Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I did.
The new Chairman of the Board of the Euroasian company is the general manager for a major bottling company in Poland. Why in the world would they pay BBDA to pay somebody else to manufacture the product in the U.S. and export it to Europe? More than likely the the European company has already secured a license from DLR to use the trademarks and will simply manufacture and distribute the product on their own.
Last year? He's been talking about it since at least 2010, maybe 2009.
Someone should email that picture to her agent. I'd be willing to bet they're using it without her consent.
He's also a Non-Executive Director. Which means he's an independent director appointed to the board who doesn't actually work for the company. Those guys show up at board meetings to vote on items and that's about it.
The company has no rights to the video or JLO's image. If they use her picture in their advertising they are setting themselves up to be sued.
LOL, didn't take much work. A simple google search provided all the proof needed to support my position. Still waiting for you or the CEO to do the same. This company is a scam.
Seems a little odd that Walmart has this new products only in October rule, and yet they added Marley's in February/March of this year don't you think? I guess this is a Koma Unwind only limitation.
http://www.business-financial-news.com/business-tips/metro-detroit-startups-tap-into-thirst-for-functional-drinks
Again it is his responsibility to substantiate his claims. And if you're referring to BW's credibility I would say it's non-existant based on past history.
I don't have to prove otherwise. I'm asking for proof of the claim being made.
I'm waiting for one shred of evidence that Walmart only has the ability to add new products once a year. Sounds like total BS to me for a company of that size and with their resources.
Why does a company making millions in net income per year need to pay penny stock pump sites to generate interest to sell shares? Hmmmm...I wonder
What evidence, past, present, or even in a "forward looking statement" possibly led you to your restricted share conclusion? I am so flabbergasted by this compeletely unfounded assumption based on a complete break from all historical precedence that I simply can't take anything you say seriously unless you can provide a reasoned response.
There were no restricted shares given to Euro Management. You have siginificantly less proof of this claim than those who state he is diluting. If you are going to choose to believe what the company PRs then it was clearly stated that he is a major investor in the european company:
There have been hundreds of posts showing promises made in PRs and shareholder updates thatt were proven to be false. I personally linked you to statement regarding stated intentions to buyback shares each of the last 4 years which never occurred. There's no point in providing you any further evidence as you have no intention of looking at it from an objective point of view.
No, that's not correct. The transfer agent knows exactly how many shares are issued and outstanding at any given time.
http://www.sec.gov/answers/transferagent.htm
So can I.
Same thing you said in the first quarter, and it was proven that he was indeed selling. It's amazing that you can't seem to draw simple conclusions from current and historical evidence.
That is the most ridiculous excuse I've ever heard. The TA is gagged to prevent traders from obtaining the actual share structure, plain and simple.
No, he simply falls back on all of the "forward looking statement" disclosures included in all of the PRs. Anything that hasn't already happened is just conjecture on his part, kind of like what is posted here.
No. I don't think that the activity on this board has any effect on the PPS whatsoever. I think you're right about a correlation but I think your causation is reversed. The PPS drives the discussion, not the other wY around. Professional stock pumping websites? That's a different story. Their mass marketing efforts reach a much larger audience and are usually acting in tandem with insiders.
I'd say it's more likely that the decline is due to unsubstantiated claims, unproven statements, and outright lies by the CEO than by random posters on a message board.
Probably yes.
Any time a CEO stoops to blaming bashers and shorts you know the end is near. Desperation has fully set in at this point. Good luck to those of you hanging around.
That's because he made enough money on the pump and dump last August to finance his racing for a few months so he turned off the dilution machine. As soon as that money ran out he cranked it up again.
What does a successful pump and dump look like? Check out BBDA's chart from 6/11 to today. Perfectly executed. Hopefully some of you took profits.
You're right, can't hold this price down. TO THE MOON!
LOL. The proof is on the financial statements if you go back and look. Heck he bought a whole racing team with company funds. And, as others have stated, a public company is owned by the shareholders, not the CEO, although you wouldn't think that by the way he runs this company.
Except that he funds his personal hobby with company money. There is something wrong with that.
Do I think there are cases of rogue market makers? Sure, but I think they're rare and not likely to waste their efforts on a stock trading at $.001. If blaming phantom shorting makes people feel better about hanging onto a stock too long then more power to them, but each significant PPS drop in BIEL can be linked to an increased OS count. GL.
"She's" a fictional character created for the purpose of pumping stocks. Nothing more, nothing less.
You're right, he's not required to provide financial statements, except that he is if he wants the company to remain in the current tier on OTCMarkets. And while he's not required by the SEC to provide the information since the shares aren't registered, he is required by law to ensure that the information he DOES provide is accurate. Clearly what he's filed to date is not.
This is why unethical people shouldn't be allowed to run public companies.
It's not even accurate so why do you want to sticky that information? According to your post the guy still works for Red Bull which isn't true. Nobody really cares as there is no evidence that BBDA has any share of the profits generated by the European group, and that's assuming there are ever any profits generated.
No. It would have been better to have done it then. Absolutely no excuse not to do it now unless they have something to hide.
The time was right two years ago when they claim to have started realizing profits.
Those daily short numbers are inaccurate and unreliable. The only numbers that can be trusted are the bi-monthly numbers listed on the OTC Markets website:
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BIEL/short-sales
As you can see, there is virtually no short interest in BIEL and hasn't been for a long time. For an explanation on why the daily numbers are unreliable see the link below. Feel free to contact FINRA to confirm.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=49600596