Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
How is that a great a assessment...a non-disclosure has been in place...and the last time Carter spoke it was regarding the courts ruling. Nothing more nothing less. Everything else in public record has been forum blather.
The investors, the security experts and the buyout candidates all disagree and the process rolls on, just look at the event dates.
The Statutory Provisions
The AIA amended 35 USC § 118 to read:
A person to whom the inventor has assigned or is under an obligation to assign the invention may make an application for patent. A person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter may make an application for patent on behalf of and as agent for the inventor on proof of the pertinent facts and a showing that such action is appropriate to preserve the rights of the parties. If the Director grants a patent on an application filed under this section by a person other than the inventor, the patent shall be granted to the real party in interest and upon such notice to the inventor as the Director considers to be sufficient.
i firmly believe its a sale of the patent and intellectual property rights, they sued and settled with 5 of the larger infringers and that was proof to the buyer or buyers the value, Carter is an older gentlemen and wants the reward, never a thought to open a security company because others have done it for him as a matter of fact he/we are the middle of a multi billion dollar industry.
He REVO was a sports team I would wear # 13.
We are holding and not wanting to trade two different matter.
In order to create doubt in the REVO arena one must make sure his or her doubt creation is somewhere near reality for anybody to look twice. People have invested in patents and intellectual property rights. What say you on the patents? They must be working and have value companies are selling the technology for 19.99, 29.99,39.99 amonth.
Talk to the USPatent office and you will find the infringers had no patents even close to this technology.
Lets all all just babble on, including me.
It is completely out of bounds to suggest this money is being hidden, these settlements are court monitored and are on the books of Alarm Force and the rest of the infringers. You put Monotronics under oath and they will scream bloody murder yes we gave Eyetalk money. Just ask the taxing authorities.
Has anybody looked at the infringers filings?
Realistically success, failure or closure of a stock such as REVO will never be found on IHUB. Come on.
Anybody know if that product that was manufactured, shipped and received was a 30 or 60 day invoice
If you really want answers fly to Charlotte and in a very civil and diplomatic fashion you knock on the doors of Eyetalk and Ross Hefler, Ronald Carter, i think he has an exwife, Ronald Carters parents and if nobody answers leave notes on the door and while your in the neighborhood leave a message with the neighbors, and if you really want to be effective arrive on a Friday and stay thru Sunday. Do the same process all three days, and if you dont have any answers by Sunday build a picket sign and carry it on PUBLIC PROPERTY in front Carters house and Ross Heflers house that says REVO WONT PAY and EYETALK wont Talk and with your other hand use your cell and call the local media outlets and tell them somebody is carrying a picket sign they always show for that crap. Carter is known in the area I think he had a nice position with the city. On Sunday morning you could always follow Carter to church that's always a great place to get straight answers.
And if you got real guts carry it in front of Carters parents house.
Probably Finger Hut
***** Should we use facts or altered view ****
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED) September 23, 2014
On September 22, 2014, Revolutionary Concepts Inc.’s (REVO) global licensee, Eyetalk365, LLC, filed multiple complaints (“lawsuits”), in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, against four separate companies (the “Defendents”), alleging patent infringement against REVO’s intellectual property. Eyetalk365, LLC is the global licensee for the patents owned by REVO, and has filed the complaints on its own behalf and on behalf of Revolutionary Concepts Inc.
1. AlarmForce NC, Inc., and AlarmForce LP
(a) Alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 8,139,098, entitled “Video Communication Method For Receiving Person At Entrance”.
(b) Alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 8,144,183, entitled “Two-Way Audio-Video Communication Method For Receiving Person At Entrance”.
2. CPI Security Systems, Inc.
(a) Alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 8,139,098, entitled “Video Communication Method For Receiving Person At Entrance”.
(b) Alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 8,144,184 entitled “Detection And Viewing System”.
(c) Alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 8,154,581, entitled “Audio-Video Communication System For Receiving Person At Entrance”.
(d) Alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 7,193,644, entitled “Automated Audio Video Messaging And Answering System”.
3. LiveWatch Security, LLC
(a) Alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 8,139,098, entitled “Video Communication Method For Receiving Person At Entrance”.
4. Protect America, Inc.
(a) Alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 8,139,098, entitled “Video Communication Method For Receiving Person At Entrance”.
The Law Offices of Farney Daniels PC, of Georgetown, Texas has been contracted to represent Eyetalk365 LLC, and to file the lawsuit. The action(s) for patent infringement(s) was filed arising under the Patent Laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. Because of the Defendant(s) alleged infringing activities, Eyetalk365 LLC, has suffered damages and will continue to suffer damages in the future. Pursuant to the complaint(s), EyeTalk365 LLC, is seeking among other things;
revoamerica.com
Everybody just simmer down...Holy Moly...Are you kidding! REVO
Non disclosure agreements between REVO and the Infringers are a two way street the people who signed license agreements do not want details disclosed either.
In order to work the shell game ( guess which cup the ball is under ) we can see where the ball is...the cups you are using are clear plastic.
I am NotImpressed with the latest doubt creative approach towards Eyetalk 365 defaulting on the agreement with REVO or the hiding of millions and millions of dollars that is being monitored by shall I say the eyes of the legal system.
So when we are gathering our intel on REVO do we want our view altered or do we want the record set straight with facts that come directly from REVO.
This is Ronald Carters last public statement.
