Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Do we believe it??
Samsung Regains Its Biggest Client Apple
http://english.hankyung.com/news/apps/news.view?c1=&newscate=1&nkey=201307150718011
Scoop: Intel’s upcoming TV service is going to be called OnCue
http://gigaom.com/2013/07/12/intel-media-tv-service-oncue/
Which Bay trail M is it? These are the lowest power versions of the family, so they are going to be the slowest.
Celeron N2805 Bay Trail-M 2 1.46 GHz max. 667 MHz <2.5 / 4.5 W $ 132
Celeron N2810 Bay Trail-M 2 2.00 GHz max. 756 MHz 4.5 / 7.5 W $ 132
Celeron N2910 Bay Trail-M 4 1.60 GHz max. 756 MHz 4.5 / 7.5 W $ 132
Pentium N3510 Bay Trail-M 4 2.00 GHz max. 750 MHz 4.5 / 7.5 W na
Intel/Samsung priming the Tizen app pump..
Samsung, Intel dangle $4M in prizes for Tizen apps
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57592746-94/samsung-intel-dangle-$4m-in-prizes-for-tizen-apps/
Looks like some new stuff here...
Baytrail desktop SOC
http://www.myce.com/news/exclusive-leaked-russian-intel-boxed-cpu-roadmap-67847/
Official Intel statement denies Tizen's death rumors
Intel is very committed to the development of Tizen. We see a unique role for Tizen in the industry to create and to grow a new, open and flexible, mobile operating system that allows developers to "write once/run on many devices". Tizen has received broad industry support through the Tizen Association and has achieved major milestones this year including establishing the storefront, releasing the Tizen 2.1 source code, the Tizen IVI 2.0 and the Tizen 2.2 Beta SDK that was just released yesterday.
http://www.tizenexperts.com/2013/07/is-tizen-really-dead-well-intel-doesnt-think-so/
"Bay Trail" in various versions
Twelve named 22nm Atom, Celeron and Pentium
The upcoming entry platform from Intel, codenamed "Bay Trail" is in these days a big issue , they shall bring the manufacturer some coals from the fire. Today, now twelve processors were based on the new " Silver Mont specified more precisely "architecture.
As expected, the newcomers will come as Atom, Celeron and Pentium on the market. This Intel-known access procedures: Various models with different cores, clock and TDP are offered. This was also the official price list of Intel stated above, be made in the first 22nm Celeron with four cores.
Said three Celeron N2910, N2810 and N2805 are the entry into the notebook segment (Bay Trail-M), followed by the Pentium N3510. For the desktop (Bay Trail-D) will be soldered Celeron processors of type J1750, J1850 and J2850 Pentium showing the list of Asia . The notebook and desktop variants differed especially in the point that the desktop officials more leeway in the TDP is given and so a higher clock can be provided.
At the lower end of the scale, the Atom processors are made in the Platform Bay Trail-I, which is primarily intended for industrial solutions and are placed directly on the five new variants. They extend across the full spectrum of single-core solutions up to quad-core CPUs.
Processors based on the Silver Mont Architecture
Model Platform Cores CPU clock GPU clock SDP / TDP Price
Atom E3810 Bay Trail-I 1 1.46 GHz max. 400 MHz - / 5 W na
Atom E3821 Bay Trail-I 2 1.33 GHz max. 533 MHz - / 6 W na
Atom E3822 Bay Trail-I 2 1.46 GHz max. 667 MHz - / 7 W na
Atom E3823 Bay Trail-I 2 1.75 GHz max. 792 MHz - / 8 W na
Atom E3840 Bay Trail-I 4 1.91 GHz max. 792 MHz - / 10 W na
Celeron N2805 Bay Trail-M 2 1.46 GHz max. 667 MHz <2.5 / 4.5 W $ 132
Celeron N2810 Bay Trail-M 2 2.00 GHz max. 756 MHz 4.5 / 7.5 W $ 132
Celeron N2910 Bay Trail-M 4 1.60 GHz max. 756 MHz 4.5 / 7.5 W $ 132
Pentium N3510 Bay Trail-M 4 2.00 GHz max. 750 MHz 4.5 / 7.5 W na
Celeron J1750 Bay Trail-D 2 2.41 GHz max. 792 MHz - / 10 W na
Celeron J1850 Bay Trail-D 4 2.00 GHz max. 792 MHz - / 10 W na
Pentium J2850 Bay Trail-D 4 2.41 GHz max. 792 MHz - / 10 W na
The most interesting models which account for CPUs that Intel already since the end of May in the official price list ( PDF leads for each 132 U.S. dollars). This notebook variants combine many cores, a high clock and with a low TDP and scenario design power (SDP), which Intel says a "more realistic position" to allow ships. For the desktop, the manufacturer leaves the reins loose, dual-and quad-core models with clock speeds up to 2.4GHz, and a high clock frequency for the integrated, ajar to "Ivy Bridge" graphics solution with four execution Untis be with a TDP of 10 Watt released into the market.
