Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Looks like I didn't even read your post Jimmy LOL
Made the same comment just a few minutes ago!
At least someone is paying attention to what is really going on, instead of believing in a system that will soon be in very serrious truble. You can only milk a cow for so long...
at some point the cow can no longer give away free milk!
Time's UP! Booaha ha ha
Janice I don't think you understand completely what we're going after. The Trillions is nothing more then to get peoples attention because of the large amount.
This is what we're after, just listen to Hodges latest words:
"this effort is not about CMKX alone. Receipt of the Economic Release will impact, one way or another, the entire financial structure of US and international activities. Once you can accept the truth of that statement, I’m sure that you can understand that it is a highly technical, complex and multi-faceted undertaking. CMKX has a role to play and we are doing our very best to assist in its successful conclusion."
Its about cleaning house!
We are just a pawn to lead to something much bigger!!!
Yes those individuals should be in Jail!
Its time people take responsibility for their actions and
you can be certain no one forced them to do this.
Let us get this straight their family members were held hostage :)
No it was greed!
Its interesting that with this new age of technology when it comes to large sums of money we are unable to track it.
Perhaps the money is being converted to Gold Bars and shipped by our Native Indians using canoes. LOL
Or there are certain organizations that prefer not to let anyone track it.
Just think back to Swiss accounts......
The largest accounts were kept confidential. Why ?
Why indeed. LOL
I agree its currious!
If you truly believe there is nothing broken in the system then please share some of those magic mushrooms with the rest of us.
You realize how many major changes the SEC has undergone because of CMKX, how many people were terminated, that millions have been stolen and the list goes on...............
If that is not biased then I don't know what is. LOL
Janice many CMKX shareholders view this stock as a HEROE in the corrupted stockmarket because we the people have stood up together to demonstrate that corruption has in fact taken place.
If CMKX is killed it will in fact become a GOD in the eyes of the people! What do people do? They worship GODS.
So you see trying to kill CMKX will only make it worse.
People will fight because this is what democracy is all about!!!
The point we're trying to make is its better to fix the broken system that has a lot of loopholes and put the blame on a computer glitch. Then from there you have a solid foundation to work with and to prevent further damage in the stock market.
Its ok to admit there were insufficient safety deterrent to protect the public at the time!
Lets face it Toyota didn't anticipate their accelerator problem, but they had the balls to announce that they are dealing with it and that their integrity will be back on track!
Would you buy a Toyota if they had tried to cover it up and it came out later on anyhow?
So Ladies and Gents its time to make an announcement that there was a computer glitch or two which prevented the SEC from protecting certain CMKX shareholders, however we are dealing with this so that it will not be an issue.
Just imagine what the result will be if there is enough evidence and we prove that the stockmarket NSS is a threat!
It doesn't take much and refusing exact totals of shares sold by every institution from the victim notification list and the shareholders audit, any foreign countries, and all the nobo/obo lists plus all the trading records provided by the SEC and DTCC is a sign of GUILT!
Its ok to admit that there is or was a computer glitch, but no one has the balls to do so! When it comes out, we guarantee that there will be a full scale investigation! Everyone involved will be dragged into this mess!!! Everyone !
Why don't you check the facts before spreading your b.s.
Ameritrade held 7.9 % of Knight Trading Group.
If you knew that, I'm sure you knew that Knight Trading group stated in Feb 2004 they traded 3.6 billion CMKX shares a day, which accounted for 44% of their average trading volume.
19 trading days in Feb 2004 at 3.6 billion shares is a total of 68,480,000,000 shares.
At that time the o/s was 100 billion.
You can easily find these facts in Phxgold's letter to Judge Murray!
Here is the major player that screwd the CMKX shareholders!!!
Does it ring a bell???
>>> <<<
NITE
Knight Equity Markets, L.P.
Mr. John McCarthy
Vice President
SnapshotPeople Company Overview
Knight Equity Markets, L.P. operates as a broker and dealer for over-the-counter equity securities traded in the Nasdaq stock market and on the OTC Bulletin Board in the United States. The company offers soft dollar and commission recapture services. It also operates the domestic institutional sales business; and owns an asset management business for institutional investors and high net worth individuals. Its statistics include transactions in securities listed on NASDAQ affected through an alternative trading system. Knight Equity Markets, L.P. was formerly known as Knight Securities, L.P. and changed its name in September 2003. The company was incorporated in 1999 and is based in Jersey Ci...
Knight Equity Markets, L.P. operates as a broker and dealer for over-the-counter equity securities traded in the Nasdaq stock market and on the OTC Bulletin Board in the United States. The company offers soft dollar and commission recapture services. It also operates the domestic institutional sales business; and owns an asset management business for institutional investors and high net worth individuals. Its statistics include transactions in securities listed on NASDAQ affected through an alternative trading system. Knight Equity Markets, L.P. was formerly known as Knight Securities, L.P. and changed its name in September 2003. The company was incorporated in 1999 and is based in Jersey City, New Jersey. Knight Equity Markets, L.P. operates as a subsidiary of Knight Capital Group Inc.
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=717018
We know they made over $2,000,000 on just the Commission alone of the CMKX shares!
Who in the hell do you think you are to make statements like that unless you were an insider at the time you had no clue what was really going on!
Its not our job to ensure the markets are safe and if every part of the entire system could be penetrated by a security guard, that should concern you as well.
Janice why not show us using actual numbers that NSS may be possible. Just break things up such as numbers provided to the public like Authorized shares, the number of distributed Entourage shares, etc....
Take a look at it from the shareholders side...
Aren't you currious what you'll end up with? Try walking in our shoes...... Just this once
See what you end up with, we're betting that the number will not add up and in fact will cause doubt to anyone who tries to do actual math......
We will wipe your grims or make them permanent like the Joker from Batman!
And Finally, can you imagine working for a company that has a little more
than 500 employees and has the following statistics:
29 have been accused of spousal abuse
7 have been arrested for fraud
19 have been accused of writing bad checks
117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses
3 have done time for assault
71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit
14 have been arrested on drug-related charges
8 have been arrested for shoplifting
21 are currently defendants in lawsuits
84 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year...
Can you guess which organization this is?
Give up yet?
It's the 535 members of the United States Congress. The same group
that
cranks out hundreds of new laws each year designed to keep the rest of us in line.
I understand the concept perfectly.
Yes Unregistered shares are not NSS shares, and are backed up with a certificate. However the SEC is unable to keep track of Billions of Unregistered shares what makes you think they can keep track of something like NSS shares ?
Perhpas this will shed some light for you...
(1): In response to the Editor’s query dated 28th January 2010 to Mr A. Clifton Hodges, of Hodges and Associates, A Professional Law Corporation, Pasadena, CA, as to whether Mr Hodges would wish us to publicise the Letter of Service to David M. Becker, Esq., General Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, the Editor received this emailed response from Mr Hodges on the same date [received in London at 18:20]; the communication reads, in part:
'Good day sir:
You have my unqualified permission to use the Becker letter in any manner you think appropriate… I, and my clients and associates, very much appreciate all you do.
