Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Well I could by something like CCDX and NTCV and watch them fall, reverse split, fall, reverse split, fall, reverse split... Then my 1000 shares will be worth less than a postage stamp.
I know someone who bought a ton of this, panicked, and sold about $50,000 worth. He received a 100% refund less a small $30 commission to the broker (as it spread over 3 days). So at least its liquid and can only go one place for the time being.
Moreover, while I can't find much information on the President guy, I at least know that the Taylor Moffitt seems to have legitimate businesses in his background without any history of pumps and dumps.
The only thing that I am curious about is where the additional shares came from and if they are restricted. Someone here said 7,000,000,000 more were printed. That's understandable if they are restricted 144s, such as for the merger with Taylor Moffitt's company. If they are unrestricted, I have a couple questions as to how they got that way. But, as I stated before, I am just paranoid having had my signature forged on debt to conversion papers during my tenure at NTCV by a crazy stock printing guy.
So the .0001 price doesn't bother me and management's claims seem feasible. The only question is the shares. I sent them an email but they did not respond to me. I wish they would address the issue.
But I'm kind of optimistic on this one.
There's alot of transparency with CCDX, Concorde Resources.
First, you can see right through the nonsensical PRs.
Second, it's clear that the price is going down.
Third, it's visible that 80% of the "historical" franchises to CCDX's Beverly Hills Weight Loss went out of business.
Based on the above, Pink Sheets ought to just lock the price where it belongs, .0001.
No, that's not how it's going to work. He'll say, "can I interest you in some shares..." and the poor guys who make $26 a month working in the kitchen will give it to him. Then they'll faithfully go up to the library to check the stock and after it reverse splits 5 times, he'll get a nice appendix removal operation he's been needing. (At least this is the scenerio a friend of my presented to me).
Well depending on how much Paul stole, I hear they'll let him go to a cushy camp. But even at a minimum security federal prison, my sources tell me if you lie to the inmates or make promises you aren't going to keep, you might find your bed burned. Most people can get along fine in jail, but Paul, he's a story teller. That's not going to fly there.
Well I'm just saying there are alot of people that are dumb enough to buy at .0001, hoping for .0002, but the caveat is that PT's history of reverse splits dooms the strategy.
Well all I can say is it's awfully quiet at the share printing mill.
I was the President. My holdings are valued at below $1.00, and they are restricted.
Volume=0.
All your guys waiting for .0002, good luck!
The printing mill has temporarily ceased.
I will guess that a surprise is in store.
No, no. Something more devious for NTCV. Something that will get rid of what's left of the shareholder value at .0001!
I think Paul's got something up his sleave.
Everyody knows Paul's a pumper and his attempts to temporarily reduce the float for his ultimate benefit are ringing on deaf ears. Maybe he can announce CCDX is buying IPO Holdings and the missing millions from Telatinos. "I found the missing millions under my pen holder, and I believed it would create shareholder value if CCDX acquired the rights to all the money that NTCV shareholders lost when the S.E.C. began investigating it. Remember, shareholders, if an law enforcement inquiry is made, the assets must be transferred to a non-public entity." He could say. Then, I'm sure, the shares will go up up up just like NTCV are doing.
Remember when Paul Taylor's wasn't just a consultant? He was still playing stock games:
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_pwwi/is_200305/ai_mark02053712
Sit back Serf, drink some Bionic Water... it's in stores everywhere... Oh, that's a different brand!! I pee, see why?
What broker are you using? My friend put test orders in at ETrade at .0001 but the level IIs still showed ETrade at .0002. With other pinks, they put in .018 on a .017 stock, but the bid didn't move. Similar problems with Ameritrade.
In addition, he makes it look like Costa Rica is the land of scams, tarnishing my country as well Serf. Keep in mind, Red Sea isn't run by Costa Ricans.
But I have good news for you, Serf! I hear that Paul Taylor's webmaster is out of town. So I was able to pick up some internet domains tonight! I registered ccdxcorp.com, ccdxcorp.info, and ccdxcorp.us. I left ccdxcorp.net for him.
I figure since ccdecorp.info is so, as Paul Taylor likes to say, "historical," I would be the one to move forward.
Right now I told them to forward it to my site, www.netcoinvestments.info, but there will come a day that we analyze CCDX for the public like Aetheum wants!
Ole Aetheum knows his latin: He told us: Ut sementem feceris, ita metes - As you sow, so shall you reap.
But I want everyone to know, it wasn't Paul Taylor being Aetheum!
From: Paul Taylor [mailto:Ptaylor07@adelphia.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 8:35 AM
To: 'Rodrigo Calderon A.'
Subject: RE: spam:
Nothing to do with me.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Rodrigo Calderon A. [mailto:rodrigocalderonaraya@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 8:25 AM
To: 'Paul Taylor'
Subject: spam:
Paul, this Aetheum alias of yours is too obvious and blatant.
Besides, my friend, the messages are too long, it's interfering with my ability to be rcathepimp.com!
Keep your insults short and sweet so I can do other things with my life.
Thanks for the consideration
He's Canadian. Balding. American looking. Went to jail up there for some sort of scheme, doesn't want to go back! But, really, I doubt he knows how his name was used repeatedly on documents. I'd show him, but I don't have his contact information. He's B.R.N.'s friend.
He's an absolute snitch on top of being a shyster. 'ole Paul says he called the police because I allegedly sent him a puppy book. I'd hate to see it if he does get indicted: "Brian did this, it was Rodrigo, that Serfdom conspired with me. Can I get some time off, I'll testify, I'll turn over everything." I can't wait.