REVO's President, Ronald Carter says, "This is a major vindication for REVO and its shareholders. The settlement validates REVO's patents and also allows us to gain a new licensee through our agreement with Eyetalk365 LLC. It also proves and clearly demonstrates and substantiates the strength of our claims about the value, effectiveness and future of our patented technology. Through Eyetalk365 LLC, we plan to continue our strategy of protecting our patented intellectual property rights."
I have taken the position of " The Thinker " by Aguste Rodin and will await news.
Dont over think other peoples standard operating procedures, this is big business and has been done this way for a reason and for a purpose.
Why do you feel REVO is trying to get delisted and go private. Please use factual findings or public statements by REVO. Nothing clandestine or bizarre.
Finally the R Word...REVENUE
So REVO who who was punished by the SEC wants to hide money from shareholders, EYETALK would have to be in on it, the distinguished legal team would have to be in on it, the infringers, the attorneys for the infringers, Carter went public and stated they have a license deal with Alarm Force. Give Carter some credit he is doing a great job living under the NDA's.
REVO has Patents...investor confidence runs high and no one is selling...you can play scrabble with the word scam...you can stand it up or lay it down or you can turn it on its side its just so meaningless anymore. REVO and its business are written on court documents. That is what is important here in less than penny land.
REVO scammed EVERYBODY involved, Alarm Force, Live Watch, CPI, attorneys, judges and on and on. one heck of a scam pulled on the patent office got those folks 8 times , license agreements WOW everybody you say.
The fact they have a serious problem should have been accepted by all on 6/18/2015. Our investment strategy and confidence was and always has been the patents and intellectual property rights. Carter was smart enough to design and get patent approval on many patents who knew he was Inspector Clouseau when it came to filing paperwork. Happy I am not investor confidence I have.
June 18th was the day...We are approximately 8 months into this process.
It has not stopped us from filing infringement cases and signing licensing deals.
We had a licensing deal or two prior to needing a market maker, certainly that had to make the process a little simpler. IMO
We could get FIRNA acceptance and 5-10 pieces of news in one week. IMO
REVO needs nothing to sell the patent or patents.
If you follow the news we know about...we are positioned nicely.
A royalty is a payment to an owner for the use of property, especially patents, copyrighted works, franchises or natural resources. A royalty payment is made to the legal owner of a property, patent, copyrighted work or franchise by those who wish to make use of it for the purposes of generating revenue or other such desirable activities. In most cases, royalties are designed to compensate the owner for the asset's use, and are legally binding
Hurry up and wait.
Good morning and good night
Our patents and intellectual property rights are also a great conversation piece, and cant forget about those 5 license and settlement talks.
Ascent Cap valued at around 600 million or so and parent company of Monitronics who purchased our Live Watch for 67 million
ADT being purchased By Apollo for 6 billion
Tons of money in this sector.
For REVO check the EYETALK365 website.
A snipet, I will be your uber
The greatest patent portfolio available for wireless entryway management.
This extensive portfolio governs 2-way audio video communication, sensing individuals, door locking and unlocking and much more. Opportunites being offered in regard to this porfolio are available upon request. Please contact us to further examine the opportunities this significant patent
porfolio may provide for your market.
Brief Description
The patent portfolio consists of one awarded utility patent, two awarded continuation patents, three awarded continuation-in-part patents and one pending continuation-in-part patent.
Nothing on the SEC website about charging REVO with fraud.
Odd that someone would walk that far out on a plank and speak for the Securities and Exchange Commission claiming fraud but the SEC claims they have serious Questions and anytime somebody has questions they want answers and if they claimed fraud and could prove fraud they would call it it fraud.
REVO patents roll on.
Monitronics
FIRNA will probably ask you who you work for.
So the whistle blower calls the SEC and rats on REVO claiming shareholders are being defrauded. The SEC takes interest and suspends for 10 days. REVO starts the explanation process to straighten things out, mean while across the street they ( REVO and Eyetalk ) are suing infringers and are being awarded settlements. REVO with license agreements and money in pocket show the SEC, FIRNA, BIRNA, MIRNA, GIRNA and all the rest of the IRNAs they are doing shareholder business. Not a chance do these entities not help process this turn around. ITS ABOUT SHAREHOLDER PROTECTION AT THE END OF THE DAY. Thats what the whistle blower, the SEC and FIRNA claim shareholder protection.
Do you think the entities involved saw this or the strength of REVOs attorneys who are fighting for JUSTICE on behalf of REVO and the
shareholders.
REVO's President, Ronald Carter says, "This is a major vindication for REVO and its shareholders. The settlement validates REVO's patents and also allows us to gain a new licensee through our agreement with Eyetalk365 LLC. It also proves and clearly demonstrates and substantiates the strength of our claims about the value, effectiveness and future of our patented technology. Through Eyetalk365 LLC, we plan to continue our strategy of protecting our patented intellectual property rights."
So the SEC and FIRNA are going to help screw us. NOT A CHANCE.
COME OWN MAN ( thanks ESPN )
Focus people...Revolutionary Concepts Inc., (otcpink:REVO), a publicly traded company that owns patented mobile video software and remote security communication systems, announced that its global licensee Eyetalk365, LLC, has reached a settlement in its patent infringement lawsuit with an international alarm and security systems company.
This was the first and now we have 5.
Just read what it is wrote, dont add or subtract only read what is written.
or a transaction is what Bill says it is.
transaction...something that is transacted, especially a business agreemement
transactionSSSSSS
Bill is charging his tweeter as we type.
Good information at the right time!
Better yet, we have the patents and intellectual property rights that control the product and license agreements support that. Hello Alarm Force how you doin!
You drag around that old REVO suspension notice and it reminds me of Linus with his blanket.