Thanks in advance and please do not hesitate to call upon us at any time. Should the need arise, please feel free to contact me at “odd” hours on my cell phone…'.
(2): Fax Transmittal of the Letter of Service for the attention of Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.
(3): Letter of Service from the Plaintiffs’ lawyers, Hodges and Associates, to David M. Becker, Esq., General Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC Headquarters, Office of the General Counsel, 100 F Street, NE, Washington DC 20549 dated 27th January 2010.
(4): For your convenience, the full text of the complaint Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx) filed on behalf of CMKM/CMKX Plaintiffs on 8th January 2010 which we posted here on 9th January 2010 but which we are reproducing again here so that all the documents are in one place.
THE DOCUMENTS START HERE:
(2): Fax Transmittal of the Letter of Service for the attention of Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.:
HODGES and ASSOCIATES
A Professional Law Corporation
4 East Holly Street
Suite 202
Pasadena
CA 91103
Tel: (626) 564-9797
Fax: (626) 564-9111
FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
DATE: January 27, 2010: CASE NAME: Anderson, et al., vs Cox, et al.
NUMBER OF PAGES: 3 [INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET]
Please deliver to:
NAME: Michael Cottrell
FAX NUMBER: (814) 453 4453
From: A CLIFTON HODGES
Re:/Message:
Attached please find a copy of our January 27 2010 letter to David M. Becker, Esq., General Counsel for the SEC regarding the above-referenced matter
(3): Letter of Service from the Plaintiffs’ lawyers, Hodges and Associates, to David M. Becker, Esq., General Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC Headquarters, Office of the General Counsel, 100 F Street, NE, Washington DC 20549, dated 27th January 2010:
HODGES and ASSOCIATES
A Professional Law Corporation
4 East Holly Street
Suite 202
Pasadena
CA 91103
Tel: (626) 564-9797
Fax: (626) 564-9111
A.Clifton Hodges
James S. Kostas
Donald W. Ricketts*
*Of Counsel
January 27, 2010
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
(202) 772-9260
David M. Becker, Esq.
General Counsel
Securities and Exchange Commission
SEC Headquarters
Office of the General Counsel
100 F. Street, NE
Washington, DC 20549
Re: David Anderson, Lt. Col., et al., vs. Christopher Cox, et al.,
USDC Case No. SACV 10-0031-JVS (MLGx)
Dear Mr Becker:
As I am advised, you are aware that I represent seven of CMKM Diamonds, Inc.’s larger shareholders. I have previously provided a copy of our Bivens based class action lawsuit to Kathleen A. Cody, Esq., which was filed in the United States Central District Court of California on January 8, 2010. We are seeking release of funds that have been previously collected for the benefit of CMKM shareholders, or in the alternative for damages in the amount of 3.87 Trillion Dollars, according to proof. A confirmed copy of the USDC Case No. SACV 10-0031-JVS (MLGx) complaint and duly issued summons is attached.
Our complaint names as individual defendants each of the SEC Commissioners who have served since June 1, 2006, as follows: Christopher Cox, Mary L. Schapiro, Cynthia A. Glassman, Paul S. Atkins, Roel C. Campos, Annette L. Nazareth, Troy A. Pareded, Luis A. Aguilar, Elisse B. Walter, and Kathleen L. Casey. I am writing to inquire whether your office is in a position to accept service on behalf of each of the named commissioners; in the event that you are in fact going to represent each of the named commissioners in this litigation, and are willing to execute a waiver of service pursuant to FRCP Rule 4(d), I would appreciate early advice of this fact. If you will accept service on behalf of these named defendants and have them execute a waiver, I will prepare the same and submit them to your office forthwith.
In the event that you are unable to accept service for these defendants, I would appreciate your early advice to that effect. Please respond to this correspondence no later than February 5, 2010. Should I not hear from you by that date, I will serve the individually named defendants personally. Thank you in advance for your courtesy and cooperation.
Very truly yours,
HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
[Signed]
A.CLIFTON HODGES
ACH/gm
Enclosures
Cc: Kathleen A Cody, Esq.
Clients.
BCC: Michael Cottrell
(4): For your convenience, the full text of the complaint Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx) filed on behalf of CMKM/CMKX Plaintiffs on 8th January 2010 which we posted here on 9th January 2010, but which we are reproducing again here so that all the documents are in one place:
THE SUMMONS CIVIL COVER SHEET DISPLAYS:
'MONEY DEMANDED IN COMPLAINT: $3.87 TRILLION'
A. CLIFTON HODGES, State Bar No. 046803
HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
4 East Holly Street
Suite 202
Pasadena
CA 91103
Tel: (626) 564-9797
Fax: (626) 564-9111
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DAVID ANDERSON, LT. COL.; NELSON L. REYNOLDS, LT. COL.; SHEILA MORRIS; PATRICK CLUNEY; ROBERT HOLLENEGG; ALLAN TREFFRY; and REECE HAMILTON, Individually and on behalf of all similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
vs.:
CHRISTOPHER COX, an individual; MARY L. SCHAPIRO, an individual; CYNTHIA A. GLASSMAN,
an individual; PAUL S. ATKINS, an individual; ROEL C. CAMPOS, an individual; ANNETTE L. NAZARETH, an individual; TROY A. PAREDES, an individual; LUIS A. AGUILAR, an individual; ELISSE B. WALTER, an individual; KATHLEEN L. CASEY, an individual;
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants. Case No.: CV10-00031-JVS (MLGx)
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT,
AND FOR DAMAGES FOR VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS
(JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)
COME NOW Plaintiffs DAVID ANDERSON, LT. COL.; NELSON L. REYNOLDS, LT. COL.; SHEILA MORRIS; PATRICK CLUNEY; ROBERT HOLLENEGG; ALLAN TREFFRY; and REECE HAMILTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, who, for causes of action herein allege:
INTRODUCTION:
1. This action for declaratory judgment and for damages for violations of the Plaintiffs’ civil rights under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the F.B.I., 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against Commissioners of the Securities and Exchange Commission, arises out of actions and failures to act occurring over the period from January 1, 2006 to date by Defendants CHRISTOPHER COX, an individual; MARY L. SCHAPIRO, an individual; CYNTHIA A. GLASSMAN, an individual; PAUL S. ATKINS, an individual; ROEL C. CAMPOS, an individual; ANNETTE L. NAZARETH, an individual; TROY A. PAREDES, an individual; LUIS A. AGUILAR, an individual; ELISSE B. WALTER, an individual; KATHLEEN L. CASEY, an individual; and other government agents whose names are not now known to the Plaintiffs.