Disclaimer: This one is just my opinion, and constitutes fair use of Paul's name as he's a public figure. It is a satire. It should not be relied upon when selling or (dare you) buying CCDX or NTCV.
Well I see he's moving up, with Netco, Paul just used a plain old scanner and fax machine to superimpose my signature on his conversion notes and a share agreement for the Belize company, West Indies Beets. Jon Miller countersigned it even though I hadn't seen him for a bit. But poor Jon, as much as I don't really like the guy, I don't think he knows he owns a beet company. I'll probably see him somewhere and I'll certainly ask.
preferred shares. that's how Paul Taylor will convert.
convertible preferred stock
Definition
Preferred stock that can be converted into a specified amount of common stock at the holder's option.
http://www.investorwords.com/1115/convertible_preferred_stock.html
Sorry guys for repeating the IPCY/CCDX stuff, but "Aetheum" posted his inquiries to me on this board, I felt you should see my responses.
If you read them on CCDX or IPCY, just ignore the Ad Nauseum messages.
Ad nauseum, Aetheum! CCDX Important message!
CCDX Concorde Resources Shareholders: Let's do a math quiz:
Can you guess the answers as the teacher speaks?
Paulie the Pumping Printer had some shares in April 2006:
202,448,518.
Paulie the Pumping Printer cut his shares by dividing them by 4.5 in June 2006.
Paulie the Pumping Printer said he had 51,400,000 he printed the new shares at the time he made the cut.
51,400,000 times 4.5 is: 231,300,000.
Okay boys and girls, can you figure out how many shares Paulie the Printing Pumper printed from April 2006 until June 2006?
ANSWER: Almost 29,000,000
Now kids, if you had 29,000,000 presplit CCDE shares and sold them at about .005 (and that was towards the low end), how much money did you make?
If you said about $145,000 bucks, you're right.
Now since two months went buy, how much did Paulie the Pumping Printer make with his CCDX shares each month?
About $72,000.
Now if Paulie the Printing Pumper can get his CCDX shares up a little higher, and he can start cashing in his preferred shares at whatever the rate of conversion will be, as Paulie the Printing Pumper pumps, how much will Paulie make?
Maybe Paulie the Printing Pumper can make an alias on here to tell us the precise terms of the preferred shares.
And what is a preferred share?
Now these preferred shares pay a dividend. How can they do that unless the company has money. Or is the dividend converted into common stock? Tell us the terms, Paulie, you Printing Pumper, of the preferred stock.
PLEASE NOTE: It is only my opinion, based on my experience working as President of a Paul Taylor controlled company, that there are manipulative stock moves being made by Paul Taylor with respect to CCDX. However, I declare under the penalty for perjury under the laws of the United States of America (28 USC 1746) that I have personal knowledge that Paul Taylor printed and dumped shares to the public company he controlled, Netco Investments, formerly Telatinos, using convertible debt and nominee companies. I further declare that I have knowledge that Paul Taylor submitted forged and fraudulent documents as to NTCV to the transfer agent, Madison Transfer. I further declare that I have knowledge that some of the converted shares of NTCV were given to a variation of the name of the President of Madison Transfer.
My name is Rodrigo Calderon Araya. I have no other aliases on this stock board.
Ad nauseum #3, answering Aetheum's IPCY message:
Aetheum, who claims no financial interest in CCDX, engaged in a dialogue with me over at IPCY. It relates to CCDX so I bring it here:
This is the rest of my response.
You state, "I’m not an attorney and I won’t be argue your or anyone’s subjective or objective emotional opinion, however in your experiences over the term you were a director and executive of a public company, did you ever actually do any work?" During my tenure as a director and executive of the public company Telatinos, I was hindered in my duties by false and misleading information coupled with the stonewalling and misplaced blame of the company's control person, Paul Taylor of Delray Beach, Florida. I attempted to present business plans, and Mr. Taylor provided them only lip service while he issued false press releases.
You argue, "And by work, I mean create revenue or employment for yourself or others? How did you fill your day?" I entertained false information from Paul Taylor and I relied on his material misrepresentations when executing certain corporate documents. When I questioned the documents, Paul Taylor simply started using a facsimile of my signature.
You complain, "You are constantly referencing and alluding to a fraud investigation that you have allegedly performed, that no other public person has seen or has access too. What CCDX corporate materials did you have access too to do such a forensic fraud investigation?" CCDX's press releases can be easily dissected with a bit of research. If you read the previous posts on this board, Aetheum, and it appears you have, we spent hours discussing the exaggerations and concealments in the press releases issued by Paul Taylor.
You state, "Again, I ask this ‘because’ you have stated numerous times that a note or debenture has been entered into and that conversion or dilution ‘has actually” occurred exclusively in CCDE/CCDX and evidentially this rumor has gathered some moss as you rolled it around your group of posters here online, again you have posted this information without using the word “allegedly”. Does the alleged note /debenture exclusive to CCDE/CCDX exist only in your opinion or is there any evidence of its existence" I am not aware that we actually stated that there must be a convertible note. Rather, we simply discussed Paul Taylor's extensive fraud scheme and printing and dumping NTCV shares using a convertible note. We do know that Paul Taylor announced on three occasions that "preferred shares" were issued. First, in February 2006, Paul announced that an "insider" traded his common shares for "preferred" shares. Second, Morgan Guaranty, a Paul Taylor alter ego, allegedly purchased 1.5MM in preferred shares. Third, today Paul Taylor's CCDX issued a claim that over 30% of the shares were turned into preferred shares. The terms of these preferred shares were not disclosed. There is a claim that an interest dividend is paid on these shares. Coming from a company that does not yet have much revenue, it would be interesting to know how that payment is made -- whether the dividend turns into stock or what. Maybe, since you are so uninterested, Aetheus, you can ask Paul.