The leaked clock rates correspond almost exactly to what a year ago was known at first about the new processors based on the 22nm Silver Mont architecture. Now all we need confirmations for the Bay Trail T variants, which are coming for Tablets as the first Silver Mont-coupling on the market. Recent benchmarks with one of these SoCs show that these models should not have to wait long.
THIS ARTICLE WAS TRANSLATED FROM GERMAN.
http://www.computerbase.de/news/2013-07/zwoelf-22-nm-atom-celeron-und-pentium-benannt/
New Intel mobile CPUs to launch in September
Last week we reported on new desktop microprocessors, coming in Q3 2013. On September 1 in Asian region, and on September 29 everywhere else, Intel is going to introduce Core i3 and Pentium Haswell CPUs, along with several Ivy Bridge budget parts. Full list of forthcoming desktop CPUs was published by VR-Zone Chinese edition a week ago, and now they revealed processor numbers and launch dates of future mobile processors. According to a new slide, posted by VR-Zone, in September Intel will release more than 20 different mobile SKUs, including standard power and ULV Haswell products. Furthermore, Bay Trail-T and Bay Trail-M systems-on-a-chip (SoC) will be available as well at the end of Q3.
The following mobile Haswell processors will be launched on September 1: Celeron 2950M, 2955U, 2980U, Pentium 3550M, 3556U, 3560Y, Core i3-4000M, i3-4005U, i3-4012Y, i3-4020Y, i3-4100M, Core i5-4200H, i5-4200M, i5-4202Y, i5-4210Y, i5-4300M, i5-4300U, i5-4300Y, i5-4302Y, i5-4330M, Core i7-4600M, i7-4600U, i7-4610Y, and i7-4960HQ. Some features of these processors can be guessed from the processor number's suffix. For instance, "M" microprocessors target mainstream notebooks. They usually have GT2 graphics, 35 watt TDP, and they are produced in a PGA package. "H" parts are similar to "M" processors, except that they have GT3 graphics unit. "U" ultra-low power SoCs are rated at 15 or 28 Watt, while "Y" ULV SoCs have even lower 11.5 Watt TDP. Lastly, the "HQ" is a high-performance SKU with 4 CPUs cores, HD 5000 series graphics, and higher, than mainstream, TDP.
Bay Trail-T SoCs for tablets will be released from August 28 to September 13. The slide does not show their processor numbers, but it does list Bay Trail-M SKUs, that will be available "after PRQ". We already reported on a few of these Bay Trail-M microprocessors, or specifically on Celeron N2805, N2810 and N2910. Brief specifications and prices of these SoCs can be found in Intel's official pricelist. In addition to dual-core N28xx and quad-core N2910 parts, there will be also Pentium N3510. Specifications of this part are not known.
http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2013/2013070301_New_Intel_mobile_CPUs_to_launch_in_September.html
My eyebrows went sky high when I read that the K900 was a top 5, too. That is a warm and fuzzy for Intel.
Wonder where they got their numbers?
Your choice, but what is bothersome is that author probably got paid to submit that piece.
Ashraf, you should read this and complain to the publisher...
http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/486002/20130703/intel-haswell-processors-skylake-new-processor.htm#.UdQUCPm1Evw
Baytrail Benchmark!
Intel Bay Trail benchmark appears online, crushes fastest Snapdragon ARM SoC by 30%
The first benchmarks of Intel’s upcoming Bay Trail SoC have appeared online — and it’s good news for x86 fans, but terrible news for ARM: Bay Trail-T, clocked at just 1.1GHz, is around 30% faster than Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 800 clocked at 2.3GHz, the fastest ARM chip on the market.
