Pillsbury, one of the biggest brands in the world, already has liquid cold pancake mix out, Nate's can't compete without spending huge huge money to make it happen. Nate's needs the dry can if this is going to have a chance to go big.IMO

http://pourflipandserve.com/

LOL, that's from 2002, for pinksheets it's always better to look on otcmarkets.com. The company is reporting $1,937 so far for this year.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=ARTM&id=127003

Good find, and good point, spray can not needed if refrigerated. As I've said all along, they need to get the non-refrigerated version out there, that one is the ticket, convient, easy, no mess, no water, unfortunately no one has an answer as to how long that will take.

http://pourflipandserve.com/

That's really bad news for this company, the grocery stores have already been exposed to this product, this isn't something new they haven't seen before, batter blaster went out of business so obviously things didn't go so well the first time around. What does that mean for Nate's pancakes, at best, they will have to pay huge slotting fees, at worst, those companies that were already exposed to it wont carry it again.IMO

http://www.theatlantic.com/video/archive/2013/03/the-short-lived-brilliance-of-batter-blaster/274105/

LOL, that's from 2002, for pinksheets it's always better to look on otcmarkets.com. The company is reporting $1,937 so far for this year.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=ARTM&id=127003

Where do you see $3MM in revs?

I was just saying obviously the starbucks deal isn't done yet, but that's the direction they are going. Obviously they have some big plans for the company. Already have the mexican restaurant chain plus they said they plan to take their bar/restaurant concept nationwide.IMO

LOL, 50MM cans is years away, they are just now making 200,000 cans, how much money does 200,000 cans equal? They did a good thing by lowering the license fee to 3%!!! But then to give a dividend at this point in the game is ridiculous and for only 1 reason, to entice buying of the stock, every single penny should be going back into the company for advertising and/or new product development. They only have non dilutive financing in place for purchase orders, they still need lots of money for advertising and R&D for new products. Also there is a lot of dilution coming next year as the insiders will have their shares freed up. Let's first see them get the dry can done, that's the most important part of this equation, the product needs to be right next to all the other pancake mixes, not by itself where people aren't looking for pancake mixes.

(a) The Series A Preferred Stock has voting rights equal to 100 votes for each 1 share of owned.

(b) The Series B Preferred converts into Common Stock at a ratio of 1:1,000. However, the Series B may not be converted for a period of 12 months.

(c) Nate Steck is entitled to 50,250,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of his Series B Preferred

(d) Marc Kassoff is entitled to 50,250,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of his Series B Preferred

(e) Tim Denton is entitled to 15,000,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of his Series B Preferred

(f) Jeremy Kaplan is entitled to 15,000,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of his Series B Preferred

(g) The officers and directors have the right to receive 130,500,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of the Series B Preferred.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10116626

Ask yourself, why would an insider buy 30,000 NHMD shares when he has 50,250,000 shares coming to him??? Hmmmm, maybe to create confidence in the market because he surely doesn't need the shares.

(a) The Series A Preferred Stock has voting rights equal to 100 votes for each 1 share of owned.

(b) The Series B Preferred converts into Common Stock at a ratio of 1:1,000. However, the Series B may not be converted for a period of 12 months.

(c) Nate Steck is entitled to 50,250,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of his Series B Preferred

(d) Marc Kassoff is entitled to 50,250,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of his Series B Preferred

(e) Tim Denton is entitled to 15,000,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of his Series B Preferred

(f) Jeremy Kaplan is entitled to 15,000,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of his Series B Preferred

(g) The officers and directors have the right to receive 130,500,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of the Series B Preferred.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10116626

WHCA and Starbucks!

Obviously not a done deal, but you can see which way this company is going.

http://bakken.com/news/id/tag/williston-holding-company/

The $3MM line of credit is for purchase orders ONLY! Where is money for advertising going to come from? Where is money for slotting fees going to come from? It's not really a big deal to get a product into Walmart or Costco when you have to pay for shelf space. How about R&D for the new products? The CEO and his buddy get 7 1/2% of GROSS REVS, so don't expect any earnings actually going to the company, those will all be eaten up way before that happens. The company clearly states they do not want to get traditional loans because that will impact their cash flow, they plan on selling shares instead. This article linked below covers the real costs associated with this business:
http://www.fastcompany.com/1182499/how-one-man-confused-grocers-and-won-customers-canned-pancakes

Paul, read this, the company isn't hiding anything, they are fully disclosing their plans, it's just being ignored.