2. These Defendants, acting in the course and scope of their employment by the United States of America as duly authorized Commissioners of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a federal agency, through their acts and omissions knowingly, consciously, wrongly, without compensation and without due process of law have effected a taking of property from each of the named Plaintiffs and all who are similarly situated.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE:
3. This action for declaratory relief and damages is predicated on the provisions of the Constitution and Statutes of the United States, the legal and equitable jurisdiction of this Court, the principles of common law, and this Court’s concurrent and pendant jurisdiction.
4. This Court has jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs’ claims under Article III of the United States Constitution and the Fifth Amendment thereto. This Court has jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ property rights under the foregoing citations and, in addition, pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1331 and the case law precedent of Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the F.B.I., 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
5. Venue is proper in this Court under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1391(e)(1)/(2). Defendants are all past or current Commissioners of the Securities and Exchange Commission and therefore agents of the United States Government, and a substantial part of the property, and the acts related to such property subject to Plaintiffs’ claims, occurred or was situated in this Central District of California at all times relevant.
THE PARTIES:
6. Plaintiff DAVID ANDERSON, LT. COL., U.S. Air Force pilot, resides in the State of Missouri, owns more than 280,000,000 shares of stock in CMKM Diamonds, Inc., and at all times relevant to the allegations set forth herein, was a citizen of the United States.
7. Plaintiff NELSON L. REYNOLDS, LT. COL., U.S. Air Force pilot, resides in the State of Texas, owns more than 15,000,000 shares of stock in CMKM Diamonds, Inc., and at all times relevant to the allegations set forth herein, was a citizen of the United States.
8. Plaintiff SHEILA MORRIS, a company owner/CEO resides in the State of North Carolina, owns
more than 400,000,000 shares of stock in CMKM Diamonds, Inc., and at all times relevant to the allegations set forth herein, was a citizen of the United States.
9. Plaintiff PATRICK CLUNEY, a retired professional athlete resides in the State of Florida, owns more than 680,000,000 shares of stock in CMKM Diamonds, Inc., and at all times relevant to the allegations set forth herein, was a citizen of the United States.
10. Plaintiff ROBERT HOLLENEGG resides in the State of North Carolina, owns more than 85,000,000 shares of stock in CMKM Diamonds, Inc., and at all times relevant to the allegations set forth herein, was a citizen of the United States.
11. Plaintiff ALLAN TREFFRY, a licensed State of California Attorney, resides in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, owns more than One Billion shares of stock in CMKM Diamonds, Inc., and at all times relevant to the allegations set forth herein, was a citizen of the United States.
12. Plaintiff REECE HAMILTON, a business owner/partner resides in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, owns more than One Billion shares of stock in CMKM Diamonds, Inc., and at all times relevant to the allegations set forth herein, was a citizen of the United States.
13. Defendants CHRISTOPHER COX, Chairman 2005-2009, MARY L. SCHAPIRO, Chairman 2009-2010, CYNTHIA A. GLASSMAN Commissioner 2002-2006, PAUL S. ATKINS, Commissioner 2002-2008, ROEL C. CAMPOS, Commissioner 2002-2007, ANNETTE L. NAZARETH, Commissioner 2005-2008, TROY A. PAREDES, Commissioner 2008-2010, LUIS A. AGUILAR Commissioner 2008-2010, ELISSE B. WALTER Commissioner 2008-2010 and KATHLEEN L. CASEY, Commissioner 2008-2010: are and, at all referenced times mentioned herein were, acting as individuals and as Commissioners of the Securities and Exchange Commission, an agency of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and acting within the course and scope of their employment. These Defendants are the real parties in interest in the claims set forth herein.
14. Other employees and servants of the Securities and Exchange Commission are also liable for damages under the causes of action set out in this Complaint. However, the names of these employees and servants are not now known to Plaintiffs, who thereby names them herein as DOES 1 through 10. When the names of these employees and servants become known, Plaintiffs reserve the right to amend this Complaint to add the names of these DOE Defendants.
FACTUAL CONTENTIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION:
15. In November and December, 2002, CYBER MARK INTERNATIONAL INC., a public company domiciled in Nevada, reverse-merged with Casavant Mineral Claims, which then held mineral claims to more than 600,000 acres within Saskatchewan, Canada, increased authorized capital from 500,000,000 to 10,000,000,000 common shares, cancelled all preferred shares, and changed its name to CASAVANT MINING KIMBERLITE INTERNATIONAL, INC. (CMKI); as of February 3, 2003, 7,241,653,404 shares were issued and outstanding.
16. During the succeeding months CMKI declared a 2 for 1 stock split and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission: Form 15 exemption claim, July, 2003; Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation changing its name to CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. (CMKM), February 5, 2004; Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation raising its authorized capital to 500,000,000,000 common shares @ $0.001 par value, March 1, 2004; Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation correcting the par value of common shares as of December 26, 2002 to $0.0001 par value, July 13, 2004; Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation raising its authorized capital to 800,000,000,000 common shares @ $0.0001 par value, July 13, 2004.
17. During the summer and fall of 2004: New York Attorney Roger Glenn was retained by the company; the number of acres upon which CMKM held claims increased to over 1.2 Million acres; claims development activity was pursued by the company; and a shareholders appreciation party was planned to be celebrated in Las Vegas, Nevada to thank the shareholders, to give them an opportunity to meet company personnel, and to announce an agreed upon merger with another public company, U.S. CANADIAN MINERALS INC. On the eve of the party celebration, the Securities and Exchange Commission placed an order on CMKM preventing any public disclosure of anticipated mergers or other development information.
18. In early 2005, CMKM announced the addition of Robert A. Maheu to the Board of Directors who shortly thereafter became the co-chairman of the Board; CMKM announced a new “corporate strategy plan to dramatically and comprehensively transform” the company for generation of consistent, long-term growth and profitability for the shareholders; CMKM filed an amended Form 15 on February 17, 2005 reinstating the company to a public reporting status; and on March 3, 2005 was notified by the Securities and Exchange Commission of a temporary suspension of trading of the company’s stock (Pink Sheets-CMKX) based upon, inter alia, concerns over the “adequacy” of publicly available information.
19. On March 16, 2005 the Securities and Exchange Commission instituted a public administrative proceeding pursuant to Section 12 (j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against CMKM to determine whether the company was required to file periodic reports under Section 12(g) and whether CMKM failed to comply with Section 13(a), and rules there-under, by failing to so file. CMKM responded on April 11, 2005 admitting that CMKM had a duty to file public reports and alleging various grounds of mistake, malpractice and other affirmative defenses to the factual allegations.