You state, "I actually found it quite difficult to amass any considerable knowledge on this Company, let alone find evidence of fraud." Well understand what fraud is, Aetheus, it is either a misrepresenation or a concealment that would cause a normal person to act. Claims like the "Morgan Guaranty" investing 1.5MM while concealing the fact that Paul Taylor formed the company constitutes a material concealment. Claiming that a takeover of a company like McLayne occurred without explaining that it was just formed and that it never followed up with its paperwork constitutes a material concealment. Talking about 60 "historical" franchises without mentioning that 80% of them went out of business constitutes a material concealment.
You request that I, "Please post the links to where you and other members of the public can gather the same information that you gathered for your fraud investigation." This board contains myriad links to the Paul Taylor falsities, also see NTCV.
You state that delisting by Pink Sheets is a non-issue, "That will happen to many pink sheet quotes while Mr Coulson at Pink sheets.com figures out how compliant Pinksheets.com needs to be to get away with charging for a new bourse. By the way, seeing as they are 20 minutes delayed it minimizes Pinksheets.com real use as a trading tool. So, what are there, at least 5000 other delayed tickers on the internet I say ho hum." The delisting by Pink Sheets is a material event that shareholders should be aware of. The fact that you may obtain quotes on the shares from your broker is not relevant. Pink Sheets found that CCDX was engaged in the promotion of their own shares. Amazingly, Paul Taylor "stopped" an anonymous person from spamming, but he never told us how he tracked them down. Someone paid Bellwether to monitor this stock, but when the heat came on, Bellwether shut up. It's an issue, Aetheum, it's a material issue.
You state, "I’m sorry to wake you up, but you will find not only Pinks working with ‘friendly’ third party financers, but all the way to big board. Closed door financing is what you are describing and although it may morally wrong, there is no law against it." Nobody is stating that obtaining financing is wrong. Obtaining financing in a manner for preparation of printing myriad shares at the expense of shareholders is a blatant breach of fiduciary duty. Would that term be more political correct that fraud?
You quip, "The name [Morgan Guaranty] appears familiar. I bet the Astor families were upset at the use of that name." Yes, I be too. That's the kind of man CCDX shareholders are dealing with. The name was used to add a touch of legitimacy to an insane transaction (allegedly paying 15c a share for something trading openly at .02 at the time). People see it, they assumed the big company.
You complain of my use of the term convertible note as to CCDX, "I have a problem with 'This appears'?
Do you know what you are saying? How does there 'appear' to be a convertible note? More importantly ‘where' does there appear to be a convertible note? And under what SEC exemption has this alleged convertible note implausibly, magically been/or being converted into CCDE/CCDX free trading shares in just the few months since your referenced press release?" It is clear that "preferred shares" have been given to insiders. The terms of those preferred shares have not been released.
You ponder, "Did an Sb-2 slip by on a non reporting pink sheet? Did a 15c-211 get filed?" Paul Taylor keeps promising documents, we have not seen any.
You surmise, "What you are alleging is implausible, actually I challenge by stating 'it’s impossible'. You are either a bald faced liar or you have inside information and you are disseminating it. Now which is it? Or is it just your opinion based on historically available information, which makes you as reliable as every other unlicensed securities soothsayer? (which you can purchase by the pound)." My name is Rodrigo Calderon Araya. Do your own due diligence whether you are long or short. You sir, "Aetheum," claim no interest in this, but answering your questions is worse than doing a telephonic deposition for the NASD. Therefore, you are either a "bald faced liar or you have inside information and you are disseminating it. Now which is it? Or is it just your opinion based on historically available information, which makes you as reliable as every other unlicensed securities soothsayer?"
You aver, "Again, this is simple. And I think its spelled Mclayne. A Nevada C Corp created to acquire and carry the assets and liabilities of a private corp 'should' be new. It happens all the time and it’s legal. The fact that it is in default is no detriment to anyone, just sloppy filing on someone’s part, however when searching Nevada SOS it needs to be spelt correctly." Then, sir, what precisely did they acquire. Do they really sell printer ink? Their catalog does not even list their name? I can pay godaddy $100 and have a domain name company. My friend does that with www.protectedlegaldomains.com . Would it not be a stretch if I issued a press release that I acquired a domain name company without including that it was just a skeleton?
As to Taylor's issuing press releases talking about 60 or so historical franchises, you state, "Stating the word ‘historically'. Is that like saying Coca Cola 'historically' had a global market until WW2, when Coca Cola was forced to re brand to Fanta in Germany and Eastern Europe, thus losing its European market for coke but gaining western support for depriving the Germans of American Champagne.Unless English is your second language, historically is neither ‘sneaky’ nor manipulative. It is common securities parlance and actually accurately descriptive." If I buy a company that had 80% of its franchise fail, and I issued a press release touting that it historically had all these franchises, all while knowing that uninformed investors will not catch the tricky language, then I am unethical. The accurate statement would be, "Beverly Hills Weight Loss historically had 60 franchises, but now it only has 9 locations."
You also inquire, "Have you visited the Beverly Hills URL since making your progress reports? Has the status of the URL changed in anyway? Are you now not responsible to report those changes if they are meaningful?" My problem was with the press release, targeted to the investor community. It's about time that Beverly Hills Weight Loss deleted all the out of business locations and now list their nine locations. That's tiny compared to their "historical" inferenced in the press release.
