kordash, was the Senior VP of the Investment Banking Department at Aegis Capital Corp from 2010 - 2013.
The only supporting documents I could find that supports this claim is a PDF file from Aegis Capital Corp, dated July 22, 2010.
http://www.aegiscapcorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/BankingTeam1.pdf
Aegis Capital Corp is the placement agent for the deal, and has worked with Terra Tech before in previous deals.
http://www.aegiscapcorp.com/category/management-team/
They have also been lead underwriter for companies that are listed on both the NYSE and Nasdaq. A link to their offering history is below.
http://www.nasdaq.com/markets/ipos/offering-history.aspx?expert=aegis+capital+corp
This is interesting!
"Peterson, who grows herbs and flowers for sale, said he is considering growing hemp even if the state doesn't approve its cultivation. There are people growing marijuana in New Jersey even though it's not legal under federal law, he said."
http://www.northjersey.com/news/244168621_North_Jersey_business_push_for_hemp_farming.html?mobile=1&ic=1&iphone=1
I hear you bro. I've been really impressed with Derek's moves so far.
After spending about a month researching different companies in this sector, the only public one I feel confident investing in, at this time, is Terra Tech.
Thanks for doing this!
Wonder what Derek has cooking? New SEC filing today.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1451512/999999999714000635/filename1.pdf
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION January 24, 2014
ORDER GRANTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Terra Tech Corp.
File No. 333-191954 - CF#30483 _____________________
Terra Tech Corp. submitted an application under Rule 406 requesting confidential treatment for information it excluded from an Exhibit to a Form S-1 originally filed on October 28, 2013, as amended.
Based on representations by Terra Tech Corp. that this information qualifies as confidential commercial or financial information under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4), the Division of Corporation Finance has determined not to publicly disclose it. Accordingly, excluded information from the following exhibit will not be released to the public for the time period specified:
Exhibit 10.12 through December 4, 2014
For the Commission, by the Division of Corporation Finance, pursuant to delegated authority:
Elizabeth M. Murphy Secretary
Right on!
Also, Dominion Capital?
DTC,
What do you think of Terra Tech's new financing deal? Growlife's GIFT vs. Terra Tech's GrowMass? What do you know about Aegis Capital Corp? Better than Hanover deal? Thoughts on dilution?
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/terra-tech-announces-the-launch-of-growmass-program-and-6500000-convertible-debenture-financing-2014-02-06?reflink=MW_news_stmp
Nice find by the way!
"I have experience with the regulated cannabis industry, as owner of dispensaries in other states."
Derek owns more than one dispensary? I thought only Blum Oakland. Can any one confirm this?
Thanks for the link Obi!
Great minds;)
TRTC$
DC Council votes to decriminalize Pot
4:10 p.m. EST February 4, 2014
WASHINGTON (WUSA9) --
The DC Council votes 11-1 to decriminalize marijuana in the District, WUSA9's Bruce Johnson reports.
There will be a second and final reading and vote on the marijuana decriminalization bill before the entire Council as early as Feb 18th, officials said.
Yvette Alexander with the DC Council voted no. Alexander is concerned that it looks like we are headed towards the legalization and said its still a crime to sell but not use. Alexander also said that the Feds do not recognize marijuana decriminalization and this will create a false sense that its okay to smoke pot. It is easier to get weed so what affect will that have on medical marijuana, Alexander asked.
Tommy Wells said that 90% of marijuana arrests in DC are African Americans and that our society is not served by arresting 5,000 people for public pot smoking. More than 5,000 people are arrested annually in DC, says Wells.
Wells said, "I am extremely disappointed that my colleagues, Mayor Gray and Chief Lanier would choose to continue the pattern of injustice by supporting these amendments. I am not advocating for the use of marijuana in public or private, but an end to the criminalization and disenfranchisement of majoritively African American DC residents. We need to end the disproportionate impact of marijuana arrests that keep our residents from job, higher education and housing opportunities. I will continue working with my colleagues in advance of our next vote to get this bill right."
Marion Barry was not present at the meeting.