20. From March 17, 2005 through April 29, 2005 CMKM traded publicly in the US under the trading symbol “CMKX,” a total of 551,756,751,833 shares, an average share volume of more than 17 billion shares per day, reaching a maximum on April 21, 2005 of 94,654,588,201 shares. These figures do not include foreign trades nor trades made on an ex-clearing basis such as those disclosed by Jefferies & Company , Inc. on May 6, 2005: between March 25, 2004 and September 21, 2004 Jefferies traded 111,780,681,204 shares of CMKX stock on an ex-clearing basis.
21. On May 10, 2005 the Section 12 (j) administrative proceeding was conducted in a United States Central District of California courtroom; the Administrative Law Judge, Honorable Brenda P. Murray entered her decision on July 12, 2005 finding the facts to be as alleged by the Securities and Exchange Commission. CMKM then filed a Petition for Review which was granted, and a briefing schedule set.
22. On October 20, 2005: Robert A. Maheu resigned as a member and co-chairman of the CMKM Board of Directors; Urban Casavant agreed to remain as the sole officer and Director of CMKM until the affairs of CMKM were wound up to ensure all shares and other assets of CMKM were properly distributed to its stockholders; CMKM entered into an agreement with Entourage Mining Ltd. pursuant to which CMKM assigned its 50% interest in United Carina Resources Corp. to Entourage for 15,000,000 shares of stock, sold its 36% interest in Nevada Minerals, Inc. claims to Entourage for 5,000,000 shares of stock, and made a joint agreement with 101047025 Saskatchewan Inc. and Entourage whereby certain claims were transferred and CMKM became entitled to receive 30,000,000 shares of stock; CMKM’s other agreements with United Carina Resources Corp. and Nevada Minerals Inc. were terminated.
23. On October 21, 2005 CMKM approved formation of a Task Force consisting of Robert A.
Maheu, Donald J. Stoecklein and Bill Frizzell for the purpose of assisting CMKM and Mr. Maheu, as “designated Trustee, to conduct an orderly and verifiable pro rata liquidating distribution of any Entourage Mining Ltd. shares…and any other available assets of CMKM;” the SEC Petition for Review was withdrawn by CMKM on October 21, 2005 and a Securities and Exchange Commission Order de-registering CMKM subsequently was formally entered on October 28, 2005. CMKM had 703,518,875,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding on that date.
24. On November 4, 2005 CMKM established a web site (CMKMTaskForce.com) for the purpose, inter alia, of advising all shareholders to request physical share certificates evidencing their ownership interest in CMKM as one means of establishing that they were bona fide shareholders of the company. The company intended at that time to wind up its affairs and distribute the 50 million shares of Entourage Mining Ltd. stock and any other assets, including previously unpaid dividends, to the bona fide shareholders. The web site set forth procedures to be followed and established a means of registering all bona fide shareholder certificates prior to December 31, 2005; certificates evidencing 43,309,298,585, shares had been registered at that time.
25. A frequently asked question (FAQ) page was added to the web site on the evening of November 4, 2005 and in response to a question about the degree of naked shorting of CMKM stock, the Task Force indicated that “Credible information indicates the number of naked short shares is potentially as high as 2 Trillion shares”.
26. The Task Force issued a press release on January 19, 2006 discussing a reduction in total shares of Entourage Mining Ltd. stock to be distributed to CMKM shareholders from 50 Million shares to 45 Million shares as a result of a reduction in mining claims involved.
The Task Force also discussed issues involving difficulties obtaining physical share certificates being experienced by shareholders; accordingly the deadline date for registration of shares was extended to March 15, 2006.
The Task Force was provided a new “cert list” by First Global Stock Transfer showing certs issued “and active” on January 13, 2006; ADP Services also provided information to the Task Force. This data reflected a sample of 25,021 certificates representing 350,000,000,000 plus shares of stock and a total of more than 67,000 additional certificates to be counted.
27. On March 16, 2006 the Task Force issued a public release that “…we received a visit in our office [in Tyler, Texas] by an E-Trade rep today. This rep personally hand delivered copies of approximately 4000” certificates. Further information regarding on-going discussions with the DTCC and other brokerage houses was also provided.
28. The Task Force provided additional information on March 20, 2006, extending the time for registration of certificates to May 15, 2006, advising the shareholders that Urban Casavant and his immediate family would not participate in the share distribution, and advising that a printed notice to stock holders would be published in at least one nationally circulated United States newspaper.
29. On May 25, 2006 the Task Force received a second batch of 1,200 share certificates from AmeriTrade, having received some 1,000 share certificates a week earlier. AmeriTrade’s cover letter indicated that several hundred more certificates would be delivered within “the next few days.” The deadline for registering certificates of May 15, 2006 had not been extended, although the Task Force continued to advise shareholders that they should obtain their certificates and that the Task Force would honor any bona fide shareholder at the time of asset distribution. By late Fall, 2006, the Task Force had received and counted copies of certificates from more than 39,000 shareholders, evidencing more than 635 Billion shares.
30. Kevin West was hired pursuant to a written agreement by CMKM during the summer of 2006
to assist in winding up the affairs of the company and, more specifically, coordinating the share certificate pull. After serving nearly a year as Interim CEO, Kevin West was appointed Chairman of the Board on March 29, 2007 after which Urban Casavant stepped down as sole director, president, secretary and treasurer of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Mr. West soon thereafter appointed Bill Frizzell as CMKM General Counsel and provided instructions for the filing of a number of lawsuits to attempt to recover moneys and other assets which had been wrongfully taken from the company.
31. During the period of June 1, 2004 through October 28, 2005 a total of 2.25 Trillion “phantom” shares of CMKM Diamonds Inc, was sold into the public market through legitimate brokers, illegitimate brokers and dealers, market makers, hedge funds, ex-clearing transactions and private transactions. The sales of the majority of such shares were at all times known to the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Defendants herein.
32. At some date prior to June 1, 2004 the Securities and Exchange Commission in concert with the Department of Justice of the United States, together combined with Robert A. Maheu and others to utilize CMKM Diamonds, Inc. for the purpose of trapping a number of widely disbursed entities and persons who were believed to be engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice, with assistance from the Department of Homeland Security, believed and developed evidence that said short sellers were utilizing their activities to illegally launder moneys, wrongfully export moneys, avoid payment of taxes, and to support foreign terrorist operations. To fulfill the plan to criminally trap such wrongdoers, the Securities and Exchange Commission, with assistance from the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security:
(a) Assisted in and approved the retention of Roger Glenn, an ex-SEC trial attorney and drafter of Sarbanes-Oxley, to join CMKM Diamonds Inc. for the purpose of verifying claims value, increasing authorized shares of stock to 800,000,000,000, and supervising from the inside of the company;
(b) Encouraged the company to expand its promotional activities, assisted in the set up of the “racing activities” of the company, and underwrote a substantial portion of the cost of such activities;
(c) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the sale of certain company claims to several foreign corporations;
(d) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the conferences between Robert A. Maheu and his associates on the one hand, and the wrongdoing short sellers on the other, all for the purpose of settling the potential liability of said wrongdoers with consent of the U. S. Government and a representation of no criminal prosecution for such illegal sales;
(e) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the declaration of dividends payable by the company to each common shareholder of CMKM Diamonds, Inc.