As to the Terrax matter, you state, "Now I understand now why this would trouble you so deeply and personally. Your hard-on for Mr Taylor must be keeping you up day and night. What if, and I don’t know but ‘What if Terrax had been well packaged for a public corp and they needed a few bucks just to get the whole thing going? What if a group of stock guys got together and said – 'we like what we see, lets go for it?' What if Terrax was hungry enough to ignore the naysayer’s, after all the naysayer’s aren’t writing any checks. Terrax didn’t get gift wrapped and mailed to Mr Taylor did they? Someone on both sides of that table got paid. Just because you can’t figure out who or what doesn’t make it dishonest." Mr. Aetheum, you know alot about what probably went on for being neutral and uninterest. It troubles me deeply and personally since I was similarly tricked into taking an executive position with Paul Taylor. What I received in return was the use of my name on unauthorized press releases by him. The guys in Vancouver were clearly shaken when they learned of Paul Taylor's past. I know that Taylor has since calmed them a bit, but I hate to see the disastrous results of what that man will do at the expense of others to pay the mortgage on his overpriced Delray Beach house.
As for my complaint that CCDX touted its own share price, you assert, "So do all the other Pinks, OTC’s, NASDAQ’s and all the rest the world over. Go ask 1000 public CFO’s or CEO’s 'do you think your stock is undervalued?' you’ll get 1000 saying 'Yes'. Until you have a handle on that statistic and the dynamics it is unrealistic to label any officer and director of such tout chat, they all do it, all the time, every day, every chance they get." The difference here is that CCDX was actively promoting its own shares at the time.
As far as the CCDX reverse split, "If shareholder majority is approving and it’s a Nevada Corp, then it’s done. That M O is text book stuff." On the contrary, no shareholders were notified. Everyone was taken off guard, as usual. That's not the way most companies do splits. If you think that's good business practice, "Aetheum," I think you'll have a hard time finding investors who agree.
With respect to my claim that the NTCV fraud is relevant, you point out that, "Well it traded 20,000 shares of NTCV today that’s $2. Whatever was going on there is evidently over now." Hardly. The statute of limitations, "Aetheum" is five years, 18 USC 3282. Put that on the wall above your pillow.
You ask, "Obviously, Telatinos didn’t go without a hitch, didn’t the SEC get involved? If it was the fraud that you have alleged why wasn’t it at least halted? I mean $50M+ in revenues must have gone somewhere? Which bank are these revenues in? You were an officer, you must have had access to the bank accounts?" The SEC is still conducting an enforcement investigation into Telatinos as are other quasi-agencies. There never was any revenues. I never saw a bank statement while CFO and President of NTCV. Paul Taylor pointed to Jon Miller for withholding records, but I learned that Jon Miller's name was also routinely applied in facsimile form by Paul Taylor.
You provide a conclusion to my comments and my answers to the inquiries you made by stating, "If you choose post this crap elsewhere sobeit. I do hope you will be good enough to be sincerely apologetic to all the Corporate executives that you have embarrassed with your munchhausen stories and the poor investment folk who may have read your theories and uneducated guesswork, I do hope that no one wasted money trading on the kind of OPINION that you are writing So all this IPCY CCDX NTCV spin just ‘your opinion'? " That doesn't sound like a neutral non-interested kind of guy, "Aetheum."
You close with, "GLTA." I question whether you mean it, "Aetheum." My name is Rodrigo Calderon Araya. My messages speak for themselves, do your own due diligence. I hope no-one loses money trusting Paul Taylor's manipulations.
Ad nauseum #2 Aetheum:
You stated, "Other posters here have called the Corporation – who I am certain do have access to accurate transfer ledgers and they now claim Mr Taylor ‘is not’ a shareholder." No poster ever cited the source of their claim that Paul Taylor is not a shareholder. Moreover, I reiterate that I use the words Paul Taylor and his nominee/alter ego company names synonymously.
You ask, "Is it still your position that IPO Holding Company controls IPCY?" I again repeat that the public does not know the terms of the settlement since IPCY has not made any announcement relating to the dismissal of the lawsuit seeking control. Both IPCY and Paul Taylor were quick on their feet to publicly cite their respective positions in press releases. Yet now everyone is quiet. I think it's a bad move on management of IPCY if Paul Taylor gave up control to keep that a secret. If I rid a roach infested house of the pests, I would not cloak it in secrecy. But if I had a couple roaches lurking around, I would indeed hide them from dinner guests.
You question, "You state Mr Taylor is generally dishonest – could it be that Mr Taylor has created a phantom position to amuse and watch you do this gala performance on Ihub?" I don't think so. Paul Taylor issued his press releases about controlling the preferred shares of IPCY long before I learned about the NTCV fraud that made it my duty to speak out. (I note that Paul Taylor is issuing preferred shares of CCDX now, so expect similar control issues there).
You ask, "Why do you not post your rhetoric on Raging bull? Bull has a much larger audience that ihub for negative rhetoric[?]" I am not a member of Raging Bull. I may, in the near future, assist the investor community by being more vocal. Thank you for the idea.
The rest of your message, "Aetheum," refers to CCDX. Therefore, I will respond there.
My name is Rodrigo Calderon Araya.
"Aeuthum" has no interest in CCDX, NTCV, or Paul Taylor.
Here's "Aetheum's" profile. (I call this my "Aetheum" due diligence).
