Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Because it makes the stock look good..... Who cares about sources? heh...........
Because it makes the stock look good..... Who cares about sources? heh...........
your "e.g" is not accurate. it was stated the BioHarp assets were "secured" not acquired.
Yeah, at least we're out of that poopy 0009 hole. haha :P
I'd like to see this back up to 0019... It shouldn't be at these levels..
EVEN IF this were a scam or whatever the worst case scenario would be.... The news and dd should have this higher... imo..
This post should be stickied :)
I think news is effing pointless UNLESS it states revenues...sales....LOIs at LEAST. But hey, news in the past ohhh 7 months has proved completely worthless for pps so idk what the hell this stock needs to move.
Good luck seeing this run outside of this box. VERY hard to move this - needs 150+ mil volume to move.
Nothing but "good news" has come out and still sitting at this pps....
Couldn't agree more... Fluffy pr if I ever seen one... The PR we "needed"?? LMF.A.O. That's a joke right?
SHORT SQUEEEEZEEEE!!!! Oh wait.. that still happening? ..............................
Sure, I suppose it does address some of the speculation of the "bs" but I don't know that they really needed to place this PR.. Idk just seems like they need to release news that they are generating revs instead of telling us for (I believe) the 3rd time they have projected revs.. I believe the last pr when they stated they had projected revenues was good enough imo.. :P
So... shorts have been squeezed? haven't? I'm lost...
That's one hell of a jump.. Is there any technicals backing this estimation up? Or is this just a good old fashioned faith guess? :P
tia :D
20 cents? On this low volume? How come everyone on this board is claiming anywhere form 20cents to 50cents? Is it all because of the pump act that's supposedly going to happen?
First thing's first everyone... we need to get rid of the effing "Q".....If that happens, I'd expect a major jump in PPS even without a product..
Has anyone had any update on the whole Bankruptcy issue?
Thanks trueheart. I see you guys are predicting a bit of a correction in this crazy run? I pulled out a few bux ago (doh!) for a quick flip... I don't have much invested here .. a couple grand.. but do you think there will be a correction in this run?
Unless it's overruled by good financials?
When will they release their financials do you know? tia
-=jjl=-
But they can be sold. That's all I'm saying, all I've ever said... thanks :)
Hey riddle the board with all the good you want. Not talking about the bad or potentially bad is a BAD idea.... If you only focus on once side of the road, you're gonna get hit from the other.
Google: Common sense
So the shares that Mr Toland has are not a personal asset? Seems like they are.. Because he owns them..And once unrestricted - he can sell them..hmm
LMAO!
Yeah that makes TOTAL sense. I'm sure the court wouldn't go after his assets or anything...... Assets with a dollar value.. wait.. it's coming to me now.. Shares... worth money... *scratches head*....
WAIT! I GOT IT! They can take his shares to pay off the lawsuit! Why didn't they think of that..hmm
Common sense told me that btw.
I'm pretty sure this Toland guy is somehow involved in SGLN.. let me check google... YEP. Looks like a pretty important figure at that... weird. So potentially it could affect SGLN..because he's uhh.. A PART OF SGLN.
And it's not slander when it's a fact. plain and simple.
How is that statement in ANY way slander if it's accurate?
another thing - HOW is it OLD news if the lawsuit is still active? .........................
Well assuming he doesn't have a hundred grand in the bank this could be an issue.
I wonder though, if the shares are restricted, would it be legal to take the shares from him if they are locked?
lmao. okay buddy. So I'll continue to use the board how it was meant to be used. Thanks for the information on "google" though, that was very informative!
So what else does Toland need to release for this thing to get out of this pps rut..?
So what's the message board for? I thought it was for discussion, Q&A ? Correct me if I'm wrong.
What would toland need to release?
Actually... Sometimes there is an opposite attraction due to budget reasons...
If certain organizations don't use up their budget for the year, it will be reduced. Which I think is RIDICULOUS.....
So the government gets paid more money the following year if they spend more money than the previous year?
Why can't WE get that perk? lmao :)
I don't know how the medical industry works, I'm just sayin that's not ALWAYS the case haha :)
Speaking about SGLN negatively and positively is not bashing - there are good and bad things for the potential of this stock. IMO hopefully the good outweighs the bad. Good being the stats, bad being the pps reflecting the stats (imo again)... I've said it multiple times that the pps does not reflect the true market value of this stock and I'm concerned as to why. For some reason that is looked HEAVILY down on here??
I completely agree with you about age. People of age committing the declaration of a correlation between intelligence/wisdom and age are proving themselves hypocritical IN that claim....
Thank you for the constructive conversation. 5 posts left - gonna save em for self defense LMAO. jk...
Nope. that was perfect. A nice, sound answer other than "WHAT ARE YOU 18? 19?"
Thank you very much :) I'm glad there is someone that thinks there could be something ELSE going on other than just shorting. Be it dilution or whatever the case.
It would seem to make sense that's what is going on idk though.. I'm just a child right? lol....
thanks again bud.
Dic, I honestly am just looking for an answer to my question bro. Instead I'm getting slammed in PMs. which is hilarious imo..
But anywho - I'm not sure that every penny stock is undervalued but this one - if all the good things are true - I think is. And I was just trying to get to the bottom of it...
sure, low is relative to your own entry point.
I just keep hearing the same thing over and over - shorts are gonna be scramblin... short squeeze this and that.... But...??? how long? is this the only factor that the pps hasn't really moved at all aside from the run to 35? I'm just. trying. to. get. an. answer. to. that. question. lol ya know?
ps..ty for not being a complete dbag. :)
Right, which is why I'm asking the damn question(s) that I'm asking.... I don't understand why I'm a basher for asking an EXTREMELY VALID question that SHOULD CONCERN people.
Climacus, could you PLEASE answer my question I've asked twice about that now? Is the shorting here the sole reason of the low pps? Your list IS an impressive one for a pink sheet stock, but WHY is the pps so low......? Are there OTHER factors than shorting?
Just a question. MnM
And it's a simple one to answer I think.. I'm just asking if there are all these good things happening for this company, is shorting the only thing keeping it down? If not, what else could be?
Revs, volume/interest, fda approval for products, connections, distributors, "big players" on the BOD..
??????
Ps. No PM.......
SO. company has revenues (and decent ones at that), good forward looking PRs, good volume (aside from today so far) and as the PRs have stated: Many distributors, connections and ties. On top of all sorts of FDA approved purchasable items.
The ONLY reason the pps is so low is because of shorting? Is that it? If so, when is this "shorting" to be over with? I think I heard someone throw a date out there; Feb 11th or something?
Just curious if shorting is the only factor in the pps being at these levels if there is all these magnificent features to this company?
yeah but, I'd really like to see the pps reflect on that however.
Ah yes. 18k in vol, wonder why it's so low? Usually a lot higher by now..
Scottrade showing 0 in volume, is this accurate?
11mil in volume... I'm still very skeptical in this stock lol.. I haven't sold anything in 2 years + and right when I say "I'm going to sell half just to be safe" it rises 70%...wtf.
This stock is killing me. At least I'm still in a bit just in case something good does happen.............
Right. It is good stuff. So let's talk about the same things over and over again.