This data comes from an Antutu benchmark, which shows a device with the code name byt_t_ffrd10 — Bay Trail-T Form Factor Reference Device — racking up the magnificent score of 43,416. This is apparently at 1.1GHz, while running Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean (it is probably the Android reference tablet that Intel showed off at Computex last month). By comparison, the latest Galaxy S4 with LTE-Advanced support, with the Snapdragon 800 SoC, scores just shy of 30,000. To round out the comparison, last year’s Exynos 4 (in the Galaxy S3) scores around 20,000, and Tegra 3 scores around 15,000. In short, the Bay Trail-T SoC is an absolute monster that’s 30% faster than the top competitor and three times the speed of Tegra 3.
Bay Trail-T is Intel’s upcoming 22nm tablet-oriented SoC with four Silvermont cores, due out sometime this year (probably fall). Silvermont is the first new Atom core in five years, and it’s safe to say that Intel has learned quite a few lessons in those intervening years. There’s out-of-order execution, more efficient branch processing and prediction, and faster recovery from pipeline collisions/crashes. Many hardware features were borrowed from Westmere (the die shrink of Nehalem). A massively improved FPU will boost performance dramatically. In short, Silvermont gets much more done per clock cycle (IPC), while using less power. The hardware hasn’t been properly benchmarked yet, but Intel is claiming that Silvermont is 3x faster than the Saltwell CPU core (Medfield/Clover Trail), while using 5x less power.
The Antutu benchmark would appear to confirm that Silvermont is indeed very, very fast — and, unless it’s being misreported, this Bay Trail-T SoC is apparently running at just 1.1GHz. When it ships, Bay Trail-T is expected to clock at 2.1GHz. Will commercial tablets score almost 90,000 on the Antutu benchmark?
Intel’s Silvermont core, versus some dual- and quad-core ARM competitors. (These are Intel’s internal figures; real benchmarks will vary wildly.)
What remains to be seen, however, is how Silvermont performs in a smaller power envelope — namely, smartphones. Will Merrifield, which is a dual-core part that will probably be clocked slower than Bay Trail, be able to keep up with the latest SoCs from Qualcomm, Samsung, and Apple? I don’t think anyone doubts Intel’s potency when it comes to raw performance, but on the matter of performance-per-watt, the jury’s still very much out.
http://www.extremetech.com/computing/160320-intel-bay-trail-benchmark-appears-online-crushes-fastest-snapdragon-arm-soc-by-30
Another phone design win, aimed at cost conscience. The wins at least are starting to add up, and this is one of the low cost versions Atoms available.
Prestigio teams with Intel for slice of the smartphone market
Targeted at 'cost conscious' consumers, the device is set to retail at AED899 in the UAE from tomorrow. The official launch takes places at Dubai Mall's Sharaf DG outlet - the store has signed an exclusive one-month deal to stock Prestigio's phones before they go on a wider release across other outlets.
While the majority of media buzz is centred on the latest and greatest high-end smartphones, there has been a recent trend to put budget handsets in the limelight. Just last week, Lenovo unveiled its range of six new phones - the most affordable of the line-up is due to hit the market a cool AED300 cheaper than the MultiPhone 5430. Yet Prestigio, and its parent firm, ASBIS, is unbowed in its conviction that their offering is stellar enough to compete.
"This is currently the fastest phone for browsing available because of the Intel processor," says Hesham Tantawi, VP of ASBIS in the META region. "We also differentiate ourselves with the add-ons we include with the phone, for example, the push apps. If we look at someone like Khaleej Times, they had launched an application which we can now push to users in relevant markets," he tells AMEinfo.
While push functionality is hardly a genuine USP, the fact that ASBIS is on board will certainly boost Prestigio's chances in such a fierce market. The multinational parent distributor has a 28-year track record in consumer tech. Valued at $1.7 billion, the firm is no household name, but has been in the UAE for 12 years, working with the likes of Intel, AMD, Toshiba and Hitachi. Prestigio is a 10-year-old subsidiary, fully owned by ASBIS.
Beautiful on the inside
In the aesthetics department, the phone itself is only remarkable for being unremarkable. The real magic lies within - the beating heart that is Intel's Atom processor Z2420 - equipped with the enchantingly monickered Hyper-Threading Technology. The little chip promises 1.2GHz of speed. Reasonable enough for the price tag.