Membership Type:
PeopleMarked By: 0
EMail Address:
Location:
Age:
Interests/Hobbies:
Favorite Stocks:
Investment Philosophy:
Job/Title:
Favorite Links:
Quote:
Alias Born On: Tuesday, June 13, 2006
Boards Moderated: 0
Total Posts: 8
Next 50 | Previous 50 Search this Member's Posts:
Posts by Aetheum Board
Date/Time
ut sementem feceris ita metes Concorde Resources Corp (CCDX)
6/15/2006 12:43:10 AM
ut sementem feceris ita metes International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/15/2006 12:42:50 AM
ut sementem feceris ita metes Netco Investments, Inc (NTCV)
6/15/2006 12:42:18 AM
stare decisis International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/14/2006 4:08:06 PM
Stating you have actually ‘no knowledge’ is prob International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/14/2006 4:36:47 AM
Well thank you rca for clearing up your International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/13/2006 1:01:25 PM
rca you seem very inflamatory and International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/13/2006 7:15:00 AM
Paul Taylor's IPO Holding votes the majority of International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/13/2006 6:30:43 AM
"Aeuthum" has no interest in CCDX, NTCV, or Paul Taylor.
Here's "Aetheum's" profile. (I call this my "Aetheum" due diligence).
Membership Type:
PeopleMarked By: 0
EMail Address:
Location:
Age:
Interests/Hobbies:
Favorite Stocks:
Investment Philosophy:
Job/Title:
Favorite Links:
Quote:
Alias Born On: Tuesday, June 13, 2006
Boards Moderated: 0
Total Posts: 8
Next 50 | Previous 50 Search this Member's Posts:
Posts by Aetheum Board
Date/Time
ut sementem feceris ita metes Concorde Resources Corp (CCDX)
6/15/2006 12:43:10 AM
ut sementem feceris ita metes International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/15/2006 12:42:50 AM
ut sementem feceris ita metes Netco Investments, Inc (NTCV)
6/15/2006 12:42:18 AM
stare decisis International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/14/2006 4:08:06 PM
Stating you have actually ‘no knowledge’ is prob International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/14/2006 4:36:47 AM
Well thank you rca for clearing up your International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/13/2006 1:01:25 PM
rca you seem very inflamatory and International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/13/2006 7:15:00 AM
Paul Taylor's IPO Holding votes the majority of International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/13/2006 6:30:43 AM
"Aeuthum" has no interest in CCDX, NTCV, or Paul Taylor.
Here's "Aetheum's" profile. (I call this my "Aetheum" due diligence).
Membership Type:
PeopleMarked By: 0
EMail Address:
Location:
Age:
Interests/Hobbies:
Favorite Stocks:
Investment Philosophy:
Job/Title:
Favorite Links:
Quote:
Alias Born On: Tuesday, June 13, 2006
Boards Moderated: 0
Total Posts: 8
Next 50 | Previous 50 Search this Member's Posts:
Posts by Aetheum Board
Date/Time
ut sementem feceris ita metes Concorde Resources Corp (CCDX)
6/15/2006 12:43:10 AM
ut sementem feceris ita metes International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/15/2006 12:42:50 AM
ut sementem feceris ita metes Netco Investments, Inc (NTCV)
6/15/2006 12:42:18 AM
stare decisis International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/14/2006 4:08:06 PM
Stating you have actually ‘no knowledge’ is prob International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/14/2006 4:36:47 AM
Well thank you rca for clearing up your International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/13/2006 1:01:25 PM
rca you seem very inflamatory and International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/13/2006 7:15:00 AM
Paul Taylor's IPO Holding votes the majority of International Pharmacy Outlets Inc (IPCY)
6/13/2006 6:30:43 AM
NTCV will never be a bottomender, maryundys! You know it likes to reverse split, my friend. Come on back to NTCV we miss your insight!
Damn Serf, I just wasted an hour answering "Aetheum," who owns no shares so he says. Maybe someone else who lost money on a Taylor stock can tell him what it's like to lose their money due to a fraud -- not a risky investment, but a fraud.
I know that if it took me an hour to answer him, it took him an hour to write to me -- but for what? He says he doesn't own CCDX. All that research, looking at the websites, reading the press, all to write me and you a letter! But "Aetheum" is a good guy for refreshing the matters so that new investors can read what CCDX and Paul Taylor are all about.
"Aetheum" is right! I should be over at raging bull letting those guys know.
Any where's marysundies? Where'd she go? She's been gone for a few days.
Ad nauseum #3, answering Aetheum's IPCY message:
Aetheum, who claims no financial interest in CCDX, engaged in a dialogue with me over at IPCY. It relates to CCDX so I bring it here:
This is the rest of my response.
You state, "I’m not an attorney and I won’t be argue your or anyone’s subjective or objective emotional opinion, however in your experiences over the term you were a director and executive of a public company, did you ever actually do any work?" During my tenure as a director and executive of the public company Telatinos, I was hindered in my duties by false and misleading information coupled with the stonewalling and misplaced blame of the company's control person, Paul Taylor of Delray Beach, Florida. I attempted to present business plans, and Mr. Taylor provided them only lip service while he issued false press releases.
You argue, "And by work, I mean create revenue or employment for yourself or others? How did you fill your day?" I entertained false information from Paul Taylor and I relied on his material misrepresentations when executing certain corporate documents. When I questioned the documents, Paul Taylor simply started using a facsimile of my signature.
You complain, "You are constantly referencing and alluding to a fraud investigation that you have allegedly performed, that no other public person has seen or has access too. What CCDX corporate materials did you have access too to do such a forensic fraud investigation?" CCDX's press releases can be easily dissected with a bit of research. If you read the previous posts on this board, Aetheum, and it appears you have, we spent hours discussing the exaggerations and concealments in the press releases issued by Paul Taylor.