(f) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the distribution of shares of CIM, a private company owned by Urban Casavant, as a stock dividend, including consent and approval of distribution of said shares to holders of more than 1.4 Trillion shares of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. common stock.
33. During the period from November, 2004 through April, 2005, CMKM Diamonds, Inc. negotiated the sale of some of its Saskatchewan, Canada, mineral claims to three Chinese domiciled corporations with the advice and consent, inter alia, of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Proceeds from the consummation of such sales were placed into a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time.
34. During the period from March, 2004 through August, 2006, on behalf of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Robert A. Maheu, with assistance from others, negotiated a settlement with the illegitimate brokers, dealers, market makers, hedge funds, and other persons and entities that had engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company. In exchange for a U. S. Government promise of no prosecution for such sales, the wrongdoers each promised to pay negotiated amounts to a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time.
35. Plaintiffs herein are informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that other moneys have been collected for the benefit of the shareholders of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. from the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, from the United States Government, and from the sale of additional assets including consent to enter into joint venture agreements with other companies holding mineral claims in Saskatchewan, Canada. Plaintiffs herein are further informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that said moneys, collected for the benefit of shareholders have also been placed in a trust or are otherwise now held in trust by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation and the United States Treasury.
36. Plaintiffs herein are informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that at all times mentioned, the Securities and Exchange Commission reserved unto itself the sole and absolute discretion to determine when moneys collected pursuant to the scheme set forth above would and could be released for distribution.
37. Demand for release of said moneys has been repeatedly presented to the Securities and Exchange Commission without result. Agents and employees of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice have represented repeatedly that the release of moneys for distribution was imminent, and/or would occur within several weeks, and/or would occur within less than a month. Each of said representations have been made knowing them
to be false, and at the specific direction of the named Defendants. These actions of withholding distribution of said moneys, without compensation and without due process of law, amount to a taking of the property of the individual Plaintiffs and of all similarly situated.
38. At all times mentioned herein, the Defendants acted with deliberate indifference or reckless disregard for the Constitutional and other rights of all Plaintiffs, or with the intention and knowledge that they were violating Plaintiffs’ Constitutional or other rights or to cause them other injuries, losses and damage.
39. As a result of the Defendants’ misconduct, each of the named Plaintiffs and all of those similarly situated, have been denied their Constitutional rights, including, but not limited to, their Fifth Amendment right to be secure in their property, free from taking without just compensation and without due process of law, and have suffered injuries and property loss in excess of Three Trillion Dollars.
CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS:
40. Plaintiffs bring this action individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and in the public interest.
41. Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of a class of persons who were and are bona fide shareholders in CMKM Diamonds, Inc., a public company directly supervised by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
42. Plaintiffs are members of said class, have a claim typical of the claims of all members of said class, and will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the members of said class.
43. The members of said class are so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable.
44. All of the class members are wholly identifiable from documents known to be in the possession of Defendants and of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
45. The claims of the members of said class present common issues of fact and law which predominate over any questions affecting only individual members of the class.
46. The defenses available to defendants to the claims of the members of the class present common issues of fact and law which predominate over any questions affecting only individual members of the class.
47. The prosecution of separate actions by the individual members of the class would create a risk of inconsistent or varying adjudications which would establish incompatible standards of conduct for defendants.
48. Adjudications with respect to individual members of said class would, as a practical matter be dispositive of the interest of other members not parties to the individual adjudications or would substantially impair or impede the right and/or ability to protect their interest.
49. Defendants have acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to said class thereby making appropriate final injunctive relief with respect to the class as a whole.
50. Unless ordered by this court, Defendants will continue their illegal and wrongful conduct, and repeated actions by individual class members will be required to obtain relief; and thereby the remedies available at law are inadequate.
51. For all of the above reasons, a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the claims alleged herein.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
(FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS):
52. Plaintiffs incorporate as though fully set forth herein, all of the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 39 above.
53. Plaintiffs allege that an actual controversy exists in this jurisdiction, in that it is the Plaintiffs’ contention that:
(a) The Defendants are, or in the past were, Commissioners of the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, an agency of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. At all relevant times herein, said Defendants were acting as individuals and in their official capacity as agents of the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
(b) On and after January 1, 2006, the Defendants, acting alone and acting in concert with each other, and acting without just cause, did consciously, knowingly, intentionally and wrongfully cause certain acts and omissions to proceed in such manner as to hinder, delay, and ultimately prevent the distribution of moneys held for the benefit of Plaintiffs, and all similarly situated, said moneys being payable to each said person on a per share basis.
(c) The Defendants, and each of them, acted in their individual and their official capacities with deliberate or reckless disregard for the Constitutional and other rights of Plaintiffs and all similarly situated or with malicious intent and with the knowledge that their acts and omissions violated and denied the Constitutional and other rights of Plaintiffs and all similarly situated, or that their acts would cause said Plaintiffs and all similarly situated other injuries.
(d) The Defendants, and each of them, did unlawfully and wrongfully cause certain acts and omissions to proceed in such manner as to hinder, delay, and ultimately prevent the distribution of moneys held for the benefit of Plaintiffs and all similarly situated, even though the Defendants knew that said persons had a vested interest and Constitutional right to receive said moneys in a timely, unfettered and unconstrained manner.
(e) The Defendants, and each of them, knew that Plaintiffs and all similarly situated had a vested interest and Constitutional right to receive said moneys in a timely, unfettered and unconstrained manner when they committed the acts and omissions set forth above, causing each said person to be deprived of property without just compensation and without due process of law.
54. The Defendants, and each of them, contend to the contrary. Therefore, it is necessary and proper for this Court at this time to determine and declare the validity of the contentions of the parties as set forth above.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
(FOR VIOLATION OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AGAINST DEFENDANTS COX, SHAPIRO, GLASSMAN, ATKINS, CAMPOS, NAZARETH, PAREDES,AGUILAR, WALTER, and CASEY):
55. Plaintiffs incorporate as though fully set forth herein all of the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 51, above.
56. Defendants, by committing the above-mentioned acts and omissions, violated and denied the Plaintiffs’ Constitutional rights, and those of all similarly situated, including, but not limited to, their Fifth Amendment right to be secure in their property, free from taking without just compensation and without due process of law.
57. Defendants, and each of them, acted and failed to act with the intent to deny the Constitutional rights of Plaintiffs and of all those similarly situated, or with the intentional or callous disregard or deliberate indifference to those rights. The above described acts of the Defendants, all charged with securities law enforcement as Commissioners of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in violation of the Constitutional rights of Plaintiffs and of all those similarly situated, were not intended to be exempt from liability.
