Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
IMO, I always believed "the coming year" was already decided it was a better chance at fiscal year i.e. March 2015. It does give PPHM leeway without looking like liars.Either the end of 2014 or by March 2015. GL PR
What I posted was that you intend to bring up Sonia Perez "ad nauseum". Bio, please don't put words in my 'post'. I NEVER mentioned I believed you thought Sonia Perez was a potential partner. Please consider reading carefully before jumping to incorrect assumptions. So I can expect no more mention of Sonia Perez in your posts and I will wait for clinical trial results...just as I posted. Happy Holidays. GL PR
I really intend no offense but seriously,you have touted,IMO,yes touted Soon-Shiong as the brilliant one who would/should/must(?) know about PPHM/Bavi and why not throw his backing towards us as he is right on the cutting edge of our knowledge all things Bavi. Now that it APPEARS he has possibly moved on to someone else you are going to bring up Sonia Perez ad nauseum because of some more puzzle pieces? You respond to yourself while changing lanes and basically claim it's just as well Soon-Shiong has moved on(who needs him?). If someone with that much clout,as you claim,has possibly moved on from PPHM I DO NOT think that will expedite other brilliant minds to MOVE IN. Maybe you know better but I would have been happier if he had not moved on but moved in. GL PR
Thank you for posting. Now we know "The Rest of the Story". carpe diem PR
Short interest was reported last night by cheynew. I believe short interest dropped by 570,000 to 12,579,396. See post 199014. GL PR
IMO,it's a puzzle piece. It's supposed to be misleading,confusing and misdirecting so only a few sleuths can uncover the mystery. By the time anyone notices the 'faux pas' there will be another mystery to investigate. Life is a mystery...NOT...compared to PPHM, IMO. gl PR
Some of what you post may be true,but have you seen the world market prices for oil lately? Have you not read the billionaires of the world have gone slightly 'turtle' with their money? You MAY be right about Middle East oil money...but I don't think so. IMO. If Avid's new production facility is up "soon" then we should hear how much it costs and how it WAS/IS paid for. That is what I'm watching for...soon. carpe diem PR
Deals,deals everywhere. I know we have "collaborations" BUT as it stands we have NO paying partners,if we did it would be a material event,IMO. In my 30 plus years of investing I have found,for the most part, that the types of deals/acquisitions go in cycles, meaning they eventually 'dry up'(so new merged companies can move forward),again IMO. Phase III is wonderful,but PPHM needs to be mentioned BY NAME from someone involved in the field of I/O and Bavi needs to BE written/spoken about. NO MORE GUESSTIMATES AND PUZZLE PIECES. Release the name and let the scientific/medical world decide. carpe diem PR
It's still very early in December BUT if pps of PPHM is any indication of Santa's mood...he's rippin'! Thankfully it appears we won't need Santa this year as we're just waiting on the 'ink to dry' on our brand new partner. The things you can learn on message boards. GL PR
So the good news is that "collaborations" can,and do, include cash and other incentives. The bad news is that PPHM is NOT one of the collaborators with Sanofi. The fact that this collaboration was PRd proves that it DOES happen(this was a PR about exclusive NEGOTIATIONS leading to collaboration) and that the possibility that PPHM is in 'possible' negotiations leading to collaborations is reason for all the "quiet time" should not be used as a reasonable assumption, IMO. Yes,maybe Sanofi does it and OUR "DOZENS" don't seems fairly implausible,IMO. Drop some names PPHM...it just might shake out that 'Santa Claus Rally'. carpe diem PR
Article schmarticle. We're in the "Santa Claus Rally" mode...I think. Although it's only Dec.1st that Jolly Ole Saint Nick will be reaching into his bag and pulling out a pps increase in time for great holiday cheer...I think. And if that doesn't happen because coal is all he gave, there will always be Jan. or...soon(I think). It's all good. Maybe you should stop looking for articles that mention Bavi specifically,or PPHM(TIC). People are funny. GL PR
But what if his cat is at the vet's office and he's worried that poor Fluffy is sick? Would his possible voice prognosticator demeanor mean the trial is not going well? Obviously TIC,but you get my drift. PPHM won't say anything,IMO. GL PR