You state, "Again, I ask this ‘because’ you have stated numerous times that a note or debenture has been entered into and that conversion or dilution ‘has actually” occurred exclusively in CCDE/CCDX and evidentially this rumor has gathered some moss as you rolled it around your group of posters here online, again you have posted this information without using the word “allegedly”. Does the alleged note /debenture exclusive to CCDE/CCDX exist only in your opinion or is there any evidence of its existence" I am not aware that we actually stated that there must be a convertible note. Rather, we simply discussed Paul Taylor's extensive fraud scheme and printing and dumping NTCV shares using a convertible note. We do know that Paul Taylor announced on three occasions that "preferred shares" were issued. First, in February 2006, Paul announced that an "insider" traded his common shares for "preferred" shares. Second, Morgan Guaranty, a Paul Taylor alter ego, allegedly purchased 1.5MM in preferred shares. Third, today Paul Taylor's CCDX issued a claim that over 30% of the shares were turned into preferred shares. The terms of these preferred shares were not disclosed. There is a claim that an interest dividend is paid on these shares. Coming from a company that does not yet have much revenue, it would be interesting to know how that payment is made -- whether the dividend turns into stock or what. Maybe, since you are so uninterested, Aetheus, you can ask Paul.
You state, "I actually found it quite difficult to amass any considerable knowledge on this Company, let alone find evidence of fraud." Well understand what fraud is, Aetheus, it is either a misrepresenation or a concealment that would cause a normal person to act. Claims like the "Morgan Guaranty" investing 1.5MM while concealing the fact that Paul Taylor formed the company constitutes a material concealment. Claiming that a takeover of a company like McLayne occurred without explaining that it was just formed and that it never followed up with its paperwork constitutes a material concealment. Talking about 60 "historical" franchises without mentioning that 80% of them went out of business constitutes a material concealment.
You request that I, "Please post the links to where you and other members of the public can gather the same information that you gathered for your fraud investigation." This board contains myriad links to the Paul Taylor falsities, also see NTCV.
You state that delisting by Pink Sheets is a non-issue, "That will happen to many pink sheet quotes while Mr Coulson at Pink sheets.com figures out how compliant Pinksheets.com needs to be to get away with charging for a new bourse. By the way, seeing as they are 20 minutes delayed it minimizes Pinksheets.com real use as a trading tool. So, what are there, at least 5000 other delayed tickers on the internet I say ho hum." The delisting by Pink Sheets is a material event that shareholders should be aware of. The fact that you may obtain quotes on the shares from your broker is not relevant. Pink Sheets found that CCDX was engaged in the promotion of their own shares. Amazingly, Paul Taylor "stopped" an anonymous person from spamming, but he never told us how he tracked them down. Someone paid Bellwether to monitor this stock, but when the heat came on, Bellwether shut up. It's an issue, Aetheum, it's a material issue.
You state, "I’m sorry to wake you up, but you will find not only Pinks working with ‘friendly’ third party financers, but all the way to big board. Closed door financing is what you are describing and although it may morally wrong, there is no law against it." Nobody is stating that obtaining financing is wrong. Obtaining financing in a manner for preparation of printing myriad shares at the expense of shareholders is a blatant breach of fiduciary duty. Would that term be more political correct that fraud?
You quip, "The name [Morgan Guaranty] appears familiar. I bet the Astor families were upset at the use of that name." Yes, I be too. That's the kind of man CCDX shareholders are dealing with. The name was used to add a touch of legitimacy to an insane transaction (allegedly paying 15c a share for something trading openly at .02 at the time). People see it, they assumed the big company.
You complain of my use of the term convertible note as to CCDX, "I have a problem with 'This appears'?
Do you know what you are saying? How does there 'appear' to be a convertible note? More importantly ‘where' does there appear to be a convertible note? And under what SEC exemption has this alleged convertible note implausibly, magically been/or being converted into CCDE/CCDX free trading shares in just the few months since your referenced press release?" It is clear that "preferred shares" have been given to insiders. The terms of those preferred shares have not been released.
You ponder, "Did an Sb-2 slip by on a non reporting pink sheet? Did a 15c-211 get filed?" Paul Taylor keeps promising documents, we have not seen any.
You surmise, "What you are alleging is implausible, actually I challenge by stating 'it’s impossible'. You are either a bald faced liar or you have inside information and you are disseminating it. Now which is it? Or is it just your opinion based on historically available information, which makes you as reliable as every other unlicensed securities soothsayer? (which you can purchase by the pound)." My name is Rodrigo Calderon Araya. Do your own due diligence whether you are long or short. You sir, "Aetheum," claim no interest in this, but answering your questions is worse than doing a telephonic deposition for the NASD. Therefore, you are either a "bald faced liar or you have inside information and you are disseminating it. Now which is it? Or is it just your opinion based on historically available information, which makes you as reliable as every other unlicensed securities soothsayer?"
You aver, "Again, this is simple. And I think its spelled Mclayne. A Nevada C Corp created to acquire and carry the assets and liabilities of a private corp 'should' be new. It happens all the time and it’s legal. The fact that it is in default is no detriment to anyone, just sloppy filing on someone’s part, however when searching Nevada SOS it needs to be spelt correctly." Then, sir, what precisely did they acquire. Do they really sell printer ink? Their catalog does not even list their name? I can pay godaddy $100 and have a domain name company. My friend does that with www.protectedlegaldomains.com . Would it not be a stretch if I issued a press release that I acquired a domain name company without including that it was just a skeleton?
As to Taylor's issuing press releases talking about 60 or so historical franchises, you state, "Stating the word ‘historically'. Is that like saying Coca Cola 'historically' had a global market until WW2, when Coca Cola was forced to re brand to Fanta in Germany and Eastern Europe, thus losing its European market for coke but gaining western support for depriving the Germans of American Champagne.Unless English is your second language, historically is neither ‘sneaky’ nor manipulative. It is common securities parlance and actually accurately descriptive." If I buy a company that had 80% of its franchise fail, and I issued a press release touting that it historically had all these franchises, all while knowing that uninformed investors will not catch the tricky language, then I am unethical. The accurate statement would be, "Beverly Hills Weight Loss historically had 60 franchises, but now it only has 9 locations."