58. As a result of the Defendants’ acts, Plaintiffs and all those similarly situated have suffered injuries and property loss in excess of 3.87 Trillion Dollars in an exact amount to be determined at the time of Trial. Because Defendants’ actions were intentional or done with callous disregard or deliberate indifference to the Constitutional and other rights of all Plaintiffs, this Court should award punitive damages against each individually named Defendant.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs seek judgment as follows:
1. For a declaratory judgment, pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C., Sections 2201 and 2202, which determines and declares the validity of the contentions of the parties set forth in Paragraphs 52 to 54, above;
2. For a judgment for compensatory, general and special damages in the amounts prayed for in the Second Cause of action set forth above;
3. For a judgment for punitive damages in an amount sufficient to punish and to make examples of these Defendants, and to deter these Defendants and others from engaging in similar conduct;
4. For an award of reasonable attorney’s fees, expenses and costs of suit incurred herein; and:
5. For such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
Dated: January 10, 2010.
HODGES AND ASSOCIATE
By: [Signed]
A. CLIFTON HODGES
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
• EDITOR'S NOTE:
This document should be read in conjunction with our reports dated 7th and 9th January 2010.
These can be accessed instantly by pressing ARCHIVE.
LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:
LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:
Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.
Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:
• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.
• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.
Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:
THEFT BY DECEPTION:
• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.
• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.
• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., 'Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.
FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:
• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.
• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary', Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.
U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:
• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.
U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:
• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.
• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.
• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=46049485
This is a problem in the system that needs to be delt with!
Yes what you said is correct, but why in the world would you sell something that has such value?????? It boggles the mind at how much corruption and what other money handling went on behind closed doors!
You can publish it for free on here: http://www.lulu.com/
and if its really good you'll even make some money!
Because the CMKX shareholders have been wronged.
What ever happened to our Diagem shares ?
I can tell you 100% certain they had Diamonds!!! Huge diamonds!
The only issue with that company was that their claims were on sacret land, hence only the locals were allowed to mine.
Again has the management failed to protect the investors or was there another deal made where someone got paid off to let this one get away.
Anyone who did a little DD saw the Power Point presentation and the size of the diamonds that they recovered.
It really bothers me when I know something has such great value and no one takes responsibility!
Why do you think we're here ? LOL
"No company, any where, at any time, has ever been harmed by naked short selling. There are no exceptions."
NSS is possible if insiders of a company can introduce as many unregistered shares as they wish! Hence raising the stock price to unrealistic levels or lowering it.
Stock manipulation is illegal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Only because you're refusing to face the reality that there is more going on here then meets the eye!
Even Janice could not dispute that Overstock proved that NSS is possible "Overstock is big board. I believe their problem resulted from options MMs using their exemption. "
Hence CMKX is another example of the exact same thing.
If you can introduce Unregistered shares into the market and no one has a clue this is going on (month after month after month after month after month), then the same thing can done from inside the system!
The state of the monitoring systems is faulty and unable to deal with NSS. MM's or anyone should not be permitted to exceed a threshold !!!!!!!!!!!! No one should be GOD when it comes to stocks!
You're missing the big picture Overstock was trying to demonstrate that NSS does exist and they have done it!
Janice here is your proof that NSS is not a figment of our imagination!!! Its been around for quite some time but no one wants to admit to the failure of the SEC's computer systems!
Smart companies do fight illegal naked short selling ...
(PRWEB) March 8, 2006 -- It’s not uncommon to read about small publicly traded companies complaining about the evils of naked short selling and the negative impact that it has on their price of their stock. It is however, quite uncommon for companies to actually take action and do something about it. The difficult, sometimes daunting task of taking on the issue of naked shorting is usually costly and time consuming, taking valuable resources away from the company’s operations. Some of the most prominent anti-naked short selling proponents include Overstock.com (OSTK), Great West Gold (GWGO), Global Links Communications (GLKC), and CMKM Diamonds which has ceased trading since October of 2005.
One of the newest companies to take on naked short selling is Loftwerks Inc (LFWK). While many of the fore-mentioned companies diverted resources towards fighting naked short positions in their companies, Loftwerks has tackled the problem by diverting more money back into the company, and buying back shares. In fact, in recent news releases Loftwerks has announced that insiders of their company hold more shares of their company’s stock, than have actually been issued.
CEO Dennis Ammerman stated, "Insiders decided to buy more shares than are legally available. There is no stock definition for this type of buying; therefore, we created our own definition. We call it 'Short Seller Captured Capital.’” Essentially what this means to Loftwerks shareholders is that insiders own the entire outstanding share count, and then some.
The last time a scenario such as this was revealed, was with Global Links Communications. Robert Simpson, CEO of Global Zann Corp. at one point had in his possession the entire issued and outstanding stock of GLKC, and filed the ownership with the SEC as required. Despite owning all the stock of Global Links, the stock continued to trade millions of shares per day. As investors caught wind, shares of Global Links quickly gained more than 1000% moving from under .01 to over .14 in a matter of weeks.
CMKM Diamonds continues to press on in its fight against naked short selling, now in its 5th month of its historic certificate withdrawal from the DTCC. Since the call to request physical delivery of shares in November, the task force set up to account for the shares has tallied over 400 billion of the 703 billion issued. Widespread reports indicate that many shareholders that have requested their certificates are having trouble actually getting them from their brokers.
So there you have it.......
CMKX is not the only one!!!
Perhaps this may be of interest to you...
GERMAN FINANCE MINISTER AMBUSHED OVER SETTLEMENTS
EDITOR CATCHES STEINBRUCK OFF GUARD AT G-7 PRESS CONFERENCE
Saturday 11 October 2008 04:00
UPDATE: 16th October 2008:
THIS REPORT WAS 'SNIPPED' AT A CRITICAL POINT, HIGHLIGHTING A SENSITIVE ISSUE
Yesterday evening, this report was found to have been illegally 'snipped' and severely truncated by NSA/CIA mental defectives. Whenever these fools do this, they reveal that what we have posted is ACCURATE AND TO THE POINT. By illegally interfering with what we publish, and cutting out parts of the text to which they take objection, they REVEAL THAT WE ARE ON THE RIGHT LINES. Anyone who is not sitting on their brains, as clearly these low-level idiots are, can work that one out.
In this instance, the 'snip' occurred at the point where we highlight the G-7's requirement that the large international banks must have an 'international college of supervisors' attached to them, to ensure that their criminal financial operations do not resume.
This is an extremely embarrassing and onerous requirement that the international community has imposed upon these banking criminal enterprises, and it also gets in the way of further financial fraud operations that elements of the corrupted US intelligence community wish to pursue in order to finance their 'Black Operations' in the future.