Wow! It is NEVER dull reading,IMO,on this message board. Posters KNOW,not just speculate, the answers to criminal activity,who is buying secret shares and who is not, futuristic forward split(s!) and 4 BILLION shares needed available by PPHM. Hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars value for a buyout by entity(ies) known only to a few(?). AA,BTD, automatic approval of Bavi by the FDA. Thousands(?) of uses for Bavi allowing PPHM to become the largest BP of all time. All of the above I have just posted is MY take on what transpires here on almost a daily basis. IMO PPHM should read this board daily to know where they stand in the world of small bio-GIANT BP! People are funny...it's just true. GLTA carpe diem PR
In regards to the statements about mice..."...After all all mice died from old age,so said Dr.Brekken."..." and I mean this seriously,do we know how old the mice were when they received Bavi? I have tried to find the data as to exact ages of mice at Bavi doses and then their ages at death. Mice in experiments such as these are GENERALLY raised to be experimented on so ages should not be a problem to deliver to scientists who do the research. I am seriously curious how long they lived...years? TIA PR
"...the next PR be it partner, AA or phase lll trial fully enrolled will take us..." You honestly believe that any of those will be the NEXT PR? I get the "IMO" part of your post but I'm thinking that is your opinion for share price. Please let me know why there will be no PRs before any of those listed above. TIA GL PR
Why are "partnerships" "collaborations"? Partnerships are partnerships and collaborations are collaborations. Period. To assume or infer otherwise allows ambiguity to run amok and will never be cause for any entity to have to prove or defend any statement. Whomever writes their copy should be paid well. They do an excellent job of misdirecting...IN MY OPINION. GL PR
So is CP asking about his own post? When I brought up the Jeff Masten departure most on here claimed there was nothing but family issues and I was trying to basically bring up questions that had no relevance to his departure or PPHM situation(s). Now it seems,IMO, that questions arise months later. Oh well, not to worry. I am fairly certain they will be dismissed,and or forgotten by the morning's coffee. People are funny. GL PR
IMO,this "quiet time" for PPHM has a great deal of intrique behind the scenes. Private MB, secretive communiques,"Family" acquisitions of more than 50% of PPHM OS. Possible multiple BP partnering talks, some entity paying for Avid expansion, MM's holding back PPHM PPS allowing for more purchases 'on the qt', bio employees leaving one bio company for another bio company, MB bashers signal PPHM is good for retail holders to acquire more shares. Science be damned,I say. "...That's the signpost up ahead-your next stop,..." carpe diem PR
I agree 100%. which is why I try to post IMO in such circumstances so as NOT to post a definitive that CANNOT be proven as fact. Really,IMO, such 'statements' are highly misleading which in turn lead to more fancy and more conjecture leading to disappointments. Facts are easier to digest. GL PR
Hopefully not deleted. Happy Veterans' Day to all who served and are serving. As we know only too well...Freedom isn't free. carpe diem PR
IMO ONLY,I believe the liver cancer numbers will keep the trials going as they should BUT the hopeful end result is more about people who WILL get liver cancer not so much the unfortunate ones who have it already. Small trials don't allow people like your neighbor access,IMO. The present very often is influenced by the future.Obvious words but true nonetheless,IMO. GL PR
When you are a small bio patent news is as good as any to PR. It generally will allow for a spike in the a.m. with retracing later in the trading session,IMO. But that being said,it should be PRd to allow PPHM name to be seen in print regarding good news. Dearth of news in penny stocks is NOT "a good thing"(anti-Martha Stewart).It's not fluff PR,IMO,and MOST companies will put out some PR so they can also explain the reason behind the patent. All IMO,of course. GL PR
Options expirations triggering large AH volume...NO. Large blocks (40K or more) AH signaling start of short squeeze...NO. Conference (s) will lead to increased PPS before powerful(?) data released...NO. Hidden shares squirreled away by Roche,et al...IMO, NO! PPHM is a penny stock(not a BAD thing,just what it is)...YES. Potential for multiple times PPS increase in the NEAR(*6 mos. or less)future...YES. Slim trading volume more recognizable as news deficient(IMO)...YES. They got to Phase III so if PPS does NOT rise exponentially day in and day out MM's and BP's galore are head slapping PPHM into a dizzy spell until they fall down and can't get up. PPHM-$1.51 on 308,917 shares traded at 11:37 a.m. E.S.T. GL PR
I am with you 100% on that. I do NOT believe PPHM is letting all that happen with the smart use of poison pill,K&L Gates,elimination of going concern,et al.(wink,wink) IHUB MB posters have it all figured out but PPHM management is living in a vacuum OR might they be part of the gathering?See how easy it is to start a rumor using innuendo or ambiguous open-ended questions? Conspiracies exist;I just believe NOT with this issue. Thanks for posting the other companies. One of them I own. LOL carpe diem PR