WOW, the CEO gave himself and his partner 7.5% of the GROSS REVS!

Payments/Royalty

The Company shall pay a royalty equal to Seven and One Half Percent (7.5%) of the Gross Revenue from the licensed products. Gross revenue is defined as total revenue minus discounts and allowances. In addition to the royalty, the license requires that the Company pay a $7,500 monthly fee beginning twelve (12) months from the execution of the license agreement. Thereby the fee shall begin on June 1, 2015.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10116626

Ask yourself, why would an insider buy 31,000 shares when he has 50,250,000 shares coming to him??? Hmmmm, maybe to create confidence in the market because he surely doesn't need the shares.

(a) The Series A Preferred Stock has voting rights equal to 100 votes for each 1 share of owned.

(b) The Series B Preferred converts into Common Stock at a ratio of 1:1,000. However, the Series B may not be converted for a period of 12 months.

(c) Nate Steck is entitled to 50,250,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of his Series B Preferred

(d) Marc Kassoff is entitled to 50,250,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of his Series B Preferred

(e) Tim Denton is entitled to 15,000,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of his Series B Preferred

(f) Jeremy Kaplan is entitled to 15,000,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of his Series B Preferred

(g) The officers and directors have the right to receive 130,500,000 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of the Series B Preferred.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10116626

It doesn't have to do with WDDD, he posted on the wrong board, look at his posting history, he meant to post it on the zecotek board.

The problem is everyone already knows about distribution news, it's pancakes, guess what, it will be sold in stores, walmart, safeway, costco, who here doesn't already know this, it's been talked about for a month now??? The big question everyone should be asking is where is the advertising money going to come from? Where is the money to run the company going to come from? Where is the money for the manufacturing plant going to come from? Where is the R&D money going to come from for the other products? The $3MM is for purchase order financing, where is this other money going to come from?

Here's what the filings say:

What you need to know:

Otcmarkets.com is pretty standard knowledge in the penny market, but here you go

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/NHMD/profile

Not really sure how that makes a big difference whether it's only Nate or him and another guy, still the CEO gave away 7 1/2% revs for the license, Oh, and to himself and another guy ;) I might add. LOL, I used to work in the grocery business, and nobody this small is going to be able to play the game as effienctly as P&G. Notice next time you go to the grocery store, the middle shelves are household name brands, usually on the top and bottom shelves you'll find brands you haven't heard of that are much more expensive, have you ever asked yourself why is that??? It's because if you don't have a huge advertising budget behind you then you have to pay for shelf space, much like rent, and they try to pass that cost onto the consumer. Well what do you think is going to happen here, check the financials, there is no big advertising budget, so guess what, they will most likely be paying for shelf space.

LOL, so that makes it better, he's still hooking himself up with a huge royalty fee. Ask him to take 7 1/2% of gross profit and not gross revs and then the company will have a chance. Hell, P&G only makes about 12% of their revs in net income, NHMD will be nowhere as effecient as they are.

That's 7 1/2% of gross revs, thanks for pointing that out, looks like Nate is just looking to line his pockets and not grow a company, I'm fine with him getting shares of the company, but shares plus a big royalty fee is ridiculous.

Purchase order financing and R&D and advertising are much different. Purchase order financing is to fulfill orders placed, R&D and advertising will have to come from somewhere else. This is what the 10Q says:

I think it's a no brainer huge hit if it's on the pancake aisle, much better than messy pancake mix, anywhere else and people will have to stumble upon it, please find out when they will have the non refrigerated one out. Also how are they going to pay for R&D and advertising?

LOL, it's from 5/14/2014, you keep posting false numbers, I'm doing DD here but your posts don't match the truth, just saying.

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=62199967

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/NHMD/profile

Your numbers are false, straight from the PR:

When I go to the store to buy pancake mix I don't go to the whip cream or cookie dough area, I go to the pancake mix aisle, that's where the product needs to be if they are going to get big sales, otherwise they will need lots and lots of advertising to get people to look for it elsewhere in the store.