So 'snipping' at this point in the text below clearly exposes what these criminals have in mind. We have now restored the entire text as it was, with the single alteration that The Refunding Plan is now referred to, for obvious reasons, as 'The G-7-Approved Refunding Program'. The point in the original text where the article was criminally cut short is shown here:
= INCLUDING ESTABLISHMENT OF COLLEGES OF SUPERVISORS to be attached to each very large institution, charged with the task of checking and monitoring the ongoing operations of the largest financial institutions. In other words, the G-7 is insisting upon CHECKS AND BALANCES.
It will be recalled that [TEXT WAS ILLEGALLY TERMINATED BY NSA HERE] these ‘colleges’ were recommended in the G-7‘s communiqué dated 13th April 2008, following the call by Mr Michael C. Cottrell in March for an ‘oversight panel’ to protect Mr Cottrell from any untoward actions that might be taken independently by others under the intended funding arrangements which we had labelled ‘The Wanta Plan’. This is now to be referred to as ‘The G7-Approved Refunding Program’.
You have no idea who I have connections to and by the time you find out it will be too late. We are going to make anyone that shorted CMKX hurt! Pain in our middle name. LOL
People like Janice because she doesn't take sides and is not biased for or against CMKX sharholders. Keep that up!
We will get to the truth!!! Even if its not what the SEC wants to hear. LOL
I highly doubt you coudl nominate anyone for Governor. Keep dreaming. LOL
Thank you Janice!!! Exactly correct kinda makes you think!
No NSS has been proved ever in Public but off the record there are many instances that are simply made to go away.
If they can't be made to go away then people are paid off.
Here are just a few examples;
Did you know that you can do what the banks are doing to you?
Lets say you ask a friend to give you a cheque for $10,000,000
This budy of yours has no money in their account.
The way the banks work is they will give you the amount if its a small amount but they can come back to you even six years down the road. Because the banks have laws that protect them so they are never at a disadvantage. On the other hand if your budy has given you that cheque for $10Million and you don't go to your bank but instead go to Money Mart that cheque is binding.
Which means they don't need to check simply transfer the money to your account and they don't care.
So neither does Money Mart care, neither does the bank because they will simply go after the person who issue the cheque.
So you see this in a way is all virtual no one cares, no one takes responsibility and you could in fact dissapear with the money already and be enjoying a long vacation somewhere with your fake passport.
What I'm saying is that its no wonder America is going under since no one cares!!! No one takes responsibility.
Even your own lawyer that assists you in buying a house has insurance protection in case something does go wrong!
We have the same problem with the way the money exists in our bank accounts. Do you really think we could all get our money out of all our bank accounts ??? Its all virtual.
We have the same problem when it comes to the stock market!
No one cares till shit happens! Its about to happen!!!
Its interesting how the CMKX shareholders were refused all the transactions that took place who were being tracked by the DTCC!
1. In 2007, WayPoint Biomedical sued DTCC for DTCC’s refusal to comply with a subpoena request for documents that Waypoint needed to track trades in the company’s shares.
2. Rolling Stone magazine featured naked shorting in an article, “Wall Street’s Naked Swindle” by Matt Taibbi, in October 2009. In the article, it was reported that an unknown investor had shorted $1.7 million worth of Bear Stearns stock through a variety of options. For the item to make a profit, Bear Stearns would have had to have lost half its value or more in less than nine days. When Bear Stearns collapsed, the options were worth $270 million, or 159 times its previous value.
3. Due to growing concern in 2008 about the effect of naked short selling on faltering companies, the SEC issued a temporary order restricting short-selling of the shares of 19 financial firms deemed important. Shortly following the failure of Lehman Brothers in September of 2008, the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history, the SEC expanded the temporary rules to remove exceptions and to cover all companies.
4. The DTCC (parent), NSCC (does the clearing), and DTC (keeps track of what clearing brokerages own the shares) are three different companies. For example, the NSCC could have huge fails and it would be accurate for them to say the DTC has no fails.
They don’t lend shares. They lend entitlements. You are not a shareholder. You are a holder of entitlements with a long position.
Those clearing brokerages play hanky panky with swaps, repos, etc. to create entitlements out of thin air and further down the chain, secondary clearing brokerages and even your own brokerage don’t bother owning enough entitlements to back what their own shareholders think they own.
The whole thing is a ponsy scheme, so they need to lie through technicality and hope you come to the wrong conclusion based on what they say which is technically accurate.
The privately owned NYSE set up the “Stock Clearing Corporation” which as far as I can tell became known as Cede & Co. Cede could mean “cede: to give up ownership” or CEntral DEpository.
They only do the bookkeeping for Cede & Co. which is the ACTUAL REGISTERED OWNER on the company’s shareholder list. Only Cede & Co. has the right to vote those shares or receive dividends as they are the only REAL shareholder.
Instead, no one audits how they vote their shares (they control the board of directors of every corporation as there is no law they have to vote the way entitlement holders direct them to vote as they are the REAL shareholder) and no one stops them from pledging these shares as collateral for various ponsy schemes.
Somehow Goldman is able to manipulate an outside order by placing an insider order before it hits the DTCC.
If they can do it going in, they mist be able to do it going back to the client. In essence double dipping on trades.
And if there software is doing this type of trading , wouldn’t that be defined as “Insider trading”. After all, they have insider knowledge of a trade at a certain price and manipulate the trade by trading the same order.
I really don’t like this system, and i dislike the fact that politicians are quickly dismissive of expert witnesses.
Since the trades are being manipulated ( handled ) once a seller/buyer initiates an order, the software knows/broker knows what the price is. If it is manipulated , doesn’t that constitute insider trading at its basic level.
I understand many people put “market orders" and give the brokerage the direction to get whatever price it can, doesn’t that imply, the BEST price.
With what i’ve read about Goldman’s software, it seems they didn’t get the best price for the client, the software assured Goldman a slice of the trade by inserting a trade between the original buyer and seller…all dome at millisecond speeds and very small percentage natch, but still preformed with knowledge and certainly not at the best price for the investor.
kinda like getting a real estate agent to put an offer on a house, he buys it ( without registering the buy ) then sells it to you. i don’t think this is allowed.
I don’t think the “software buy” registers anywhere let alone on level 2 trading!!!!!!!!!!
Anything that appears to lead to an investigation that may prove NSS is simply made to go away by paying people off with no questions asked and "NO Competition"!
We are about to get a taste of how corruption has brought about another great depression! The current job loss is just the beginning.
http://www1.voanews.com/english/news/Steady-Improvement-in-US-Job-Loss-Picture-80923192.html
Don't you love the wording... just 434,000 American workers filed for unemployment benefits last week
That a Half a Million people without jobs in a single week!
Janice ignoring previous cases such as Madoff what do you think is the maximum penalty that can be given that involves NSS ???
According to state prosecutors, Madoff told his staff that the hedge fund was “basically, a giant Ponzi scheme.” Investors have put in $50 billion into the hedge fund.