The processor-centric phone runs the latest Android OS without any noticeable quirks or facelift. The marketing pitch seems to be based on 'fast web browsing, responsive apps and effortless multitasking'.
As you'd expect for an affordable handset, with the MultiPhone 5430 you get a competent 8MP camera and an HD display. But the let-down comes with the measly 4GB of internal storage. Thankfully, there's a slot for your microSD card.
"We are delighted to be working with Intel this first smartphone initiative which is part of a broader collaboration. It will support the main goal of our company, which is to create the quality, reliability and affordability that is important to our end-users," says Yuri Antoshkin, Prestigio's COO.
The device will be launched in Saudi Arabia next month and is then due to hit shelves across the whole of the Middle East simultaneously.
The needle hasn't moved? What is the continual setting of new 52 week (and multi-year) highs mean to you?
Taken a short position?
I read it differently, and without conspiracy. He is "approaching" the madatory level, but not there yet. His family issue is making him take a leave now, so they didn't have a replacement ready. But by the time he would return, he would be at the 65 year limit, so they made the announcement now.
Yes, I am speculating this is about Apple. And it does appear Intel haven't captured the business yet, because it will have to be for the right deal. Don't know if it will happen, but Brian is throwing something out there in the press. That's what is intriguing.
You do recall that your own article said an Apple deal with TSMC was "fishy." Is that a backup plan? Was it of the scale to displace Samsung? It doesn't appear to be.
Apple got caught with a sole source, and I bet they have taken an oath to not let that happen again. I still think Intel could be a primary, TSMC a backup, or even just leverage in this high stakes game.
Now you are just being obtuse. You clearly know that is not what we are talking about here. This is new business, and ARM App processor.
They would be taking the business because the WANT the business, not simply to thwart TSMC.
There's a new sheriff in town, and he has clearly thrown building ARM processors on the table. But, his comment about being strategic means he is getting something out of this, and it isn't just to be a foundry for them.
Brian was speaking in a future tense, so I don't think it was a reference to Altera. Intel has that business.
I agree with that, and that everyone was publicly aware of that plan.
Brian's comments really seem to be telling us that something is happening, and that something is Apple. Why else frame up a situation with comments like that unless you had a reason.
Reading again the post, I guess this may include building something around an ARM core, but I struggle with Intel doing that. The press would have a field day with it, and I am not sure it is the right direction. How far do you go to capture business?
Exactly what I was thinking. Apple keeps their CPU team, designs something with Atom cores like they do today with ARM, and get exclusivity on their proprietary parts....but with Intel's process tech!
Huge...
Some interesting notes...Is this a prep for landing Apple as a package???
Intel Sees Faster, More Flexible Future
SAN FRANCISCO--Intel Corp.'s ( INTC ) new leaders on Friday vowed to step up the chip maker's long-delayed penetration of mobile devices and other new product categories, starting by giving its inexpensive Atom chip equal billing with its pricier Core line.
Renee James, Intel's newly appointed president, told reporters that the company's new strategy is based on putting Atom "on a level playing field" with Core.
Among other things, that means that Intel will begin using the company's most advanced manufacturing processes sooner to produce the Atom chip, which will help drive down its power consumption, boost its performance and reduce the cost to make it. Up until now, Core chips--the electronic brains of personal computers and Intel's highest-volume products-- typically got first access to new Intel manufacturing recipes.
Brian Krzanich, Intel's new chief executive, also vowed to use the Atom technology and other new building block components to step up the company's new "foundry" business, which makes chips for other companies.
He disclosed that Intel has been working to offer customers blocks of specialized circuitry, along with its processors, so they can mix and match different combinations to create customizeable chips for their products.
While expecting to stick mainly with Intel's longtime-processor technology, Mr. Krzanich said he would not rule out building chips for major foundry customers who prefer the ARM Holdings PLC ( ARMH ) technology that dominates in smartphones and tablets.
"We will consider what it takes to land customers," Ms. James said.
Write to Don Clark at Don.Clark@wsj.com
Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires
Read more: http://www.nasdaq.com/article/intel-sees-faster-more-flexible-future-20130628-00532#ixzz2XXJyXaLU
Expect a comprehensive analysis next week on Seeking Alpha.