Or
Senate Passes Long-Stalled Farm Bill
By RON NIXON
February 4, 2014
WASHINGTON — The Senate on Tuesday passed the long-awaited farm bill, ending two years of partisan rancor and stalled negotiations and clearing what is expected to be the last hurdle for the nearly $1 trillion spending measure.
The bill was passed with strong bipartisan support, 68 to 32. The legislation now heads to the desk of President Obama, who is expected to sign it.
The nearly 1,000-page bill reauthorizes hundreds of programs for agriculture, dairy production, conservation, nutrition and international food aid.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill will cost $956 billion and reduce spending on farm subsidies and nutrition by $16.6 billion over the next 10 years. But lawmakers said the savings would be much higher, around $23 billion, when sequestration cuts to agriculture programs were factored in.
Among the biggest changes in the bill are cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps, the expansion of the crop insurance program and the elimination of direct payments to farmers. Direct payments have cost about $5 billion a year, and have been paid to farmers regardless of whether they grew crops.
Spending on the food stamp program will be reduced by about $8 billion over the next decade, and will account for about 1 percent of the total spending in the bill. The reduction in spending will affect about 1.7 million people, who will have their benefits reduced by about $90 a month, according to the budget office. The bill’s proponents said the measure closed a loophole exploited by 16 states that helped food stamp recipients get more in benefits than they should have.
But antihunger advocates said the cuts would increase the number of people in need of food, even though the bill adds about $205 million to food banks.
“These cuts will be absolutely devastating,” said Sheena Wright, the president of the United Way of New York City. “Two hundred million can in no way plug a nearly $9 billion hole.”
The bill adds $7 billion to the crop insurance program, a government-backed insurance subsidy that dates to the Dust Bowl. Taxpayers pay about 62 percent of the premiums. Some of the savings from the elimination of direct payments will be added to the crop insurance program. Proponents of the program said it provides a better safety net for farmers and ensures that they get help only in cases when they need it, such as a natural disaster.
But critics of the crop insurance program, such as Vincent H. Smith, a professor of agriculture at Montana State University, and conservative groups like the Heritage Foundation, said the program had morphed from a safeguard against natural disasters into income support for farmers.
The bill also makes changes to the international food aid program and contains several conservation measures supported by environmental and hunting groups. And it adds money to combat fraud in the food stamp and crop insurance programs.
“Given all the complexity and competing interests, I think they did an adequate job,” said Dan Glickman, a former agriculture secretary and member of Congress.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/02/05/us/politics/senate-passes-long-stalled-farm-bill.html?_r=1&referrer=
Senate Sends Farm Bill to Obama - ABC News
Congress has given its final approval to a sweeping five-year farm bill that provides food for the needy and subsidies for farmers.
Ending years of political battles, the Senate on Tuesday sent the measure to President Barack Obama, who is expected to sign it. The Senate passed the bill 68-32.
The bill provides a financial cushion for farmers who face unpredictable weather and market conditions. But the bulk of its nearly $100 billion-a-year cost is for the food stamp program, which aids 1 in 7 Americans.
House Republicans had hoped to trim the bill's costs, pointing to a booming agriculture sector in recent years and saying the now $80 billion-a-year food stamp program has spiraled out of control. Partisan disagreements stalled the bill for more than two years, but conservatives were eventually outnumbered as the Democratic Senate, the White House and a still-powerful bipartisan coalition of farm-state lawmakers pushed to get the bill done.
The final compromise bill would get rid of controversial subsidies known as direct payments, which are paid to farmers whether they farm or not. But most of that program's $4.5 billion annual cost was redirected into new, more politically defensible subsidies that would kick in when a farmer has losses. The food stamp program was cut about 1 percent; the House had pushed for five times that much.
Senate Agriculture Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., said before the bill passed that she and her House counterpart, Rep. Frank Lucas, R-Okla., tried to craft a bill that would work for all regions of the country, "from traditional row crops, to specialty crops like fruits and vegetables, to livestock, to organics, to local food systems."
Those incentives scattered throughout the bill — a boost for crop insurance popular in the Midwest and higher subsidies for Southern rice and peanut farmers, for example — helped the bill pass easily in the House last week, 251-166. House leaders who had objected to the legislation since 2011 softened their disapproval as they sought to put the long-stalled bill behind them. Leaders in both parties also have hoped to bolster rural candidates in this year's midterm elections.