Market cap is O/S X share price. O/S is 67MM. And the float is 54MM, not 38MM per otcmarkets.

NHMD Security Details
Share Structure
Market Value1 $11,692,800 a/o Nov 17, 2014
Shares Outstanding 67,200,000 a/o Oct 01, 2014
Float 54,000,000 a/o Oct 01, 2014
Authorized Shares 300,000,000 a/o Oct 01, 2014

When is the 45 day shelf life can going to be ready? The one that has to be refrigerated will be hard to find, the one next to all the other pancake mixes is where it's at.

Mik, not in any longer

It's a bit of a confusing sentence IMO, because it can be read 2 ways. One way would be, trial of actions for causes thereafter arising, meaning trials thereafter arising and the other way could be read as for causes thereafter arising, meaning infringment thereafter arising. Either way WDDD is covered in the case against Activision, but as to future lawsuits I'm not sure if they are limited by the cert date or not. The USPTO is fixing it all the way back to the original issued date, they do not state it's fixed back to the cert date, which would make it seem valid for the whole time, like I wrote, it's a bit confusing to me as far as future lawsuits are concerned.

35 USC 254/255 Every such patent, together with such certificate, shall have the same effect and operation in law on the trial of actions for causes thereafter arising as if the same had been originally issued in such corrected form.

"35 USC 254/255 Every such patent, together with such certificate, shall have the same effect and operation in law on the trial of actions for causes thereafter arising as if the same had been originally issued in such corrected form."

The patents still apply from the original dates per the USPTO, but the patent code only speaks about trial of actions arising after the correction is made and makes no comment as to trial of actions already in process, thus the judge got to weight in on the matter in this case.
IMO

Was it taped or not, both of you claim to have been there yet one says it was taped and the other says it wasn't???

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=106909455

Just as a heads up, many moons ago the CEO alluded to me that they were waiting for a successful markman hearing before going forward with litigation against other companies, as the markman results should apply towards other lawsuits because they will be coming from a federal judge. FWIW

35 USC 254/255 Every such patent, together with such certificate, shall have the same effect and operation in law on the trial of actions for causes thereafter arising as if the same had been originally issued in such corrected form.

The patents still apply from the original dates per the USPTO, but the patent code only speaks about trial of actions arising after the correction is made and makes no comment as to trial of actions already in process, thus the judge got to weight in on the matter in this case.

One day after launching their anticipated online shooter, Activision announced that they’ve sold in over $500 million worldwide

https://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in/destiny-tops--500-million-in-day-one-sales-to-stores-162745164.html

http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/more-feast-than-famine-in-the-bakken/3xr86byt

Make sure to watch the whole thing, he talks about rolling out the brewing company nationally.

I talked to a patent attorney recently, he said that once a positive markman result is obtained, that that result will apply towards all other lawsuits as it's coming from a federal judge, thus we should expect to hear about more lawsuits once a positive markman result is released.

Yes, the CEO plans on uplisting and such when good things are rolling and coming in, and not before, he has consistantly said this. Most of your points are moot because as the S-1 states, the reverse would happen to get the stock onto a higher exchange, AMEX, at which time a secondary would be offered. My guess is there are people that are willing to invest some big money, as long as the stock is on a higher exchange, also it's a chess move against Activision who is taking the angle of trying to get the timer to run out on WDDD, so cash in the bank would remove that play.

As an aside, your point still does not make sense on it's own, you would rather have them sell double the shares at 15c pre-runup as opposed to half the shares at 30c at the runup, not sure how it would be bad for existing shareholders if people are buying a secondary at 30c, those buying will want more than 30c, if they bought shares at 15c than they would be willing to sell at any prices higher than 15c, does that really need to be stated??? Your post makes me feel like it's opposite day or that I have now entered the Twilight Zone.

First of all, you should read the link you posted, as you have twisted the whole thing around. There will not be any stock offering until a reverse split takes place, and that will only happen with the intention of uplisting. As to you thinking it would be good if the company sold shares low and bad if the company sold shares high, LMAO, that's the silliest thing I have ever read.