You also inquire, "Have you visited the Beverly Hills URL since making your progress reports? Has the status of the URL changed in anyway? Are you now not responsible to report those changes if they are meaningful?" My problem was with the press release, targeted to the investor community. It's about time that Beverly Hills Weight Loss deleted all the out of business locations and now list their nine locations. That's tiny compared to their "historical" inferenced in the press release.
As to the Terrax matter, you state, "Now I understand now why this would trouble you so deeply and personally. Your hard-on for Mr Taylor must be keeping you up day and night. What if, and I don’t know but ‘What if Terrax had been well packaged for a public corp and they needed a few bucks just to get the whole thing going? What if a group of stock guys got together and said – 'we like what we see, lets go for it?' What if Terrax was hungry enough to ignore the naysayer’s, after all the naysayer’s aren’t writing any checks. Terrax didn’t get gift wrapped and mailed to Mr Taylor did they? Someone on both sides of that table got paid. Just because you can’t figure out who or what doesn’t make it dishonest." Mr. Aetheum, you know alot about what probably went on for being neutral and uninterest. It troubles me deeply and personally since I was similarly tricked into taking an executive position with Paul Taylor. What I received in return was the use of my name on unauthorized press releases by him. The guys in Vancouver were clearly shaken when they learned of Paul Taylor's past. I know that Taylor has since calmed them a bit, but I hate to see the disastrous results of what that man will do at the expense of others to pay the mortgage on his overpriced Delray Beach house.
As for my complaint that CCDX touted its own share price, you assert, "So do all the other Pinks, OTC’s, NASDAQ’s and all the rest the world over. Go ask 1000 public CFO’s or CEO’s 'do you think your stock is undervalued?' you’ll get 1000 saying 'Yes'. Until you have a handle on that statistic and the dynamics it is unrealistic to label any officer and director of such tout chat, they all do it, all the time, every day, every chance they get." The difference here is that CCDX was actively promoting its own shares at the time.
As far as the CCDX reverse split, "If shareholder majority is approving and it’s a Nevada Corp, then it’s done. That M O is text book stuff." On the contrary, no shareholders were notified. Everyone was taken off guard, as usual. That's not the way most companies do splits. If you think that's good business practice, "Aetheum," I think you'll have a hard time finding investors who agree.
With respect to my claim that the NTCV fraud is relevant, you point out that, "Well it traded 20,000 shares of NTCV today that’s $2. Whatever was going on there is evidently over now." Hardly. The statute of limitations, "Aetheum" is five years, 18 USC 3282. Put that on the wall above your pillow.
You ask, "Obviously, Telatinos didn’t go without a hitch, didn’t the SEC get involved? If it was the fraud that you have alleged why wasn’t it at least halted? I mean $50M+ in revenues must have gone somewhere? Which bank are these revenues in? You were an officer, you must have had access to the bank accounts?" The SEC is still conducting an enforcement investigation into Telatinos as are other quasi-agencies. There never was any revenues. I never saw a bank statement while CFO and President of NTCV. Paul Taylor pointed to Jon Miller for withholding records, but I learned that Jon Miller's name was also routinely applied in facsimile form by Paul Taylor.
You provide a conclusion to my comments and my answers to the inquiries you made by stating, "If you choose post this crap elsewhere sobeit. I do hope you will be good enough to be sincerely apologetic to all the Corporate executives that you have embarrassed with your munchhausen stories and the poor investment folk who may have read your theories and uneducated guesswork, I do hope that no one wasted money trading on the kind of OPINION that you are writing So all this IPCY CCDX NTCV spin just ‘your opinion'? " That doesn't sound like a neutral non-interested kind of guy, "Aetheum."
You close with, "GLTA." I question whether you mean it, "Aetheum." My name is Rodrigo Calderon Araya. My messages speak for themselves, do your own due diligence. I hope no-one loses money trusting Paul Taylor's manipulations.
Ad nauseum again, Aetheum:
You stated, "Other posters here have called the Corporation – who I am certain do have access to accurate transfer ledgers and they now claim Mr Taylor ‘is not’ a shareholder." No poster ever cited the source of their claim that Paul Taylor is not a shareholder. Moreover, I reiterate that I use the words Paul Taylor and his nominee/alter ego company names synonymously.
You ask, "Is it still your position that IPO Holding Company controls IPCY?" I again repeat that the public does not know the terms of the settlement since IPCY has not made any announcement relating to the dismissal of the lawsuit seeking control. Both IPCY and Paul Taylor were quick on their feet to publicly cite their respective positions in press releases. Yet now everyone is quiet. I think it's a bad move on management of IPCY if Paul Taylor gave up control to keep that a secret. If I rid a roach infested house of the pests, I would not cloak it in secrecy. But if I had a couple roaches lurking around, I would indeed hide them from dinner guests.
You question, "You state Mr Taylor is generally dishonest – could it be that Mr Taylor has created a phantom position to amuse and watch you do this gala performance on Ihub?" I don't think so. Paul Taylor issued his press releases about controlling the preferred shares of IPCY long before I learned about the NTCV fraud that made it my duty to speak out. (I note that Paul Taylor is issuing preferred shares of CCDX now, so expect similar control issues there).
You ask, "Why do you not post your rhetoric on Raging bull? Bull has a much larger audience that ihub for negative rhetoric[?]" I am not a member of Raging Bull. I may, in the near future, assist the investor community by being more vocal. Thank you for the idea.
The rest of your message, "Aetheum," refers to CCDX. Therefore, I will respond there.