The final savings in the food stamp program, $800 million a year, would come from cracking down on some states that seek to boost individual food stamp benefits by giving people small amounts of federal heating assistance that they don't need. That heating assistance, sometimes as low as $1 per person, triggers higher benefits, and some critics see that practice as circumventing the law. The compromise bill would require states to give individual recipients at least $20 in heating assistance before a higher food stamp benefit could kick in.
Some Democrats still objected to the cuts, even though those cuts are much lower than what the House had sought. The Senate-passed farm bill had a $400 million annual cut to food stamps.
"This bill will result in less food on the table for children, seniors and veterans who deserve better from this Congress, while corporations continue to receive guaranteed federal handouts," Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., said. "I cannot vote for it."
At the same time, some Republicans took to the Senate floor to say the bill doesn't do enough to trim spending.
"It's mind-boggling, the sum of money that's spent on farm subsidies, duplicative nutrition and development assistance programs, and special interest pet projects," Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said Monday. "How are we supposed to restore the confidence of the American people with this monstrosity?"
McCain pointed to grants and subsidies for sheep marketing, for sushi rice, for the maple syrup industry.
Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, a longtime member of the Agriculture Committee, said he would vote against the bill because the compromise does not include provisions he authored to reduce the number of people associated with one farm who can collect farm subsidies. Grassley has for years fought to lower subsidies to the wealthiest farmers.
The bill does have a stricter cap on the overall amount of money an individual farmer can receive — $125,000 in a year, when some programs were previously unrestricted. But the legislation otherwise continues a generous level of subsidies for farmers.
In place of the direct payments, farmers would now be able to choose between subsidies that pay out when revenue drops or when prices drop. Cotton and dairy supports were overhauled to similarly pay out when farmers have losses. Those programs may kick in sooner than expected as some crop prices have started to drop in recent months.
The bill would save around $1.65 billion annually overall. But critics said that under the new insurance-style programs, those savings could disappear if the weather or the market doesn't cooperate.
Craig Cox of the Environmental Working Group, an organization that has fought for subsidy reform for several years, said replacing the direct payments with the new programs is simply a "bait and switch."
"The potential for really big payoffs" is huge, he said.
———
Follow Mary Clare Jalonick on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mcjalonick
http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=22355065&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
CEO Derek Peterson, has a permit in California to cultivate and produce both Hemp and Cannabis. Him and his partners that run Blum Oakland (a medical marijuana dispensary in Oakland California) could be one avenue.
My post was in reply to the comment you made below.
"It looks like there are some issues here that management needs to address. IG"
Management has long addressed this non-issue.
This issue was addressed by the CEO Derek Peterson on December 19, 2013 in an interview with Alan Brochstein on 420 Investor. The link to that interview is below and the topic of "email list promotions" is discussed starting at 48:50.
http://www.marketfy.com/product/420investor/lessons/816/view/37060/
LiveWire Ergogenics, Inc. Issues Clarification
Feb. 3, 2014, 4:43 p.m. EST
ORANGE, CA, Feb 03, 2014 (Marketwired via COMTEX) --
LiveWire Ergogenics, Inc. (otcqb:LVVV) would like to clarify the background of the new advisors to LiveWire Herbaceuticals. Eric Krogius and Robert Drust were initial investors and advisors to GrowOp Technology Ltd., which was the predecessor to Terra Tech Corp.
"I apologize for any confusion this morning. The current team of Terra Tech is not involved with LiveWire. We wish them all the best. The point of our press release is that we have well respected industry veterans as part of our team," said Bill Hodson, CEO of LiveWire Ergogenics, Inc.
For more information about LiveWire Ergogenics, Inc., or to find a LiveWire Territory Manager near you, please visit www.livewireenergy.com .
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/livewire-ergogenics-inc-issues-clarification-2014-02-03?reflink=MW_news_stmp
Thanks, appreciate your work. GLTU
DTC,
What are your thoughts on ENERTOPIA CORP's recent (1/31/14) filing?