Thanks in advance!
I have the impression that Intel is a step or two behind in LTE much like they are ahead in process. I think a lot of us on this board would like to know more about LTE and how competitive Intel is with their current offering and their soon to be released dual mode. There are a lot of detail to determine if an offering is really complete and competitive.
Anyone know any prolific Seeking Alpha authors with technical savvy who could do the research and write an article? (My cheeks hurt from trying to keep a straight face...)
Rexahn Awarded U.S. Patent for Novel Anti-Cancer Compounds
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20130617005167/en/Rexahn-Awarded-U.S.-Patent-Anti-Cancer-Compounds
Intel desktop roadmap for H2 2013 and H1 2014 (leaked slides)
http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2013/2013061301_Intel_desktop_roadmap_for_H2_2013_and_H1_2014.html
Leaked Slides
Thursday June 13, 2013 04:15
Haswell desktop processors debuted last week, and, as was the case with Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge launches, the initial lineup consisted of Core i5 and i7 quad-core models. Less expensive products, such as Core i3 and Pentium CPUs, were expected later this year, but we didn't have much information about specific SKUs up until now. We recently stumbled on a few slides from Intel desktop roadmap, that shed more light on Haswell mid-range lineup. The roadmap shows several Core i3 and Pentium model numbers, and we were able to confirm them using another source. The roadmap slides, originally published in the last week of May, also mention Haswell refresh, that was revealed by VR-Zone last week.
In the third quarter, Intel is going to launch next generation of Core i7 Extreme microprocessors, including Core i7-4820K, i7-4930K and i7-4960X. These CPUs will be based on Ivy Bridge-E core. Furthermore, Intel will add support for Ivy Bridge-E core to X79 chipset.
Also in Q3, Haswell line of chips will be expanded with Core i7-4771 SKU, and several Core i3 and Pentium microprocessors. It is not obvious how the i7-4771 will differ from the i7-4770.
New mid-class Haswell processors, planned by Intel, are Core i3-4130, i3-4330, i3-4340. The former two CPUs are going to replace recently launched Core i3-3240 and i3-3240/i3-3245. Currently available Pentium G2030, G2130 and G2140, all based on Ivy Bridge architecture, will be superseded by Pentium G3220, G3420 and G3430. The launch of Core i3 and Pentium processors will be accompanied by new H81 chipset.
The roadmap doesn't contain any specifics on new SKUs for Q4 2013 and the first two quarters of 2014. It does say that Haswell Celeron processors are scheduled to launch in Q1 2014. Additionally, it shows that Haswell refresh is coming in Q2 2014, and that the launch of Z97 and H97 chipsets will coincide with the refresh.
Yeah, and did you notice that Apple put their iBooks on the Mac OS? Need to do that if they come out with a iPad Pro...
That would be a nice announcement.
Most people consider Mac Pro to be a workstation, not a desktop.
Agreed, but their big "innovation" at this conference was a box that sits on the desktop. I found that a little ironic. Not that I mind that it has a very expensive Xeon sitting in it. Bet Apple got a good deal to go in this direction.
AMD is also probably happy, too, with their win.
A new apple mac pro DESKTOP with a 12 core xeon processor. Post PC era!!! Too funny.
Macbook Air with Haswell announced (lifted from live blog at engadget:)
11-inch is going from 5 hours of battery life up to 9! The 13-incher goes from 7 hours to 12!
Re-read your response. Those really aren't reasons for a corporation to justify this. No product manager would ever put those reasons on a slide as their business case. There is something more to this in my opinion, and "anti-google" is the only one that has some basis.
The biggest thing I can't ignore is the largest producer of Android product is driving Tizen (Samsung.) Why do you think that is?
It looks like a 2010 era UI. Not that I was expecting much.
Agreed, it is very flat looking. But how do you differentiate a new OS GUI when there are plenty of heavy hitters and well established eco systems (and also don't trample on others IP?) Tizen seems to have been created as a way to fix what's perceived to be wrong with Google/Android. If there is enough worry about Google having too much control, OEMs may jump on board Tizen just to appease their concerns. That might be enough to get this thing kicked off, versus some new bell or whistle. Time will tell.