My name is Rodrigo Calderon Araya.
Ad nauseum, Aetheum! CCDX Important message!
CCDX Concorde Resources Shareholders: Let's do a math quiz:
Can you guess the answers as the teacher speaks?
Paulie the Pumping Printer had some shares in April 2006:
202,448,518.
Paulie the Pumping Printer cut his shares by dividing them by 4.5 in June 2006.
Paulie the Pumping Printer said he had 51,400,000 he printed the new shares at the time he made the cut.
51,400,000 times 4.5 is: 231,300,000.
Okay boys and girls, can you figure out how many shares Paulie the Printing Pumper printed from April 2006 until June 2006?
ANSWER: Almost 29,000,000
Now kids, if you had 29,000,000 presplit CCDE shares and sold them at about .005 (and that was towards the low end), how much money did you make?
If you said about $145,000 bucks, you're right.
Now since two months went buy, how much did Paulie the Pumping Printer make with his CCDX shares each month?
About $72,000.
Now if Paulie the Printing Pumper can get his CCDX shares up a little higher, and he can start cashing in his preferred shares at whatever the rate of conversion will be, as Paulie the Printing Pumper pumps, how much will Paulie make?
Maybe Paulie the Printing Pumper can make an alias on here to tell us the precise terms of the preferred shares.
And what is a preferred share?
Now these preferred shares pay a dividend. How can they do that unless the company has money. Or is the dividend converted into common stock? Tell us the terms, Paulie, you Printing Pumper, of the preferred stock.
PLEASE NOTE: It is only my opinion, based on my experience working as President of a Paul Taylor controlled company, that there are manipulative stock moves being made by Paul Taylor with respect to CCDX. However, I declare under the penalty for perjury under the laws of the United States of America (28 USC 1746) that I have personal knowledge that Paul Taylor printed and dumped shares to the public company he controlled, Netco Investments, formerly Telatinos, using convertible debt and nominee companies. I further declare that I have knowledge that Paul Taylor submitted forged and fraudulent documents as to NTCV to the transfer agent, Madison Transfer. I further declare that I have knowledge that some of the converted shares of NTCV were given to a variation of the name of the President of Madison Transfer.
My name is Rodrigo Calderon Araya. I have no other aliases on this stock board.
My name is Rodrigo Calderon Araya. What's your name?
CCDX (Concorde Resources) zero debt? Maybe. This time it appears to be "preferred shares." See, e.g., both the Morgan Guaranty release and todays release.
Conspiracy theory? A conspiracy is more than one person. Aetheum, Paul Taylor's use of nominees and minions does not make it a conspiracy. Using aliases on a stock board, at Paul has had plenty, doesn't create a conspiracy.
Rather, it makes for a continuing criminal enterprise, a racketeer influenced corrupt organization. Can you say 18 USC 1964 for Mr. Paul Taylor? I can arrange that. Or, worse, can he say 18 USC 1963? The government can arrange that.
Adios, amigo.
350,000 Netco shares, well that'll be 1000 when he pulls another 333 to 1 reverse split. Plus you'll be whammied with your broker's fees for the change. I'd order the certificate, put it on your wall.
I visited NTCV's offices in the Plaza Colonial in Escazu. It's a very nice little mall, has a coffee shop, internet cafe, and bank. I looked around... but couldn't find Netco. Then there it was, along with 1000 other companies, a post office box on the wall. Problem is, Netco couldn't afford to pay the $12 a year for a box, so they don't list their APDO number.
I sent the following message to Matt asking that RKD be released from jail. Am I a humanist or what?
-------
Matt,
I know RKD1953 from his posts on NTCV and CCDE. Nothing he says there is ..., for the lack of a better term, agreeable with my outlook on things. Nevertheless, he adds a voice that allows dialogue. I think that he should be released from jail. I saw four messages from him promising to behave, and I'm not sure what he did to reach jail, but I think he should be paroled.
RCA
Your message speaks for itself.
Well as you know Aetheum, Paul Taylor and his associates routinely apply for new accounts and post, including accounts using variations of my family's name. The modus operandi is always the same: new user, posts directed to the victims of NTCV, and not much else. The previous accounts were eventually shut down by the management because they all came from the same IP address.
In your case, you claim no interest but you came here especially to post. Your interest was originally IPCY, which seemed like a legitimate interest. But then you strayed into areas such as a puppy dog cartoon that only Paul Taylor is upset about.
You have a ton of information and what seems to be research on CCDX, correcting me on the spelling of an obscure company name, et al. Thus, you fall into the pattern. You're a little more professional than the website Paul Taylor's crony made for me (rcathepimp.com). So, you're right, your name is Aetheum, and that's about it.
Note that I am not in the habit of questioning those who criticize me about their motives. My statements have been questioned by others (RKD and martyj1), but I saw no appearance that they were not individuals with their own opinion, and it brings dialogue. With you, there seems to be more to it. Why don't you tell us what it is?
Aetheum, for a person who, as a new user here, says they have no interest in the Paul Taylor stocks, you seem to be doing alot of research.
My name is Rodrigo Calderon Araya. I don't know your name. You don't need to respond publicly, but why don't you send me a private message or email me at lugocalderon @ racsa.co.cr (taking out the spaces) and let me have a way to speak to you.
I will be answering your concerns when I come back from a meeting today. You have an awful lot of issues for a non-interested party.
I previously ran the Bradford companies and saw that they were in business for several years and had many offices for their mortgage companies. I never thought of doing an address search to see what else is there. But that's the result, so it seems they are into alot of things and have been at that address for a while.
Oooops! Wrong board, ignore 1822. LOL. Sorry Serf for the confusion.