InvestorsHub Logo

LOL

Followers 157
Posts 20365
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 08/21/2003

LOL

Re: IPobserver post# 17755

Thursday, 10/09/2014 4:28:46 PM

Thursday, October 09, 2014 4:28:46 PM

Post# of 46512
It's a bit of a confusing sentence IMO, because it can be read 2 ways. One way would be, trial of actions for causes thereafter arising, meaning trials thereafter arising and the other way could be read as for causes thereafter arising, meaning infringment thereafter arising. Either way WDDD is covered in the case against Activision, but as to future lawsuits I'm not sure if they are limited by the cert date or not. The USPTO is fixing it all the way back to the original issued date, they do not state it's fixed back to the cert date, which would make it seem valid for the whole time, like I wrote, it's a bit confusing to me as far as future lawsuits are concerned.

35 USC 254/255 Every such patent, together with such certificate, shall have the same effect and operation in law on the trial of actions for causes thereafter arising as if the same had been originally issued in such corrected form.




"You take the blue pill – the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill – you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes." -Morpheus