Tizen is still percolating in the background. This will pay benefits if Intel will be the processor of choice for the platform.
Early Images of Intel’s “Obsidian” Smartphone User Interface
For those who haven’t heard of Tizen, it’s basically a new mobile operating system that’s still under development. Although it’s backed by the Linux Foundation, the real driving forces behind its development are said to be Intel and Samsung, with the latter already announcing that it intends to start selling devices running Tizen later this year. Samsung’s interest in Tizen is believed to stem from its dislike of its current over-reliance on Google’s Android OS, which powers basically its entire range of noteworthy smartphones. On the other hand, Intel has struggled to make much of an impact in the mobile arena to date, with just a token number of Android phones sporting its chips.
http://siliconangle.com/blog/2013/06/10/early-images-of-intels-obsidian-smartphone-user-interface/
AnandTech: The Haswell Ultrabook Review: Core i7-4500U Tested
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7047/the-haswell-ultrabook-review-core-i74500u-tested
Final Words
On the desktop, Haswell offers a reasonable increase in IPC, and a decrease in idle power consumption. The combination of the two feel very evolutionary over Ivy Bridge however. In high-end notebooks, Iris Pro dramatically improves the processor graphics story by finally delivering discrete GPU class gaming performance. In Ultrabooks, Haswell’s offer is dominated by significant improvements in battery life.
Intel refers to Haswell ULT’s performance in Ultrabooks as being the single largest improvement in battery life of Intel history. As far as I can tell, that’s true. Under heavy load I wouldn’t expect any substantial increase in battery life, however most notebook usage models boast significant periods of idle time. Staring at your screen, browsing the web, or even multitasking all offer opportunities for idle power optimizations to kick in. That’s where Haswell ULT excels. Using Acer’s Aspire S7 as a comparison platform and normalizing for battery capacity differences I measured anywhere from a 15% to a 60% increase in battery life thanks to the move to Haswell.
Peak CPU performance doesn’t really change with Haswell ULT. Performance on battery on the other hand does improve by a bit over 10%. On the GPU side you should expect to see around a 15% increase in performance compared to last generation’s HD 4000 GPU. Neither improvement is significant enough to dramatically change the performance class of Ultrabooks, but the situation at least improves.
With the last generation of Ultrabooks, the tradeoff between portability and battery life was more evident than ever. The Ultrabook targeted Haswell U-SKUs aim to change that. Based on what I’ve seen here, they will.
Chinese supercomputer with Intel inside...
Chinese supercomputer destroys speed record and will get much faster
A Chinese supercomputer known as Tianhe-2 has been measured at speeds of 30.65 petaflops, or 74 percent faster than the current holder of the world's-fastest-supercomputer title.
The speed is remarkable partly because the Intel-based Tianhe-2 (also known as Milkyway-2) wasn't even running at full capacity during testing. A five-hour Linpack test using 14,336 out of 16,000 compute nodes, or 90 percent of the machine, clocked in at the aforementioned 30.65 petaflops. (A petaflop is one quadrillion floating point operations per second, or a million billion.) Linpack benchmarks are used to rank the Top 500 supercomputers in the world. The Top 500 list's current champion is Titan, a US system that hit 17.59 petaflops. Tianhe-2 achieved 1.935 gigaflops per watt, which is slightly less efficient than Titan's 2.143 gigaflops per watt.
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/06/chinese-supercomputer-destroys-speed-record-and-will-get-much-faster/
I think it was a combination. The article created the spike, but all the investors/traders waiting for this stock to take off pile on. I think a lot feel the stock is undervalued and know it's always a day a way from being recognized. The problem of late is the traders; as soon as they have an profit and momentum slows a bit, they head for the exits. Makes it tougher for LT investors.
I am still waiting for a material event for this to go higher and stick. The article was the first one that intelligently spoke about competition and how well RNN stacked up. I think the new CEO was hired to get a deal done.
A must-read article. Wish we saw more like this...
Rexahn's Oncology Platform Led By Its Akt-1 Inhibitor Challenges Big Pharma With Ground-Breaking Cancer Therapy
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1481531-rexahn-s-oncology-platform-led-by-its-akt-1-inhibitor-challenges-big-pharma-with-ground-breaking-cancer-therapy
Thanks for the link, but I'm not a subscriber so no joy.