Maybe I am out of line here but I BELIEVE Internet Forum User posted ARNA Arena Pharmaceutical had 108 MILLION Broker non-votes. Basically voted on ARNA just as PPHM's Broker non-votes had 97 MILLION votes. I do not believe he suggests PPHM has 108 MILLIUON votes,if that is what you are posting,IMO. Otherwise...never mind. GL PR
Ok,I have to ask. What events that would be worth a PR "...and save up multiple consecutive lineups of PR's to spoil the fun for the shorts..." can be SAVED? Spoil the shorts fun;does that mean that PPHM realizes the short position is at XX million shares and they are waiting to trap them? Or is that your opinion of what will happen and not the company line? TIA GL PR
Maybe it's because the Roche Family Singers cartel could gobble up those 97 million shares and bury them on Oak Island. Nobody will ever find them there. Seriously people keep talking about thankfully PPHM did not partner with Abbvie. I want to know what the terms were for people to ASSUME it was chump change.PPHM's MOA knowledge aside,how many BPs have overpaid for Phase II partnerships? Give me exact partnership numbers and I will mea culpa should those numbers reflect"chump change". Otherwise it's just guesstimates and assumptions. All IMO and thankfully in U.S.A. we're all allowed to voice our opinions. carpe diem PR
I'd like to know the cost per patient numbers. PR
So let's get PPHM to $2.00 a share. PR
Certainly some strange discrepancies. I know volume between Yahoo! and Scottrade have been off in the past but the $1.95-$1.53 high and the no trades is a LITTLE peculiar. Then again it will probably all change back again by 4:00 p.m. as if nothing ever happened. LOL GL PR
Yahoo! PPHM page shows $1.95. Yahoo! shows volume at 593,188 while my Scottrade acct. show PPHM volume at 554,253. GL PR
My Scottrade acct. shows high at $1.53...low $1.46. GL PR
With all due respect,if it is a 'given' they are inexperienced because they have yet to be involved in a drug approved and marketed,there is NO reason to state that(IMO).It just does not translate well,especially now when PPHM is in full swing with a Phase III trial they(PPHM)are banking on to be a significant addition to cancer care/treatments. Why say it 2014? It was a mistake,IMO,but it is not the signal of trial failure,even though some will continue to punch that ticket. People say the darndest things, IMO. GL PR
It does seem surprisingly quiet as far as ASM attendees are concerned. If I remember correctly last year they were posting after the ASM was over. Maybe I'm just having a senior moment. PR
6:45 p.m EDT-PPHM 16,000 shares traded AH-up $0.0003. GL PR
Would have liked to see more than 59,000 shares pre-market but not unexpected. Skittish market could end up today...around and around the market goes,where she stops;nobody knows. GL PR
IF Avid were involved AND PPHM did NOT PR that collaboration especially in a quiet time AND right before ASM then I would be sadly in the camp of those who call for breakup of BOD and management. That collaboration would have NO reason to be covered up. IMO, that is NEWS worth reporting. PR
I BELIEVE that in the CC in Spring, mgmnt. stated that IF 'enrollment' was "substantianally" behind or ahead of schedule they would PR that situation. 50 or 60 patients enrolled NOW would,IMO, be "substantially behind schedule". Just my opinion about enrollment and I can't seem to bring up the CC. If I am wrong about the CC statements I blame it on too many rings on my life tree. carpe diem PR
Thankfully your emoticon is smiling(should be winking) but "heavens to murgatroid"(Snagglepuss) Avid should be worth a buck a share...good gravy. PR LOL
IMO, it is the way of the world that new and deadly diseases, et al surface. Just from the plague to yellow fever and cholera to TB to influenza to cancer in all its' gory forms. When scientists and medical community rein in one terror another seems to rear its' head. From AIDS to Legionnaires' Disease to SARS, Bird Flu to Ebola to...? Man will always,IMO, have to struggle to combat new and deadlier forms of invasions of the human body. Do we do it to ourselves by the way we live,treat our planet,p--- off God? That's why bios like PPHM will exist,IMO, to try and find the extinction to the latest round of kilers of humanity. You can add anything you want to the list;over-population,greed,war and even global warming if you're so inclined. My point is we will NEVER wipe out the biggest killer of man because the next one may be right behind the one we just eradicated. That's my take on it which is why I try to live by ...carpe diem GLTA PR