In court state prosecutors charged Madoff with securities fraud. The maximum sentence was 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $5 million.
So you can take Billions and return millions ???
Why not introduce the option of a death sentence or life in prison and the guilty can choose what they prefer...if someone is caught??? Perhaps its time ???
We are talking Billions of dollars!!!
Then again Millions of CMKX is a lot of money too!
What is the maximum penatly ever collected by shareholders who proved NSS ? What can the maximum penalty be ?
Just something to think about!
Although I can't speak for all shareholders I think just getting our origninal investment back would be fine.
A brand new BMW Z4 will look good in my garage :)
Janice crazy is the definition of anyone who actually believes that the SEC has any authority to protect the investors.
They are a sham!!! The can't do Jack!!!
Face it the SEC is useless :)
Your son need to dig deeper but he is on the right trail about the Supreme Court justices.
The reality is that there is a secret society that has control of many of the large companies and organizations. It is these companies and organizations that make their demands on the Supreme Court justices and they have no choice but to follow their advice.
I know it sounds like something out of a movie but there really is a secret society that abuses their power through large monetary ownership and donations during elections.
Nothing is black and white and even they don't realize that someone is pulling their strings. It doesn't take much effort to get to the bottom of anything if you're dedicated.
But it is too late to debate and complain as the USA economy is heading for a very sharp turn! This will then tumble down to the rest of the world and we have another 1929 depression. People said it could not happen again because there are preventive measures in place but if it happened in the past.....
historyt tends to repeat itself. LOL
Looks like we need to blame the Illuminati for this entire mess.
Don't they practice the black arts so maybe its their devil.
Hey their pyramid symbol with an eyeball is on the USA $$$ already. Why is it there? So it must just be just a consiparcy.
LOL
I never agreed to any third party, that was all your idea so stop making a fool of yourself.
It is you who is LYING because you are making up any agreement based on your own rules!
I said I accept the challange and if you do then it will be soly based on our honour, but only if you actually have any?
If you accept then it is a bet!
Any thoughs Janice...
90 days have passed in January 2010 and still no communication from the company.
"NOTE: As of October 1, 2009, Pacific Stock Transfer Company will no longer be the transfer agent for CMKM Diamonds, Inc. The Company is currently interviewing other firms and will make its best efforts to select a new one within the next 90 days. Please be advised that any transfers of CMKM stock certificates are on hold until a new transfer agent has been selected. The Company will post more information as soon as a new transfer agent is under contract.
UPDATE: Due to the complex nature and expense of hiring a competent transfer agent for this Company, the process is taking longer than expected. Paid transfer agents are a necessary expense for a company containing thousands of shareholders. Unfortunately, the expense to the Company increases relative to the size of the shareholder base.
Please be advised that the Company will update this message with all contact information once a new transfer agent is under contract. We appreciate your patience in this matter."
---
Attorney Al Clifton Hodges confirmed to me that he did post the attached letter, “CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. suffered THE LARGEST NAKED SHORT IN HISTORY” to the SEC.
This financial assault on CMKM Diamonds and its Legal Stockholders resulted in substantial losses and hardships on CMKM Diamonds and the Legal Stockholders of CMKX, CMKI, and CIM. It is required by law that appropriate actions are taken to ensure a just compensation for all Legal Stockholders of CMKX.
Thank you Attorney Hodges for your contributions to a noble cause, ‘The “Righting” On The Wall’ Street for Investors who “Got CMKX!”, “Got Naked Shorted!” and should have “Got Paid”.
All the Best,
BHollenegg
CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. suffered THE LARGEST NAKED SHORT IN HISTORY.
Subject: File No. S7-08-08
From: A. Clifton Hodges, Esq.
http://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-08-08/s70808-151.htm
To The SEC Commission and Financial Industry at Large:
Naked shorts in the United States = “counterfeit shares.” The case of CMKX represents the greatest “counterfeit shares” fraud in the UNITED STATES. CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. suffered THE LARGEST NAKED SHORT IN HISTORY. Trillions of stock shares traded and changed hands UNTIL CMKX revoked itself and had every stock holder pull physical stock certificates out of brokerages, and out of street name, to trap those whom had committed fraud. CMKX is also the LARGEST STOCK CERTIFICATE PULL IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES”
Naked short selling is a case of short selling the shares without first arranging a borrow. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 stipulates a settlement period up to three business days before a stock needs to be delivered, generally referred to as “T+3 delivery”. The SECs public position as of the Spring of 2005 was that naked shorting did not exist. With enactment of Regulation SHO, the subsequent elimination of the SHO grandfather exemption, and now the promulgation of this rule, the SEC has finally admitted the error of its ways.
The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation has also been criticized for its approach to naked short selling. DTCC has been sued with regard to its alleged participation in naked short selling, and the issue of DTCC’s possible involvement has been taken up by Senator Robert Bennett and discussed by the NASAA and in articles—disagreed with by DTCC—in the Wall Street Journal and Euromoney Magazine. Robert J. Shapiro, former undersecretary of commerce for economic affairs, has, however, found that naked short selling has cost investors $100 billion and driven 1,000 companies into the ground.
Naked shorting is illegal because it allows manipulators a chance to force stock prices down without regard for normal stock supply/demand patterns. It is in fact, institutional fraud further, counterfeiting of securities is a crime of U.S. Constitutional magnitude. This criminal conduct, once asserted by the SEC not to exist, has destroyed many, many companies, lives and opportunities. But now the word is out on naked shorting it must be stopped, and all whom conspired put in jail. This naked shorting fraud rule must be passed - NOW.
Sincerely,
A. Clifton Hodges
Actually it is Frizzell that absolutely detests Urban!
You'll find out why... soon enough
Frizzle has his reasons and don't think for a second he is not on our side! If you call him which I would not, you'll learn that it has to do everything with timing.
I think this one suits Johny more :)
Not only that Canada is running bs advertising about second career funding, only problem is most people don't read the fine print. They only have funding for about 20,000 people and the second career is ment to fill in the gap with regards to the lack of physical labour in the construction industry as most indian people are not willing to do anything physical. Not being racial but its a fact and all you need to do is look at the number of imigrants that come to Canada and what country they're coming from.
To sweeten the deal further there is more bs advertising offering $4000 for those same construction workers but little do they know if you further look into this it is only ment to be used for purchasing their tools.
As always do your own DD.
We are Canadian — and we’re going to kick your butt
Fellow biathletes and bobsledders, beware: the Canadian Olympic team is going to crush you,”
LOL
http://www.timescolonist.com/story_print.html?id=2514536&sponsor=
I did say when the time is right and now is not that time...
We need to get the players in the right position and this has not taken place yet.
LOL Jobs that pay minimum wage. The average person would need to have 2 to 3 jobs the way the salaries are going...